CNBC Exposed As Biased 'Pooh-Throwing Monkeys'

[Redfish]

Riiight. All networks are biased, even Fox. What a bunch of pathetic whiners.

PM, with your massive intellect (and evidently your 3rd grade reading/comprehension level), please point out where in the following sentence I claim ALL NETWORKS are biased:

"The biggest 'revelations' from last night's debate are that extreme Liberal bias in the media is alive and well AND that CNBC's faux 'journalists' and last night's debate 'moderators' are little more than 'pooh-throwing monkeys'!"

Let me help you out, you 'pooh-flinging monkey'... NOWHERE in that sentence do I say ALL MEDIA is biased. (You should consider seeking employment with CNBC, my friend.)

Do you wish to pass laws that would criminalize bias in the media?

Would you be happy with a government controlled media? No? Well, we are very close to that today.

But remember, conservatives may control the government starting in 2016, if you like government control of the media, get ready.

a good journalist does not take sides, he/she merely reports the facts. We used to have that kind of media, today we don't.

 

[bedowin62]

How a Credit Union's Left-Wing Execs Got Uncle Sam to ...
freebeacon.com/.../how-a-credit-unions-left...

• Cached
• Similar

The Washington Free Beacon
Loading...
Jan 5, 2015 - Eakes, a left-wing housing policy leader who before the 2008 financial crisis described Self-Help as “one of the earliest subprime [mortgage] ...

 

[bedowin62]

MSNBC Silent on Rich-Bashing Hosts' Tax Problems
www.newsmax.com/US/msnbc-hosts...taxes/.../640206/

• Cached

Newsmax Media
Loading...
Apr 22, 2015 - Regressive taxation & tax-avoidance & union crushing & the .... Ol Snake Oil Sharpton is the poster child (in living color) for left wing hypocrisy

 

[bedowin62]

The biggest 'revelations' from last night's debate are that extreme Liberal bias in the media is alive and well AND that CNBC's faux 'journalists' and last night's debate 'moderators' are little more than 'pooh-throwing monkeys'!




(LINK: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...s-who-allowed-cnbc-moderate-debate-should-be_)


“CNBC could have saved themselves and the Republican Party a lot of money by hiring actual monkeys to fling their pooh at the candidates. This was a disgrace.”
- Erick Erickson of Red State

------------------

“CNBC's should be embarrassed for their pitiful display of partisan liberal media bias and apologize to the GOP candidates and the American people."
- Media Research Center President Brent Bozell.

------------------

"After 15 minutes it was clear that this was not a debate, but a verbal shooting gallery set up by CNBC, with the targets the Republican candidates and the shooters their biased antagonists from the press,” said Meese.

“Ted Cruz accurately described what was going on,” he said. “Whoever selected the ‘moderators’ should be FIRED and the RNC leaders who allowed it should be condemned.”

-------------------

The biggest reaction came from the audience after Ted Cruz 'skewered' CNBC 'moderator' Carl Quintanilla for his un-professional, inappropriate question and hammered the liberal media moderators for their, by comparison, 'love-fest' questioning of Hillary in debates.
-- Pollster Frank Luntz sent out a Tweet: “Ted Cruz's focus group dials hits 98 with his attack on media bias. That's the highest score we've ever measured. EVER.”

The focus group's reaction and that so MANY Americans as seen so far after this debate proves CNBC did nothing more than embarrass themselves, embarrass the profession of true journalism, and reveal that extreme liberal bias is alive and well in the media...and the American people (not the left wing partisans who saw nothing wrong with what happened last night) are fed up with it!


Way to go, CNBC! Here's to you, you 'pooh-flinging monkeys'!

Riiight. All networks are biased, even Fox. What a bunch of pathetic whiners.

t


thanks nutcase; did you just admit there is no reason for the Left to keep crying about Fox News?

hurry nutjob; obama needs to hear this!!!

 

[Uncensored2008]

ya but, today all their op eds will read how smart they are and what dumb sob's the candidates were. They'll mix a little grey in there to try and convince us their objective

Actually, even left leaning USA Today and Huffington are taking CNBC to task.

No doubt the NY Times will praise the unprofessional monkeys, but looks like even normally left media found MSNBC's act too much to take.

 

[rightwinger]

How will 3 pages explain the tax code?

