Kevin McCarthy Vows To Subpoena 51 Deep State Intelligence Agents Who Stated Hunter Biden Laptop Was Likely Russian Election Interference

[Moonglow]

Every single one of these 50+ "senior intelligence officials" got it wrong, and you're not even willing to ask how such a monumental fuck up happened. That's just sad.

View attachment 738036

Then they will ask them if they believe what they attested to, then the reply will be, "to the best of my knowledge", and the inquisition will end.

 

[Care4all]

I hope they do have a real investigation, to uncover it all, including who inserted emails in to it, after it left the hands of the repair man, to Giuliani.

 

[easyt65]

51 US Intelligence personnel committed Perjury by signing a document swearing the contents of Hunter's laptop was 'Russian Disinformation', which has been proven to be false.

Perjury, Obstruction, Conspiracy to affect the outcome of an election...just a few crimes with which they could be charged.


If any have a security clearance it should be stripped.

If any still work for tbe government in any capacity they should be fired.

Enough of renegade, hyper-partisan criminals and traitors being 'transferred', 'allowed to retire', and / or simply not being held accountable.

 

[Rambunctious]

What are you talking about? There’s ample evidence of foreign election interference. See volume 1 of the Mueller report. There were extensive active measures in the US using social media as a huge tool.

Moreover, the attempts carried into 2020 and were documented by the DNI.

Intelligence Community Assessment on Foreign Threats to the 2020 U.S. Federal Elections

Declassified by Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines Date: March 16, 2021 "Foreign Threats to the 2020 U.S. Federal Elections" ...

www.dni.gov

Who told you there was no foreign interference?

You post a link of excuses from the fox himself... why not call Hitler to defend killing the jews... dummy.... LOL

 

[Care4all]

And now they will need to explain why they believed that, and how every single one of them was wrong, in front of congress and the nation, under oath. I look forward to it.

They were not all wrong, they were in part wrong....And that was because it was too early to tell....

That is why the WALL STREET JOURNAL who Giuliani first gave the laptop story exclusive to, was hesitant to post the story in October for Giuliani's October Surprise, because they had not completed their verification needed yet.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

My fascism??? how about the current government conspiring with the media companies and big tech social media giants and the FBI to kick opposing positions opinions and statements off of the internet papers and nightly news?... that is fascism dumbass....

Nope, it sure isn't. Good luck.

 

[Marener]

You post a link of excuses from the fox himself... why not call Hitler to defend killing the jews... dummy.... LOL

Trump tried to use his intelligence agencies to bury it because they are political hacks using government to try to sway elections.

DNI will no longer brief Congress in person on election security over leak concerns

The move comes weeks before the presidential election and as President Donald Trump continues to downplay the severity of foreign interference.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Rambunctious]

Trump tried to use his intelligence agencies to bury it because they are political hacks using government to try to sway elections.

DNI will no longer brief Congress in person on election security over leak concerns

The move comes weeks before the presidential election and as President Donald Trump continues to downplay the severity of foreign interference.

www.nbcnews.com

The fifth installment of Elon Musk's "Twitter Files" Monday revealed that staffers believed that tweets written by former President Trump around the events of Jan. 6 had not actually violated its policies despite the company saying so at the time.

"For years, Twitter had resisted calls both internal and external to ban Trump on the grounds that blocking a world leader from the platform or removing their controversial tweets would hide important information that people should be able to see and debate," Bari Weiss of The Free Press wrote towards the beginning of her thread on Monday. "But after January 6, as @mtaibbi and @shellenbergermd have documented, pressure grew, both inside and outside of Twitter, to ban Trump."

Weiss cited "dissenters" within Twitter that did not want to ban Trump, including one who wrote, "Maybe because I am from China. I deeply understand how censorship can destroy the public conversation."

"But voices like that one appear to have been a distinct minority within the company. Across Slack channels, many Twitter employees were upset that Trump hadn’t been banned earlier," Weiss wrote. "After January 6, Twitter employees organized to demand their employer ban Trump. ‘There is a lot of employee advocacy happening,’ said one Twitter employee."

