Zone1 atheists don't have proof of God... because they refuse to look at the proof

[Woodznutz]

That's because you applied the wrong discipline. You should have applied biology.

Math reveals the odds. Not very good for evolution.

 

[Hollie]

Math reveals the odds. Not very good for evolution.

I wouldn't use the "what are the chances" argument against biological evolution.

The odds are greatly in favor of naturalism vs. supernaturalism.

 

[Hollie]

The earth was perfect when first created. See Gap Theory.

The earth was not created by supernatural God's.
See Geological textbooks.

 

[Donald H]

Bronze Age entertainment?

Your bibles invented the goofy stories and Christians need to learn how to own it. That is in fact in the process of learning how to do that, out of necessity.

The reason why the Catholic church finally had to accept Darwinian evolution.

 

[Woodznutz]

I wouldn't use the "what are the chances" argument against biological evolution.

The odds are greatly in favor of naturalism vs. supernaturalism.

It's a time thing. There just hasn't been enough time for all the evolutionary changes to occur. Adding the bogus 'natural selection' doesn't help.

 

[Woodznutz]

The earth was not created by supernatural God's.
See Geological textbooks.

Do they explain the origin of the minerals needed?

 

[Hollie]

Do they explain the origin of the minerals needed?

Yep.

 

[Hollie]

It's a time thing. There just hasn't been enough time for all the evolutionary changes to occur. Adding the bogus 'natural selection' doesn't help.

There has plenty of time.

 

[Woodznutz]

There has plenty of time.

Let's ask Google's giant 'brain'.

 

[Woodznutz]

Yep.

I don't think so.

 

[Hollie]

Let's ask Google's giant 'brain'.

Let us know what you find.

 

[Hollie]

I don't think so.

That's fine.

 

[Grumblenuts]

It's a time thing. There just hasn't been enough time for all the evolutionary changes to occur. Adding the bogus 'natural selection' doesn't help.

For starters, no one posits that evolution took only six days..

 

[Woodznutz]

Let us know what you find.

Science is the study of the creation and will eventually debunk the ToE.

 

[Woodznutz]

For starters, no one posits that evolution took only six days..

No matter how much time is allotted to evolution there isn't enough to produce the organisms we see today.

 

[Hollie]

Science is the study of the creation and will eventually debunk the ToE.

Science is the study of the natural world.

There is nothing in any of the various religions that debunks science.

 

[Woodznutz]

Science is the study of the natural world.

There is nothing in any of the various religions that debunks science.

No need. Science will debunk some of its own theories eventually.

 

[Hollie]

No need. Science will debunk some of its own theories eventually.

Yes. Theories such as planets revolving around the earth are theories maintained by the church and debunked by science.

What new information has been learned about any of the gods over the last 1,000 years?

 

[Woodznutz]

Yes. Theories such as planets revolving around the earth are theories maintained by the church and debunked by science.

What new information has been learned about any of the gods over the last 1,000 years?

I'm still studying the old information.

 

[Hollie]

I'm still studying the old information.

I’ll lend an assist. No. There is new information learned about any of the gods over the last 1,000 years.