'Flat' or 'Fair Tax' - EVERYONE pays, end the ridiculous hundreds of pages of loopholes, etc... it could easily be done. Tell me why THOUSANDS of pages are needed to explain / direct tax collecting? forget it - Gruber already explained it.

The biased IRS targeting that was proven - that Cummings, a Senator, was involved in, and which Lois Lerner herself admitted and apologized for when talking to the media - and the Obama administration's recent announcement that they will not prosecute anyone for it (or fire, reprimand, fine, or cut their pay) is a flaming red flag / sign of WHY the IRS needs to be reformed so that this agency can NEVER be used as a weapon against the citizens of this country again (which reportedly is STILL happening).

-----------

IRS Apologizes For Inappropriately Targeting Conservative Political Groups In 2012 Election
- LINK: IRS Apologizes For Inappropriate Action In 2012 Election

"The Internal Revenue Service apologized Friday for what it acknowledged was "inappropriate" targeting of conservative political groups during the 2012 election to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status.

IRS agents singled out dozens of organizations for additional reviews because they included the words "tea party" or "patriot" in their exemption applications, said Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt groups. In some cases, groups were asked for lists of donors, which violates IRS policy in most cases, she said."

-----------

IRS agent: Tax agency is still targeting Tea Party groups
- LINK: IRS agent: Tax agency is still targeting Tea Party groups
- Thurs, 29 Oct 2015

"In a remarkable admission that is likely to rock the Internal Revenue Service again, testimony released Thursday by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp reveals that an agent involved in reviewing tax exempt applications from conservative groups told a committee investigator that the agency is still targeting Tea Party groups."

Show me a single flat tax proposal that does not result in the wealthy paying less and the working poor paying more

Donald Trump for one. And Im not even a Trump supporter

Trumps proposal results in a one trillion dollar tax cut to the wealthy, with only hedge fund managers paying an additional two percent

 

[Vigilante]

• The Big Loser in Tuesday Night’s GOP Debate: The Media
  Canada Free Press ^ | 10/29/15 | Roger Aronoff
  Instead of cowering in fear of the media, it appears that a number of the GOP candidates are fighting back, and calling them out. It wasn’t the first time, but it felt like a turning point. It’s about time While the media focus on which of the candidates did well, and which didn’t, they overlooked the biggest loser of the night: the media. Whether intended or not, the difference in the questioning of the Democrats in their October 13 CNN debate versus the questioning of the Republicans in their three debates so far proved to be an issue that boiled...
• Happy-Warrior Cruz CRUSHED IT Last Night
  Reaganite Republican ^ | 10/29/2015
  First thing everybody's talking about is how Cruz put a snarky CNBC drone against the wall and schooled his punk ass. Pollster Frank Luntz claimed Cruz's lightning counter-attack on snotty, effeminate hack Carl Quintanilla (and MSM liberal bias in presidential primary debates in-general) scored a stunning 98%... 'That's the highest score we've ever measured. EVER'... Hannity remarked in his post-game wrap-up that Cruz's retort 'changed the trajectory of the entire debate'. Furthermore, Senator Cruz -despite suffering from an apparent dry throat- got through the CNBC smokescreen impressively well, getting more time and appearing sharper in illustrating his arguments than in...

The LEFT is COLLAPSING before their very face, as THE TRUTH willALWAYS find a way to COME TO THE TOP!

 

[tyroneweaver]

ya but, today all their op eds will read how smart they are and what dumb sob's the candidates were. They'll mix a little grey in there to try and convince us their objective

Izzatrite sploogy?

You truly are dumb as a post.

It wasn't your "post" I was referring too. But that's the great thing about the silly quote function at USMB......it drags everyone in.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Looks like Cruz was the trained monkey performing tricks for the Teatards

Looks like you're a drooling retard, flailing in a desperate attempt at damage control.

 

[Uncensored2008]

ya but, today all their op eds will read how smart they are and what dumb sob's the candidates were. They'll mix a little grey in there to try and convince us their objective

Izzatrite sploogy?

You truly are dumb as a post.

It wasn't your "post" I was referring too. But that's the great thing about the silly quote function at USMB......it drags everyone in.

Yeah, I apologize - I misread what you were saying.

