Would/could the Republican Party get behind a ‘movement’ pushed by Caucasians?

Could they show support for such a movement publicly?
Wouldn’t Dems shout them down if they did...wouldn't they order republicans to denounce such a movement...wouldn’t they declare all republicans racists if they did support such a movement?
There are dark pigmented caucasians also.
No hair splitting semantics allowed here...We’re not trying to create blur and deflect.
 
Could they show support for such a movement publicly?
Wouldn’t Dems shout them down if they did...wouldn't they order republicans to denounce such a movement...wouldn’t they declare all republicans racists if they did support such a movement?
There are dark pigmented caucasians also.
No hair splitting semantics allowed here...We’re not trying to create blur and deflect.
I am sorry you can't accept reality of God's creations.
 
“The race doesn't matter; the message does.”
Their message is that racism is still impacting their God given rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Pointing out that there is still a racial problem in this country is not "racist." It's a conversation.

It isn't ONLY Black Lives Matter. It is Black Lives Matter Too.

But the basis of their platform has been debunked over and over again...How / why do you still take them serious? Why pretend they have a case?

“A recent study, published by the prestigious National Bureau of Economic Research, found "no evidence of racial discrimination in officer-involved shootings." The study, by Harvard economics professor Roland Fryer Jr., who is black, studied data from three major cities"
https://www.nber.org/papers/w22399.pdf
people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-race.jpg
Police shootings are the tip of the iceberg. There is a whole lot more to it. Blacks continuing to be a community with lower economic status and higher unemployment fuels the crime which fuels the bias and it's a never ending vicious cycle. BLM would like that all addressed. It would be great if they had a leader, one spokesperson who pretty much spoke for them as an organization, but there are a multitude of activists with their own ideas all adding to a very confusing dialogue. Hopefully, the BLM representatives who are meeting locally with city and state officials will be able to hammer out some sort of sane reforms that will help break that vicious cycle. It ain't gonna be easy and it ain't gonna happen overnight.
 
“The race doesn't matter; the message does.”
Their message is that racism is still impacting their God given rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Pointing out that there is still a racial problem in this country is not "racist." It's a conversation.

It isn't ONLY Black Lives Matter. It is Black Lives Matter Too.

But the basis of their platform has been debunked over and over again...How / why do you still take them serious? Why pretend they have a case?

“A recent study, published by the prestigious National Bureau of Economic Research, found "no evidence of racial discrimination in officer-involved shootings." The study, by Harvard economics professor Roland Fryer Jr., who is black, studied data from three major cities"
https://www.nber.org/papers/w22399.pdf
people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-race.jpg
Police shootings are the tip of the iceberg. There is a whole lot more to it. Blacks continuing to be a community with lower economic status and higher unemployment fuels the crime which fuels the bias and it's a never ending vicious cycle. BLM would like that all addressed. It would be great if they had a leader, one spokesperson who pretty much spoke for them as an organization, but there are a multitude of activists with their own ideas all adding to a very confusing dialogue. Hopefully, the BLM representatives who are meeting locally with city and state officials will be able to hammer out some sort of sane reforms that will help break that vicious cycle. It ain't gonna be easy and it ain't gonna happen overnight.

The Left has a tendency to create great complexity in every issue. Look, the problem blacks have is blacks themselves and everybody sane knows it...Somebody bold and black must ask the question...”When should we hold ourselves accountable for our habits and behavior...the habits and behavior that hold us down, who FORCES us to behave the way we do...who forces our women to drop out of school and have multiple baby daddy’s by age 19.”
The “whitey holds us back” ship sailed when America elected a Kenyan to the highest office.
 
Are they the only group forbidden from expanding their population in America?
Please tell us who exactly is forbidding whites from reproducing?

That’s not very clever of you...Think once.
Democrats think it’s acceptable to encourage every ethnicity to expand their footprint within American society while making it known that whitey can’t dare say they desire to do the same. You honestly don’t see the problem here?
 
Democrats think it’s acceptable to encourage every ethnicity to expand their footprint within American society
I've never actually heard of that in the Democratic platform. What they do say is "Live and Let Live."
 
Democrats think it’s acceptable to encourage every ethnicity to expand their footprint within American society
I've never actually heard of that in the Democratic platform. What they do say is "Live and Let Live."

You’ve regressed to playing stupid now...The party openly and publicly celebrates the ‘achievement’ of fewer whites...They veil the celebrations in the joy of greater diversity....Come on, don’t dumb down...remember affirmative action?
 
