Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I grow weary of these bedwetters. First they were afraid of Cuba, then Iraq, then North Korea, then Iran, and now Russia. There's no end to their fears and their fear-mongering. Please boys, grow up, huh?
It's dangerous world and in the end we are all dead. Just deal with it. If the pattern holds, Russia will be old news by the time Limbaugh finds something else that keeps him awake at night.
The Iraq liberation Act Clinton signed did not call for US troops to invade and occupy Iraq.
it certainly did leave the possibility open
did it forbid it?
It didn't forbid you pulling your head out of your ass but you apparently haven't done that.
There was one Commander-in-Chief who gave the order to invade Iraq. The fact that the chicken-hawk supporters who backed the invasion are now trying to blame it on Democrats shows that they now get it that it was a pure dip-shit move.
Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton saw President Obamas speech in Brussels today as deeply concerning for the United States and a grave insight into how Obama views international relations.
Bolton, speaking directly after the speech on Fox News, was flummoxed that President Obamas chief concern appeared to be that Russian President Vladimir Putin violated international law by invading Ukraine.
Absent, Bolton noted, was any mention of Russias imperialist motivations or the need to implement further deterrents against Putin.
Theres nothing in the speech about understanding force and power and international affairs the way the Russians do and how they proceeded, nor anything about deterrents or dissuasion. It was almost entirely about international norms, international law, the United Nations, none of which have done a thing to stop Russians in Ukraine.
Additionally, Bolton ripped President Obama for suggesting U.S. interests in Ukraine are minimal considering the former Soviet states geopolitical significance.
Bolton: Obama Is Living In a World of Words, Putin Is Living In a World of Power | Washington Free Beacon
Great post.
Thanks for helping put that asshole joke of a President's performance into the right perspective!
Bolton was appointed by George W Bush. I guess that makes him an expert on "joke presidents". However, it isn't really funny because George W Bush's chicken-hawk ignorance resulted in thousands of dead Americans.
Your Op lacks any sort of journalistic integrity. Simply calling him "Form UN Ambassador" ignores the fact that he is a spokes-mouth for right wing idiots. Earlier this year he was badmouthing Obama at CPAC, a gathering of Right Wing ideologues.
John Bolton CPAC Speech Lambasts Obama
"Our biggest national security crisis is Barack Obama," said Bolton, who served under President George W. Bush.
He criticized the Obama administration's handling of Benghazi.
He was appointed by and supported George W Bush but now wants to talk about Obama. No president in history has had a worse foreign policy than George W Bush.
You are a joke.
The only thing you have against Bolton is that he's a Right person.
What we and Bolton have against Obozo are a long list of actual fuck ups and abuses against America and Americans.
When we have a Conservative POTUS it is imbeciles like you who are going to jump on him for no good reason.
In your mind TIT-4-TAT is a valid reason.
You are a reckless un-thinking, immature, ignorant fuck.
The thing people have against Bolton is that he's batshit crazy. We'd be bombing half the world if he was in charge.
Whether Russia or Iran, the best way to contain them is not with military intervention, but with the development of renewable energy sources.
What bothered me about Obama's speech, was his attempt to justify the invasion of Iraq. Even when Obama defends con stupidity, they criticize instead.
So have any of you geniuses come up with a plan that is better than what the President is doing?
What's your plan to drive the Russians out of the Crimea?
Be specific.
The Iraq liberation Act Clinton signed did not call for US troops to invade and occupy Iraq.
it certainly did leave the possibility open
did it forbid it?
It didn't forbid you pulling your head out of your ass but you apparently haven't done that.
There was one Commander-in-Chief who gave the order to invade Iraq. The fact that the chicken-hawk supporters who backed the invasion are now trying to blame it on Democrats shows that they now get it that it was a pure dip-shit move.
The best part of what Bolton said is what he didn't say...
...nothing of substance as to what policy would be better than what the administration is doing.
Bolton wasn't offering criticism. He was just doing what everyone on the right has been doing over the Ukraine situation,
taking cheap meaningless shots at the President.
ODS.
I grow weary of these bedwetters. First they were afraid of Cuba, then Iraq, then North Korea, then Iran, and now Russia. There's no end to their fears and their fear-mongering. Please boys, grow up, huh?
It's dangerous world and in the end we are all dead. Just deal with it. If the pattern holds, Russia will be old news by the time Limbaugh finds something else that keeps him awake at night.
