Glenn Beck has endorsed Hillary

[LaDexter]

Glen Beck - Zionist "libertarian" FRAUD

One cannot possibly be Zionist and libertarian.

Just ask Mikey Bloomberg, who wants to regulate how much soda you drink and how much salt you use when you cook...

 

[amrchaos]

How did he endorse Hillary by saying he is voting for castle?

What's with the lying? Seriously.

Beck has some pull on the right and does not support trump

There is a huge difference between not supporting trump and endorsing clinton

According to some
If you do not support trump, you support Clinton.

It is illogical, but that is the best argument trump supporters have.

Thus beck is a Clinton supporter because he do not support trump.

There is a bit of false perceptions you have to go through in order to see another world

 

[kaz]

Glen Beck - Zionist "libertarian" FRAUD

One cannot possibly be Zionist and libertarian.

Just ask Mikey Bloomberg, who wants to regulate how much soda you drink and how much salt you use when you cook...

I agree in the part that he's Zionist but he's not libertarian. He doesn't actually claim to be libertarian, BTW, he says he has some libertarian leanings. I'm yet to hear them though. He sounds like a right winger to me.

I don't get your quote though that "One cannot possibly be Zionist and libertarian." Explain the conflict between Jews having a home and being libertarian

 

[FJO]

Well, I'd say "endorsed" is a strong word - it's more like he's resigned himself to stop fighting it:

If she is elected, the world does not end…. Once elected, Hillary can be fought. Her tactics are blatant and juvenile, and battling her by means of political and procedural maneuvering or through the media , through public marches and online articles, all of that will be moral, worthy of man of principal.

Her nominees can be blocked, her proposed laws voted down.
.

With all the spineless hypocrites denouncing Trump, the House and the Senate are fair game and sure win for the Democrats.

Hillary's nominees will NOT be opposed by a Democratic Senate.
Her proposed laws will NOT be opposed by a Democratic House.

Glen Beck and Mike Lee and the Bushes and Ted Cruz and the rest of the self righteous turn coats can go to Hell.

My guess is that Trump's supporters assumed that at some point the rest of the party would fall in line, even though he's clearly not one of them.

Couldn't those who refuse to support Trump be said to be holding to their principles?
.

Apparently we are hypocrites for not selling out

But you DID sell out.

Not supporting Trump you are supporting Hillary Clinton.

 

[LaDexter]

Explain the conflict between Jews having a home and being libertarian

You are right. You cannot support Judaism and be libertarian is how I should have phrased it. Judaism is all for central control, one size fits all, government and elites know best, so shut up and do what you are told...

 

[LaDexter]

Not supporting Trump you are supporting Hillary Clinton

As a Libertarian since 2004, I agree. Johnson forfeited long ago...

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

He better take back all the "he's a progressive" insults he's thrown at Romney over the years


Glenn Beck Officially Endorses Hillary Clinton To A Stunned Internet

That's the height of hypocrisy. He has basically made the case that these people on the left are communists.

 

[Avatar4321]

How did he endorse Hillary by saying he is voting for castle?

What's with the lying? Seriously.

Beck has some pull on the right and does not support trump

There is a huge difference between not supporting trump and endorsing clinton

According to some
If you do not support trump, you support Clinton.

It is illogical, but that is the best argument trump supporters have.

Thus beck is a Clinton supporter because he do not support trump.

There is a bit of false perceptions you have to go through in order to see another world

Using their logic though, beck is a yuuuge trump supporter because he isn't voting for Hillary and has done more than just about anyone else this election cycle exposing hillarys scandals

 

[Avatar4321]

Well, I'd say "endorsed" is a strong word - it's more like he's resigned himself to stop fighting it:

If she is elected, the world does not end…. Once elected, Hillary can be fought. Her tactics are blatant and juvenile, and battling her by means of political and procedural maneuvering or through the media , through public marches and online articles, all of that will be moral, worthy of man of principal.

Her nominees can be blocked, her proposed laws voted down.
.

With all the spineless hypocrites denouncing Trump, the House and the Senate are fair game and sure win for the Democrats.

Hillary's nominees will NOT be opposed by a Democratic Senate.
Her proposed laws will NOT be opposed by a Democratic House.

Glen Beck and Mike Lee and the Bushes and Ted Cruz and the rest of the self righteous turn coats can go to Hell.

My guess is that Trump's supporters assumed that at some point the rest of the party would fall in line, even though he's clearly not one of them.

Couldn't those who refuse to support Trump be said to be holding to their principles?
.

Apparently we are hypocrites for not selling out

But you DID sell out.

Not supporting Trump you are supporting Hillary Clinton.

Lying to yourself about reality doesn't change the fact that we have held to our principles. We aren't voting for a bill Clinton rerun just because he has an R next to his name this time.

This is precisely what we spent the last two decades fighting with the Clintons.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Democrat media"

lol

 

[Mac1958]

Well, I'd say "endorsed" is a strong word - it's more like he's resigned himself to stop fighting it:

If she is elected, the world does not end…. Once elected, Hillary can be fought. Her tactics are blatant and juvenile, and battling her by means of political and procedural maneuvering or through the media , through public marches and online articles, all of that will be moral, worthy of man of principal.

Her nominees can be blocked, her proposed laws voted down.
.

With all the spineless hypocrites denouncing Trump, the House and the Senate are fair game and sure win for the Democrats.

Hillary's nominees will NOT be opposed by a Democratic Senate.
Her proposed laws will NOT be opposed by a Democratic House.

Glen Beck and Mike Lee and the Bushes and Ted Cruz and the rest of the self righteous turn coats can go to Hell.

My guess is that Trump's supporters assumed that at some point the rest of the party would fall in line, even though he's clearly not one of them.

Couldn't those who refuse to support Trump be said to be holding to their principles?
.

Apparently we are hypocrites for not selling out

I can no longer figure out who's who.
.

 

[Mac1958]

Well, I'd say "endorsed" is a strong word - it's more like he's resigned himself to stop fighting it:

If she is elected, the world does not end…. Once elected, Hillary can be fought. Her tactics are blatant and juvenile, and battling her by means of political and procedural maneuvering or through the media , through public marches and online articles, all of that will be moral, worthy of man of principal.

Her nominees can be blocked, her proposed laws voted down.
.

With all the spineless hypocrites denouncing Trump, the House and the Senate are fair game and sure win for the Democrats.

Hillary's nominees will NOT be opposed by a Democratic Senate.
Her proposed laws will NOT be opposed by a Democratic House.

Glen Beck and Mike Lee and the Bushes and Ted Cruz and the rest of the self righteous turn coats can go to Hell.

My guess is that Trump's supporters assumed that at some point the rest of the party would fall in line, even though he's clearly not one of them.

Couldn't those who refuse to support Trump be said to be holding to their principles?
.

Principles?

How many of the sixteen who pledged to support the eventual nominee stuck to their given word?

Those who did not, have no honesty, no, honor, no character and no principles. They are also devoid of any proximity to the people who made their choice crystal clear in the primaries.

Let them bear the burden of the (at least three) new Supreme Court Justices ruling on the left side of Kin Jung Un. Let them bear the burden of a bankrupt country. Let them bear the burden of a weakened and virtually disabled military. Let them bear the burden of increasing terrorist on American soil.

I am sure they will have a perfectly acceptable excuse for their principles.

But Trump isn't even a conservative, and his supporters admit it.

They've moved from conservatism to populist nationalism, on a dime.

Why should conservatives be expected to make such a big change?
.

 

[Norman]

He better take back all the "he's a progressive" insults he's thrown at Romney over the years


Glenn Beck Officially Endorses Hillary Clinton To A Stunned Internet

Wow, what a loser!

He's probably as criminal as Clintons.

Anyway, it appears that this is actually hoax, and CNN is running with it as their usual lying selves.

 

[FJO]

Well, I'd say "endorsed" is a strong word - it's more like he's resigned himself to stop fighting it:

If she is elected, the world does not end…. Once elected, Hillary can be fought. Her tactics are blatant and juvenile, and battling her by means of political and procedural maneuvering or through the media , through public marches and online articles, all of that will be moral, worthy of man of principal.

Her nominees can be blocked, her proposed laws voted down.
.

With all the spineless hypocrites denouncing Trump, the House and the Senate are fair game and sure win for the Democrats.

Hillary's nominees will NOT be opposed by a Democratic Senate.
Her proposed laws will NOT be opposed by a Democratic House.

Glen Beck and Mike Lee and the Bushes and Ted Cruz and the rest of the self righteous turn coats can go to Hell.

