Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmm doesn’t that mean with the right control policies, gun violence can be miminized? First world countries like Australia and in Western Europe have low death rates by guns per capita.
Republicans don't like questions. Questions can lead to thinking. They prefer to follow. Follow a crazy.Hmm doesn’t that mean with the right control policies, gun violence can be miminized? First world countries like Australia and in Western Europe have low death rates by guns per capita.
Most mass shooters are white GTFOHHmm doesn’t that mean with the right control policies, gun violence can be miminized? First world countries like Australia and in Western Europe have low death rates by guns per capita.
To answer your question, let me pose a scenario:
You have two areas: one is a nice upper-middle-class area, and the other is a crime ridden area with lots of drugs, murders, and robberies.
Make a law for both areas. In the crime area, no guns period. In the upper-middle-class area, every citizen must have a firearm in the house and on person.
So what changes would you expect in both areas after four or five years? None. Nothing will change. The lower class area will still be rife with crime and the upper area will still be peaceful and virtually crime-free.
We are a very diverse country, and sad to say, but some cultures are much more violent than others. You are six times more likely to be murdered in the US by a black person than a white.
In your comparison to us and other countries, you are only comparing gun regulations and not the people. That's why you're so confused. People kill people, not guns.
I hate to break it to you. But these days, the opioid epidemic is in the upper area where it's still peaceful and virtually crime-free, except for the drug deaths.Hmm doesn’t that mean with the right control policies, gun violence can be miminized? First world countries like Australia and in Western Europe have low death rates by guns per capita.
To answer your question, let me pose a scenario:
You have two areas: one is a nice upper-middle-class area, and the other is a crime ridden area with lots of drugs, murders, and robberies.
Make a law for both areas. In the crime area, no guns period. In the upper-middle-class area, every citizen must have a firearm in the house and on person.
So what changes would you expect in both areas after four or five years? None. Nothing will change. The lower class area will still be rife with crime and the upper area will still be peaceful and virtually crime-free.
We are a very diverse country, and sad to say, but some cultures are much more violent than others. You are six times more likely to be murdered in the US by a black person than a white.
In your comparison to us and other countries, you are only comparing gun regulations and not the people. That's why you're so confused. People kill people, not guns.
True:Most mass shooters are white GTFOHHmm doesn’t that mean with the right control policies, gun violence can be miminized? First world countries like Australia and in Western Europe have low death rates by guns per capita.
To answer your question, let me pose a scenario:
You have two areas: one is a nice upper-middle-class area, and the other is a crime ridden area with lots of drugs, murders, and robberies.
Make a law for both areas. In the crime area, no guns period. In the upper-middle-class area, every citizen must have a firearm in the house and on person.
So what changes would you expect in both areas after four or five years? None. Nothing will change. The lower class area will still be rife with crime and the upper area will still be peaceful and virtually crime-free.
We are a very diverse country, and sad to say, but some cultures are much more violent than others. You are six times more likely to be murdered in the US by a black person than a white.
In your comparison to us and other countries, you are only comparing gun regulations and not the people. That's why you're so confused. People kill people, not guns.
Most mass shooters are white GTFOHHmm doesn’t that mean with the right control policies, gun violence can be miminized? First world countries like Australia and in Western Europe have low death rates by guns per capita.
To answer your question, let me pose a scenario:
You have two areas: one is a nice upper-middle-class area, and the other is a crime ridden area with lots of drugs, murders, and robberies.
Make a law for both areas. In the crime area, no guns period. In the upper-middle-class area, every citizen must have a firearm in the house and on person.
So what changes would you expect in both areas after four or five years? None. Nothing will change. The lower class area will still be rife with crime and the upper area will still be peaceful and virtually crime-free.
We are a very diverse country, and sad to say, but some cultures are much more violent than others. You are six times more likely to be murdered in the US by a black person than a white.
In your comparison to us and other countries, you are only comparing gun regulations and not the people. That's why you're so confused. People kill people, not guns.
I hate to break it to you. But these days, the opioid epidemic is in the upper area where it's still peaceful and virtually crime-free, except for the drug deaths.Hmm doesn’t that mean with the right control policies, gun violence can be miminized? First world countries like Australia and in Western Europe have low death rates by guns per capita.
To answer your question, let me pose a scenario:
You have two areas: one is a nice upper-middle-class area, and the other is a crime ridden area with lots of drugs, murders, and robberies.
Make a law for both areas. In the crime area, no guns period. In the upper-middle-class area, every citizen must have a firearm in the house and on person.
So what changes would you expect in both areas after four or five years? None. Nothing will change. The lower class area will still be rife with crime and the upper area will still be peaceful and virtually crime-free.
We are a very diverse country, and sad to say, but some cultures are much more violent than others. You are six times more likely to be murdered in the US by a black person than a white.
In your comparison to us and other countries, you are only comparing gun regulations and not the people. That's why you're so confused. People kill people, not guns.
Look American society is very harsh...Most mass shooters are white GTFOHHmm doesn’t that mean with the right control policies, gun violence can be miminized? First world countries like Australia and in Western Europe have low death rates by guns per capita.
To answer your question, let me pose a scenario:
You have two areas: one is a nice upper-middle-class area, and the other is a crime ridden area with lots of drugs, murders, and robberies.
Make a law for both areas. In the crime area, no guns period. In the upper-middle-class area, every citizen must have a firearm in the house and on person.
So what changes would you expect in both areas after four or five years? None. Nothing will change. The lower class area will still be rife with crime and the upper area will still be peaceful and virtually crime-free.
