All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

Status
Not open for further replies.
In 2020, the European Union handed UNRWA some $157,059,235—that’s in addition to the $1.52 billion paid through the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) channeled through the PEGASE Direct Financial Support, the main E.U. financing instrument for Palestine, between 2017-2020, plus various other funds.

In addition to that, last year, Germany donated $210,384,339 to UNRWA (which has oversight of schools in the Palestinian territories), the U.K. donated $64,129,434, Sweden donated $60,420,012, France donated $22,986,067, Italy donated $17,714,100 and the list goes on.

With such vast sums flowing from Europe to the Palestinians, the Commission is coming under mounting pressure to prove that its funding is, as claimed, laying the groundwork for creating a viable independent Palestinian state that serves Palestine’s citizens. Education has been of particular concern, thanks to persistent evidence that the school system is being used to indoctrinate children.

---
Meanwhile, the P.A.—whose senior members have grown fabulously wealthy from all the funding poured into their coffers—is trapped between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, if they give in to demands to deliver a fit-for-purpose curriculum, the drive behind their Palestinian nationalist narrative will quickly falter, leading eventually to normalization with Israel and to their rule being toppled in favor of true moderate rule. On the other, if they brazen it out and have funding pulled, they risk an impoverished Palestinian population turning on them.

Either way, the true winners in both scenarios would be the children of Palestine, who might, at last, have a chance of receiving a reasonable education, setting them up for a prosperous life.

(full article online)

If they let the Palestinians go back home they would not have that expense.

Jordan won't take them back.
The facts of the attack as known are presented at a Web site I created at http://www.ariga.com/peacewatch/dy. Briefly, on April 9, 1948, the dissident Jewish Irgun and Lehi underground groups attacked the village of Deir Yassin, at the entrance to Jerusalem, though the village had had a defense pact with the Jewish agency. In the attack, four of the attackers and over a hundred villagers were killed, many of them women and children. According to an affidavit provided by an Irgun commander, about 80 prisoners were shot. A number of witnesses, Jewish and Arab, reported independently that a group of about 15 persons were taken to a quarry and shot. Me'ir Pail, a Palmach (Zionist underground) officer who spied on the attack, and two or three additional witnesses, reported women children and old men shot at close range. The Zionist executive apologized for this attack, which was done by forces not under its control. The Palestinians subsequently exacted revenge by killing about 80 Jews in a convoy to Hadassah hospital, and another 50 who had surrendered at Gush Etzion
 
In 2020, the European Union handed UNRWA some $157,059,235—that’s in addition to the $1.52 billion paid through the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) channeled through the PEGASE Direct Financial Support, the main E.U. financing instrument for Palestine, between 2017-2020, plus various other funds.

In addition to that, last year, Germany donated $210,384,339 to UNRWA (which has oversight of schools in the Palestinian territories), the U.K. donated $64,129,434, Sweden donated $60,420,012, France donated $22,986,067, Italy donated $17,714,100 and the list goes on.

With such vast sums flowing from Europe to the Palestinians, the Commission is coming under mounting pressure to prove that its funding is, as claimed, laying the groundwork for creating a viable independent Palestinian state that serves Palestine’s citizens. Education has been of particular concern, thanks to persistent evidence that the school system is being used to indoctrinate children.

---
Meanwhile, the P.A.—whose senior members have grown fabulously wealthy from all the funding poured into their coffers—is trapped between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, if they give in to demands to deliver a fit-for-purpose curriculum, the drive behind their Palestinian nationalist narrative will quickly falter, leading eventually to normalization with Israel and to their rule being toppled in favor of true moderate rule. On the other, if they brazen it out and have funding pulled, they risk an impoverished Palestinian population turning on them.

Either way, the true winners in both scenarios would be the children of Palestine, who might, at last, have a chance of receiving a reasonable education, setting them up for a prosperous life.

(full article online)

If they let the Palestinians go back home they would not have that expense.

