Catsnmeters
Gold Member
- Sep 19, 2022
- 15,218
- 5,907
The opposite of the party that controlled the budget Trump's last two years.who?
Do the math.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
The opposite of the party that controlled the budget Trump's last two years.who?
huh? a budget needs to pass both chambers…for the last six years of rhe trump admin not one party has control of both chambersThe opposite of the party that controlled the budget Trump's last two years.
Do the math.
Oh. Ok. I guess jknowgood was incorrect then. It was Trump's budget all 4 years.huh? a budget needs to pass both chambers…for the last six years of rhe trump admin not one party has control of both chambers
try again
A. Republicans had everything for the first two years. And did NOT address debt. They increased it...a lothuh? a budget needs to pass both chambers…for the last six years of rhe trump admin not one party has control of both chambers
try again
A. The poster said last 6 years…but you are wrong in the first two they did. They passed the highly successful tax reform legislation that raised tax revenue....we are still enjoying that, with record revenue contining to pour in.A. Republicans had everything for the first two years. And did NOT address debt. They increased it...a lot
B. Trump signed off on all those budgets
And Quid Pro had a unified, friendly Congress for two years as well. They did NOTHING about the debt. In fact, the ONLY time Washington even TALKS about the debt is when Republicans control part of Congress and democrats occupy the White House, so they need to really work to get the job done while they can.A. Republicans had everything for the first two years. And did NOT address debt. They increased it...a lot
B. Trump signed off on all those budgets
Because they are at war with the working classThe House has done their duty to raise the debt limit. Why are the Senate and White House MIA?
When the deficits were way lower than Barry Hussein’s first two years?You forget who controlled the budget Obama's last 6 years.
I don't like agreeing with you. I really don't like really, really agreeing with you.Dock their pay till they do their jobs.
They want to drive the country off a cliff. They hate America.The House has done their duty to raise the debt limit. Why are the Senate and White House MIA?
Why were deficits so high the first two years?When the deficits were way lower than Barry Hussein’s first two years?
they weren’t they were lower then Barry’s and Xiden’sWhy were deficits so high the first two years?
No. I mean why were Obama's so high the first two years?they weren’t they were lower then Barry’s and Xiden’s
oh because he had a dem controlled congress for four yearsNo. I mean why were Obama's so high the first two years?
I thought it was two years?oh because he had a dem controlled congress for four years
nope, there was a dem congress for the two years prior to his election and the two his first two years.I thought it was two years?
So coming out of Bushe's recession had nothing to do with it?
Congress members don’t mind if you dock their pay. Most are wealthy enough to go without a paycheck.I don't like agreeing with you. I really don't like really, really agreeing with you.
I'm sure it won't last.![]()
ah not true. My Congressman isn’t wealthy..he’s not a dem that’s been getting rich off his office like xiden and nancyCongress members don’t mind if you dock their pay. Most are wealthy enough to go without a paycheck.
But stop paying their staff who live paycheck to paycheck and they will be impacted
Which of course raises the question, Why do they so often enter office moderately well off and leave decades later obscenely wealthy? It's not like their salaries are THAT large. It's a rhetorical question, of course, but it's not working the way the FF's wanted it to work.Congress members don’t mind if you dock their pay. Most are wealthy enough to go without a paycheck.
But stop paying their staff who live paycheck to paycheck and they will be impacted