 

[Vigilante]

How will 3 pages explain the tax code?

'Flat' or 'Fair Tax' - EVERYONE pays, end the ridiculous hundreds of pages of loopholes, etc... it could easily be done. Tell me why THOUSANDS of pages are needed to explain / direct tax collecting? forget it - Gruber already explained it.

The biased IRS targeting that was proven - that Cummings, a Senator, was involved in, and which Lois Lerner herself admitted and apologized for when talking to the media - and the Obama administration's recent announcement that they will not prosecute anyone for it (or fire, reprimand, fine, or cut their pay) is a flaming red flag / sign of WHY the IRS needs to be reformed so that this agency can NEVER be used as a weapon against the citizens of this country again (which reportedly is STILL happening).

-----------

IRS Apologizes For Inappropriately Targeting Conservative Political Groups In 2012 Election
- LINK: IRS Apologizes For Inappropriate Action In 2012 Election

"The Internal Revenue Service apologized Friday for what it acknowledged was "inappropriate" targeting of conservative political groups during the 2012 election to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status.

IRS agents singled out dozens of organizations for additional reviews because they included the words "tea party" or "patriot" in their exemption applications, said Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt groups. In some cases, groups were asked for lists of donors, which violates IRS policy in most cases, she said."

-----------

IRS agent: Tax agency is still targeting Tea Party groups
- LINK: IRS agent: Tax agency is still targeting Tea Party groups
- Thurs, 29 Oct 2015

"In a remarkable admission that is likely to rock the Internal Revenue Service again, testimony released Thursday by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp reveals that an agent involved in reviewing tax exempt applications from conservative groups told a committee investigator that the agency is still targeting Tea Party groups."

Show me a single flat tax proposal that does not result in the wealthy paying less and the working poor paying more

Donald Trump for one. And Im not even a Trump supporter

Trumps proposal results in a one trillion dollar tax cut to the wealthy, with only hedge fund managers paying an additional two percent

AND how many TRILLIONS to the MIDDLE CLASS.....

Scum, like you LIED about the Bush Tax cut,which aided the middle class way more than the rich, I would expect that BS worked for you, BUT people are more INFORMED today!

 

[rightwinger]

I loved Ted Cruz and his fake outrage

He is asked a question about his position on raising the debt limit.....a substantive question

He responds in outrage over how the moderators were not asking substantive questions....Rehearsed?

Hildabeasts trained pet monkeys, the media are easy to predict...

Looks like Cruz was the trained monkey performing tricks for the Teatards

are you really as stupid as you appear to be? or are you nothing but a dem/lib parrot? its one or the other because you clearly are not capable of rational thinking.

Sorry to pop your bubble

But Cruz is a trained monkey doing tricks for the Teatards who throw nickels in his cup

 

[tyroneweaver]

How will 3 pages explain the tax code?

'Flat' or 'Fair Tax' - EVERYONE pays, end the ridiculous hundreds of pages of loopholes, etc... it could easily be done. Tell me why THOUSANDS of pages are needed to explain / direct tax collecting? forget it - Gruber already explained it.

The biased IRS targeting that was proven - that Cummings, a Senator, was involved in, and which Lois Lerner herself admitted and apologized for when talking to the media - and the Obama administration's recent announcement that they will not prosecute anyone for it (or fire, reprimand, fine, or cut their pay) is a flaming red flag / sign of WHY the IRS needs to be reformed so that this agency can NEVER be used as a weapon against the citizens of this country again (which reportedly is STILL happening).

-----------

IRS Apologizes For Inappropriately Targeting Conservative Political Groups In 2012 Election
- LINK: IRS Apologizes For Inappropriate Action In 2012 Election

"The Internal Revenue Service apologized Friday for what it acknowledged was "inappropriate" targeting of conservative political groups during the 2012 election to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status.

IRS agents singled out dozens of organizations for additional reviews because they included the words "tea party" or "patriot" in their exemption applications, said Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt groups. In some cases, groups were asked for lists of donors, which violates IRS policy in most cases, she said."

-----------

IRS agent: Tax agency is still targeting Tea Party groups
- LINK: IRS agent: Tax agency is still targeting Tea Party groups
- Thurs, 29 Oct 2015

"In a remarkable admission that is likely to rock the Internal Revenue Service again, testimony released Thursday by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp reveals that an agent involved in reviewing tax exempt applications from conservative groups told a committee investigator that the agency is still targeting Tea Party groups."