Jordan won't take them back.
About 6.8 million Jewish Israelis and 6.8 million Palestinians live today between the Mediterranean Sea and Jordan River, an area encompassing Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT), the latter made up of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip. Throughout most of this area, Israel is the sole governing power; in the remainder, it exercises primary authority alongside limited Palestinian self-rule. Across these areas and in most aspects of life, Israeli authorities methodically privilege Jewish Israelis and discriminate against Palestinians. Laws, policies, and statements by leading Israeli officials make plain that the objective of maintaining Jewish Israeli control over demographics, political power, and land has long guided government policy. In pursuit of this goal, authorities have dispossessed, confined, forcibly separated, and subjugated Palestinians by virtue of their identity to varying degrees of intensity. In certain areas, as described in this report, these deprivations are so severe that they amount to the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution
 
In 2020, the European Union handed UNRWA some $157,059,235—that’s in addition to the $1.52 billion paid through the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) channeled through the PEGASE Direct Financial Support, the main E.U. financing instrument for Palestine, between 2017-2020, plus various other funds.

In addition to that, last year, Germany donated $210,384,339 to UNRWA (which has oversight of schools in the Palestinian territories), the U.K. donated $64,129,434, Sweden donated $60,420,012, France donated $22,986,067, Italy donated $17,714,100 and the list goes on.

With such vast sums flowing from Europe to the Palestinians, the Commission is coming under mounting pressure to prove that its funding is, as claimed, laying the groundwork for creating a viable independent Palestinian state that serves Palestine’s citizens. Education has been of particular concern, thanks to persistent evidence that the school system is being used to indoctrinate children.

---
Meanwhile, the P.A.—whose senior members have grown fabulously wealthy from all the funding poured into their coffers—is trapped between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, if they give in to demands to deliver a fit-for-purpose curriculum, the drive behind their Palestinian nationalist narrative will quickly falter, leading eventually to normalization with Israel and to their rule being toppled in favor of true moderate rule. On the other, if they brazen it out and have funding pulled, they risk an impoverished Palestinian population turning on them.

Either way, the true winners in both scenarios would be the children of Palestine, who might, at last, have a chance of receiving a reasonable education, setting them up for a prosperous life.

(full article online)

If they let the Palestinians go back home they would not have that expense.

Jordan won't take them back.
 
In 2020, the European Union handed UNRWA some $157,059,235—that’s in addition to the $1.52 billion paid through the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) channeled through the PEGASE Direct Financial Support, the main E.U. financing instrument for Palestine, between 2017-2020, plus various other funds.

In addition to that, last year, Germany donated $210,384,339 to UNRWA (which has oversight of schools in the Palestinian territories), the U.K. donated $64,129,434, Sweden donated $60,420,012, France donated $22,986,067, Italy donated $17,714,100 and the list goes on.

With such vast sums flowing from Europe to the Palestinians, the Commission is coming under mounting pressure to prove that its funding is, as claimed, laying the groundwork for creating a viable independent Palestinian state that serves Palestine’s citizens. Education has been of particular concern, thanks to persistent evidence that the school system is being used to indoctrinate children.

---
Meanwhile, the P.A.—whose senior members have grown fabulously wealthy from all the funding poured into their coffers—is trapped between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, if they give in to demands to deliver a fit-for-purpose curriculum, the drive behind their Palestinian nationalist narrative will quickly falter, leading eventually to normalization with Israel and to their rule being toppled in favor of true moderate rule. On the other, if they brazen it out and have funding pulled, they risk an impoverished Palestinian population turning on them.

Either way, the true winners in both scenarios would be the children of Palestine, who might, at last, have a chance of receiving a reasonable education, setting them up for a prosperous life.

(full article online)

If they let the Palestinians go back home they would not have that expense.

Jordan won't take them back.
 
In 2020, the European Union handed UNRWA some $157,059,235—that’s in addition to the $1.52 billion paid through the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) channeled through the PEGASE Direct Financial Support, the main E.U. financing instrument for Palestine, between 2017-2020, plus various other funds.

In addition to that, last year, Germany donated $210,384,339 to UNRWA (which has oversight of schools in the Palestinian territories), the U.K. donated $64,129,434, Sweden donated $60,420,012, France donated $22,986,067, Italy donated $17,714,100 and the list goes on.

With such vast sums flowing from Europe to the Palestinians, the Commission is coming under mounting pressure to prove that its funding is, as claimed, laying the groundwork for creating a viable independent Palestinian state that serves Palestine’s citizens. Education has been of particular concern, thanks to persistent evidence that the school system is being used to indoctrinate children.

