Arrest made in Ohio 10 year old rape case

[Faun]

10 year olds having babies is a threatening medical condition.

Though very possible, not necessarily. It would have ended up in the courts to determine if she could get an abortion and potentially pass a date where she could legally get one anywhere unless a doctor determined her life was at risk, which it wasn't at 6 weeks.

Furthermore, she might have been denied an abortion altogether in Ohio until she was dying as the state legislature argued age would not be a condition worthy of an abortion...

Jeff Crossman wants to protect abortion rights — but needs to defeat Ohio AG Dave Yost first

An interview with the Ohio Dem. And, a Law Dork exclusive: Analysis from the state's nonpartisan Legislative Service Commission contradicts Yost's claim about Ohio's six-week abortion ban.

chrisgeidner.substack.com

Crossman said he was “so stunned” that Yost said something “so blatantly and brazenly wrong” that he checked with the nonpartisan Ohio Legislative Services Commission to ask for an opinion about whether “minor victims of sexual assault are able to receive abortions within Ohio after six weeks gestation.”

The answer, from Amy Archer, a research analyst with the commission, was direct: “No, Ohio’s abortion prohibition applies regardless of the circumstances of conception or the age of the mother.”

Whomever instructed that girl be taken to another state where abortion is legal made the absolute best choice in the interest of the child. She was able to get her abortion and not deal with rightwingnuts in Ohio who wanted to control her body.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Though very possible, not necessarily. It would have ended up in the courts to determine if she could get an abortion and potentially pass a date where she could legally get one anywhere unless a doctor determined her life was at risk, which it wasn't at 6 weeks.

Furthermore, she might have been denied an abortion altogether in Ohio until she was dying as the state legislature argued age would not be a condition worthy of an abortion...

Jeff Crossman wants to protect abortion rights — but needs to defeat Ohio AG Dave Yost first

An interview with the Ohio Dem. And, a Law Dork exclusive: Analysis from the state's nonpartisan Legislative Service Commission contradicts Yost's claim about Ohio's six-week abortion ban.

chrisgeidner.substack.com

​

Crossman said he was “so stunned” that Yost said something “so blatantly and brazenly wrong” that he checked with the nonpartisan Ohio Legislative Services Commission to ask for an opinion about whether “minor victims of sexual assault are able to receive abortions within Ohio after six weeks gestation.”​

​

The answer, from Amy Archer, a research analyst with the commission, was direct: “No, Ohio’s abortion prohibition applies regardless of the circumstances of conception or the age of the mother.”​

​

Whomever instructed that girl be taken to another state where abortion is legal made the absolute best choice in the interest of the child. She was able to get her abortion and not deal with rightwingnuts in Ohio who wanted to control her body.

Possibly, but the AG said he would have allowed it, he's the guy that prosecutes those things. It's a state law, not a local one.

 

[Faun]

Possibly, but the AG said he would have allowed it, he's the guy that prosecutes those things. It's a state law, not a local one.

Please, no doctor in Ohio would have performed an abortion on that. They're the ones who face prosecution.

Again, what was done for the girl was done in her best interest, not the best interest of Ohio.

And he didn't say he wouldn't prosecute. He only made a bland statement that she didn't have to leave Ohio to get the abortion. Meaningless words meant to save face after the fact.

 

[westwall]

Please, no doctor in Ohio would have performed an abortion on that. They're the ones who face prosecution.

Again, what was done for the girl was done in her best interest, not the best interest of Ohio.

The reason for the change of State was the requirement to report the RAPE. No other reason.

The mom didn't want her child raping boyfriend to get in trouble.

 

[Faun]

The reason for the change of State was the requirement to report the RAPE. No other reason.

The mom didn't want her child raping boyfriend to get in trouble.

While there is evidence the mother didn't want her boyfriend to get in trouble for raping her daughter, the only reason police even knew about the girl is because her mother submitted a referral to Franklin County Children Services. And it was a physician who recommended the girl be taken to Indiana for a legal abortion.

 

[woodwork201]

I never said it was, you moron. I have also mentioned that the dept they went to should get into trouble.
But you are a hack and just have to lash out.
Well congrats on looking stupid! Because thats where your lashing out got you.

You said there was a report made. There was not.

 

[woodwork201]

While there is evidence the mother didn't want her boyfriend to get in trouble for raping her daughter, the only reason police even knew about the girl is because her mother submitted a referral to Franklin County Children Services. And it was a physician who recommended the girl be taken to Indiana for a legal abortion.

The proof, not just "evidence", that the mother didn't want her boyfriend to get in trouble is that the mother is on TV on Telemundo saying that everything said about the boyfriend is a lie and that he didn't rape her daughter - even though he admitted to having sex with her since she was 9.

She didn't go to children's services to report a rape; she went there to apply for more welfare to cover the pregnancy and the new additions coming to the family. The mother and the girl didn't want the abortion; it was promoted to protect the rapist.

