Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because Trump isn't being charged with the other crime. The other crime has already been charged and the individual (Cohen) convicted.
WW
The bank up the street was robbed last week, and they got the guy. I hope they don’t charge ME.Because Trump isn't being charged with the other crime. The other crime has already been charged and the individual (Cohen) convicted.
WW
Fat Alvin is still trying to figure out what underlying crime to create.Fat Alvin said he is able to charge Trump with a felony because he tried to cover up another crime, but didn't list what that crime was. Furthermore how would Fat Alvin know how it was paid in the first place? He got that info from a convicted perjurer and serial liar.
Sigh…. Bragg does not need to list the felony… as per NY State lawFat Alvin said he is able to charge Trump with a felony because he tried to cover up another crime, but didn't list what that crime was. Furthermore how would Fat Alvin know how it was paid in the first place? He got that info from a convicted perjurer and serial liar.
P.S. Any testimony from Cohen should be disallowed. He has been convicted for perjury, as you point out, so why would anyone believe what he has to say now? It’s known in legal circles that once a witness is caught in a lie, all his other testimony is considered not credible.Fat Alvin said he is able to charge Trump with a felony because he tried to cover up another crime, but didn't list what that crime was. Furthermore how would Fat Alvin know how it was paid in the first place? He got that info from a convicted perjurer and serial liar.
If you aided and or abetted that crime they well mightThe bank up the street was robbed last week, and they got the guy. I hope they don’t charge ME.
And tell me again….what crime was Cohen convicted on?
Fat Alvin said he is able to charge Trump with a felony because he tried to cover up another crime, but didn't list what that crime was. Furthermore how would Fat Alvin know how it was paid in the first place? He got that info from a convicted perjurer and serial liar.
That’s not how it works dumbass.P.S. Any testimony from Cohen should be disallowed. He has been convicted for perjury, as you point out, so why would anyone believe what he has to say now? It’s known in legal circles that once a witness is caught in a lie, all his other testimony is considered not credible.
The bookkeeping issue has a 2-year statute of limitations, not 5-years.
The bank up the street was robbed last week, and they got the guy. I hope they don’t charge ME.
And tell me again….what crime was Cohen convicted on?
Fat Alvin is still trying to figure out what underlying crime to create.
You're mistaken. Trump is charged with a felony which carries a 5 year statute of limitations.
Yes the FEC said there was no crime. Both FEC commissioners Trainor & Smith explained it this way.
Campaign finance laws are VERY subjective and specific.
Looking at specific "campaign" items:
1. Buying a new very expensive suit to look good? NO
2. Teeth whitening? NO
3. Paying hush money? NO
4. Buying TV commercials? YES
5. Hiring a campaign manager? YES
6. Buying newspaper ads? YES
The FEC said there was no crime for the Stormy payment since Trump did NOT use campaign money.
www.businessinsider.com
1. Posting a democrat whine by 2 democrat commissioners about democrat claimed campaign violations doesn't prove anything.And here is the FEC documenting the failed vote and that charges should be pursued.
To quote a well respected poster: "Those two FEC commissioners know election laws better than anyone."
WW
1. Those two FEC commissioners know election laws better than anyone. Stop grasping at straws that are not there. What part of "there is no crime" don't you understand? If Trump committed ANY campaign finance violation the FEC would have prosecuted him.
2. You point to two partisan commission members instead of the actual Election Law. If the case went to the USSC we both know how it would end.
3. If those two "GOP" members voted not to indict, that still leaves a four member majority that could have indicted. Why did two abstain? Two commissioners couldn't block it, as you claim. Why didn't the DOJ indict? They're all democrats.
This happened long before Biden with the 2016 campaign.So let’s say he did? What of it? Trump can use his own money for any legal purpose, and paying off a porn star with an NDA agreement is legal.
This is all a distraction to shift attention from the corruption in the Biden Crime Family, the weaponization of the government against Republicans, and Biden’s theft of classified info from the SCIF when he was a senator. All that is much worse than two consenting adults playing hide the pickle.
I asked you two questions, Simp.Not a dodge, Dumbfuck, when I never said he was charged but yet you're asking me to say what he was charged with.
Are you ever not a dumbfuck?
Ever???
You came up with what you thought, not facts, Dumbass.Mind reading?
He admitted to reimbursing Cohen for paying out the NDA. And he concealed those business expenses as "legal services," which conceals Cohen's crime.
The other 4 voted NOT to pursue campaign violations. So there were two partisan hacks.
