BOLO: Marxist Code Words

"restoring fairness to the economy"

"Jobs"

“investment”

“competitiveness”

“win the future”
T, you do not know Marxism from the Marx brothers; more MARXIST code phrases;

The betterment of the people
Capitalist lackeys
Enemies of the people*

*The "people", defined by the Marxists means PARTY LEADERS.

Really? Is that why Obama said he was working as a "spy behind enemy lines"?

Don't you portend to tell me what I know, wench.
 
"restoring fairness to the economy"

"Jobs"

“investment”

“competitiveness”

“win the future”
T, you do not know Marxism from the Marx brothers; more MARXIST code phrases;

The betterment of the people
Capitalist lackeys
Enemies of the people*

*The "people", defined by the Marxists means PARTY LEADERS.

Really? Is that why Obama said he was working as a "spy behind enemy lines"?

Don't you portend to tell me what I know, wench.

I t'ink you meant "pretend."

And, don't sweat it. Peachy doesn't seem to even grasp the meaning of the OP.
 
BOLO for the following Marxist words and phrases:

Income inequality
Workers Rights
Deregulation
1%
Redistribution
Fairness

corporations
wealthy
can afford it
need it
investment (for spending)
spending (for tax cuts)
giveaway (for tax cuts)
 
T, you do not know Marxism from the Marx brothers; more MARXIST code phrases;

The betterment of the people
Capitalist lackeys
Enemies of the people*

*The "people", defined by the Marxists means PARTY LEADERS.

Really? Is that why Obama said he was working as a "spy behind enemy lines"?

Don't you portend to tell me what I know, wench.

I t'ink you meant "pretend."

And, don't sweat it. Peachy doesn't seem to even grasp the meaning of the OP.
Apparently.
 
Sustainable
Green
The former Soviets are as brown as dirt when it comes to the environment. GREEN is not a Marxist word.

Peachy, you miss the point. The BOLO on the code words is not a matter of literal interpretation.

It is just a heads up about the distortion of language as a tool of the rhetoric employed by the Marxists and socialists and modern American "liberals" under any name they may try to conceal themselves behind.

In the lexicon of the present day Marxist wannabes, they beat you over the head about the alleged "NEED" for "going green," when what they are really doing is trying to re-arrange the economy along their preferred lines.
So it is each person's bias as to what the think. I note the Pledge is discussed endlessly here; the Constitution gets a few mentions; the writings of the Founders are IGNORED. The soundbite generation doesn't like reading entire books, or actual documents. Reliance upon what OTHER people said the Founders wrote is enough for many. An actual quote from Adams on DEMOCRACY:

"If there have been those who doubted whether a confederated representative democracy were a government competent to the wise and orderly management of the common concerns of a mighty nation, those doubts have been dispelled."

Jefferson concurred on that issue:

The development of representative political institutions, Jefferson concluded, "has rendered useless almost everything written before on the structure of government and in a great measure relieves our regret if the political writings of Aristotle, or of any other ancient, have been lost, or are unfaithfully rendered or explained to us." [3]
**************************************************
Jefferson feared what he termed PURE Democracy & favored REPRESENTATIVE democracy in the Republic.
 
The former Soviets are as brown as dirt when it comes to the environment. GREEN is not a Marxist word.

Peachy, you miss the point. The BOLO on the code words is not a matter of literal interpretation.

It is just a heads up about the distortion of language as a tool of the rhetoric employed by the Marxists and socialists and modern American "liberals" under any name they may try to conceal themselves behind.

In the lexicon of the present day Marxist wannabes, they beat you over the head about the alleged "NEED" for "going green," when what they are really doing is trying to re-arrange the economy along their preferred lines.
So it is each person's bias as to what the think. I note the Pledge is discussed endlessly here; the Constitution gets a few mentions; the writings of the Founders are IGNORED. The soundbite generation doesn't like reading entire books, or actual documents. Reliance upon what OTHER people said the Founders wrote is enough for many. An actual quote from Adams on DEMOCRACY:

"If there have been those who doubted whether a confederated representative democracy were a government competent to the wise and orderly management of the common concerns of a mighty nation, those doubts have been dispelled."

