GOP Congress Plans To Deal With ISIS

[The Rabbi]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

What actions do you think the Congress can take? The last I checked only the CIC also known as the President could order military action or a troop deployment against ISIS.

I don't know what you imagine you checked but it certainly wasn't the Constitution.

That's Article II Section 2 of the US COnstition, dumbshit.

Hard to imagine anyone of your standing as a constitutional scholar purposely misinterpreting the Constitution......quite surprising really.

You seem to be getting your ass handed to you pretty much from all sides here. Maybe you should stop digging your grave?

 

[Discombobulated]

SO you want to go back to Iraq?

No, I want the Republican controlled Congress to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities, instead of running for cover while jeering from the sidelines.

Isn't the President CIC in accordance with the Constitution. YOU really want the Congress to be running the military? Really?

The President doesn't decide to attack a sovereign nation on his own, that would require a declaration of war or at least congressional approval on a contingency basis.. The Constitution expressly gives war making powers only to the Congress.

 

[Discombobulated]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

What actions do you think the Congress can take? The last I checked only the CIC also known as the President could order military action or a troop deployment against ISIS.

I don't know what you imagine you checked but it certainly wasn't the Constitution.

That's Article II Section 2 of the US COnstition, dumbshit.

Hard to imagine anyone of your standing as a constitutional scholar purposely misinterpreting the Constitution......quite surprising really.

You seem to be getting your ass handed to you pretty much from all sides here. Maybe you should stop digging your grave?

More profound musing on constitutional questions.

 

[The Rabbi]

SO you want to go back to Iraq?

No, I want the Republican controlled Congress to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities, instead of running for cover while jeering from the sidelines.

Isn't the President CIC in accordance with the Constitution. YOU really want the Congress to be running the military? Really?

The President doesn't decide to attack a sovereign nation on his own, that would require a declaration of war or at least congressional approval on a contingency basis.. The Constitution expressly gives war making powers only to the Congress.

You keep repeating this as though it's true. It isnt.. There are many cases where presidents launched raids etc without formal approval.
But at least you admit the president is the one in charge of these things.
What is Obama's plan for dealing with ISIS now that his initial plan is in tatters?

 

[The Rabbi]

What actions do you think the Congress can take? The last I checked only the CIC also known as the President could order military action or a troop deployment against ISIS.

I don't know what you imagine you checked but it certainly wasn't the Constitution.

That's Article II Section 2 of the US COnstition, dumbshit.

Hard to imagine anyone of your standing as a constitutional scholar purposely misinterpreting the Constitution......quite surprising really.

You seem to be getting your ass handed to you pretty much from all sides here. Maybe you should stop digging your grave?

More profound musing on constitutional questions.

It might seem that way to someone who knows nothing. Like you.

 

[Roadrunner]

SO you want to go back to Iraq?

No, I want the Republican controlled Congress to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities, instead of running for cover while jeering from the sidelines.

Isn't the President CIC in accordance with the Constitution. YOU really want the Congress to be running the military? Really?

The President doesn't decide to attack a sovereign nation on his own, that would require a declaration of war or at least congressional approval on a contingency basis.. The Constitution expressly gives war making powers only to the Congress.

Have you ever heard of things like the War powers Act?

Even if you have, have you ever heard of Obama giving a rat's ass about the Constitution?

 

[The Rabbi]

SO you want to go back to Iraq?

No, I want the Republican controlled Congress to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities, instead of running for cover while jeering from the sidelines.

Isn't the President CIC in accordance with the Constitution. YOU really want the Congress to be running the military? Really?

The President doesn't decide to attack a sovereign nation on his own, that would require a declaration of war or at least congressional approval on a contingency basis.. The Constitution expressly gives war making powers only to the Congress.

Have you ever heard of things like the War powers Act?

Even if you have, have you ever heard of Obama giving a rat's ass about the Constitution?

But somehow it's the GOP's fault. Even though Obama is responsible for foreign policy and every decision he's made has been total disaster.
But idiots like Dismembered think they can blame the GOP for every presidential failure and someone somewhere will believe it.

 

[Discombobulated]

SO you want to go back to Iraq?

No, I want the Republican controlled Congress to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities, instead of running for cover while jeering from the sidelines.

Isn't the President CIC in accordance with the Constitution. YOU really want the Congress to be running the military? Really?

The President doesn't decide to attack a sovereign nation on his own, that would require a declaration of war or at least congressional approval on a contingency basis.. The Constitution expressly gives war making powers only to the Congress.

You keep repeating this as though it's true. It isnt.. There are many cases where presidents launched raids etc without formal approval.
But at least you admit the president is the one in charge of these things.
What is Obama's plan for dealing with ISIS now that his initial plan is in tatters?

Yes, I'm as aware of the ongoing violations of Constitutional authority as am of the continued avoidance of responsibility by our congressional representatives.

 

[Discombobulated]

SO you want to go back to Iraq?

No, I want the Republican controlled Congress to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities, instead of running for cover while jeering from the sidelines.

Isn't the President CIC in accordance with the Constitution. YOU really want the Congress to be running the military? Really?

The President doesn't decide to attack a sovereign nation on his own, that would require a declaration of war or at least congressional approval on a contingency basis.. The Constitution expressly gives war making powers only to the Congress.

Have you ever heard of things like the War powers Act?

Even if you have, have you ever heard of Obama giving a rat's ass about the Constitution?

But somehow it's the GOP's fault. Even though Obama is responsible for foreign policy and every decision he's made has been total disaster.
But idiots like Dismembered think they can blame the GOP for every presidential failure and someone somewhere will believe it.

The GOPs fault? Really? OK......if you say so.

 

[The Rabbi]

SO you want to go back to Iraq?

