Challenge to my liberal friends

[Mikeoxenormous]

lol, so if Trump gets busted for obstruction of justice,

you people are saying that he will have obstructed an investigation into crimes he never committed?

that would be awesome!

There was no crime in having oral sex with a 24 year old either, but Clinton was nailed for lying about it under oath.

Ummm... yeah... having consensual sex with another adult is not a crime, PERJURY on the other hand is.

absolutely, it is a form of obstruction of justice....via lying and can send investigators on a wild goose chase....

but you missed my point completely....

Obstruction of Justice, does not have to have an underlying crime, nor does perjury...

So if Mooler showed up at your door, and accused you of obstructing justice, your sorry ass would go to jail?

And where do you live again?

Ringtone, hello Mueller, I know this person who is obstructing justice, you need to get there quick...

What you are saying is exactly the way Adolf Hitler did against those that opposed him. The TRUE fascists are showing their colors again, and it a very liberal color. Once a Nazi , always a Nazi.

Remember kiddies if a liberal accuses you of being something bad, you can bet it is the liberal who is bad.

 

[Marion Morrison]

lol, so if Trump gets busted for obstruction of justice,

you people are saying that he will have obstructed an investigation into crimes he never committed?

that would be awesome!

There was no crime in having oral sex with a 24 year old either, but Clinton was nailed for lying about it under oath.

Except that William Jefferson Clinton, abused his power by poking a young intern in the parts that bleed with a Cuban Cigar, and getting the Lewinski in the Oval Orifice, during office hours. We now know that Harvey Weinstein, a bleeding heart liberal who LOVES women did the same thing, and he had to resign because of it. But hey Clinton got 5 years probation from practicing law, was admired by the liberal women(who are stupid as hell) his wife the enabler, almost achieved the white house and Bill is pissed that he cant get more interns for 4 more years...

Monica Lewinsky went after and chased Bill Clinton, that was testimony under oath by her back stabbing so called friend, that was wired by Starr before meeting with Monica.

and regardless, NO it was not a crime to have sex with her...but the lying about it under oath, was the stand alone crime......

and the same with Trump, whether there was an underlying crime or not, if he obstructed an official investigation, with or without a crime committed, it is still a crime for the obstruction.

So you're saying the taxpayers should pay for two worthless sham investigations?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

lol, so if Trump gets busted for obstruction of justice,

you people are saying that he will have obstructed an investigation into crimes he never committed?

that would be awesome!

There was no crime in having oral sex with a 24 year old either, but Clinton was nailed for lying about it under oath.

Except that William Jefferson Clinton, abused his power by poking a young intern in the parts that bleed with a Cuban Cigar, and getting the Lewinski in the Oval Orifice, during office hours. We now know that Harvey Weinstein, a bleeding heart liberal who LOVES women did the same thing, and he had to resign because of it. But hey Clinton got 5 years probation from practicing law, was admired by the liberal women(who are stupid as hell) his wife the enabler, almost achieved the white house and Bill is pissed that he cant get more interns for 4 more years...

Monica Lewinsky went after and chased Bill Clinton, that was testimony under oath by her back stabbing so called friend, that was wired by Starr before meeting with Monica.

and regardless, NO it was not a crime to have sex with her...but the lying about it under oath, was the stand alone crime......

and the same with Trump, whether there was an underlying crime or not, if he obstructed an official investigation, with or without a crime committed, it is still a crime for the obstruction.

How many of those women Chased Harvey Weinstein so they could get a bit part in his sicko movies? Same fucking thing, but liberal women are just typical hypocrites and stupid to boot...

 

[Wry Catcher]

Here is the challenge:

There has been so much talk about how the Trump campaign "colluded" with Russia but almost no talk of exactly "how" did the team "collude". Explain your theory about how the Trump team specifically and tangibly "colluded" with Russia to influence the election?

Seriously? This is no challenge, the evidence is clear. Members of the Trump Team met with Russians. The same members lied about the meetings and attempted to mislead the public and LE on the purpose/agenda of said meetings.

Point: Those issues are not necessarily criminal acts. However, the lack of transparency is suspicious, and the lies to LE are criminal acts.

See: OSBA | What You Should Know about Obstruction of Justice

Any questions?

Yeah, exactly what is your prediction of what will happen as a result of the findings?

Who has gone to jail as a result of the Mueller investigation?

Dumbest question of the month: "Who has gone to jail as a result of the Mueller investigation?"

