Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whatever it is you call yourself you are still a dumbass. Gave you the answer why secession is legally impossible and you come back splitting hairs over what you think you should be called, dumbass.Dumbass.So why don't you clarify what those laws are exactly? Nixon said he had a plan to get us out of Vietnam, did that mean he had one? Where are these laws? What are they?
Ever heard of the the 14th amendment? That equal protection clause conservatives hate with a passion is all the legal justification the government needs to drag any breakaway state back to the union. States cannot take any action that removes any US citizen from the protection of the US constitution.
Wow, that's awful. You should argue with a Republican about that.
Dumbass? You mean like calling a libertarian a Republican over and over because you are too stupid to know the difference? You mean dumb ass in that way or a different one?
I'm pretty sure you didn't grasp the importance Shay's rebellion had on those Founders minds who were at the Constitutional Convention, or the all important "blood of tyrants" Jefferson quote so fondly bandied about by the "Patriot" crowd, or the punctuating quote from Sam Adams I left with. (all of which you excised from my post without noting you had snipped it...)That's a great quote from Jefferson. It's one the "TP Patriots" like to quote a lot.
It was said by Jefferson when he was in Paris when a lil thing going on here (well, it was sort of a big thing) stirred up the countryside,
It was called Shay's Rebellion. You recall it from your history books?
So you don't grasp the difference between a rebellion against a State and a State seceding from the Union? LOL, I'm sure you don't...
I don't care if you ever say another word to me, and that's the truth. Get back on topic or bugger off.Whatever it is you call yourself you are still a dumbass. Gave you the answer why secession is legally impossible and you come back splitting hairs over what you think you should be called, dumbass.Dumbass.Ever heard of the the 14th amendment? That equal protection clause conservatives hate with a passion is all the legal justification the government needs to drag any breakaway state back to the union. States cannot take any action that removes any US citizen from the protection of the US constitution.
Wow, that's awful. You should argue with a Republican about that.
Dumbass? You mean like calling a libertarian a Republican over and over because you are too stupid to know the difference? You mean dumb ass in that way or a different one?
Why would i want to debate you if you don't know what my views are? There is no point in that. If you're interested in debating a libertarian, I'm here. If you want to debate Republicans, which you keep telling me you want to do, then do that. I don't care. But if you want to debate me, you have to address my views. Non negotiable.
I think Republicans suck too, so why don't you defend their views? Why do I have to find a Republican when I can assign it to you?
Just heard this- that 23% of Americans and 53% if tee potties answered yes to the question of 'would they like to secede from the union?'
A poster here recently asked 'why, if Scotland can vote to secede, why can't Americans?'
People say they want to secede but don't even know what US laws concerning secession.
Comments?
Would you vote to secede?
Why or why not?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatal
There is no US law regarding secession. Lincoln was wrong. The Federal government operates from the consent of the governed. A people who don't consent cannot be governed by the Federal government.
Texas v. White
Also, too, See: Civil War, 1861-1865.
lol.20 States I believe have passed affirmations of sovereignty in some form.
Unprecedented since 1860
Don't you have a KKK meeting you have to be attending?Just heard this- that 23% of Americans and 53% if tee potties answered yes to the question of 'would they like to secede from the union?'
A poster here recently asked 'why, if Scotland can vote to secede, why can't Americans?'
People say they want to secede but don't even know what US laws concerning secession.
Comments?
Would you vote to secede?
Why or why not?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatal
There is no US law regarding secession. Lincoln was wrong. The Federal government operates from the consent of the governed. A people who don't consent cannot be governed by the Federal government.
Texas v. White
Also, too, See: Civil War, 1861-1865.
The Lincoln cult members never fail to quote the opinion handed down by Lincoln's hand picked stooges on the Supreme Court that supports Lincoln's crimes.
I'm pretty sure you didn't grasp the importance Shay's rebellion had on those Founders minds who were at the Constitutional Convention, or the all important "blood of tyrants" Jefferson quote so fondly bandied about by the "Patriot" crowd, or the punctuating quote from Sam Adams I left with. (all of which you excised from my post without noting you had snipped it...)That's a great quote from Jefferson. It's one the "TP Patriots" like to quote a lot.
It was said by Jefferson when he was in Paris when a lil thing going on here (well, it was sort of a big thing) stirred up the countryside,
It was called Shay's Rebellion. You recall it from your history books?
So you don't grasp the difference between a rebellion against a State and a State seceding from the Union? LOL, I'm sure you don't...
In fact, the more I read of your posts, the more I am convinced you don't grasp much of anything very well.
I don't care if you ever say another word to me, and that's the truth. Get back on topic or bugger off.Whatever it is you call yourself you are still a dumbass. Gave you the answer why secession is legally impossible and you come back splitting hairs over what you think you should be called, dumbass.Dumbass.Wow, that's awful. You should argue with a Republican about that.
