Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yea thats what it means.....keep making excuses for the old pedophile.......
Probably because theyre oftentimes so loud, vulgar, and mouthyOne thing worth mentioning.
"Yet for Black women, the numbers are even more stark. More than 40% of Black women will experience domestic violence in their lifetime, according to the Institute of Women’s Policy Research’s Status of Black Women in the United States."
Probably because theyre oftentimes so loud, vulgar, and mouthy
I'm sure that's what they thought too until the end of segregation came around. The one constant there is is that things always change.You honestly think some half wit grassroots is going to change the system that's in place? Bro, there's no way. We're passed all that. That wasn't even possible as far back as the 50's.
The Justice Democrats pulled in more money typically than their establishment opponents from average Americans $10 at a time.How the hell does a black ex lobbyist who sided with big coal (recently) during the Obama administration get to be the DNC chair? By not giving a damn about negroids or white trash or their little organizations. They get their by those with more money than all your little grassroots donations combined.
They tried that in the last election and they all got re-elected.Radical progressives will sit down and STFU, or they won't get re-elected. The DNC will make sure that their democratic opponent is financially well healed, and that the media in their districts push for the DNC's chosen candidate. All those little donations from individuals won't even matter if you can't get your face on TV.
Thats your side bro. I never told you to support cucks.That's how it works bro. Look at Rand Paul. He had to come out and endorse Trump to get re-elected. He had to squelch his honesty about how corrupt the republicans were to get re-elected.
I'm sure that's what they thought too until the end of segregation came around. The one constant there is is that things always change.
The Justice Democrats pulled in more money typically than their establishment opponents from average Americans $10 at a time.
They tried that in the last election and they all got re-elected.
Thats your side bro. I never told you to support cucks.
I can't agree: As a child I lived under segregation and now I see it was a WHOLE lot safer than I feel now, with all the terrible crime. With the schools impossible for white children to attend. Segregation had a purpose and now that there is so much black crime and animal-like behavior on planes, in stores, everywhere, just wild thrashing about, we see what that purpose was.Bro, the end of segregation came because it was just wrong to start with.
And another:
A white woman acting like this wouldn't be treated so gingerly
I can't agree: As a child I lived under segregation and now I see it was a WHOLE lot safer than I feel now, with all the terrible crime. With the schools impossible for white children to attend. Segregation had a purpose and now that there is so much black crime and animal-like behavior on planes, in stores, everywhere, just wild thrashing about, we see what that purpose was.
This is ridiculous. They sentence a cop to 1st degree murder for holding down a black criminal who is ODing on fentanyl and resisting arrests. But a black kid who kills a white man is given house arrest. This country is going to hell!
I would prefer that people, including store owners, renters, etc. had rights about who they wanted to associate with. You could put up a sign, "No Irish" if you wanted. Well, "No blacks" these days. The rules about having to sell and rent to people no one wants in the neighborhood for EXCELLENT reasons are oppressive and have caused us all to have to live next door to crime, crime, crime.Safer is one thing. But there's a lot of factors that would've changed, had segregation ended or not. But telling someone they can't eat with white people because they're blacks. Or go to school with whites. Or all the other things blacks weren't allowed to do. That's just wrong.
"All men are created equal, with certain unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." There are no caveats in that statement.
Classy!
If that creature were white, she'd be gaged and hog tied within a minute.
Black privilege permits this to go on in public places
I would prefer that people, including store owners, renters, etc. had rights about who they wanted to associate with. You could put up a sign, "No Irish" if you wanted. Well, "No blacks" these days. The rules about having to sell and rent to people no one wants in the neighborhood for EXCELLENT reasons are oppressive and have caused us all to have to live next door to crime, crime, crime.
I would prefer that people, including store owners, renters, etc. had rights about who they wanted to associate with. You could put up a sign, "No Irish" if you wanted. Well, "No blacks" these days. The rules about having to sell and rent to people no one wants in the neighborhood for EXCELLENT reasons are oppressive and have caused us all to have to live next door to crime, crime, crime.
im changing the subject?.....i was talking about the old pedo.....your the one trying to make it about the other guy.....I don't even care about the old pedophile. He's not the point. And you know it. You're just trying to change the subject to keep from having to admit your boi is an entitled thug.
I'd probably do the same thing if I was a black racist, who is embarrassed by the thugs with my skin color.
Safer is one thing. But there's a lot of factors that would've changed, had segregation ended or not. But telling someone they can't eat with white people because they're blacks. Or go to school with whites. Or all the other things blacks weren't allowed to do. That's just wrong.
"All men are created equal, with certain unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." There are no caveats in that statement.
Like blacks are more likely to get shot by a cop. Percentage wise, maybe. But still more whites are being shot by cops. So that narrative was destroyed.
The number of blacks being shot by cops is pretty high. But then we found out that like 99% of them were either armed and shooting at the cops, or was about to.
So once again, the race hustlers lost that argument.
Where they really lost the argument is there is no law in any state that denies one to use deadly force against an unarmed attacker. As a CCW holder in my state, I can tell you our laws mirror other states. The law states "A CCW holder is legally allowed to use deadly force if they believe they (or others) are in jeopardy of serious bodily harm or death." Nowhere does it state they have to be armed.
30 years ago I would have had a hard time proving my case that I believed I was in jeopardy of serious bodily harm against a young physically fit attacker. Today at the age of 61 with a lot of medical problems, I can make that case. I'm 6'3" and back then worked out with weights. I was not only a big guy, but a black belt in Kenpo. A prosecutor could make the case I was more than able to defend myself against an unarmed attacker. Now, the law would be on my side.
Police have to abide by the same laws we do. A police officer (if prosecuted) would have to demonstrate he (or she) believed they or others were in jeopardy of serious bodily harm by a suspect if they used deadly force. However they don't have to prove the suspect was armed or attacking them while armed.