Show me a single flat tax proposal that does not result in the wealthy paying less and the working poor paying more

Donald Trump for one. And Im not even a Trump supporter

Trumps proposal results in a one trillion dollar tax cut to the wealthy, with only hedge fund managers paying an additional two percent

But didn't Trump say it's his intention that the rich pay more

 

[bedowin62]

Looks like Cruz was the trained monkey performing tricks for the Teatards

Looks like you're a drooling retard, flailing in a desperate attempt at damage control.

yup leave it to a left-wing loser to declare victory even as he goes down the lion's throat!! lol

 

[NYcarbineer]

obama created a deficit commission

which of their reccomendations did he actually follow?????

try answering the question nutcase. is it too much to ask for you to think for yourself??

I misread your post.

The 2010 deficit commission concluded without a consensus.

The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (often called Simpson-Bowles/Bowles-Simpsonfrom the names of co-chairs Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles; or NCFRR) is a Presidential Commission created in 2010 by President Barack Obama to identify "policies to improve the fiscal situation in the medium term and to achieve fiscal sustainability over the long run".[1] The commission first met on April 27, 2010.[2] A report was released on December 1, 2010,[3] and although the Commission was supported by over 60% of the members (11 out of 18),[1] and an equal number of Democrats and Republicans, the report did not reach the 14-vote threshold required to formally endorse the blueprint and have it sent to Congress for approval.[4] Proponents of the plan praised it for hitting all parts of the federal budget and for putting the national debt on a stable and then downward path. Prominent supporters include JPMorgan Chase CEOJamie Dimon,[2] Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (although at first she opposed the proposal)[3] and Republican SenatorTom Coburn,[4] Democratic Representative Chris Van Hollen[5] has called for a deal based on the Simpson-Bowles framework. Critics say that it would cut entitlement and safety net programs, including Social Security and Medicare. Prominent opponents include Paul Krugman,[6] Republican Vice-Presidential nominee Paul Ryan,[7] President of the Americans for Tax Reform Grover Norquist[8] and Democratic Representative Jan Schakowsky[9]

 

[NYcarbineer]

How will 3 pages explain the tax code?

'Flat' or 'Fair Tax' - EVERYONE pays, end the ridiculous hundreds of pages of loopholes, etc... it could easily be done. Tell me why THOUSANDS of pages are needed to explain / direct tax collecting? forget it - Gruber already explained it.

The biased IRS targeting that was proven - that Cummings, a Senator, was involved in, and which Lois Lerner herself admitted and apologized for when talking to the media - and the Obama administration's recent announcement that they will not prosecute anyone for it (or fire, reprimand, fine, or cut their pay) is a flaming red flag / sign of WHY the IRS needs to be reformed so that this agency can NEVER be used as a weapon against the citizens of this country again (which reportedly is STILL happening).

-----------

IRS Apologizes For Inappropriately Targeting Conservative Political Groups In 2012 Election
- LINK: IRS Apologizes For Inappropriate Action In 2012 Election

"The Internal Revenue Service apologized Friday for what it acknowledged was "inappropriate" targeting of conservative political groups during the 2012 election to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status.

IRS agents singled out dozens of organizations for additional reviews because they included the words "tea party" or "patriot" in their exemption applications, said Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt groups. In some cases, groups were asked for lists of donors, which violates IRS policy in most cases, she said."

-----------

IRS agent: Tax agency is still targeting Tea Party groups
- LINK: IRS agent: Tax agency is still targeting Tea Party groups
- Thurs, 29 Oct 2015

"In a remarkable admission that is likely to rock the Internal Revenue Service again, testimony released Thursday by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp reveals that an agent involved in reviewing tax exempt applications from conservative groups told a committee investigator that the agency is still targeting Tea Party groups."

Show me a single flat tax proposal that does not result in the wealthy paying less and the working poor paying more

Donald Trump for one. And Im not even a Trump supporter

Trumps proposal results in a one trillion dollar tax cut to the wealthy, with only hedge fund managers paying an additional two percent

But didn't Trump say it's his intention that the rich pay more

Rich GOP politicians always pretend their plans will do that.

