Kamala Harris voted against giving children that survived an abortion medical care ...

[struth]

The 2002 law requires ordinary treatment as well.

Ordinary vs Extraordinary Care | ALL

The American Life League is the oldest grassroots pro-life education organization in the US, and has been defending the sacredness of life since 1979.

all.org

It was a PR stunt for the Rabid Right.

we are talking about the 2020 law that Harris voted against....

 

[BlindBoo]

we are talking about the 2020 law that Harris voted against....

It's not a law. It was a failed bill and Neo-GOP PR stunt intended to be weaponized like you're attempting to do now. Children born alive, including failed abortions, have had legal protection for two decade. Both parties agreed unanimously on that issue back in 2002.

 

[struth]

It's not a law. It was a failed bill and Neo-GOP PR stunt intended to be weaponized like you're attempting to do now. Children born alive, including failed abortions, have had legal protection for two decade. Both parties agreed unanimously on that issue back in 2002.

True, it failed, due to Harris and other dems that don't think babies should be cared for

 

[BlindBoo]

True, it failed, due to Harris and other dems that don't think babies should be cared for

All Democrats and Republicans agreed unanimously that there should be a law protecting all infants who were born alive. That's why they passed a bill into law two decades ago. Did Democrat try to repeal that law while I wasn't looking? If not, then you are simply wrong.

 

[struth]

All Democrats and Republicans agreed unanimously that there should be a law protecting all infants who were born alive. That's why they passed a bill into law two decades ago. Did Democrat try to repeal that law while I wasn't looking? If not, then you are simply wrong.

back in the early 2000s they did, but by 2020 the radicals have taken over the Demfascist party and obviously don't agree

 

[BlindBoo]

back in the early 2000s they did, but by 2020 the radicals have taken over the Demfascist party and obviously don't agree

The Hell you say. Democrats have never tried to repeal the law making it a crime to ignore an infant who was born alive.

 

[struth]

The Hell you say. Democrats have never tried to repeal the law making it a crime to ignore an infant who was born alive.

They voted again the 2020 law, Kameltoe did twice

 

[lafayette]

back in the early 2000s they did, but by 2020 the radicals have taken over the Demfascist party and obviously don't agree

Nonsense.

 

[struth]

Nonsense.

Harris and the votes are recorded

 

[lafayette]

Harris and the votes are recorded

Your argument is nonsense.

 

[struth]

Your argument is nonsense.

It’s not an argument. These votes are recorded. It’s fact

 

[yidnar]

yidnar hates anything not MAGA including Jews, so...
... consider the source.

I have never posted anti semetic opinions .. I am a staunch supporter of the nation of Israel .

 

[BlindBoo]

They voted again the 2020 law, Kameltoe did twice

Did it repeal the original unanimously passed Infants Born Alive Act? Nope, the Neo-GOP just want lie to the county.

"Opponents, noting the rarity of such births and citing laws already making it a crime to kill newborn babies, said the bill was unnecessary. They said it is part of a push by abortion opponents to curb access to the procedure and intimidate doctors who perform it, and said late-term abortions generally occur when the infant is considered incapable of surviving after birth."

Democrats block Senate GOP bill on infants surviving abortions

The Republican bill that would have threatened prison for doctors who don't try saving the life of infants born alive during abortions.

www.pbs.org

I bet you even already knew it was a crime to not provide normal care to any infant born alive.

 

[struth]

Did it repeal the original unanimously passed Infants Born Alive Act? Nope, the Neo-GOP just want lie to the county.

"Opponents, noting the rarity of such births and citing laws already making it a crime to kill newborn babies, said the bill was unnecessary. They said it is part of a push by abortion opponents to curb access to the procedure and intimidate doctors who perform it, and said late-term abortions generally occur when the infant is considered incapable of surviving after birth."

Democrats block Senate GOP bill on infants surviving abortions

The Republican bill that would have threatened prison for doctors who don't try saving the life of infants born alive during abortions.

www.pbs.org

I bet you even already knew it was a crime to not provide normal care to any infant born alive.