A. An investigation seeks evidence: Exculpable as well as culpable. The evidence is then weighed and a decision is made to indict or not.

If the investigation leads the prosecutor to conclude the defendant is culpable, a complaint will be filed and a preliminary hearing will be held. Or, a Grand Jury is impaneled.

In both, the trier of fact decides if there is reason to go to trial, if so, the matter will be set for other hearings. If the trier of fact is a judge, and the judge decides that the evidence is insufficient s/he can dismiss the complaint with or without prejudice.

However, if the Grand Jury decides the evidence does not agree on the culpability (by usually a super majority, 2/3 or 3/4 of the jurors) the prosecutor can still move forward on the investigation which would not be possible when/if the judge above dismissed the matter with prejudice.

 

[Wry Catcher]

lol, so if Trump gets busted for obstruction of justice,

you people are saying that he will have obstructed an investigation into crimes he never committed?

that would be awesome!

There was no crime in having oral sex with a 24 year old either, but Clinton was nailed for lying about it under oath.

Except that William Jefferson Clinton, abused his power by poking a young intern in the parts that bleed with a Cuban Cigar, and getting the Lewinski in the Oval Orifice, during office hours. We now know that Harvey Weinstein, a bleeding heart liberal who LOVES women did the same thing, and he had to resign because of it. But hey Clinton got 5 years probation from practicing law, was admired by the liberal women(who are stupid as hell) his wife the enabler, almost achieved the white house and Bill is pissed that he cant get more interns for 4 more years...

Monica Lewinsky went after and chased Bill Clinton, that was testimony under oath by her back stabbing so called friend, that was wired by Starr before meeting with Monica.

and regardless, NO it was not a crime to have sex with her...but the lying about it under oath, was the stand alone crime......

and the same with Trump, whether there was an underlying crime or not, if he obstructed an official investigation, with or without a crime committed, it is still a crime for the obstruction.

How many of those women Chased Harvey Weinstein so they could get a bit part in his sicko movies? Same fucking thing, but liberal women are just typical hypocrites and stupid to boot...

misogynist speaks ^^^, no one but other bigots listen.

 

[Alexanderful]

Here is the challenge:

There has been so much talk about how the Trump campaign "colluded" with Russia but almost no talk of exactly "how" did the team "collude". Explain your theory about how the Trump team specifically and tangibly "colluded" with Russia to influence the election?

Seriously? This is no challenge, the evidence is clear. Members of the Trump Team met with Russians. The same members lied about the meetings and attempted to mislead the public and LE on the purpose/agenda of said meetings.

Point: Those issues are not necessarily criminal acts. However, the lack of transparency is suspicious, and the lies to LE are criminal acts.

See: OSBA | What You Should Know about Obstruction of Justice

Any questions?

Here is the challenge:

There has been so much talk about how the Trump campaign "colluded" with Russia but almost no talk of exactly "how" did the team "collude". Explain your theory about how the Trump team specifically and tangibly "colluded" with Russia to influence the election?

Seriously? This is no challenge, the evidence is clear. Members of the Trump Team met with Russians. The same members lied about the meetings and attempted to mislead the public and LE on the purpose/agenda of said meetings.

Point: Those issues are not necessarily criminal acts. However, the lack of transparency is suspicious, and the lies to LE are criminal acts.

See: OSBA | What You Should Know about Obstruction of Justice

Any questions?

Yes, I understand. According to you no collusion occurred.

 

[NightFox]

lol, so if Trump gets busted for obstruction of justice,

you people are saying that he will have obstructed an investigation into crimes he never committed?

that would be awesome!

There was no crime in having oral sex with a 24 year old either, but Clinton was nailed for lying about it under oath.

Ummm... yeah... having consensual sex with another adult is not a crime, PERJURY on the other hand is.

absolutely, it is a form of obstruction of justice....via lying and can send investigators on a wild goose chase....

Perjury and Obstruction are two distinctly different things... using your example if Clinton had refused to answer the court order to respond to discovery then he may have been guilty of obstruction but since he chose to lie about it on a pre-trial discovery sworn affidavit he was guilty of perjury not obstruction, the (2) obstruction of justice charges Clinton was impeached on stemmed from his efforts to convince Lewinsky to cover up their relationship, the perjury charge he was impeached on stemmed from his lying under oath.


.

Obstruction of Justice, does not have to have an underlying crime, nor does perjury...