---
Meanwhile, the P.A.—whose senior members have grown fabulously wealthy from all the funding poured into their coffers—is trapped between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, if they give in to demands to deliver a fit-for-purpose curriculum, the drive behind their Palestinian nationalist narrative will quickly falter, leading eventually to normalization with Israel and to their rule being toppled in favor of true moderate rule. On the other, if they brazen it out and have funding pulled, they risk an impoverished Palestinian population turning on them.

Either way, the true winners in both scenarios would be the children of Palestine, who might, at last, have a chance of receiving a reasonable education, setting them up for a prosperous life.

(full article online)

If they let the Palestinians go back home they would not have that expense.

Jordan won't take them back.
 
In 2020, the European Union handed UNRWA some $157,059,235—that’s in addition to the $1.52 billion paid through the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) channeled through the PEGASE Direct Financial Support, the main E.U. financing instrument for Palestine, between 2017-2020, plus various other funds.

In addition to that, last year, Germany donated $210,384,339 to UNRWA (which has oversight of schools in the Palestinian territories), the U.K. donated $64,129,434, Sweden donated $60,420,012, France donated $22,986,067, Italy donated $17,714,100 and the list goes on.

With such vast sums flowing from Europe to the Palestinians, the Commission is coming under mounting pressure to prove that its funding is, as claimed, laying the groundwork for creating a viable independent Palestinian state that serves Palestine’s citizens. Education has been of particular concern, thanks to persistent evidence that the school system is being used to indoctrinate children.

---
Meanwhile, the P.A.—whose senior members have grown fabulously wealthy from all the funding poured into their coffers—is trapped between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, if they give in to demands to deliver a fit-for-purpose curriculum, the drive behind their Palestinian nationalist narrative will quickly falter, leading eventually to normalization with Israel and to their rule being toppled in favor of true moderate rule. On the other, if they brazen it out and have funding pulled, they risk an impoverished Palestinian population turning on them.

Either way, the true winners in both scenarios would be the children of Palestine, who might, at last, have a chance of receiving a reasonable education, setting them up for a prosperous life.

(full article online)

If they let the Palestinians go back home they would not have that expense.

Jordan won't take them back.
The land that we have bought (for the colony of Ghederal constitutes the "soul and spirit" (nefesh vi ruah)
of the [Arab] village [of Qatra]. The villagers borrowed from the French moneylender Polivar at such a
high rate that they were finally compelled to sell their lands at the loanshark's price. As long as Polivar
remained owner of the land, the fel laheen did not feel the full burden of their misfortune because he leased
it to them. But now that the fellaheen realize that our [Jewish] brothers work the land on their own, and will
not lease it ... the fellaheen are bare-how will they come by their daily bread? [15 November 1885, Muyal
to Pinsker, in Druyanov 1919,1:670-71]
The Ottoman fiscal and land reforms (of the second phase of tanzimat), which first took
effect in Palestine around 1870, soon resulted in the peasantry losing title to much of the land
they cultivated (Schumacher 1889; Post 1891). But life conditions hardly deteriorated: improved
physical security and opportunities provided by the emerging agricultural market more than
offset the cost of paying rent to absentee titleholders (Scholch 1984; Gilbar 1986; cf. Oliphant
1887). Then came the Jewish colonists. Exchanging meager savings for precious deeds in Zion,
they had left behind the alienating commerce of pogrom-ridden Eastern Europe to work the land
of Abraham and Isaac for themselves: "that is why, all of a sudden, many fellaheen had no land
to till; this affected their very existence and provoked the conflicts [at Petah Tikvah] that set our
(Arab] brothers against us" (4 April 1886, Hirsch to Pinsker, in Druyanov 1919,1:746-54, 761-
65). Many of these early colonists were genuinely surprised to find the children of Abraham's
half-forgotten son, Ishmael, still dwelling on their father's land. A few saw the Arabs as long-lost
brothers. Others dreamed the Arabs could be forced back to their desert banishment. The Arab
peasants, it appears, were similarly disconcerted.
 