Dumbass? You mean like calling a libertarian a Republican over and over because you are too stupid to know the difference? You mean dumb ass in that way or a different one?
Why would i want to debate you if you don't know what my views are? There is no point in that. If you're interested in debating a libertarian, I'm here. If you want to debate Republicans, which you keep telling me you want to do, then do that. I don't care. But if you want to debate me, you have to address my views. Non negotiable.
I think Republicans suck too, so why don't you defend their views? Why do I have to find a Republican when I can assign it to you?
Don't you have a KKK meeting you have to be attending?Just heard this- that 23% of Americans and 53% if tee potties answered yes to the question of 'would they like to secede from the union?'
A poster here recently asked 'why, if Scotland can vote to secede, why can't Americans?'
People say they want to secede but don't even know what US laws concerning secession.
Comments?
Would you vote to secede?
Why or why not?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatal
There is no US law regarding secession. Lincoln was wrong. The Federal government operates from the consent of the governed. A people who don't consent cannot be governed by the Federal government.
Texas v. White
Also, too, See: Civil War, 1861-1865.
The Lincoln cult members never fail to quote the opinion handed down by Lincoln's hand picked stooges on the Supreme Court that supports Lincoln's crimes.
So you made a completely irrelevant point from the post you were quoting from and had little else to contribute to the whole. I see. Any more irrelevancies you want to share with the class?I'm pretty sure you didn't grasp the importance Shay's rebellion had on those Founders minds who were at the Constitutional Convention, or the all important "blood of tyrants" Jefferson quote so fondly bandied about by the "Patriot" crowd, or the punctuating quote from Sam Adams I left with. (all of which you excised from my post without noting you had snipped it...)That's a great quote from Jefferson. It's one the "TP Patriots" like to quote a lot.
It was said by Jefferson when he was in Paris when a lil thing going on here (well, it was sort of a big thing) stirred up the countryside,
It was called Shay's Rebellion. You recall it from your history books?
So you don't grasp the difference between a rebellion against a State and a State seceding from the Union? LOL, I'm sure you don't...
In fact, the more I read of your posts, the more I am convinced you don't grasp much of anything very well.
No, I don't grasp the inherent truth of liberalism.
Your great intelligence sadly does not include basic logic. I did not argue Shay's rebellion was not important, I said it's not the same as a State seceding from the Union. Which is why I said, it's not the same as a State seceding from the Union. Clever trick there, eh?
So you made a completely irrelevant point from the post you were quoting from and had little else to contribute to the whole. I see. Any more irrelevancies you want to share with the class?I'm pretty sure you didn't grasp the importance Shay's rebellion had on those Founders minds who were at the Constitutional Convention, or the all important "blood of tyrants" Jefferson quote so fondly bandied about by the "Patriot" crowd, or the punctuating quote from Sam Adams I left with. (all of which you excised from my post without noting you had snipped it...)That's a great quote from Jefferson. It's one the "TP Patriots" like to quote a lot.
It was said by Jefferson when he was in Paris when a lil thing going on here (well, it was sort of a big thing) stirred up the countryside,
It was called Shay's Rebellion. You recall it from your history books?
So you don't grasp the difference between a rebellion against a State and a State seceding from the Union? LOL, I'm sure you don't...
In fact, the more I read of your posts, the more I am convinced you don't grasp much of anything very well.
No, I don't grasp the inherent truth of liberalism.
Your great intelligence sadly does not include basic logic. I did not argue Shay's rebellion was not important, I said it's not the same as a State seceding from the Union. Which is why I said, it's not the same as a State seceding from the Union. Clever trick there, eh?
I've never posted anything that remotely could be concluded I would be interested. In fact, I have been a capitalist for over 25 years, and come from a long line of capitalists.Don't you have a KKK meeting you have to be attending?Just heard this- that 23% of Americans and 53% if tee potties answered yes to the question of 'would they like to secede from the union?'
A poster here recently asked 'why, if Scotland can vote to secede, why can't Americans?'
People say they want to secede but don't even know what US laws concerning secession.
Comments?
Would you vote to secede?
Why or why not?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatal
There is no US law regarding secession. Lincoln was wrong. The Federal government operates from the consent of the governed. A people who don't consent cannot be governed by the Federal government.
Texas v. White
Also, too, See: Civil War, 1861-1865.
The Lincoln cult members never fail to quote the opinion handed down by Lincoln's hand picked stooges on the Supreme Court that supports Lincoln's crimes.
Maybe it's next door to your Communist Party of America meeting. Would that be a hoot or what?
