Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are dozens of Black comic book super heroes that could have been picked for this movie. There was clear intent to invoke politics and Racism by picking 'Black Panther'. If you look at the history, both the comic book character and the militant group came into being in the same year 1966.
IMO a cooler and less political choice for the movie would have been Black Talon. But like I said there are dozens of choices.
View attachment 177378
that is surprising; the Shaft movies don't seem nearly racist enough for your tastes, not even as racist as this pile of shit movie is.
Have you seen Black Panther? What makes it racist? I haven't seen it yet.
I havent seen it either but you'd have to be blind not to comprehend the black supremacist undertones in just the title alone, never mind the politicized hype surrounding it. Hard to imagine the studio execs who decided this obscure character needed a blockbuster didn't know that a militant black supremacist group called the Black Panthers exists.
naming the 'Hero' after a violent, murdering gang of 1970's heroin dealers is par for the course with racist neo-fascists. As is typical of 'black revolutionaries', they kill more black people than anybody else.
Amazing how a character created in the 1960's was based on a "murdering gang of the 1970's."
Nothing to be ashamed about not being up on the Origin Story of all Marvel Superheros.
There are dozens of Black comic book super heroes that could have been picked for this movie. There was clear intent to invoke politics and Racism by picking 'Black Panther'. If you look at the history, both the comic book character and the militant group came into being in the same year 1966.
IMO a cooler and less political choice for the movie would have been Black Talon. But like I said there are dozens of choices.
View attachment 177378
Don't pick Black Panther, perhaps the most well known black Marvel superhero that Marvel studios owns the rights to (and almost certainly the most well known that isn't already part of the MCU or a TV series), a character that was already introduced in Captain America: Civil War, and instead pick an obscure character that is actually a villain?
Black Talon - Marvel Comics - Barone - Voodoo & zombies guy - Profile
Samuel Barone (Earth-616)
There are dozens of Black comic book super heroes that could have been picked for this movie. There was clear intent to invoke politics and Racism by picking 'Black Panther'. If you look at the history, both the comic book character and the militant group came into being in the same year 1966.
IMO a cooler and less political choice for the movie would have been Black Talon. But like I said there are dozens of choices.
View attachment 177378
Don't pick Black Panther, perhaps the most well known black Marvel superhero that Marvel studios owns the rights to (and almost certainly the most well known that isn't already part of the MCU or a TV series), a character that was already introduced in Captain America: Civil War, and instead pick an obscure character that is actually a villain?
Black Talon - Marvel Comics - Barone - Voodoo & zombies guy - Profile
Samuel Barone (Earth-616)
Was Black Panther really that big?
I would have thought that the Falcon would have had just as much name recognition.
Have you seen Black Panther? What makes it racist? I haven't seen it yet.
I havent seen it either but you'd have to be blind not to comprehend the black supremacist undertones in just the title alone, never mind the politicized hype surrounding it. Hard to imagine the studio execs who decided this obscure character needed a blockbuster didn't know that a militant black supremacist group called the Black Panthers exists.
naming the 'Hero' after a violent, murdering gang of 1970's heroin dealers is par for the course with racist neo-fascists. As is typical of 'black revolutionaries', they kill more black people than anybody else.
Amazing how a character created in the 1960's was based on a "murdering gang of the 1970's."
Nothing to be ashamed about not being up on the Origin Story of all Marvel Superheros.
That is certainly true. However, if one does not know about the origin of the character, one probably shouldn't make statements about the origin of the character.
There are dozens of Black comic book super heroes that could have been picked for this movie. There was clear intent to invoke politics and Racism by picking 'Black Panther'. If you look at the history, both the comic book character and the militant group came into being in the same year 1966.
IMO a cooler and less political choice for the movie would have been Black Talon. But like I said there are dozens of choices.
View attachment 177378
Don't pick Black Panther, perhaps the most well known black Marvel superhero that Marvel studios owns the rights to (and almost certainly the most well known that isn't already part of the MCU or a TV series), a character that was already introduced in Captain America: Civil War, and instead pick an obscure character that is actually a villain?