How the hell would a case of obstruction or perjury ever arise without either an accusation of a crime or a civil lawsuit being filed? Are you imagining we just perform investigations, perform pre-trial discovery and conduct trials just for the fun of it? I know our justice system is screwed up but it's not THAT BAD yet.

Using your example : Clinton wasn't being investigated for sex with Monica Lewinsky however his relationship with Monica Lewinsky was deemed material to what he was being investigated (sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Paula Jones), hence he was required to testify (via sworn affidavit during pre-trial discovery) and since he chose to lie under oath pursuant to the inquiry of a civil infraction was guilty of perjury and his efforts to convince Ms. Lewinsky to cover up their relationship made him guilty of obstruction of justice.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Here is the challenge:

There has been so much talk about how the Trump campaign "colluded" with Russia but almost no talk of exactly "how" did the team "collude". Explain your theory about how the Trump team specifically and tangibly "colluded" with Russia to influence the election?

Seriously? This is no challenge, the evidence is clear. Members of the Trump Team met with Russians. The same members lied about the meetings and attempted to mislead the public and LE on the purpose/agenda of said meetings.

Point: Those issues are not necessarily criminal acts. However, the lack of transparency is suspicious, and the lies to LE are criminal acts.

See: OSBA | What You Should Know about Obstruction of Justice

Any questions?

Yeah, exactly what is your prediction of what will happen as a result of the findings?

Who has gone to jail as a result of the Mueller investigation?

Dumbest question of the month: "Who has gone to jail as a result of the Mueller investigation?"

A. An investigation seeks evidence: Exculpable as well as culpable. The evidence is then weighed and a decision is made to indict or not.

If the investigation leads the prosecutor to conclude the defendant is culpable, a complaint will be filed and a preliminary hearing will be held. Or, a Grand Jury is impaneled.

In both, the trier of fact decides if there is reason to go to trial, if so, the matter will be set for other hearings. If the trier of fact is a judge, and the judge decides that the evidence is insufficient s/he can dismiss the complaint with or without prejudice.

However, if the Grand Jury decides the evidence does not agree on the culpability (by usually a super majority, 2/3 or 3/4 of the jurors) the prosecutor can still move forward on the investigation which would not be possible when/if the judge above dismissed the matter with prejudice.

Here's what a moron you are: It was a rhetorical question.


The answer is: Reality Winner. I'm sure you've all but forgotten about that. Guess what? Comey did the same thing. (Which will come to light in next couple weeks)

What you do in the dark will always come into the light.

NSA contractor faces 10-year sentence in first Espionage Act charge under Trump

How the Interrogation of Reality Winner Reveals the Deceptive Tactics of “Exceedingly Friendly” FBI Agents

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

lol, so if Trump gets busted for obstruction of justice,

you people are saying that he will have obstructed an investigation into crimes he never committed?

that would be awesome!

There was no crime in having oral sex with a 24 year old either, but Clinton was nailed for lying about it under oath.

Except that William Jefferson Clinton, abused his power by poking a young intern in the parts that bleed with a Cuban Cigar, and getting the Lewinski in the Oval Orifice, during office hours. We now know that Harvey Weinstein, a bleeding heart liberal who LOVES women did the same thing, and he had to resign because of it. But hey Clinton got 5 years probation from practicing law, was admired by the liberal women(who are stupid as hell) his wife the enabler, almost achieved the white house and Bill is pissed that he cant get more interns for 4 more years...

Monica Lewinsky went after and chased Bill Clinton, that was testimony under oath by her back stabbing so called friend, that was wired by Starr before meeting with Monica.

and regardless, NO it was not a crime to have sex with her...but the lying about it under oath, was the stand alone crime......

and the same with Trump, whether there was an underlying crime or not, if he obstructed an official investigation, with or without a crime committed, it is still a crime for the obstruction.

How many of those women Chased Harvey Weinstein so they could get a bit part in his sicko movies? Same fucking thing, but liberal women are just typical hypocrites and stupid to boot...

misogynist speaks ^^^, no one but other bigots listen.

Says thy guy whose party frequently abuses women with their war on women..

Again if a liberal is saying you are the bad guy, then you know it is the liberal doing it....Just cant get more funny than this. Time for more popcorn...

 

[Wry Catcher]

Mary, Mary always contrary, how does her nose grow?
Her nose it grows in leaps and bounds
as her lies impede the truth.

 

[Care4all]

lol, so if Trump gets busted for obstruction of justice,

you people are saying that he will have obstructed an investigation into crimes he never committed?

that would be awesome!

