Ketanji Should Be Disqualified

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Yeah I know she is now on SCOTUS but, why the FUCK is this regime applauding a woman that can't define what a woman is? Does that mean if a Woman is involved in a SCOTUS case she will have to recuse herself? One would think that, and her past record of leniency for pedophiles, would have precluded her from nomination in the first place but, Joe Biden is a political hack and cares not one iota for the American People.

That Jackson will rule defending the rights of gay and transgender Americans from attack by the hateful, bigoted right consistent with the Constitution and its case law makes her exceedingly qualified.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

do you know the difference between the word cant and the word refuse?

The reprehensible right is going all-out exhibiting its fear, ignorance, bigotry, and hate.

 

[WinterBorn]

Why do you support leniency for pedophiles?

The pedophiles were still prosecuted and sentenced. They did not receive the maximum sentence. They did not receive the maximum sentence in 30% of all the cases in which non-production child porn was tried (which is what hers were). And many of those judges were put in place by good republicans.

Each case judges on it's own merits.

 

[WinterBorn]

So what? She doesn't even know what a woman is. She should recuse herself from any case that involves a woman.

She refused to be trapped by a bogus question. That is all.

 

[armadei]

The pedophiles were still prosecuted and sentenced. They did not receive the maximum sentence. They did not receive the maximum sentence in 30% of all the cases in which non-production child porn was tried (which is what hers were). And many of those judges were put in place by good republicans.

Each case judges on it's own merits.

Look at you trying to justify NOT sentencing pedophiles to the maximum sentence possible by law. Do you molest kids? Do you approve of molesting kids? Explain here on a public forum why child abusers should not receive the maximum penalty allowed by law. Matter of fact, explain why they should even be allowed to continue to breathe the same air that the rest of us do, you pedo-sympathizing fuck.

 

[WinterBorn]

Look at you trying to justify NOT sentencing pedophiles to the maximum sentence possible by law. Do you molest kids? Do you approve of molesting kids? Explain here on a public forum why child abusers should not receive the maximum penalty allowed by law. Matter of fact, explain why they should even be allowed to continue to breathe the same air that the rest of us do, you pedo-sympathizing fuck.

First, tell us all which case(s) Judge Jackson ruled on were actual child molesters, or even producers of child porn (not just possessing it).

 

[armadei]

First, tell us all which case(s) Judge Jackson ruled on were actual child molesters, or even producers of child porn (not just possessing it).

"They just watched it, they didn't produce it!"

This is the hill you want to fight on? LMFAO. Shut the fuck up you degenerate. There is ZERO defense here. The fact that you're trying says something extremely sinister about you.

 

[WinterBorn]

"They just watched it, they didn't produce it!"

This is the hill you want to fight on? LMFAO. Shut the fuck up you degenerate. There is ZERO defense here. The fact that you're trying says something extremely sinister about you.

You are a hostile little prick, aren't you?

You have been ranting about child rapists. Did Judge Jackson preside over any trial of a child rapist? Or are you just being overly sensationalistic and lying about the actual cases?

And yes, someone who just watched child porn should receive a lighter sentence than someone who actually raped a child.

 

[WinterBorn]

I think you'll find that most people, parents especially, will find that those who perpetrate acts of child rape are just as guilty as those who demand it.

Way to expose yourself, pedo. Well done. You sick, degenerate fuck.

So you have no evidence of any case involving actual child rape being presided over by Judge Jackson? That figures.

And you need to edit your post to remove your accusation that I am a pedophile. I am not.

 

[armadei]

So you have no evidence of any case involving actual child rape being presided over by Judge Jackson? That figures.

And you need to edit your post to remove your accusation that I am a pedophile. I am not.

You are actively defending lenient sentences for pedophiles that KBJ set which are easily verifiable through public record. I'm not editing shit. Fuck you, pedo-apologist.

 

[WinterBorn]

You are actively defending lenient sentences for pedophiles that KBJ set which are easily verifiable through public record. I'm not editing shit. Fuck you, pedo-apologist.

And you are lying about what actually happened in the cases presided over by Judge Jackson.

Also, calling someone a pedo-apologist is borderline. But calling someone a pedophile is crossing the line. Edit it.