Black Talon - Marvel Comics - Barone - Voodoo & zombies guy - Profile
Samuel Barone (Earth-616)
Was Black Panther really that big?
I would have thought that the Falcon would have had just as much name recognition.
As I said, most well known that isn't already part of the MCU or another series. That leaves out Falcon and Luke Cage, who both could be more well known than Black Panther.
black talon?....the guy who creates and controls zombies?....he was a bad guy....There are dozens of Black comic book super heroes that could have been picked for this movie. There was clear intent to invoke politics and Racism by picking 'Black Panther'. If you look at the history, both the comic book character and the militant group came into being in the same year 1966.
IMO a cooler and less political choice for the movie would have been Black Talon. But like I said there are dozens of choices.
View attachment 177378
black talon?....the guy who creates and controls zombies?....he was a bad guy....There are dozens of Black comic book super heroes that could have been picked for this movie. There was clear intent to invoke politics and Racism by picking 'Black Panther'. If you look at the history, both the comic book character and the militant group came into being in the same year 1966.
IMO a cooler and less political choice for the movie would have been Black Talon. But like I said there are dozens of choices.
View attachment 177378
learn about the comic before you start talking....No Shaft didnt have super powers. He was a hero though. Love the song from the movie. Hope they play it my funeral.That famous superhero movie, Shaft!
that is surprising; the Shaft movies don't seem nearly racist enough for your tastes, not even as racist as this pile of shit movie is.
Have you seen Black Panther? What makes it racist? I haven't seen it yet.
I havent seen it either but you'd have to be blind not to comprehend the black supremacist undertones in just the title alone, never mind the politicized hype surrounding it. Hard to imagine the studio execs who decided this obscure character needed a blockbuster didn't know that a militant black supremacist group called the Black Panthers exists.
naming the 'Hero' after a violent, murdering gang of 1970's heroin dealers is par for the course with racist neo-fascists. As is typical of 'black revolutionaries', they kill more black people than anybody else.
learn about the comic before you start talking....No Shaft didnt have super powers. He was a hero though. Love the song from the movie. Hope they play it my funeral.
that is surprising; the Shaft movies don't seem nearly racist enough for your tastes, not even as racist as this pile of shit movie is.
Have you seen Black Panther? What makes it racist? I haven't seen it yet.
I havent seen it either but you'd have to be blind not to comprehend the black supremacist undertones in just the title alone, never mind the politicized hype surrounding it. Hard to imagine the studio execs who decided this obscure character needed a blockbuster didn't know that a militant black supremacist group called the Black Panthers exists.
naming the 'Hero' after a violent, murdering gang of 1970's heroin dealers is par for the course with racist neo-fascists. As is typical of 'black revolutionaries', they kill more black people than anybody else.
except he didnt do that....he was a villain.....black talon?....the guy who creates and controls zombies?....he was a bad guy....There are dozens of Black comic book super heroes that could have been picked for this movie. There was clear intent to invoke politics and Racism by picking 'Black Panther'. If you look at the history, both the comic book character and the militant group came into being in the same year 1966.
IMO a cooler and less political choice for the movie would have been Black Talon. But like I said there are dozens of choices.
View attachment 177378
The movie could be his "origin story" as he realizes that he should raise zombies to protect the innocent and fight crime.
so are the dummies who think they are....learn about the comic before you start talking....that is surprising; the Shaft movies don't seem nearly racist enough for your tastes, not even as racist as this pile of shit movie is.
Have you seen Black Panther? What makes it racist? I haven't seen it yet.
I havent seen it either but you'd have to be blind not to comprehend the black supremacist undertones in just the title alone, never mind the politicized hype surrounding it. Hard to imagine the studio execs who decided this obscure character needed a blockbuster didn't know that a militant black supremacist group called the Black Panthers exists.
naming the 'Hero' after a violent, murdering gang of 1970's heroin dealers is par for the course with racist neo-fascists. As is typical of 'black revolutionaries', they kill more black people than anybody else.