There was no crime in having oral sex with a 24 year old either, but Clinton was nailed for lying about it under oath.

Ummm... yeah... having consensual sex with another adult is not a crime, PERJURY on the other hand is.

absolutely, it is a form of obstruction of justice....via lying and can send investigators on a wild goose chase....

Perjury and Obstruction are two distinctly different things... using your example if Clinton had refused to answer the court order to respond to discovery then he may have been guilty of obstruction but since he chose to lie about it on a pre-trial discovery sworn affidavit he was guilty of perjury not obstruction, the (2) obstruction of justice charges Clinton was impeached on stemmed from his efforts to convince Lewinsky to cover up their relationship, the perjury charge he was impeached on stemmed from his lying under oath.


.

Obstruction of Justice, does not have to have an underlying crime, nor does perjury...

How the hell would a case of obstruction or perjury ever arise without either an accusation of a crime or a civil lawsuit being filed? Are you imagining we just perform investigations, perform pre-trial discovery and conduct trials just for the fun of it? I know our justice system is screwed up but it's not THAT BAD yet.

Using your example : Clinton wasn't being investigated for sex with Monica Lewinsky however his relationship with Monica Lewinsky was deemed material to what he was being investigated (sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Paula Jones), hence he was required to testify (via sworn affidavit during pre-trial discovery) and since he chose to lie under oath pursuant to the inquiry of a civil infraction was guilty of perjury and his efforts to convince Ms. Lewinsky to cover up their relationship made him guilty of obstruction of justice.

by interfering with an official investigation.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

lol, so if Trump gets busted for obstruction of justice,

you people are saying that he will have obstructed an investigation into crimes he never committed?

that would be awesome!

There was no crime in having oral sex with a 24 year old either, but Clinton was nailed for lying about it under oath.

Ummm... yeah... having consensual sex with another adult is not a crime, PERJURY on the other hand is.

absolutely, it is a form of obstruction of justice....via lying and can send investigators on a wild goose chase....

Perjury and Obstruction are two distinctly different things... using your example if Clinton had refused to answer the court order to respond to discovery then he may have been guilty of obstruction but since he chose to lie about it on a pre-trial discovery sworn affidavit he was guilty of perjury not obstruction, the (2) obstruction of justice charges Clinton was impeached on stemmed from his efforts to convince Lewinsky to cover up their relationship, the perjury charge he was impeached on stemmed from his lying under oath.


.

Obstruction of Justice, does not have to have an underlying crime, nor does perjury...

How the hell would a case of obstruction or perjury ever arise without either an accusation of a crime or a civil lawsuit being filed? Are you imagining we just perform investigations, perform pre-trial discovery and conduct trials just for the fun of it? I know our justice system is screwed up but it's not THAT BAD yet.

Using your example : Clinton wasn't being investigated for sex with Monica Lewinsky however his relationship with Monica Lewinsky was deemed material to what he was being investigated (sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Paula Jones), hence he was required to testify (via sworn affidavit during pre-trial discovery) and since he chose to lie under oath pursuant to the inquiry of a civil infraction was guilty of perjury and his efforts to convince Ms. Lewinsky to cover up their relationship made him guilty of obstruction of justice.

Are you imagining we just perform investigations, perform pre-trial discovery and conduct trials just for the fun of it?

With Hitlery and the left not getting their way.. Yes.. Not yes, but FUCK YES!!!!

When you liberals don't get your way, this shit happens. Moooler knows that if he comes up empty handed his ass is going to be handed to him, along with Comey, HItlery, Hummer, and many other of the worthless Democraps. The liberals like Sell out Schumer knows that their days are numbered when nothing is found out about President Trump, which is why Mooooler is in panic mode to try to gin up any charges at all...

 

[NightFox]

Obstruction of Justice, does not have to have an underlying crime, nor does perjury...

How the hell would a case of obstruction or perjury ever arise without either an accusation of a crime or a civil lawsuit being filed? Are you imagining we just perform investigations, perform pre-trial discovery and conduct trials just for the fun of it? I know our justice system is screwed up but it's not THAT BAD yet.
.

by interfering with an official investigation.

Official Investigation of WHAT?

 

[Marion Morrison]

Mary, Mary always contrary, how does her nose grow?
Her nose it grows in leaps and bounds
as her lies impede the truth.

ad hom, you lose!

Who has gone to jail as a result of the "collusion" probe again? Let's see if you've learned anything.