My guess is that Trump's supporters assumed that at some point the rest of the party would fall in line, even though he's clearly not one of them.

Couldn't those who refuse to support Trump be said to be holding to their principles?
.

Apparently we are hypocrites for not selling out

But you DID sell out.

Not supporting Trump you are supporting Hillary Clinton.

Lying to yourself about reality doesn't change the fact that we have held to our principles. We aren't voting for a bill Clinton rerun just because he has an R next to his name this time.

This is precisely what we spent the last two decades fighting with the Clintons.

??????

 

[kaz]

Explain the conflict between Jews having a home and being libertarian

You are right. You cannot support Judaism and be libertarian is how I should have phrased it. Judaism is all for central control, one size fits all, government and elites know best, so shut up and do what you are told...

Well, "Judaism" is a religion. Certainly Jews in this country and in Israel are overwhelmingly socialist, I can't dispute that.

You do condemn the Palestinian and other Arab terrorists who are trying to murder them though, yes?

 

[kaz]

Well, I'd say "endorsed" is a strong word - it's more like he's resigned himself to stop fighting it:

If she is elected, the world does not end…. Once elected, Hillary can be fought. Her tactics are blatant and juvenile, and battling her by means of political and procedural maneuvering or through the media , through public marches and online articles, all of that will be moral, worthy of man of principal.

Her nominees can be blocked, her proposed laws voted down.
.

With all the spineless hypocrites denouncing Trump, the House and the Senate are fair game and sure win for the Democrats.

Hillary's nominees will NOT be opposed by a Democratic Senate.
Her proposed laws will NOT be opposed by a Democratic House.

Glen Beck and Mike Lee and the Bushes and Ted Cruz and the rest of the self righteous turn coats can go to Hell.

My guess is that Trump's supporters assumed that at some point the rest of the party would fall in line, even though he's clearly not one of them.

Couldn't those who refuse to support Trump be said to be holding to their principles?
.

Apparently we are hypocrites for not selling out

But you DID sell out.

Not supporting Trump you are supporting Hillary Clinton.

Not necessarily. I don't support Trump or Clinton, I'm voting for Johnson

 

[FJO]

Well, I'd say "endorsed" is a strong word - it's more like he's resigned himself to stop fighting it:

If she is elected, the world does not end…. Once elected, Hillary can be fought. Her tactics are blatant and juvenile, and battling her by means of political and procedural maneuvering or through the media , through public marches and online articles, all of that will be moral, worthy of man of principal.

Her nominees can be blocked, her proposed laws voted down.
.

With all the spineless hypocrites denouncing Trump, the House and the Senate are fair game and sure win for the Democrats.

Hillary's nominees will NOT be opposed by a Democratic Senate.
Her proposed laws will NOT be opposed by a Democratic House.

Glen Beck and Mike Lee and the Bushes and Ted Cruz and the rest of the self righteous turn coats can go to Hell.

My guess is that Trump's supporters assumed that at some point the rest of the party would fall in line, even though he's clearly not one of them.

Couldn't those who refuse to support Trump be said to be holding to their principles?
.

Principles?

How many of the sixteen who pledged to support the eventual nominee stuck to their given word?

Those who did not, have no honesty, no, honor, no character and no principles. They are also devoid of any proximity to the people who made their choice crystal clear in the primaries.

Let them bear the burden of the (at least three) new Supreme Court Justices ruling on the left side of Kin Jung Un. Let them bear the burden of a bankrupt country. Let them bear the burden of a weakened and virtually disabled military. Let them bear the burden of increasing terrorist on American soil.

I am sure they will have a perfectly acceptable excuse for their principles.

But Trump isn't even a conservative, and his supporters admit it.

They've moved from conservatism to populist nationalism, on a dime.

Why should conservatives be expected to make such a big change?
.

When you give your word and pledge to do a certain thing, not knowing what the future might bring, you take a chance, and if you are an honest man, you stand by your given word.

The sixteen unsuccessful wannabe's were sure Trump would not get the nomination, so they gave their pledge/word with fingers crossed behind their backs. And all who did not have the courage to stick by their word, are gutless, worthless nobodies, who should resign any current elected post they have and never run for an election again. After all, if they deceived their "equals" how can they be trusted not to deceive the people who would be foolish enough to vote for them?

When you sign on the dotted line to pay your mortgage, you better do, or pay the consequences. When you give your word of honor, you honor it or be forever remembered as a human piece of slime.