During the May 2021 Gaza conflict, several outside observers reported publicly on Hamas’ use of civilians as human shields for its weapons and fighters. The Associated Press found that “Palestinian fighters are clearly operating in built-up residential areas and have positioned tunnels, rocket launchers and command and control infrastructure in close proximity to schools, mosques and homes.”6 Each rocket launched at Israeli civilians from such sites entails two separate war crimes, violating the law of armed conflict’s prohibition on targeting civilians as well as the prohibition on using civilians as human shields.7 The Office of the United Nations Special Commissioner for the Middle East Peace Process likewise said: “Hamas & other militants’ indiscriminate launching of rockets & mortars from highly populated civilian neighborhoods into civilian population centers in Israel violates [the law of armed conflict] and must cease immediately.”8

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) catalogued numerous specific examples of human-shields use by Hamas, which included the following:

  • military intelligence headquarters installed next to a kindergarten;
  • weapons depots placed in various houses and apartment buildings;
  • civilian apartment buildings used for military planning and operations; and
  • weapons factories situated in the heart of densely populated civilian areas.9
The IDF released photographs of several additional examples of human-shields use by Hamas, including:

  • 14 rocket launchpads in a Gaza schoolyard;10
  • a Hamas rocket launcher located next to a civilian building;11
  • Hamas rockets launched from near a school;12
  • Hamas military tunnel openings located near a hospital and a school;13
  • a Hamas military tunnel entrance located near a kindergarten and a mosque;14
  • a Hamas military tunnel entrance located underneath a Gaza beachside hotel;15 and
  • a Hamas military tunnel under a school.16

(full article online)

FDD is an Israeli propaganda organization.
That's becoming another of your cut and paste slogans.
The FDD was outed by:

The Israel Lobby in the U.S. - Documentary by Al Jazeera​

 
During the May 2021 Gaza conflict, several outside observers reported publicly on Hamas’ use of civilians as human shields for its weapons and fighters. The Associated Press found that “Palestinian fighters are clearly operating in built-up residential areas and have positioned tunnels, rocket launchers and command and control infrastructure in close proximity to schools, mosques and homes.”6 Each rocket launched at Israeli civilians from such sites entails two separate war crimes, violating the law of armed conflict’s prohibition on targeting civilians as well as the prohibition on using civilians as human shields.7 The Office of the United Nations Special Commissioner for the Middle East Peace Process likewise said: “Hamas & other militants’ indiscriminate launching of rockets & mortars from highly populated civilian neighborhoods into civilian population centers in Israel violates [the law of armed conflict] and must cease immediately.”8

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) catalogued numerous specific examples of human-shields use by Hamas, which included the following:

  • military intelligence headquarters installed next to a kindergarten;
  • weapons depots placed in various houses and apartment buildings;
  • civilian apartment buildings used for military planning and operations; and
  • weapons factories situated in the heart of densely populated civilian areas.9
The IDF released photographs of several additional examples of human-shields use by Hamas, including:

  • 14 rocket launchpads in a Gaza schoolyard;10
  • a Hamas rocket launcher located next to a civilian building;11
  • Hamas rockets launched from near a school;12
  • Hamas military tunnel openings located near a hospital and a school;13
  • a Hamas military tunnel entrance located near a kindergarten and a mosque;14
  • a Hamas military tunnel entrance located underneath a Gaza beachside hotel;15 and
  • a Hamas military tunnel under a school.16

(full article online)

FDD is an Israeli propaganda organization.
That's becoming another of your cut and paste slogans.
The FDD was outed by:

The Israel Lobby in the U.S. - Documentary by Al Jazeera​

Your conspiracy theories are a hoot.
 
You will always get the same answer if you only look at one side of the story, there is plenty of blame to go around. bottom line the Jewish people were given the land (land controlled by the British) by all the WW2 war winning allies. Because of the despicable way they were treated during WW2.
 
You will always get the same answer if you only look at one side of the story, there is plenty of blame to go around. bottom line the Jewish people were given the land (land controlled by the British) by all the WW2 war winning allies. Because of the despicable way they were treated during WW2.
The Mandate for Palestine comes after WWI, not WWII, from the Balfour Declaration.
The land had been controlled by the Ottoman Empire until 1918. The British, one of the Allies, became responsible for the Mandate for Palestine and the Mandate for Iraq.
ONLY the Mandate for Palestine, aka Israel, was rejected by the Muslims because its government was not going to be Muslim.

The Jews were working on re - establishing their ancient nation on their ancient land.
The Muslims, and many Christians like the British government, would have none of that and worked against them.
 