Comic books are gay
I Would not say gay as much as they are childish.Comic books are gay
Thats because you have no clue what my tastes are. Black Panther isnt racist in the least. You just mad its making money and providing inspiration.No Shaft didnt have super powers. He was a hero though. Love the song from the movie. Hope they play it my funeral.Blankman? That should be considered a comedy rather than a superhero movie. I wouldn't call Super Fuzz a superhero movie.
they've had all kinds of super hero movies. Super Fly, Shaft, all those movies with the football player turned cop, and many others.
That famous superhero movie, Shaft!
that is surprising; the Shaft movies don't seem nearly racist enough for your tastes, not even as racist as this pile of shit movie is.
No Shaft didnt have super powers. He was a hero though. Love the song from the movie. Hope they play it my funeral.
that is surprising; the Shaft movies don't seem nearly racist enough for your tastes, not even as racist as this pile of shit movie is.
Have you seen Black Panther? What makes it racist? I haven't seen it yet.
I havent seen it either but you'd have to be blind not to comprehend the black supremacist undertones in just the title alone, never mind the politicized hype surrounding it. Hard to imagine the studio execs who decided this obscure character needed a blockbuster didn't know that a militant black supremacist group called the Black Panthers exists.
naming the 'Hero' after a violent, murdering gang of 1970's heroin dealers is par for the course with racist neo-fascists. As is typical of 'black revolutionaries', they kill more black people than anybody else.
Amazing how a character created in the 1960's was based on a "murdering gang of the 1970's."
learn about the comic before you start talking....
i know when he first appeared,i had the comic back then,you seem to be the clueless one,the panthers alter ego was never a thug and not inspired by one....like i said learn about the comic before you spew your ignorance.....learn about the comic before you start talking....
You should take your own advice. Most here don't have a clue as to when the character first appeared nor do they know when the Black Panther gangsters formed. I'm enjoying myself laughing at them trying to school everybody else on their racist thug inspired hero. Even when another poster dated it they still babble on and think they're getting over on somebody. lol lol lol
They probably wait until the sequel to have the Hero start selling drugs in the neighborhoods he 'cleaned up'; that's what the original thugs did.
There are dozens of Black comic book super heroes that could have been picked for this movie. There was clear intent to invoke politics and Racism by picking 'Black Panther'. If you look at the history, both the comic book character and the militant group came into being in the same year 1966.
IMO a cooler and less political choice for the movie would have been Black Talon. But like I said there are dozens of choices.
View attachment 177378
Don't pick Black Panther, perhaps the most well known black Marvel superhero that Marvel studios owns the rights to (and almost certainly the most well known that isn't already part of the MCU or a TV series), a character that was already introduced in Captain America: Civil War, and instead pick an obscure character that is actually a villain?
Black Talon - Marvel Comics - Barone - Voodoo & zombies guy - Profile
Samuel Barone (Earth-616)
Was Black Panther really that big?
I would have thought that the Falcon would have had just as much name recognition.
As I said, most well known that isn't already part of the MCU or another series. That leaves out Falcon and Luke Cage, who both could be more well known than Black Panther.
Why limit it to characters who are not already part of the MCU?
I could see avoiding Luke Cage, who has an active tv show, but
The Falcon would be perfect imo.
that is surprising; the Shaft movies don't seem nearly racist enough for your tastes, not even as racist as this pile of shit movie is.
Have you seen Black Panther? What makes it racist? I haven't seen it yet.
I havent seen it either but you'd have to be blind not to comprehend the black supremacist undertones in just the title alone, never mind the politicized hype surrounding it. Hard to imagine the studio execs who decided this obscure character needed a blockbuster didn't know that a militant black supremacist group called the Black Panthers exists.
naming the 'Hero' after a violent, murdering gang of 1970's heroin dealers is par for the course with racist neo-fascists. As is typical of 'black revolutionaries', they kill more black people than anybody else.
Amazing how a character created in the 1960's was based on a "murdering gang of the 1970's."
Is that the fake history Pelosi has instructed you puppets to run around spouting? Hilarious.