 

[Wry Catcher]

There was no crime in having oral sex with a 24 year old either, but Clinton was nailed for lying about it under oath.

Except that William Jefferson Clinton, abused his power by poking a young intern in the parts that bleed with a Cuban Cigar, and getting the Lewinski in the Oval Orifice, during office hours. We now know that Harvey Weinstein, a bleeding heart liberal who LOVES women did the same thing, and he had to resign because of it. But hey Clinton got 5 years probation from practicing law, was admired by the liberal women(who are stupid as hell) his wife the enabler, almost achieved the white house and Bill is pissed that he cant get more interns for 4 more years...

Monica Lewinsky went after and chased Bill Clinton, that was testimony under oath by her back stabbing so called friend, that was wired by Starr before meeting with Monica.

and regardless, NO it was not a crime to have sex with her...but the lying about it under oath, was the stand alone crime......

and the same with Trump, whether there was an underlying crime or not, if he obstructed an official investigation, with or without a crime committed, it is still a crime for the obstruction.

How many of those women Chased Harvey Weinstein so they could get a bit part in his sicko movies? Same fucking thing, but liberal women are just typical hypocrites and stupid to boot...

misogynist speaks ^^^, no one but other bigots listen.

Says thy guy whose party frequently abuses women with their war on women..

Again if a liberal is saying you are the bad guy, then you know it is the liberal doing it....Just cant get more funny than this. Time for more popcorn...

Hey dipshit, I ran my agencies domestic violence unit and liberals, conservatives, Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians and Independents - in fact every man no matter what color, race, creed or outward appearance came through our jail for abusing women.

The only Political Party to oppose the Equal Rights Amendment and the Lily Ledbetter Bill, and to try to repeal VAWA, is the Republican Party.

You're a damn liar!

 

[Care4all]

lol, so if Trump gets busted for obstruction of justice,

you people are saying that he will have obstructed an investigation into crimes he never committed?

that would be awesome!

There was no crime in having oral sex with a 24 year old either, but Clinton was nailed for lying about it under oath.

Ummm... yeah... having consensual sex with another adult is not a crime, PERJURY on the other hand is.

absolutely, it is a form of obstruction of justice....via lying and can send investigators on a wild goose chase....

Perjury and Obstruction are two distinctly different things... using your example if Clinton had refused to answer the court order to respond to discovery then he may have been guilty of obstruction but since he chose to lie about it on a pre-trial discovery sworn affidavit he was guilty of perjury not obstruction, the (2) obstruction of justice charges Clinton was impeached on stemmed from his efforts to convince Lewinsky to cover up their relationship, the perjury charge he was impeached on stemmed from his lying under oath.


.

Obstruction of Justice, does not have to have an underlying crime, nor does perjury...

How the hell would a case of obstruction or perjury ever arise without either an accusation of a crime or a civil lawsuit being filed? Are you imagining we just perform investigations, perform pre-trial discovery and conduct trials just for the fun of it? I know our justice system is screwed up but it's not THAT BAD yet.

Using your example : Clinton wasn't being investigated for sex with Monica Lewinsky however his relationship with Monica Lewinsky was deemed material to what he was being investigated (sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Paula Jones), hence he was required to testify (via sworn affidavit during pre-trial discovery) and since he chose to lie under oath pursuant to the inquiry of a civil infraction was guilty of perjury and his efforts to convince Ms. Lewinsky to cover up their relationship made him guilty of obstruction of justice.

The elements for a federal obstruction of justice conviction are based on the specific part of the federal code that criminalizes behavior. For example, the elements for influencing or injuring an officer or juror include that there was a pending federal case, the defendant was aware of the proceeding and the defendant had the corrupt intent to interfere with the proceeding or did attempt to interfere with the proceeding. An attempt to obstruct is sufficient to justify a charge of this nature.

 

[NightFox]

lol, so if Trump gets busted for obstruction of justice,

you people are saying that he will have obstructed an investigation into crimes he never committed?

that would be awesome!

There was no crime in having oral sex with a 24 year old either, but Clinton was nailed for lying about it under oath.

Ummm... yeah... having consensual sex with another adult is not a crime, PERJURY on the other hand is.

absolutely, it is a form of obstruction of justice....via lying and can send investigators on a wild goose chase....

Perjury and Obstruction are two distinctly different things... using your example if Clinton had refused to answer the court order to respond to discovery then he may have been guilty of obstruction but since he chose to lie about it on a pre-trial discovery sworn affidavit he was guilty of perjury not obstruction, the (2) obstruction of justice charges Clinton was impeached on stemmed from his efforts to convince Lewinsky to cover up their relationship, the perjury charge he was impeached on stemmed from his lying under oath.