Asked and answered. Bitch.So you made a completely irrelevant point from the post you were quoting from and had little else to contribute to the whole. I see. Any more irrelevancies you want to share with the class?I'm pretty sure you didn't grasp the importance Shay's rebellion had on those Founders minds who were at the Constitutional Convention, or the all important "blood of tyrants" Jefferson quote so fondly bandied about by the "Patriot" crowd, or the punctuating quote from Sam Adams I left with. (all of which you excised from my post without noting you had snipped it...)That's a great quote from Jefferson. It's one the "TP Patriots" like to quote a lot.
It was said by Jefferson when he was in Paris when a lil thing going on here (well, it was sort of a big thing) stirred up the countryside,
It was called Shay's Rebellion. You recall it from your history books?
So you don't grasp the difference between a rebellion against a State and a State seceding from the Union? LOL, I'm sure you don't...
In fact, the more I read of your posts, the more I am convinced you don't grasp much of anything very well.
No, I don't grasp the inherent truth of liberalism.
Your great intelligence sadly does not include basic logic. I did not argue Shay's rebellion was not important, I said it's not the same as a State seceding from the Union. Which is why I said, it's not the same as a State seceding from the Union. Clever trick there, eh?
Every post with you is an irrelevancy.
Care to answer the actual question, I asked what "laws" said States cannot succeed.
You've been pompous, bitchy, and hot winded, but you haven't answered the question.
You should feel flattered by my comments, I despise libertarians worst of all and think they are non committal political cowards who will never develop a consensus amongst themselves, much less gain a popular following. Most of you are basement dwelling neckbeards with no girlfriend or any friends for that matter and have no capacity to think about anyone other than yourselves and what a magnificent individualist you are for refusing to play well with others.I don't care if you ever say another word to me, and that's the truth. Get back on topic or bugger off.Whatever it is you call yourself you are still a dumbass. Gave you the answer why secession is legally impossible and you come back splitting hairs over what you think you should be called, dumbass.Dumbass.
Dumbass? You mean like calling a libertarian a Republican over and over because you are too stupid to know the difference? You mean dumb ass in that way or a different one?
Why would i want to debate you if you don't know what my views are? There is no point in that. If you're interested in debating a libertarian, I'm here. If you want to debate Republicans, which you keep telling me you want to do, then do that. I don't care. But if you want to debate me, you have to address my views. Non negotiable.
I think Republicans suck too, so why don't you defend their views? Why do I have to find a Republican when I can assign it to you?
Why would you care? When I post anything, your reply always starts out that you think I am a Republican. If you figure out what my views actually are and address them rather than your wanting to argue with John Boehner it would be a lot more interesting. In the mean time, you can contemplate the great political paradox to liberals. I'm not a liberal, and I'm not a Republican. At the same time. OOOOhhhhh, blows your fucking mind, doesn't it?
I've never posted anything that remotely could be concluded I would be interested. In fact, I have been a capitalist for over 25 years, and come from a long line of capitalists.Don't you have a KKK meeting you have to be attending?There is no US law regarding secession. Lincoln was wrong. The Federal government operates from the consent of the governed. A people who don't consent cannot be governed by the Federal government.
Texas v. White
Also, too, See: Civil War, 1861-1865.
The Lincoln cult members never fail to quote the opinion handed down by Lincoln's hand picked stooges on the Supreme Court that supports Lincoln's crimes.
Maybe it's next door to your Communist Party of America meeting. Would that be a hoot or what?
Meanwhile, bripat (and we go way back) has a rich history (and anyone can mine his posts) of white supremacy related posts. Don't believe me? Go mining.
Asked and answered. Bitch.So you made a completely irrelevant point from the post you were quoting from and had little else to contribute to the whole. I see. Any more irrelevancies you want to share with the class?I'm pretty sure you didn't grasp the importance Shay's rebellion had on those Founders minds who were at the Constitutional Convention, or the all important "blood of tyrants" Jefferson quote so fondly bandied about by the "Patriot" crowd, or the punctuating quote from Sam Adams I left with. (all of which you excised from my post without noting you had snipped it...)So you don't grasp the difference between a rebellion against a State and a State seceding from the Union? LOL, I'm sure you don't...
In fact, the more I read of your posts, the more I am convinced you don't grasp much of anything very well.
No, I don't grasp the inherent truth of liberalism.
Your great intelligence sadly does not include basic logic. I did not argue Shay's rebellion was not important, I said it's not the same as a State seceding from the Union. Which is why I said, it's not the same as a State seceding from the Union. Clever trick there, eh?
Every post with you is an irrelevancy.
Care to answer the actual question, I asked what "laws" said States cannot succeed.
You've been pompous, bitchy, and hot winded, but you haven't answered the question.
And you ??? -- calling people pompous?
Sweetie pie
