Dot Com
Nullius in verba
because they are part of the rw hive mindWhy defend what this woman said? What makes it in any way defensible?
![tinfoil :tinfoil: :tinfoil:](/styles/smilies/tinfoil.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
because they are part of the rw hive mindWhy defend what this woman said? What makes it in any way defensible?
^ thatThe First Daughters seem to be dressing in the latest style and fashion as dictated by all the teen fashion magazines, including the prevailing trend for hem lines. So are we attacking all teens trying to following the latest trends in teen fashion? How about their parents? Should we attack all parents of teens who allow their girls to attempt to be fashionable and up with the latest styles, or is this just another lame attempt to bash the President and First Lady?
Don't answer a question with a question ScooterDoesn't appear to be an attack on the child with Downs syndrome.....just conspiracy bullshit
Are you claiming that your fellow scumbagcrats never attacked Palin's disabled child, comrade?
Show me
Are you claiming that your fellow scumbagcrats have not?
Yes or no, comrade?
For you too, some right-wing rhetoric.
You are so jealous and envious of those with stature and class.
![]()
Not at all. I merely pointed out that the left is far more vicious and unapologetic. Using your logic, that makes the Palin attackers far more envious. If being mean is a sign of envy, the left shows that they are consumed by the green monster.
The woman, who was a lowly employee, resigned after a fairly mild comment. If her comment angered the left, then why are they so accepting of calling Palin the "c" word and even hoping others got raped? How can that possibly be accepted while merely suggesting that Obama's girls weren't dressy enough is condemned? At least be consistent.
Please just stop....For you too, some right-wing rhetoric.
You are so jealous and envious of those with stature and class.
![]()
Not at all. I merely pointed out that the left is far more vicious and unapologetic. Using your logic, that makes the Palin attackers far more envious. If being mean is a sign of envy, the left shows that they are consumed by the green monster.
The woman, who was a lowly employee, resigned after a fairly mild comment. If her comment angered the left, then why are they so accepting of calling Palin the "c" word and even hoping others got raped? How can that possibly be accepted while merely suggesting that Obama's girls weren't dressy enough is condemned? At least be consistent.
You claimed he was a paid person, paid by the DNC.
The topic in part of this thread is the difference between private entertainers making comments and officials of a party or the the government making comments.
You were asked directly to back up your claim that the DNC or officials of the Democrat Party made disparaging or insulting comments about the Palin kids. Your answer was McGinniss, with the claim he was paid by the DNC. That was an untrue statement. Now you are claiming he was an operative. Of course you can't back that up either. So the conclusion has to be that no official of the Dem Party ever made a bad comment about the Palin kids. An official tied to the Republican Party went down the slippery slope and disparaged the President's kid and was forced to resign for it.
BTW, in regards to who would buy his book, his first best seller was in 1968 and several of his books were turned into TV movies which earned him Emmy Awards.
Show me...when you start your post out with a lie, you are going to need proof of your quote
Camp, you can't go around Bitch Slapping posters!!!!\
Don't answer a question with a question Scooter![]()
You fail to demonstrate he is paid by the DNC or any partisan groupShow me...when you start your post out with a lie, you are going to need proof of your quote
ROFL
What lie is it I told, Herr Goebbels? Please cite it?
Feigned outrage from the person with the least integrity of anyone on this board is a bit beyond the pale, shitflinger.
You fail to demonstrate he is paid by the DNC or any partisan group
You fail to prove your quote
All you prove is he moved next door to the Palins
In other words, as usual, you are just making shit up
that was journalists deflection boi not taxpayer-financed staffersDon't answer a question with a question Scooter![]()
I notice you Communists will never take an affirmative stand.
Oh, you're late to the party - the point was to get shitflinger to claim that you filthy demagogues are above trashing a Downs Syndrome baby, THEN toss out panty sniffer McGinniss - but you worms lack the spine to ever take a stand on anything....
Oh, but I don't want YOU to feel left out, will you state, here in public, that your fellow Communists have treated the Palin children better than the evil and hated Republicans have treated the children of our GLORIOUS ruler?
Come on, take a stand for your god, tell us how CRUEL the running dog capitalists have been, while you progressives were nothing but supportive of the children of your enemies.....
that was journalists deflection boi not taxpayer-financed staffers
NEXT!!!
AGAIN for the facts-averse (in this case- youthat was journalists deflection boi not taxpayer-financed staffers
NEXT!!!
So, a nationally known writer slandering a Downs Syndrome baby is good with you, but a staffer that no one has never heard of criticizing clothes is out of bounds?
Honestly, I'd just sit back and laugh at you demagogues if not for your love of gulags and death camps...
AGAIN for the facts-averse (in this case- youthat was journalists deflection boi not taxpayer-financed staffers
NEXT!!!
So, a nationally known writer slandering a Downs Syndrome baby is good with you, but a staffer that no one has never heard of criticizing clothes is out of bounds?
Honestly, I'd just sit back and laugh at you demagogues if not for your love of gulags and death camps...) someone on the gov't teet (payroll) openly libeling/attacking another gov't official's teenagers is frowned upon. Understand now?
Double down on your lies doesn't cut itYou fail to demonstrate he is paid by the DNC or any partisan group
Here is my statement, shitflinger - point out the lie?
GOP Staffer Elizabeth Lauten To Resign Page 12 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
You fail to prove your quote
All you prove is he moved next door to the Palins
In other words, as usual, you are just making shit up
ROFL
Too bad you aren't any good at this...
Of course not.....she has a first amendment right to say what she wantsAGAIN for the facts-averse (in this case- youthat was journalists deflection boi not taxpayer-financed staffers
NEXT!!!
So, a nationally known writer slandering a Downs Syndrome baby is good with you, but a staffer that no one has never heard of criticizing clothes is out of bounds?
Honestly, I'd just sit back and laugh at you demagogues if not for your love of gulags and death camps...) someone on the gov't teet (payroll) openly libeling/attacking another gov't official's teenagers is frowned upon. Understand now?
So, being on the government payroll means that the employee should never say anything critical about the Ruling Elite?
SRSLY?
being on a gov't payroll ( I was for 4 yrs) means you remain non-partisan in the public sphere like posting comments on a Reps official FB page for instance. Its called "maturity" &/or "professionalism" google itAGAIN for the facts-averse (in this case- youthat was journalists deflection boi not taxpayer-financed staffers
NEXT!!!
So, a nationally known writer slandering a Downs Syndrome baby is good with you, but a staffer that no one has never heard of criticizing clothes is out of bounds?
Honestly, I'd just sit back and laugh at you demagogues if not for your love of gulags and death camps...) someone on the gov't teet (payroll) openly libeling/attacking another gov't official's teenagers is frowned upon. Understand now?
So, being on the government payroll means that the employee should never say anything critical about the Ruling Elite?
SRSLY?