You will always get the same answer if you only look at one side of the story, there is plenty of blame to go around. bottom line the Jewish people were given the land (land controlled by the British) by all the WW2 war winning allies. Because of the despicable way they were treated during WW2.
And then the Israelis ethnically cleansed the palis
 
You will always get the same answer if you only look at one side of the story, there is plenty of blame to go around. bottom line the Jewish people were given the land (land controlled by the British) by all the WW2 war winning allies. Because of the despicable way they were treated during WW2.
The Mandate for Palestine comes after WWI, not WWII, from the Balfour Declaration.
The land had been controlled by the Ottoman Empire until 1918. The British, one of the Allies, became responsible for the Mandate for Palestine and the Mandate for Iraq.
ONLY the Mandate for Palestine, aka Israel, was rejected by the Muslims because its government was not going to be Muslim.

The Jews were working on re - establishing their ancient nation on their ancient land.
The Muslims, and many Christians like the British government, would have none of that and worked against them.
 
You will always get the same answer if you only look at one side of the story, there is plenty of blame to go around. bottom line the Jewish people were given the land (land controlled by the British) by all the WW2 war winning allies. Because of the despicable way they were treated during WW2.
 
You will always get the same answer if you only look at one side of the story, there is plenty of blame to go around. bottom line the Jewish people were given the land (land controlled by the British) by all the WW2 war winning allies. Because of the despicable way they were treated during WW2.
The Mandate for Palestine comes after WWI, not WWII, from the Balfour Declaration.
The land had been controlled by the Ottoman Empire until 1918. The British, one of the Allies, became responsible for the Mandate for Palestine and the Mandate for Iraq.
ONLY the Mandate for Palestine, aka Israel, was rejected by the Muslims because its government was not going to be Muslim.

The Jews were working on re - establishing their ancient nation on their ancient land.
The Muslims, and many Christians like the British government, would have none of that and worked against them.
That's how Jewish terrorists viewed the brits
 
You will always get the same answer if you only look at one side of the story, there is plenty of blame to go around. bottom line the Jewish people were given the land (land controlled by the British) by all the WW2 war winning allies. Because of the despicable way they were treated during WW2.
The Mandate for Palestine comes after WWI, not WWII, from the Balfour Declaration.
The land had been controlled by the Ottoman Empire until 1918. The British, one of the Allies, became responsible for the Mandate for Palestine and the Mandate for Iraq.
ONLY the Mandate for Palestine, aka Israel, was rejected by the Muslims because its government was not going to be Muslim.

The Jews were working on re - establishing their ancient nation on their ancient land.
The Muslims, and many Christians like the British government, would have none of that and worked against them.
 
You will always get the same answer if you only look at one side of the story, there is plenty of blame to go around. bottom line the Jewish people were given the land (land controlled by the British) by all the WW2 war winning allies. Because of the despicable way they were treated during WW2.
Deir yassin has never been mentioned by the US media. At least not in my lifetime
 
You will always get the same answer if you only look at one side of the story, there is plenty of blame to go around. bottom line the Jewish people were given the land (land controlled by the British) by all the WW2 war winning allies. Because of the despicable way they were treated during WW2.
The Mandate for Palestine comes after WWI, not WWII, from the Balfour Declaration.
The land had been controlled by the Ottoman Empire until 1918. The British, one of the Allies, became responsible for the Mandate for Palestine and the Mandate for Iraq.
ONLY the Mandate for Palestine, aka Israel, was rejected by the Muslims because its government was not going to be Muslim.

The Jews were working on re - establishing their ancient nation on their ancient land.
The Muslims, and many Christians like the British government, would have none of that and worked against them.
Many movies about the Holocaust. None about al nakba in the US
 
You will always get the same answer if you only look at one side of the story, there is plenty of blame to go around. bottom line the Jewish people were given the land (land controlled by the British) by all the WW2 war winning allies. Because of the despicable way they were treated during WW2.
The Mandate for Palestine comes after WWI, not WWII, from the Balfour Declaration.
The land had been controlled by the Ottoman Empire until 1918. The British, one of the Allies, became responsible for the Mandate for Palestine and the Mandate for Iraq.
ONLY the Mandate for Palestine, aka Israel, was rejected by the Muslims because its government was not going to be Muslim.

The Jews were working on re - establishing their ancient nation on their ancient land.
The Muslims, and many Christians like the British government, would have none of that and worked against them.
 
You will always get the same answer if you only look at one side of the story, there is plenty of blame to go around. bottom line the Jewish people were given the land (land controlled by the British) by all the WW2 war winning allies. Because of the despicable way they were treated during WW2.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top