Bragg’s Pursuit of Trump Violates the Sixth Amendment

yep, he said another crime that he didn't say what it was and implied it was a future crime.

The underlying crime was clearly the case involving Cohen which is in the Statement of Facts.

A word search of the indictment returns zero occurrences of the word "future".

WW
 
The underlying crime was clearly the case involving Cohen which is in the Statement of Facts.

A word search of the indictment returns zero occurrences of the word "future".

WW
hahahahahha

what statement of fact did cohen give??
and what is cohen in jail for??
thats right he is in jail for lying,,
 
All I can do is repeat, the previous post because you are taking text out of context. In context they clearly refer to a time frame. The "other crime" is not in the indictment because the FDOTUS isn't being charged with that crime, the crime the FDOTUS is being charged with is aiding or concealing a crime committed by another. That information is in the Statement of Facts.

The phrase "Intent to commit" shows up 34 times in the Indictment submitted to the court. In each case they are in structure of one of the 34 charges.

The structure is along these lines: "The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoice from Michael Cohen dated February 14, 2017, marked as a record of the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization."

Notice that in each usage of "intent to commit" the context is in reference to a date in the past and the intent to commit the crime at that point in time.

Glad to help in understanding the context of what was actually written.

WW
The underlying “defrauding” crime of which Trump is being charged, and which he committed on Feb 17 after he won the election, was what exactly? Trying to keep the affair hidden? That’s what the NDA was for - perfectly legal.
 
Not sure off the top of my head. But it I'm pretty sure it was within the 10 year New York Statute of Limitations (as tolled).

WW
But not when he handed out money. And the indictment didn't include the crime that makes the over statued misdemeanor a felony. Still nothing.
 
Bragg has charged Trump with falsifying business records (a misdemeanor past the statute of limitations) and the “intent to commit a future more serious crime” (the unarmed felony).

Trump has a right to know what this unnamed future crime he intends to commit is. Otherwise, the Democrats could arrest me, and every Trump voter, on the grounds that we intend to commit a felony in the future.

The case against Trump is unconstitutional and should be tossed. Bragg should be disbarred for using the power of his office, along with his personal hate for a citizen, to violate that citizen’s Sixth Amendment Rights. And Biden should be insisting on that, instead of that evil smile when asked about it.

You put the words "intent to commit a future more serious crime" in quotations....as if you pulled it from someone's (Bragg's?)actual quote.

Can you please provide a credible link to this quote?

If not then the OP is just more bullshit TWS.

Meanwhile though here is a link to the actual charges. Maybe you can actually read them so that this armchair trailer-park constitutional scholar thing you're doing might at least seem credible.

 
The money was handed out in 2017, Cohen took the illegal actions in 2016. A 10 year SOL for a tolled felony would take it out to 2026.

We are not outside the SOL.

WW
nope, if that were the case it would have been discussed in the presser that way. you've got bubkis.
 

Forum List

Back
Top