Why would they repeal that law?? Crazy weird

 

[Arlette]

then Sen Harris D representing California voted against a bill that would require medical practitioners to provide medical care for children that survived an abortion !

CBS Accidentally Admits that Harris Thinks Medical Care for Infants Born Alive after Abortion Is ‘Extreme’

On Sunday, vice presidential nominee and Ohio Senator J.D. Vance (R) joined Margaret Brennan on CBS's "Face the Nation" for an interview. Predictably, the conve

washingtonstand.com

I contacted the management here and requested that your thread gets moved to the crackpot sub forum. And you better learn to call Harris the Great Mother.

 

[BlindBoo]

Why would they repeal that law?? Crazy weird

Since it is already the law of the land, the only way to vote against giving all infants who are born alive the care they need to survive would be to repeal the law making it a crime. Did she vote to repeal the law?

 

[struth]

Since it is already the law of the land, the only way to vote against giving all infants who are born alive the care they need to survive would be to repeal the law making it a crime. Did she vote to repeal the law?

It isn't the law of the land, Harris and the Dems blocked it in 2020. what part of that are you missing?

 

[BlindBoo]

It isn't the law of the land, Harris and the Dems blocked it in 2020. what part of that are you missing?

Contrary to known reality. It has been a federal crime since 2002 to not give aid and ordinary medical care to any infant born alive regardless if it was a botched abortion.

 

[struth]

Contrary to known reality. It has been a federal crime since 2002 to not give aid and ordinary medical care to any infant born alive regardless if it was a botched abortion.

It was not a crime. It was going to be in 2020. The 2002 one simply authorized the right to sue in civil court

Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

However, this law did not establish explicit criminal penalties for failing to treat such infants, and the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act has been introduced in every Congress since the 114th in attempts to remedy it

Harris was blocking that, that what we are talking about.

 

[BlindBoo]

It was not a crime. It was going to be in 2020. The 2002 one simply authorized the right to sue in civil court

Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

However, this law did not establish explicit criminal penalties for failing to treat such infants, and the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act has been introduced in every Congress since the 114th in attempts to remedy it

Harris was blocking that, that what we are talking about.

Killing a baby is a homicide (in every State). “States can and do punish people for killing children who are born alive,” Mary Ziegler, a professor at Florida State University’s College of Law and the author of two books on the abortion debate, told us in a phone interview. “Most criminal laws are at the state level not the federal level.”

Ziegler said Sasse’s bill would add uniform federal criminal penalties for health care practitioners, so it does include new measures. “It’s more just of questionable importance given that state law prosecutions are already happening.”

The Facts on the Born-Alive Debate - FactCheck.org

Republicans and Democrats traded accusations on the topic of abortion after a “born-alive” bill failed in the Senate. Democrats say the legislation was unnecessary and aimed at restricting access to legal abortion, while Republicans say it was about protecting babies. We’ll go through what the...

www.factcheck.org

The 2002 bill added clarity for the issue because of other court rulings......

https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/107th-congress/house-report/186

The purposes of H.R. 2175, the ``Born-Alive Infants
Protection Act of 2001'' are:

(1) Lto repudiate the flawed notion that a child's
entitlement to the protections of the law is dependent
upon whether that child's mother or others want him or
her;

(2) Lto repudiate the flawed notion that the right to
an abortion means the right to a dead baby, regardless
of where the killing takes place;

(3) Lto affirm that every child who is born alive--
whether as a result of induced abortion, natural labor,
or caesarean section--bears an intrinsic dignity as a
human being which is not dependent upon the desires,
interests, or convenience of any other person, and is
entitled to receive the full protections of the law;
and

(4) Lto establish firmly that, for purposes of Federal
law, the term ``person'' includes an infant who is
completely expelled or extracted from his or her mother
and who is alive, regardless of whether or not the
baby's development is believed to be, or is in fact,
sufficient to permit long-term survival, and regardless
of whether the baby survived an abortion.

Background and Need for the Legislation