We are a very diverse country, and sad to say, but some cultures are much more violent than others. You are six times more likely to be murdered in the US by a black person than a white.
In your comparison to us and other countries, you are only comparing gun regulations and not the people. That's why you're so confused. People kill people, not guns.
So are we talking about mass shooters only or overall gun murders?
Recreational narcotics have been illegal in this country my entire life. Yet today, we have more of a problem with drugs than at any other time in our history. More addicts, more drug users, more overdose deaths, more people being saved from OD"s.
Looool a dark bar full of drunk armed folks, they hear a shooting, every starts shooting in all directions...smart move.Repeal all gun laws and let people be responsible for their own security.
If everyone is armed, nobody is armed. It's the only real somution.
Being drunk in public is dangerous.Looool a dark bar full of drunk armed folks, they hear a shooting, every starts shooting in all directions...smart move.Repeal all gun laws and let people be responsible for their own security.
If everyone is armed, nobody is armed. It's the only real somution.
Do you guys ever travel overseas and see how people are living? Do you know there is a world out there with no mass shooting?
I say this and I've lived ina countr with 0 gun violence....why you guys dont get it?
It's because they are Lilly white, dumbass. Wherever you find brown or black people, you find gun violence.Hmm doesn’t that mean with the right control policies, gun violence can be miminized? First world countries like Australia and in Western Europe have low death rates by guns per capita.
How many people are murdered per capital where you come from? I'll bet it's a lot more than here in the USA.Looool a dark bar full of drunk armed folks, they hear a shooting, every starts shooting in all directions...smart move.Repeal all gun laws and let people be responsible for their own security.
If everyone is armed, nobody is armed. It's the only real somution.
Do you guys ever travel overseas and see how people are living? Do you know there is a world out there with no mass shooting?
I say this and I've lived ina countr with 0 gun violence....why you guys dont get it?
Then why are most mass shootings and terrorist attacks committed by white people in this country?It's because they are Lilly white, dumbass. Wherever you find brown or black people, you find gun violence.Hmm doesn’t that mean with the right control policies, gun violence can be miminized? First world countries like Australia and in Western Europe have low death rates by guns per capita.
Most mass shooters are white Americans sweetie.All throughout central and south America homicide is high, violence is endemic. Naturally when we bring those people here we will have elevated levels of violence.
Hmm doesn’t that mean with the right control policies, gun violence can be miminized? First world countries like Australia and in Western Europe have low death rates by guns per capita.
Just off the top of my head, I think it has to do with liberty, maybe diet and psychological issues that go unattended to, an ambitious, independent system in which you succeed and fail on your own (loneliness attached to this), and a violent culture of movies, music and media.
It could be worse, the murder rate (and general crime rate) in England is higher than yours, but they get close up and hack you to death. Probably laugh when they are finished.
Look American society is very harsh...Most mass shooters are white GTFOHHmm doesn’t that mean with the right control policies, gun violence can be miminized? First world countries like Australia and in Western Europe have low death rates by guns per capita.
To answer your question, let me pose a scenario:
You have two areas: one is a nice upper-middle-class area, and the other is a crime ridden area with lots of drugs, murders, and robberies.
Make a law for both areas. In the crime area, no guns period. In the upper-middle-class area, every citizen must have a firearm in the house and on person.
So what changes would you expect in both areas after four or five years? None. Nothing will change. The lower class area will still be rife with crime and the upper area will still be peaceful and virtually crime-free.
We are a very diverse country, and sad to say, but some cultures are much more violent than others. You are six times more likely to be murdered in the US by a black person than a white.
In your comparison to us and other countries, you are only comparing gun regulations and not the people. That's why you're so confused. People kill people, not guns.
So are we talking about mass shooters only or overall gun murders?
Recreational narcotics have been illegal in this country my entire life. Yet today, we have more of a problem with drugs than at any other time in our history. More addicts, more drug users, more overdose deaths, more people being saved from OD"s.
People are under immense stress, less family support (everyone on his own), drugs, violent video games, movies...even a violent president. So when people lose their shit they have access to guns and they used them...I cant the same about other countries, because guns are hard to get....keep counting the bodies, 307 mass shootings so far.
Your claim only looks legitimate because you aren't counting bombings and mass homicides with Trucks.Then why are most mass shootings and terrorist attacks committed by white people in this country?It's because they are Lilly white, dumbass. Wherever you find brown or black people, you find gun violence.Hmm doesn’t that mean with the right control policies, gun violence can be miminized? First world countries like Australia and in Western Europe have low death rates by guns per capita.
Lol why are you citing incidents outside of the US?Your claim only looks legitimate because you aren't counting bombings and mass homicides with Trucks.Then why are most mass shootings and terrorist attacks committed by white people in this country?It's because they are Lilly white, dumbass. Wherever you find brown or black people, you find gun violence.Hmm doesn’t that mean with the right control policies, gun violence can be miminized? First world countries like Australia and in Western Europe have low death rates by guns per capita.
France commemorates third anniversary of Charlie Hebdo shootings
Page semi-protected November 2015 Paris attacks
2014 Peshawar school massacre
Sinjar massacre
2014 Bentiu massacre
Ethnic violence in South Sudan
France stunned after truck attacker kills 84 on Bastille Day in Nice
2017 London Bridge attack - Wikipedia
Manchester Arena bombing - Wikipedia
7 July 2005 London bombings - Wikipedia
2017 Westminster attack
Pan Am Flight 103 - Wikipedia
I could go on and on, but you get the point.
