Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,099
If the report merely stated the facts instead of calling it a raid then I would not view this situation as a sensationalized piece of nonsense. The cops showed up did not have a warrant and left never to return.
Feel free to outline, in detail, what is necessary for something to be a raid by your definition. My guess is the problem here is not that this was not a raid, but that you haven't actually thought about the issue.
I have thought about the issues. According to the protocols for the Department of Children and Families services a home visit was required to investigate a situation. They did. There were firearms involved, therefore the police also investigated to the degree necessary according determine no further action was necessary. End of story. What came after is outrage because the agency charged with maintaining public safety did their job and the agency charged with "ensuring the safety, well-being and success of children, youth, families and communities" did their job.
The protocol required them to show up at 8PM on a Friday night with police in tow? Can you show me that, or am I just supposed to take their word for it because the government is so trustworthy?
Try assessing all the facts before you tell me you considered everything. There is nothing that points to immediate danger from a picture posed on Facebook.
Last edited: