Glen Beck packs a full House: Lincoln Memorial

[DiveCon]

you are a dishonest piece of shit

 

[drsmith1072]

you are a dishonest piece of shit

Since when is posting the FACTS dishonest?? LOL

Face it hack, you lost and your own words PROVE it.

ok moron, show the scripture where Jesus said to have the GOVERNMENT do those things

ok moron, show the scripture where Jesus said to have the GOVERNMENT NOT do those things

"render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's"

 

[DiveCon]

you are a dishonest piece of shit

Since when is posting the FACTS dishonest?? LOL

Face it hack, you lost and your own words PROVE it.

ok moron, show the scripture where Jesus said to have the GOVERNMENT NOT do those things

"render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's"

no, my words do not say what you claim they do
you are a fucking moron

 

[Ava]

I like, respect and admire Glenn Beck and watch him faithfully if I am home, but I have a growing concern that his programs are going to become sermons and if so, I will discontinue watching him. I want him to stay with informative programs about our history and politics and have authors as guests, to discuss their points of views. I have written him of this. He needs to know that while he may gain a larger audience, he will also lose some. His heart is in the right place and his intentions are noble, in my opinion.

Aqua*

 

[drsmith1072]

you are a dishonest piece of shit

Since when is posting the FACTS dishonest?? LOL

Face it hack, you lost and your own words PROVE it.

"render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's"

no, my words do not say what you claim they do
you are a fucking moron

YOU posted "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's" in response to my post meaning that it was meant as a response to the argument and was your attempt to claim that jesus said that the government should NOT do the things listed in the strip.

If it wasn't then, please explain what you meant to say but failed miserably at actually doing. LOL

 

[DiveCon]

Since when is posting the FACTS dishonest?? LOL

Face it hack, you lost and your own words PROVE it.

no, my words do not say what you claim they do
you are a fucking moron

YOU posted "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's" in response to my post meaning that it was meant as a response to the argument and was your attempt to claim that jesus said that the government should NOT do the things listed in the strip.

If it wasn't then, please explain what you meant to say but failed miserably at actually doing. LOL

dipshit, how many fucking times do you need it explained to you?

 

[drsmith1072]

no, my words do not say what you claim they do
you are a fucking moron

YOU posted "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's" in response to my post meaning that it was meant as a response to the argument and was your attempt to claim that jesus said that the government should NOT do the things listed in the strip.

If it wasn't then, please explain what you meant to say but failed miserably at actually doing. LOL

dipshit, how many fucking times do you need it explained to you?

So in other words you have no explanation so your response stands as is and you are proven WRONG by your own words.

here is the comic strip

This is what I posted

ok moron, show the scripture where Jesus said to have the GOVERNMENT NOT do those things

and this was your response

"render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's"

LOL This is so much fun. LOL

 

[daveman]

It's funny when people who don't believe in God use His Word to justify their worship of big government.

 

[drsmith1072]

It's funny when people who don't believe in God use His Word to justify their worship of big government.

Yeah that would be funny. So can you tell me who is doing that??

 

[JakeStarkey]

daveman who is not christian uses the word to argue that government should not be involved.

 

[DiveCon]

it's funny when people who don't believe in god use his word to justify their worship of big government.

yeah that would be funny. So can you tell me who is doing that??

you

 

[daveman]

It's funny when people who don't believe in God use His Word to justify their worship of big government.

Yeah that would be funny. So can you tell me who is doing that??

 

[daveman]

daveman who is not christian uses the word to argue that government should not be involved.

A big government statist who claims to be a mainstream Republican has no authority to judge the validity of anyone's beliefs, boy.

 

[Intense]

daveman who is not christian uses the word to argue that government should not be involved.

I don't think that is what anyone is saying Jake. Let's distinguish between Government acting with the consent of the governed and Government acting beyond It's authority and consent. The history of the Bible is filled with King's, which would represent Government, acting under God's direction and against it. Sometimes circumstance dictates what must be done, for survival, what is the humane thing. Famine, rationing is a prime example. Progressive Socialism is not the only remedy for what ails us Jake. It is no substitute for an individual relationship with God either. There is nothing of the Physical World or existence that parallels what is of the Spirit. If God is Spirit and Truth, and we are instructed to Worship Him in Spirit and Truth, What of Government compares to that????? What place does Government have in Salvation, which is the Primary function of the Spiritual Path, other than to stop obstructing and move out of the way????? Spend some more time on Thoreau, and less on Porn.
Play nice now,

 

[JakeStarkey]

SCOTUS has determined that the federal government is acting within its authority in terms of Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, senior drug prescriptions, and a host of other social programs. No reasonable person imagines that SCOTUS will find differently with health insurance reform.