Hell, the Democratic Party is already damned-near the American Black and Brown People's Party...

It's only a couple of dozen-million Wiggers and Millenials who don't know any better that give the Party any diversity anymore...

Then again, the Republican Party is already far down the road to becoming the American White People's Party...

Both sides are guilty of playing Race-Politics, although the Democrats get the lion's share of Authoring credit for that one... they excel at playing the Race Card...

It was only a matter of time before White Folk decided that they'd had enough and that it was time to do something about it...

Unfortunately for them, the incompetent, ignorant, arrogant a$$ they chose as their Standard Bearer risks losing momentum before it reaches its peak.
 
Last edited:
Could they show support for such a movement publicly?
Wouldn’t Dems shout them down if they did...wouldn't they order republicans to denounce such a movement...wouldn’t they declare all republicans racists if they did support such a movement?
What's a "movement pushed by caucasians?" Most of our orgs already are. What you got in mind?
If you are asking if the Republican party should publicly embrace the white supremacists, it would be the stupidest thing they EVER did.
Technically, every group that has whites can be called white supremacists by those in control. Which are Progs. People that belong to ethnic clubs in the community they live in can be branded. And they will be. In Frisco the terrorists tore down a statue of U.S. Grant. At some point will something have to be done?
I'm pretty much opposed to groups based solely on race. It's not sensible, to start with. If a group has an agenda that includes targeting another race or religion, they ought to be "branded," and they already are.
BLM, as you've seen the past couple weeks, is supported by people of all races. The race doesn't matter; the message does. Same with the supremacist groups. Their message matters. It is dangerous and unthinking.
Especially when the messages of the supposed terrorist groups is for communism and tyranny but are fronts like BLM and Antifa.
 
Hell, the Democratic Party is already damned-near a American Black and Brown People's Party...

It's only a couple of dozen-million Wiggers and Millenials who don't know any better that give the Party any diversity anymore...

Then again, the Republican Party is already far down the road to becoming the American White People's Party...

Both sides are guilty of playing Race-Politics, although the Democrats get the lion's share of Authoring credit for that one... they excel at playing the Race Card...

It was only a matter of time before White Folk decided that they'd had enough and that it was time to do something about it...

Unfortunately for them, the incompetent, ignorant, arrogant a$$ they chose as their Standard Bearer risks losing momentum before it reaches its peak.
Both sides? This is the Saul Alinsky Prog Socialist playbook. The Republicans have removed themselves from any thwarting of this.
 
Hell, the Democratic Party is already damned-near a American Black and Brown People's Party...

It's only a couple of dozen-million Wiggers and Millenials who don't know any better that give the Party any diversity anymore...

Then again, the Republican Party is already far down the road to becoming the American White People's Party...

Both sides are guilty of playing Race-Politics, although the Democrats get the lion's share of Authoring credit for that one... they excel at playing the Race Card...

It was only a matter of time before White Folk decided that they'd had enough and that it was time to do something about it...

Unfortunately for them, the incompetent, ignorant, arrogant a$$ they chose as their Standard Bearer risks losing momentum before it reaches its peak.
Both sides? This is the Saul Alinsky Prog Socialist playbook. The Republicans have removed themselves from any thwarting of this.
Yes... BOTH sides... and they're BOTH full of $hit clean up to their ears...
 
1. BLM (in theory) is a peaceful movement devoted to police reform. That's fine.

2. And maybe in a few decades the Republicans will start a peaceful movement that is devoted to establishing an autonomous zone where Euro-Americans can feel comfortable and safe. That would be fine, too -- in my opinion.
 
Democrats think it’s acceptable to encourage every ethnicity to expand their footprint within American society
I've never actually heard of that in the Democratic platform. What they do say is "Live and Let Live."

You’ve regressed to playing stupid now...The party openly and publicly celebrates the ‘achievement’ of fewer whites...They veil the celebrations in the joy of greater diversity....Come on, don’t dumb down...remember affirmative action?
You are talking about a breeding program for whites to maintain 70% caucasians. Because the Democrats don't have the vapors over 13% blacks or 16% Hispanics in this country does not mean they want them to go forth and multiply and fill the country. What the Democrats do by "celebrating diversity" is looking for equal percentages of minorities in colleges, jobs, government, the military....as exist in the overall population. There is nothing wrong with that. It is how it should be.
 

Forum List

Back
Top