 

[bedowin62]

I loved Ted Cruz and his fake outrage

He is asked a question about his position on raising the debt limit.....a substantive question

He responds in outrage over how the moderators were not asking substantive questions....Rehearsed?

Hildabeasts trained pet monkeys, the media are easy to predict...

Looks like Cruz was the trained monkey performing tricks for the Teatards

are you really as stupid as you appear to be? or are you nothing but a dem/lib parrot? its one or the other because you clearly are not capable of rational thinking.

Sorry to pop your bubble

But Cruz is a trained monkey doing tricks for the Teatards who throw nickels in his cup

i expect nothing less than this moronic tripe from people who go around pretending every day that their precious progressives didnt make the richest richer and the poorest poorer on the Democrat's watch

 

[easyt65]

yup leave it to a left-wing loser to declare victory even as he goes down the lion's throat!! lol

What do you expect? Hillary got exposed as her having lied her ass off to the American people and the grieving families of those she allowed to die, and Libs ran screaming how Hillary had 'won'.

 

[bedowin62]

'Flat' or 'Fair Tax' - EVERYONE pays, end the ridiculous hundreds of pages of loopholes, etc... it could easily be done. Tell me why THOUSANDS of pages are needed to explain / direct tax collecting? forget it - Gruber already explained it.

The biased IRS targeting that was proven - that Cummings, a Senator, was involved in, and which Lois Lerner herself admitted and apologized for when talking to the media - and the Obama administration's recent announcement that they will not prosecute anyone for it (or fire, reprimand, fine, or cut their pay) is a flaming red flag / sign of WHY the IRS needs to be reformed so that this agency can NEVER be used as a weapon against the citizens of this country again (which reportedly is STILL happening).

-----------

IRS Apologizes For Inappropriately Targeting Conservative Political Groups In 2012 Election
- LINK: IRS Apologizes For Inappropriate Action In 2012 Election

"The Internal Revenue Service apologized Friday for what it acknowledged was "inappropriate" targeting of conservative political groups during the 2012 election to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status.

IRS agents singled out dozens of organizations for additional reviews because they included the words "tea party" or "patriot" in their exemption applications, said Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt groups. In some cases, groups were asked for lists of donors, which violates IRS policy in most cases, she said."

-----------

IRS agent: Tax agency is still targeting Tea Party groups
- LINK: IRS agent: Tax agency is still targeting Tea Party groups
- Thurs, 29 Oct 2015

"In a remarkable admission that is likely to rock the Internal Revenue Service again, testimony released Thursday by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp reveals that an agent involved in reviewing tax exempt applications from conservative groups told a committee investigator that the agency is still targeting Tea Party groups."

Show me a single flat tax proposal that does not result in the wealthy paying less and the working poor paying more

Donald Trump for one. And Im not even a Trump supporter

Trumps proposal results in a one trillion dollar tax cut to the wealthy, with only hedge fund managers paying an additional two percent

But didn't Trump say it's his intention that the rich pay more

Rich GOP politicians always pretend their plans will do that.

and the left pretends their policies are about "fairness"

when the rich get richer and the poor get poorer ON THE DEMOCRAT WATCH

libs run around pretending not to see or hear facts they dont like

 

[NYcarbineer]

Riiight. All networks are biased, even Fox. What a bunch of pathetic whiners.

PM, with your massive intellect (and evidently your 3rd grade reading/comprehension level), please point out where in the following sentence I claim ALL NETWORKS are biased:

"The biggest 'revelations' from last night's debate are that extreme Liberal bias in the media is alive and well AND that CNBC's faux 'journalists' and last night's debate 'moderators' are little more than 'pooh-throwing monkeys'!"

Let me help you out, you 'pooh-flinging monkey'... NOWHERE in that sentence do I say ALL MEDIA is biased. (You should consider seeking employment with CNBC, my friend.)

Do you wish to pass laws that would criminalize bias in the media?

Would you be happy with a government controlled media? No? Well, we are very close to that today.

But remember, conservatives may control the government starting in 2016, if you like government control of the media, get ready.

a good journalist does not take sides, he/she merely reports the facts. We used to have that kind of media, today we don't.

Journalism has always involved opinions.

When did we have opinion-free media?