Jefferson concurred on that issue:

The development of representative political institutions, Jefferson concluded, "has rendered useless almost everything written before on the structure of government and in a great measure relieves our regret if the political writings of Aristotle, or of any other ancient, have been lost, or are unfaithfully rendered or explained to us." [3]
**************************************************
Jefferson feared what he termed PURE Democracy & favored REPRESENTATIVE democracy in the Republic.

So much prose; so little accuracy.

You on the left tend to make reference to only those limited PORTIONS of the Constitution you like -- and only when it suits you.

You take out of context the words of the Framers and Founders to distort their meaning, to suit your agenda.

YOU guys try (valiantly) to ignore the Federalist Papers, however.

I'm afraid I cannot take your posts seriously when they demonstrate -- as your quoted one does -- such an abject disregard for reality.
 
Sustainable
Green
The former Soviets are as brown as dirt when it comes to the environment. GREEN is not a Marxist word.

Peachy, you miss the point. The BOLO on the code words is not a matter of literal interpretation.

It is just a heads up about the distortion of language as a tool of the rhetoric employed by the Marxists and socialists and modern American "liberals" under any name they may try to conceal themselves behind.

In the lexicon of the present day Marxist wannabes, they beat you over the head about the alleged "NEED" for "going green," when what they are really doing is trying to re-arrange the economy along their preferred lines.
You must know them all. Conservatives may choose to believe policies they do not agree with are MARXIST, but that does not make them such. Likewise I see FASCIST (not on this board much, as most posters are conservative to very conservative.) tossed out to describe conservative positions. I despise Rick Scott's policies but do not refer to him as a FASCIST.
 
The former Soviets are as brown as dirt when it comes to the environment. GREEN is not a Marxist word.

Peachy, you miss the point. The BOLO on the code words is not a matter of literal interpretation.

It is just a heads up about the distortion of language as a tool of the rhetoric employed by the Marxists and socialists and modern American "liberals" under any name they may try to conceal themselves behind.

In the lexicon of the present day Marxist wannabes, they beat you over the head about the alleged "NEED" for "going green," when what they are really doing is trying to re-arrange the economy along their preferred lines.
You must know them all. Conservatives may choose to believe policies they do not agree with are MARXIST, but that does not make them such. Likewise I see FASCIST (not on this board much, as most posters are conservative to very conservative.) tossed out to describe conservative positions. I despise Rick Scott's policies but do not refer to him as a FASCIST.

Accurately identifying a socialist/Marxist is just accurate identification.

If YOU happen to have the capacity NOT to falsely label a conservative as a "fascist" that too is merely being honest and accurate.

So, if you think you were making a point, you were wrong.
 
BOLO for the following Marxist words and phrases:

Income inequality
Workers Rights
Deregulation
1%
Redistribution
Fairness

Nothing quite relays the realities of the dangers of false consciousness delusions than when middle class conservatives carry the water for the uber wealthy.
Nothing quite relays the realities of the dangers of false consciousness delusions than when socialists have to change the subject, demagogue and otherwise falsely characterize those who have caught them bastardizing the language.
 
Peachy, you miss the point. The BOLO on the code words is not a matter of literal interpretation.

It is just a heads up about the distortion of language as a tool of the rhetoric employed by the Marxists and socialists and modern American "liberals" under any name they may try to conceal themselves behind.

In the lexicon of the present day Marxist wannabes, they beat you over the head about the alleged "NEED" for "going green," when what they are really doing is trying to re-arrange the economy along their preferred lines.
You must know them all. Conservatives may choose to believe policies they do not agree with are MARXIST, but that does not make them such. Likewise I see FASCIST (not on this board much, as most posters are conservative to very conservative.) tossed out to describe conservative positions. I despise Rick Scott's policies but do not refer to him as a FASCIST.

Accurately identifying a socialist/Marxist is just accurate identification.

If YOU happen to have the capacity NOT to falsely label a conservative as a "fascist" that too is merely being honest and accurate.

So, if you think you were making a point, you were wrong.
So in the tiny brain cells of SOME conservatives a MARXIST can be identified by one belief? The MARXISTS all meet at night when you are asleep and devise code words.......sure...............and I am not green, but am hoping to learn to create less environmental waste. As ______ used to write, "I am a 19th century liberal". Guess the conservative.
 
Peachy, you miss the point. The BOLO on the code words is not a matter of literal interpretation.

It is just a heads up about the distortion of language as a tool of the rhetoric employed by the Marxists and socialists and modern American "liberals" under any name they may try to conceal themselves behind.