 

[Intense]

SCOTUS has determined that the federal government is acting within its authority in terms of Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, senior drug prescriptions, and a host of other social programs. No reasonable person imagines that SCOTUS will find differently with health insurance reform.

I hate to break it to you Jake, but even The Supreme Court is Subject to the Will of the People, and has no mandate that is exempt from the Super Majority. The Powers of The Supreme Court have been, are, and will continue to be granted by the consent of the governed. That is our system, which no shell game will change. You may divert, delay, obstruct, but the threat to you, that Justice and Righteousness will rule in the end, remains a constant reminder that all schemes will face the light of truth. Stay thirsty my friend.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

What is to challenge?? I don't see any proof of any real numbers. You offered an OPINION, so what is there to challenge?
Furthermore, even given the range of 150,000 to the extreme high of 500,000 that beck claimed, it is still miniscule when compared to other rallies.

So what is your point?

It depends on what other rallies you are comparing it to. Your response is to vague in that area for me to pose a direct "comeback" response you calling this "restoring honor" rally miniscule.

The challenge I was looking for was for actual proof that can't be refuted. Like you said there is no real proof either way.

The rallies were mentioned earlier are you saying that you forgot already?? The Million Man March and "The March for Women's Lives". The Million Man March at it's low estimate was 400,000 which is your high estimate. The March for Women's Lives was twice that at it's low estimate. So the "Restoring Honor" rally was pretty miniscule in comparison.

Either way you can't prove your claims so there is NOTHING to challenge. So asking for challengers to your own opinion is pretty pointless seeing as how all they have to say is "I disagree" and the "challenge" is over.

Then why did you initially disparage the claims of people saying there were a lot of people at this rally again?

 

[NYcarbineer]

SCOTUS has determined that the federal government is acting within its authority in terms of Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, senior drug prescriptions, and a host of other social programs. No reasonable person imagines that SCOTUS will find differently with health insurance reform.

I hate to break it to you Jake, but even The Supreme Court is Subject to the Will of the People, and has no mandate that is exempt from the Super Majority. The Powers of The Supreme Court have been, are, and will continue to be granted by the consent of the governed. That is our system, which no shell game will change. You may divert, delay, obstruct, but the threat to you, that Justice and Righteousness will rule in the end, remains a constant reminder that all schemes will face the light of truth. Stay thirsty my friend.

There is no sane real world scenario within which the American people amend the Constitution to make Social Security and Medicare unconstitutional.

 

[JakeStarkey]

SCOTUS has determined that the federal government is acting within its authority in terms of Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, senior drug prescriptions, and a host of other social programs. No reasonable person imagines that SCOTUS will find differently with health insurance reform.

I hate to break it to you Jake, but even The Supreme Court is Subject to the Will of the People, and has no mandate that is exempt from the Super Majority. The Powers of The Supreme Court have been, are, and will continue to be granted by the consent of the governed. That is our system, which no shell game will change. You may divert, delay, obstruct, but the threat to you, that Justice and Righteousness will rule in the end, remains a constant reminder that all schemes will face the light of truth. Stay thirsty my friend.

The hurricane could come tommorow, but it won't. The Super Majority will not over rule SCOTUS. Those who feel like you do about this issue are in the very small majority about the constitutionality of health insurance reform, and certainly are not in the mainstream.

Keep that in mind.

 

[JakeStarkey]

It depends on what other rallies you are comparing it to. Your response is to vague in that area for me to pose a direct "comeback" response you calling this "restoring honor" rally miniscule.

The challenge I was looking for was for actual proof that can't be refuted. Like you said there is no real proof either way.

The rallies were mentioned earlier are you saying that you forgot already?? The Million Man March and "The March for Women's Lives". The Million Man March at it's low estimate was 400,000 which is your high estimate. The March for Women's Lives was twice that at it's low estimate. So the "Restoring Honor" rally was pretty miniscule in comparison.

Either way you can't prove your claims so there is NOTHING to challenge. So asking for challengers to your own opinion is pretty pointless seeing as how all they have to say is "I disagree" and the "challenge" is over.

Then why did you initially disparage the claims of people saying there were a lot of people at this rally again?

Was not the issue of the inflation of the claim?