She was sent to Indiana by an Ohio doctor who conspired (as in conspiracy, as in 20+ years in prison) with children's services, the mother, and the boyfriend/rapist to avoid reporting the rape of a 9-year-old girl.

 

[Correll]

Idiot, the law is vague in that regard...

"Medical emergency means a condition that in the physician's good faith medical judgment, based upon the facts known to the physician at that time, so complicates the woman's pregnancy as to necessitate the immediate performance or inducement of an abortion in order to prevent the death of the pregnant woman or to avoid a serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman that delay in the performance or inducement of the abortion would create."​

From what condition did she suffer that a physician could have diagnosed as life-threatening?

THey didn't even make a phone call to ask any doctors if they would do the procedure. They WANTED to create the story to give gist to you whiny faggots.

 

[TNHarley]

You said there was a report made. There was not.

Bless your heart

 

[jc456]

While there is evidence the mother didn't want her boyfriend to get in trouble for raping her daughter, the only reason police even knew about the girl is because her mother submitted a referral to Franklin County Children Services. And it was a physician who recommended the girl be taken to Indiana for a legal abortion.

where is all this evidence?

 

[Faun]

where is all this evidence?

The news...

Patients head to Indiana for abortion services as other states restrict care

A 10-year-old girl is among those from Ohio who have been forced to seek abortions in Indiana after Roe was overturned.

www.indystar.com

Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio.​

 

[jc456]

The news...

Patients head to Indiana for abortion services as other states restrict care

A 10-year-old girl is among those from Ohio who have been forced to seek abortions in Indiana after Roe was overturned.

www.indystar.com

​

Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio.​

what's the evidence in the news reports?

 

[Lesh]

10 year olds having babies is a threatening medical condition.

How about 12 year olds

14 year olds

17 year olds

Seems like there’s a lot of exceptions… but there actually are none

 

[Lesh]

Possibly, but the AG said he would have allowed it, he's the guy that prosecutes those things. It's a state law, not a local one.

The AG said a lot of shit. Most of it wrong. Most of it dishonest

 

[jc456]

The AG said a lot of shit. Most of it wrong. Most of it dishonest

cause you know it all. With zip for evidence. amazing still.

 

[Lesh]

cause you know it all. With zip for evidence. amazing still.

This is the guy who claimed it didn’t happen because he didn’t know about it.

Apparently what he “knows” is limited ( by his partisanship)

And he’s claiming groundlessly that the girl could have gotten an abortion in Ohio despite there being no exception for rape or incest and her life or bodily functions were not on imminent danger.

Right

 

[jc456]

This is the guy who claimed it didn’t happen because he didn’t know about it.

Apparently what he “knows” is limited ( by his partisanship)

And he’s claiming groundlessly that the girl could have gotten an abortion in Ohio despite there being no exception for rape or incest and her life or bodily functions were not on imminent danger.

Right

I still haven't seen anything vaguely resembling evidence of anything. And if the AG doesn't know, and you most certainly know, you're in the wrong business.

 

[jc456]

You’re fucking insane. Go play with a bone in the back yard doggie

will I find your evidence there?

 

[Faun]

what's the evidence in the news reports?

Write them and ask for their sources.

 

[playtime]

You said there was a report made. There was not.

ummm.

ya.

she did.

Indiana Dr. Caitlin Bernard reported 10-year-old Ohio girl's abortion, records show​

Tony Cook
Indianapolis Star July 15, 2022

The Indiana physician who provided abortion services to a 10-year-old Ohio girl who was raped disclosed the abortion in a form filed with the Indiana Department of Health and the Department of Child Services, according to documents obtained by IndyStar through a public records request.
Indiana Dr. Caitlin Bernard reported 10-year-old Ohio girl's abortion, records show

oh & guess what?

Doctor who provided abortion for Ohio girl files claim for damages against Todd Rokita​

Tony Cook
Indianapolis Star July 10, 2022

Dr. Caitlin Bernard, who was cast into the national spotlight after providing abortion services for a 10-year-old Ohio girl, has filed a claim for damages against Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita ― a first step toward a possible defamation lawsuit.
Attorneys for Bernard sent a tort claim notice Tuesday to Rokita seeking unspecified damages for security costs, legal fees, reputational harm, and emotional distress. The tort claim triggers a 90-day period for Rokita to investigate or settle the claim. After that, Bernard can file a lawsuit.

“Mr. Rokita’s false and misleading statements about alleged misconduct by Dr. Bernard in her profession constitute defamation per se," the notice says. "The statements have been and continue to be published by or on behalf of Mr. Rokita and the Office of the Attorney General. To the extent that these statements exceed the general scope of Mr. Rokita’s authority as Indiana’s Attorney General, the statement forms the basis of an actionable defamation claim against Mr. Rokita individually.”
Doctor who provided abortion for Ohio girl files claim for damages against Todd Rokita

lol... ^^^ THAT ^^^