 

[armadei]

And you are lying about what actually happened in the cases presided over by Judge Jackson.

Also, calling someone a pedo-apologist is borderline. But calling someone a pedophile is crossing the line. Edit it.

I will edit NOTHING. I know what's going on here now. You're all jumpy about being called out. Called out because you are trying to mitigate the difference between actually raping a child vs being "just someone who watches", as if that makes someone less culpable.

No. You will not get away from this. You are literally, miserably, arguing in defense of pedophilia and it's lack of prosecution. Fuck you.

 

[WinterBorn]

I will edit NOTHING. I know what's going on here now. You're all jumpy about being called out. Called out because you are trying to mitigate the difference between actually raping a child vs being "just someone who watches", as if that makes someone less culpable.

No. You will not get away from this. You are literally, miserably, arguing in defense of pedophilia and it's lack of prosecution. Fuck you.

No, your accusations against me being a pedophile have no more merit than your accusations against Judge Jackson being lenient in sentencing child rapists.

Both are lies. And one is against the site rules.

 

[armadei]

No, your accusations against me being a pedophile have no more merit than your accusations against Judge Jackson being lenient in sentencing child rapists.

Both are lies. And one is against the site rules.

I don't give a fuck about the "site rules". You are attempting to minimize and deflect pedophilia, plain and simple. This is not nuance or hyperbole. This is a moral, primal line that I will not tolerate crossing. I will call you out for what you are without reservation or fear. And, if push came to shove, I have an arsenal of IP's to continue doing so. You will never get away from this so long as you use that username. Stop downplaying pedophilia, you fucking degenerate.

 

[WinterBorn]

I don't give a fuck about the "site rules". You are attempting to minimize and deflect pedophilia, plain and simple. This is not nuance or hyperbole. This is a moral, primal line that I will not tolerate crossing. I will call you out for what you are without reservation or fear. And, if push came to shove, I have an arsenal of IP's to continue doing so. You will never get away from this so long as you use that username. Stop downplaying pedophilia, you fucking degenerate.

Your self-righteous bullshit is laughable.

I am not downplaying pedophilia. And as for crossing a line, calling me a pedophile is clearly crossing a line. Congrats on your collection of IPs. But I do not tolerate being called a pedophile by some hostile prick without the balls to give evidence.

 

[armadei]

Your self-righteous bullshit is laughable.

I am not downplaying pedophilia. And as for crossing a line, calling me a pedophile is clearly crossing a line. Congrats on your collection of IPs. But I do not tolerate being called a pedophile by some hostile prick without the balls to give evidence.

I could give a fuck what you "tolerate". You are defending light/lenient sentences for pedophiles. There's nothing more to be said. You are exposed.

 

[WinterBorn]

I could give a fuck what you "tolerate". You are defending light/lenient sentences for pedophiles. There's nothing more to be said. You are exposed.

LMAO!! Exposed? Now you are some crusader?

Sit down, junior. You have completely misclassified what I said, as well as what Judge Jackson did.

 

[armadei]

LMAO!! Exposed? Now you are some crusader?

Sit down, junior. You have completely misclassified what I said, as well as what Judge Jackson did.

Right. Sure.

The internet is forever. As is KBJ's jurist record. Freak.

 

[WinterBorn]

Right. Sure.

The internet is forever. As is KBJ's jurist record. Freak.

The internet is not forever. And you are not the noble crusader you think you are. You are just another internet asshole.

 

[armadei]

LMAO!! Exposed? Now you are some crusader?

You know what? I'll give you that. I am a crusader. A crusader against the abuse of children, doubly so for sexual abuse, and all those who would seek to minimize it - such as yourself.

There's a lot I'll put up with. Degenerate entertainment, Marxist teachers, toxic Tik-Toks, etc. I'm a father. I can take a lot. And as such I can shield my kids from most of society's debauchery.

However, I would tell you this: I will not move a single inch on the rape of children. There is no gray area. There are no mitigating factors. As a father I wouldn't think twice to rip your heart from your fucking chest to protect my kids, nor any other innocent child.

Try me at your own peril, pedo-apologist.