No, I want the Republican controlled Congress to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities, instead of running for cover while jeering from the sidelines.

Isn't the President CIC in accordance with the Constitution. YOU really want the Congress to be running the military? Really?

The President doesn't decide to attack a sovereign nation on his own, that would require a declaration of war or at least congressional approval on a contingency basis.. The Constitution expressly gives war making powers only to the Congress.

You keep repeating this as though it's true. It isnt.. There are many cases where presidents launched raids etc without formal approval.
But at least you admit the president is the one in charge of these things.
What is Obama's plan for dealing with ISIS now that his initial plan is in tatters?

Yes, I'm as aware of the ongoing violations of Constitutional authority as am of the continued avoidance of responsibility by our congressional representatives.

Sorry but what responsibility does Congress have for foreign policy. Please cite sources.
WHere are your threads decrying the constitutional breaches by this president?

 

[Contumacious]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

That is true of the DEMOPUBLICAN controlled Congress.


The War Powers Resolution Fraud

 

[whitehall]

How is it congress's responsibility to deal with ISIS?

 

[Discombobulated]

No, I want the Republican controlled Congress to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities, instead of running for cover while jeering from the sidelines.

Isn't the President CIC in accordance with the Constitution. YOU really want the Congress to be running the military? Really?

The President doesn't decide to attack a sovereign nation on his own, that would require a declaration of war or at least congressional approval on a contingency basis.. The Constitution expressly gives war making powers only to the Congress.

You keep repeating this as though it's true. It isnt.. There are many cases where presidents launched raids etc without formal approval.
But at least you admit the president is the one in charge of these things.
What is Obama's plan for dealing with ISIS now that his initial plan is in tatters?

Yes, I'm as aware of the ongoing violations of Constitutional authority as am of the continued avoidance of responsibility by our congressional representatives.

Sorry but what responsibility does Congress have for foreign policy. Please cite sources.
WHere are your threads decrying the constitutional breaches by this president?

Are you really this stupid? If the Congress is violating their oath to uphold the Constitution then so is the President......obviously.

 

[Discombobulated]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

That is true of the DEMOPUBLICAN controlled Congress.


The War Powers Resolution Fraud

They all run cover when it comes to the hard decisions.

 

[Discombobulated]

How is it congress's responsibility to deal with ISIS?

I'll bet they even figure out how not to go on the record as having voted to fund operations in Syria.

 

[The Rabbi]

Isn't the President CIC in accordance with the Constitution. YOU really want the Congress to be running the military? Really?

The President doesn't decide to attack a sovereign nation on his own, that would require a declaration of war or at least congressional approval on a contingency basis.. The Constitution expressly gives war making powers only to the Congress.

You keep repeating this as though it's true. It isnt.. There are many cases where presidents launched raids etc without formal approval.
But at least you admit the president is the one in charge of these things.
What is Obama's plan for dealing with ISIS now that his initial plan is in tatters?

Yes, I'm as aware of the ongoing violations of Constitutional authority as am of the continued avoidance of responsibility by our congressional representatives.

Sorry but what responsibility does Congress have for foreign policy. Please cite sources.
WHere are your threads decrying the constitutional breaches by this president?

Are you really this stupid? If the Congress is violating their oath to uphold the Constitution then so is the President......obviously.

Sorry but that doesnt even make sense. Even for you.
Are you off your meds again?

 

[Contumacious]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

That is true of the DEMOPUBLICAN controlled Congress.


The War Powers Resolution Fraud

They all run cover when it comes to the hard decisions.

True.

The DEMOPUBLICANS run for cover when it comes to the hard decisions.

 

[Contumacious]

How is it congress's responsibility to deal with ISIS?

It isn't.


But the congresscriters are controlled by the War Party. The war profiteers need a constant state of war. So we had the nazis, the USSR, Korea, Vietnam, Al Qaeda, ad nauseam, they need a bogeyman to steal our money, our lives, our liberties.


.

 

[idb]

No, I want the Republican controlled Congress to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities, instead of running for cover while jeering from the sidelines.

Isn't the President CIC in accordance with the Constitution. YOU really want the Congress to be running the military? Really?

The President doesn't decide to attack a sovereign nation on his own, that would require a declaration of war or at least congressional approval on a contingency basis.. The Constitution expressly gives war making powers only to the Congress.

You keep repeating this as though it's true. It isnt.. There are many cases where presidents launched raids etc without formal approval.
But at least you admit the president is the one in charge of these things.
What is Obama's plan for dealing with ISIS now that his initial plan is in tatters?

Yes, I'm as aware of the ongoing violations of Constitutional authority as am of the continued avoidance of responsibility by our congressional representatives.

Sorry but what responsibility does Congress have for foreign policy. Please cite sources.
WHere are your threads decrying the constitutional breaches by this president?

Obama must be getting sick of being hauled over the coals by the SCOTUS for all those constitutional breaches.

 

[Discombobulated]

The President doesn't decide to attack a sovereign nation on his own, that would require a declaration of war or at least congressional approval on a contingency basis.. The Constitution expressly gives war making powers only to the Congress.

You keep repeating this as though it's true. It isnt.. There are many cases where presidents launched raids etc without formal approval.
But at least you admit the president is the one in charge of these things.
What is Obama's plan for dealing with ISIS now that his initial plan is in tatters?

Yes, I'm as aware of the ongoing violations of Constitutional authority as am of the continued avoidance of responsibility by our congressional representatives.

Sorry but what responsibility does Congress have for foreign policy. Please cite sources.
WHere are your threads decrying the constitutional breaches by this president?

Are you really this stupid? If the Congress is violating their oath to uphold the Constitution then so is the President......obviously.

Sorry but that doesnt even make sense. Even for you.
Are you off your meds again?

You really are a very stupid little man......even for a Republican.