and i'm having a hard time following. on the one hand you're saying clinton/bush went out of their way to protect bin laden and bush did nothing about the warnings of terrorist attacks in his first 9 months.
but then you say there were no hijackers.
so you're saying there were hijackers on 9/11, the US government knew about them, and as soon as their flights took off, the government somehow managed to make them disappear and fly drones in to the towers and shoot missiles in to the pentagon, and jsut for the hell of it, they shot down an actual plane over pennsylvania?
on a side not, did the rothchilds and rockefellers determine the supreme court's ruling on the bush/gore recount?
but then you say there were no hijackers.
so you're saying there were hijackers on 9/11, the US government knew about them, and as soon as their flights took off, the government somehow managed to make them disappear and fly drones in to the towers and shoot missiles in to the pentagon, and jsut for the hell of it, they shot down an actual plane over pennsylvania?
on a side not, did the rothchilds and rockefellers determine the supreme court's ruling on the bush/gore recount?