Is there anyone here crazy enough to think that there is a viable military option against Russia?
The Iraq liberation Act Clinton signed did not call for US troops to invade and occupy Iraq.
it certainly did leave the possibility open
did it forbid it?
It didn't forbid you pulling your head out of your ass but you apparently haven't done that.
There was one Commander-in-Chief who gave the order to invade Iraq. The fact that the chicken-hawk supporters who backed the invasion are now trying to blame it on Democrats shows that they now get it that it was a pure dip-shit move.
How would we win a ground war in eastern Europe against the Russians?
i see....just tell the Ukrainians to passively lie down and let Russia roll over them....
because according to BO physically fighting for one's freedom is just so 'last century'....?
The Ukrainians should be prepared to defend themselves. They did kick out the pro Russian President.
I think our President was pretty clear in that the Ukraine is not part of NATO and that a similar attack on a NATO ally would, without question, bring about a military response.
Then what's the point of this discussion, or any other discussion about Obama's terrible policies?
What do Republicans propose to do about Russia? Come up with some ideas besides repeating, "Obama's weak!" What is the GOP plan for dealing with Russia? What is the GOP plan for fixing Obamacare? What is the GOP plan for ending the drug war? What is the GOP plan for creating jobs?
Does the GOP have any plan other than trying to make Obama a one-term President?
Your Op lacks any sort of journalistic integrity. Simply calling him "Form UN Ambassador" ignores the fact that he is a spokes-mouth for right wing idiots. Earlier this year he was badmouthing Obama at CPAC, a gathering of Right Wing ideologues.
John Bolton CPAC Speech Lambasts Obama
"Our biggest national security crisis is Barack Obama," said Bolton, who served under President George W. Bush.
He criticized the Obama administration's handling of Benghazi.
He was appointed by and supported George W Bush but now wants to talk about Obama. No president in history has had a worse foreign policy than George W Bush.
You are a joke.
The only thing you have against Bolton is that he's a Right person.What we and Bolton have against Obozo are a long list of actual fuck ups and abuses against America and Americans.
When we have a Conservative POTUS it is imbeciles like you who are going to jump on him for no good reason.
In your mind TIT-4-TAT is a valid reason.
You are a reckless un-thinking, immature, ignorant fuck.
You need to slow down and focus on comprehending what is presented before starting with the overly emotional personal attacks. I simply pointed out that Bolton was part of the chicken-hawk George W Bush administration and the hunt for "WMD's" in Iraq. Bolton, like all other right wing ideologues, has been criticizing Obama from day one. It isn't a "news flash" when he goes on Fox and says something critical of the current Commander-in-Chief. Right now the true Americans stand united. The Russian government, Al-Qaida, the Taliban, right wing ideologues, and all others who do not put America first, are in a state of constant criticism when it comes to our current Commander-in-Chief. There is nothing new about that. There is nothing "conservative" about trying to publicly undermine the president on a daily basis. That is the problem with the right wing ideologues; they are ideologues. All pure ideologues put their cause above everything else. In this case, the right wing ideologues are putting their phony brand of "conservatism" over patriotism. Fuck anybody who wants to undermine our country. True Americans put America first.
Sure, we have such a good chance of winning a war, in Russia. What's that Adolf, we should maybe reconsider? Nah, you fuckin' pussy.Is there anyone here crazy enough to think that there is a viable military option against Russia?
not with BO in charge....
as the Russians continue to build up along the Ukraine border.....Obama sends MREs....not arms, comm support, etc....
Sure, we have such a good chance of winning a war, in Russia. What's that Adolf, we should maybe reconsider? Nah, you fuckin' pussy.
you're about as stupid as the stinking BO....
How would we win a ground war in eastern Europe against the Russians?
Sure, we have such a good chance of winning a war, in Russia. What's that Adolf, we should maybe reconsider? Nah, you fuckin' pussy.
you're about as stupid as the stinking BO....
How would we win a ground war in eastern Europe against the Russians?
How would we win a ground war in eastern Europe against the Russians?
i see....just tell the Ukrainians to passively lie down and let Russia roll over them....
because according to BO physically fighting for one's freedom is just so 'last century'....?
The Ukrainians should be prepared to defend themselves. They did kick out the pro Russian President.
I think our President was pretty clear in that the Ukraine is not part of NATO and that a similar attack on a NATO ally would, without question, bring about a military response.