.

Obstruction of Justice, does not have to have an underlying crime, nor does perjury...

How the hell would a case of obstruction or perjury ever arise without either an accusation of a crime or a civil lawsuit being filed? Are you imagining we just perform investigations, perform pre-trial discovery and conduct trials just for the fun of it? I know our justice system is screwed up but it's not THAT BAD yet.

Using your example : Clinton wasn't being investigated for sex with Monica Lewinsky however his relationship with Monica Lewinsky was deemed material to what he was being investigated (sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Paula Jones), hence he was required to testify (via sworn affidavit during pre-trial discovery) and since he chose to lie under oath pursuant to the inquiry of a civil infraction was guilty of perjury and his efforts to convince Ms. Lewinsky to cover up their relationship made him guilty of obstruction of justice.

The elements for a federal obstruction of justice conviction are based on the specific part of the federal code that criminalizes behavior. For example, the elements for influencing or injuring an officer or juror include that there was a pending federal case, the defendant was aware of the proceeding and the defendant had the corrupt intent to interfere with the proceeding or did attempt to interfere with the proceeding. An attempt to obstruct is sufficient to justify a charge of this nature.

Uh-huh and your point is?

 

[ph3iron]

Here is the challenge:

There has been so much talk about how the Trump campaign "colluded" with Russia but almost no talk of exactly "how" did the team "collude". Explain your theory about how the Trump team specifically and tangibly "colluded" with Russia to influence the election?

Might help if you knew the def of liberal. For the individual and small gov.
No Latin in college?
No college?
So you want the uneducated old white forum farts to pontificate more?
Think they know more than Mueller and his team?
You do know collusion is not a crime?. That's why the C grabber always mentions collusion and never mentions obstruction or money laundering.
Which are federal crimes

 

[buckeye45_73]

Talking about criminal activity and misleading the public, the Lame Stream Media not only lied about President Trump but lied to you shithole liberals, that Hitlery was going to win by a landslide. Why aren't you going after lame stream media for colluding against you? Because stupid is as stupid votes, and they vote Democrat..

LOL Nice rant. Do you have a question on the issue of Obstruction of Justice? Did you read the link? If so (and I suspect you didn't) did you understand it?

You still haven't told us what happened, they had meetings, Flynn lied for some reason....that's it... Manafort stuff has nothing to do with Russian Collusion.....so give us a high level look at what you think happened?

• Russia attacked democracy in America
• Russians' met with Team Trump
• Trump has not ever defended our election from what is known about the Russian attack on our democracy. Period: No crime, no time.

However:

• There are two concurrent investigations

1. Russia's impact on our Election
2. Trump&Co. efforts to obstruct #1

Does this help refine the issues?

Here's a fact: Obama was president when the "Russians attacked democracy in America", Trump wasn't.

What did Obama do about it?

He enacted sanctions that Trump lifted. Thanks for asking.

You mean after the gift Obama gave Russia by not enacting the Missile shield in Ukraine and elsewhere in Europe?

and the Ukraine is giving N Korea tech?

North Korea’s Missile Success Is Linked to Ukrainian Plant, Investigators Say


And wasn't Trump adding sanctions to Russia?

Trump administration reveals new list of potential Russia sanctions

What sanctions did he remove?
and I'll ask again,

where is the evidence of collusion?

 

[ph3iron]

Here is the challenge:

There has been so much talk about how the Trump campaign "colluded" with Russia but almost no talk of exactly "how" did the team "collude". Explain your theory about how the Trump team specifically and tangibly "colluded" with Russia to influence the election?

Seriously? This is no challenge, the evidence is clear. Members of the Trump Team met with Russians. The same members lied about the meetings and attempted to mislead the public and LE on the purpose/agenda of said meetings.

Point: Those issues are not necessarily criminal acts. However, the lack of transparency is suspicious, and the lies to LE are criminal acts.

See: OSBA | What You Should Know about Obstruction of Justice

Any questions?

Yeah, exactly what is your prediction of what will happen as a result of the findings?

Who has gone to jail as a result of the Mueller investigation?

Well they have pleaded guilty.
Be patient
And omg our john Wayne, the famous white nationalist and he like the C grabber evaded military duty.
John in WWII, the C grabber , Vietnam
Super guys