gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 67,232
- 35,809
- 2,605
Wrong. Fraud can be exposed and proven to have occurred without knowing those involved. You moved the goal posts by adding the need to go to court and prosecute someone.Um, yea.....Is that the requirement to prove voter fraud?So, Mike Griffith - name names.
If you go to any court and allege an action needs to be taken to address some type of fraud....
The court is going to want to know specifics...like who committed the fraud...
So who?