Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
eots would be mute if not for utube!So neither you nor any of these youtube videos can answer the simple questions I asked that anyone who makes the assertions you did should be able to answer, if they really knew what they were talking about and you don't...strange how some people fantasize their world view from youtube clips and internet websites....very strange.
eots would be mute if not for utube!So neither you nor any of these youtube videos can answer the simple questions I asked that anyone who makes the assertions you did should be able to answer, if they really knew what they were talking about and you don't...strange how some people fantasize their world view from youtube clips and internet websites....very strange.
really shit for brains ?"there is nothing inherently factual or non-factual in information on youtube.."eotseots would be mute if not for utube!So neither you nor any of these youtube videos can answer the simple questions I asked that anyone who makes the assertions you did should be able to answer, if they really knew what they were talking about and you don't...strange how some people fantasize their world view from youtube clips and internet websites....very strange.
youtube is just a format to disseminate information and there is nothing inherently factual or non-factual in information on youtube..how else do you show the verbal testimony of the taxi driver ...the gramophone ?
really shit for brains ?"there is nothing inherently factual or non-factual in information on youtube.."eotseots would be mute if not for utube!
youtube is just a format to disseminate information and there is nothing inherently factual or non-factual in information on youtube..how else do you show the verbal testimony of the taxi driver ...the gramophone ?
either something is fact or it's not
for your edification: Definition of INHERENT
: involved in the constitution or essential character of something : belonging by nature or habit.
by you definition you tube does nothing...
Still, nobody explained what took down the lightpoles if it wasn't AA77.
I don't believe you're arguing a point that has already been agreed to. What purpose does that serve?
So you agree AA77 took down the light poles?
I don't believe you're arguing a point that has already been agreed to. What purpose does that serve?
So you agree AA77 took down the light poles?
Well? Yes or no?
CANDYCORNS DENIAL OF THE FAILURES OF NIST AND THE 911 COMMISSION REPORT IS
LAMPOST...
Pentagon Attack Cab Driver Lloyde England's Virtual Confession - YouTube
as always you're wrongreally shit for brains ?"there is nothing inherently factual or non-factual in information on youtube.."eotsyoutube is just a format to disseminate information and there is nothing inherently factual or non-factual in information on youtube..how else do you show the verbal testimony of the taxi driver ...the gramophone ?
either something is fact or it's not
for your edification: Definition of INHERENT
: involved in the constitution or essential character of something : belonging by nature or habit.
by you definition you tube does nothing...
you have no Idea what you are struggling to say...do you
Don't you think if there was any credible evidence that 9/11 was an inside job the Obama (blame Bush for everything) administration would have pursued it? Or were they in on it too?
maybe 9/11 didn't really happen, after all everyone knows the government faked putting a man on the moon, didn't they?
Dude wake the hell up already.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...caught-registering-over-100-bogus-voters.html
Yeah there was a lawsuit from delegates of Romneys who were forced to be delegates of his who filed a lawsuit against RNC and of course our corrupt court system throughout the lawsuit.They also came up with last minute rule changes at the RNC convention to sabatoge Ron Pauls election.
They wanted to make sure Romney got the nomination and thast because they dont care if Obama ir Romney gets in office because they are both corrupt.Both bought off and paid for by wall street here to serve them instead of us so as long as one of them is in office,they dont care.Neither of them believe in the constitution and are war mongrels so they are happy either way.
You are too dense to realise that Ron Paul being elected would be the only way that the crimes of The Bush administration would have been pursued.He was the only candidate who believes in the constitution and not a member of that evil organization the CFR.
you should add that stuff you just posted to your link in your sig you have.That is some hilarious stuff on the net you just posted.
Now THAT is more hilarious than anything thats in that link what you just posted.
You must still be in high school.Thats the ONLY thing that makes any sense that explains why your as dense and naive as you are. Presidents have committed autrocites against the american people for decades now and the newly sworn in president never pursues what they did because both parties are corrupt.Its a ONE PARTY SYSTEM designed to look like two parties so the american sheople think they have a choice in who gets elected.
The constitution has been trashed by Obama and many other presidents in recent years the last few decades.In the constitution it states the government is suppose to serve the people.we are not suppose to serve them which is what we do now.
9/11 was done so the patriot act could be passed.If you ever bothered to find out what the patriot act states, you would understand that it is against us.Its not for us.
Obama has expanded everything Bush got started and lied about everything he said he would do once he got into office.He said we would vote against the patriot act before he became president.He reversed himself once he got in office and reinstated it.He launched more drone attacks against civilians in pakistan and afghanistan in his first year in office more than Bush did in his entire 8 years in office and your seriously asking if he would pursue this?
Also you might actually take the time to watch that video here he posted before making anymore laughable comments on this thread.
Seriously, you mean to tell me there are Americans out there who still believe their Government told them the truth about 9/11? Wow, unbelievable. Unbelievable.
what I wish is that the official conspiracy theory apologists like that last poster on page 39 who replied after you did would actually take the time to watch the video before coming on here and making such ignorant comments first.I mean is that too much to ask just to take five minutes out of yout time to view a video?
so neither you nor any of these youtube videos can answer the simple questions i asked that anyone who makes the assertions you did should be able to answer, if they really knew what they were talking about and you don't...strange how some people fantasize their world view from youtube clips and internet websites....very strange.
not near as strange as those who characterize factual information on rockefeller's unwarranted influence on government policy and cheneys admission he lied to voters about his involvement in the cfr and bush and kerrys admission to being members of the same secret society as "youtube clips" and fantasize their world to that which to controlled corporate media feeds them...very strange
Interesting.It looks like I have made orBeMezaTtnoD'd ignore list.
Don't you think if there was any credible evidence that 9/11 was an inside job the Obama (blame Bush for everything) administration would have pursued it? Or were they in on it too?
maybe 9/11 didn't really happen, after all everyone knows the government faked putting a man on the moon, didn't they?
Dude wake the hell up already.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...caught-registering-over-100-bogus-voters.html
edited for waste of bandwidth .................................................
So you agree AA77 took down the light poles?
Well? Yes or no?
The animation from the NTSB of the data in the flight recorder shows the plane nowhere near those light poles, so I don't honestly know.
Well? Yes or no?
The animation from the NTSB of the data in the flight recorder shows the plane nowhere near those light poles, so I don't honestly know.
Really? Where does is show the plane being and at what time?
The animation from the NTSB of the data in the flight recorder shows the plane nowhere near those light poles, so I don't honestly know.
Really? Where does is show the plane being and at what time?
It shows the plane to the north of the lightpoles and 400+ feet in the air.
You should watch it if your attention span is long enough... All the data used in the simulation comes from the flight data recorder they say was recovered on scene.
Really? Where does is show the plane being and at what time?
It shows the plane to the north of the lightpoles and 400+ feet in the air.
You should watch it if your attention span is long enough... All the data used in the simulation comes from the flight data recorder they say was recovered on scene.
So the altitude never got to zero?
It shows the plane to the north of the lightpoles and 400+ feet in the air.
You should watch it if your attention span is long enough... All the data used in the simulation comes from the flight data recorder they say was recovered on scene.
So the altitude never got to zero?
Why don't you spend the hour to watch it yourself? It's very illuminating, especially the last 10 minutes...