In the lexicon of the present day Marxist wannabes, they beat you over the head about the alleged "NEED" for "going green," when what they are really doing is trying to re-arrange the economy along their preferred lines.
You must know them all. Conservatives may choose to believe policies they do not agree with are MARXIST, but that does not make them such. Likewise I see FASCIST (not on this board much, as most posters are conservative to very conservative.) tossed out to describe conservative positions. I despise Rick Scott's policies but do not refer to him as a FASCIST.

Accurately identifying a socialist/Marxist is just accurate identification.

If YOU happen to have the capacity NOT to falsely label a conservative as a "fascist" that too is merely being honest and accurate.

So, if you think you were making a point, you were wrong.
The last thing Liberals want is truth in advertising and accuracy in labeling. Of course, conservatives demand it even upon themselves.
 
BOLO for the following Marxist words and phrases:

Income inequality
Workers Rights
Deregulation
1%
Redistribution
Fairness

Nothing quite relays the realities of the dangers of false consciousness delusions than when middle class conservatives carry the water for the uber wealthy.
Nothing quite relays the realities of the dangers of false consciousness delusions than when socialists have to change the subject, demagogue and otherwise falsely characterize those who have caught them bastardizing the language.
ODD, now FAIRNESS & DEREGULATION are "Marxist" words also? Restricting the entire standard american usage language will be a tough task. ;)
 
BOLO for the following Marxist words and phrases:

Income inequality
Workers Rights
Deregulation
1%
Redistribution
Fairness

Nothing quite relays the realities of the dangers of false consciousness delusions than when middle class conservatives carry the water for the uber wealthy.

Sure, the left think that the top 1% of taxpayers paying 40% of taxes is too high and all Americans should have skin in the game for funding. That we don't is a clear cause of our out of control spending. Which is "carrying the water for the uber wealthy." That we don't want to target the wealthy makes us their water carriers. Grow a pair, my man, and learn to take personal responsibility. On that day, you will stop being a Democrat.
 
You must know them all. Conservatives may choose to believe policies they do not agree with are MARXIST, but that does not make them such. Likewise I see FASCIST (not on this board much, as most posters are conservative to very conservative.) tossed out to describe conservative positions. I despise Rick Scott's policies but do not refer to him as a FASCIST.

Accurately identifying a socialist/Marxist is just accurate identification.

If YOU happen to have the capacity NOT to falsely label a conservative as a "fascist" that too is merely being honest and accurate.

So, if you think you were making a point, you were wrong.
So in the tiny brain cells of SOME conservatives a MARXIST can be identified by one belief? The MARXISTS all meet at night when you are asleep and devise code words.......sure...............and I am not green, but am hoping to learn to create less environmental waste. As ______ used to write, "I am a 19th century liberal". Guess the conservative.


Do you imagine that one's beliefs don't inform others as to whether or not he or she is a "Marxist?"

What is it that makes that label appropriate in your large brain cells?

Is it a specific set of required actions?

Or is there a tattoo required or a semi-secret handshake?

OF COURSE I can ascertain if someone is a MARXIST based on his beliefs. I can also ascertain if someone is a mere quasi-marxist or a socialist or a modern American "liberal" on the same basis.

It's not even difficult (except for some overlaps and things like that).
 
You must know them all. Conservatives may choose to believe policies they do not agree with are MARXIST, but that does not make them such. Likewise I see FASCIST (not on this board much, as most posters are conservative to very conservative.) tossed out to describe conservative positions. I despise Rick Scott's policies but do not refer to him as a FASCIST.

Accurately identifying a socialist/Marxist is just accurate identification.

If YOU happen to have the capacity NOT to falsely label a conservative as a "fascist" that too is merely being honest and accurate.

So, if you think you were making a point, you were wrong.
The last thing Liberals want is truth in advertising and accuracy in labeling. Of course, conservatives demand it even upon themselves.
The last thing Liberals want is truth in advertising and accuracy in labeling. Of course, conservatives demand it even upon themselves.
__________________
So ALL conservatives demand it OF themselves? Tell that to Romney, Santorum, Newt, and Paul. They attack each other daily on the issue of "WHO IS THE MOST CONSERVATIVE". And call each other dishonest often also.
 

Forum List

Back
Top