Regardless of your present or past stage in life.

 

[Mac1958]

Well, I'd say "endorsed" is a strong word - it's more like he's resigned himself to stop fighting it:

If she is elected, the world does not end…. Once elected, Hillary can be fought. Her tactics are blatant and juvenile, and battling her by means of political and procedural maneuvering or through the media , through public marches and online articles, all of that will be moral, worthy of man of principal.

Her nominees can be blocked, her proposed laws voted down.
.

With all the spineless hypocrites denouncing Trump, the House and the Senate are fair game and sure win for the Democrats.

Hillary's nominees will NOT be opposed by a Democratic Senate.
Her proposed laws will NOT be opposed by a Democratic House.

Glen Beck and Mike Lee and the Bushes and Ted Cruz and the rest of the self righteous turn coats can go to Hell.

My guess is that Trump's supporters assumed that at some point the rest of the party would fall in line, even though he's clearly not one of them.

Couldn't those who refuse to support Trump be said to be holding to their principles?
.

Principles?

How many of the sixteen who pledged to support the eventual nominee stuck to their given word?

Those who did not, have no honesty, no, honor, no character and no principles. They are also devoid of any proximity to the people who made their choice crystal clear in the primaries.

Let them bear the burden of the (at least three) new Supreme Court Justices ruling on the left side of Kin Jung Un. Let them bear the burden of a bankrupt country. Let them bear the burden of a weakened and virtually disabled military. Let them bear the burden of increasing terrorist on American soil.

I am sure they will have a perfectly acceptable excuse for their principles.

But Trump isn't even a conservative, and his supporters admit it.

They've moved from conservatism to populist nationalism, on a dime.

Why should conservatives be expected to make such a big change?
.

When you give your word and pledge to do a certain thing, not knowing what the future might bring, you take a chance, and if you are an honest man, you stand by your given word.

The sixteen unsuccessful wannabe's were sure Trump would not get the nomination, so they gave their pledge/word with fingers crossed behind their backs. And all who did not have the courage to stick by their word, are gutless, worthless nobodies, who should resign any current elected post they have and never run for an election again. After all, if they deceived their "equals" how can they be trusted not to deceive the people who would be foolish enough to vote for them?

When you sign on the dotted line to pay your mortgage, you better do, or pay the consequences. When you give your word of honor, you honor it or be forever remembered as a human piece of slime.

Regardless of your present or past stage in life.

Well, such is politics, I guess. They're being expected to put their party over their principle, but there's nothing new about that on either end.

They're probably wishing they had answered that question with a caveat, something like "I will support the nominee if I feel he or she is a good representative of the party". This wasn't really an issue before Trump.
.

 

[LaDexter]

You do condemn the Palestinian and other Arab terrorists who are trying to murder them though, yes?

I support the US. I care about the US. I am an American.

And I notice things... like what our CIA file now says about the 67 war....

CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency

"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move"

Lyndon Johnson LIED to the American people about that.


Israel deliberately attacked and murdered the crew of the USS Liberty, which was sent to see if Israel was exterminating the residents of the "occupied territories" in 1968. If Israel was not doing that, why attack the Liberty???

The USS Liberty Cover-Up


And then this jewel in 1998 from one of Hillary's closest pals, Madeleine Albright...


Gen. Hugh Shelton: Clinton Official Suggested Letting U.S. Plane Be Shot Down To Provoke War With Iraq | Huffington Post

"“Hugh, I know I shouldn’t even be asking you this, but what we really need in order to go in and take out Saddam is a precipitous event — something that would make us look good in the eyes of the world. Could you have one of our U-2s fly low enough — and slow enough — so as to guarantee that Saddam could shoot it down?”"


And then this...




and if one is a "truther...." like me....

yeah, sorry, no sympathy for aggressor Israel here.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

He better take back all the "he's a progressive" insults he's thrown at Romney over the years


Glenn Beck Officially Endorses Hillary Clinton To A Stunned Internet

Glenn Beck lost his mind years ago.

You know that large fly on Hillary is disturbing. They have also landed on Barack more than a few speeches.

I really think it has a significance. Cue the book "Lord of the Flies." I am officially creeped out and prepared for the worst.

PS -- Any republican or "Chrsitian" pastor that endorses Hillary is a pawn for the enemy.

It's this sort of lunacy that supports the likes of Trump.