 

[Rambunctious]

They were not all wrong, they were in part wrong....And that was because it was too early to tell....

That is why the WALL STREET JOURNAL who Giuliani first gave the laptop story exclusive to, was hesitant to post the story in October for Giuliani's October Surprise, because they had not completed their verification needed yet.

The fifth installment of Elon Musk's "Twitter Files" Monday revealed that staffers believed that tweets written by former President Trump around the events of Jan. 6 had not actually violated its policies despite the company saying so at the time.

"For years, Twitter had resisted calls both internal and external to ban Trump on the grounds that blocking a world leader from the platform or removing their controversial tweets would hide important information that people should be able to see and debate," Bari Weiss of The Free Press wrote towards the beginning of her thread on Monday. "But after January 6, as @mtaibbi and @shellenbergermd have documented, pressure grew, both inside and outside of Twitter, to ban Trump."

Weiss cited "dissenters" within Twitter that did not want to ban Trump, including one who wrote, "Maybe because I am from China. I deeply understand how censorship can destroy the public conversation."

"But voices like that one appear to have been a distinct minority within the company. Across Slack channels, many Twitter employees were upset that Trump hadn’t been banned earlier," Weiss wrote. "After January 6, Twitter employees organized to demand their employer ban Trump. ‘There is a lot of employee advocacy happening,’ said one Twitter employee."

 

[Rambunctious]

Proof that the Government censored these media companies has not been forthcoming but there are a lot of familiar folks running around with....

View attachment 738058\

again.

Anti Free speech Elon's files will prove it.

The fifth installment of Elon Musk's "Twitter Files" Monday revealed that staffers believed that tweets written by former President Trump around the events of Jan. 6 had not actually violated its policies despite the company saying so at the time.

"For years, Twitter had resisted calls both internal and external to ban Trump on the grounds that blocking a world leader from the platform or removing their controversial tweets would hide important information that people should be able to see and debate," Bari Weiss of The Free Press wrote towards the beginning of her thread on Monday. "But after January 6, as @mtaibbi and @shellenbergermd have documented, pressure grew, both inside and outside of Twitter, to ban Trump."

Weiss cited "dissenters" within Twitter that did not want to ban Trump, including one who wrote, "Maybe because I am from China. I deeply understand how censorship can destroy the public conversation."

"But voices like that one appear to have been a distinct minority within the company. Across Slack channels, many Twitter employees were upset that Trump hadn’t been banned earlier," Weiss wrote. "After January 6, Twitter employees organized to demand their employer ban Trump. ‘There is a lot of employee advocacy happening,’ said one Twitter employee."

 

[martybegan]

They were not all wrong, they were in part wrong....And that was because it was too early to tell....

That is why the WALL STREET JOURNAL who Giuliani first gave the laptop story exclusive to, was hesitant to post the story in October for Giuliani's October Surprise, because they had not completed their verification needed yet.

Then they should have kept their fucking mouth's shut.

They went on record, they played it like they knew exactly what had happened.

 

[Faun]

You suck up the fact that the GOP is coming closer to national domination... by the finish of the 24 election the republicans will hold the house the senate and the white house....

LOL

Haven't you embarrassed yourself enough making nonsensical predictions?

Red Wave baby... its coming...

In due time... first we are going to take back the house and the senate and make Joe a lame duck...

So when we take the house and the senate we can all troll you... right?...

the blue states can cheat all they want it won't change the fact that the GOP will win the house and senate despite McConnell....

Yep the red wave is coming... No amount of cheating will help you libs this time....

In a red wave election year like this any republican can beat any democrat....

​

 

[Marener]

The fifth installment of Elon Musk's "Twitter Files" Monday revealed that staffers believed that tweets written by former President Trump around the events of Jan. 6 had not actually violated its policies despite the company saying so at the time.

"For years, Twitter had resisted calls both internal and external to ban Trump on the grounds that blocking a world leader from the platform or removing their controversial tweets would hide important information that people should be able to see and debate," Bari Weiss of The Free Press wrote towards the beginning of her thread on Monday. "But after January 6, as @mtaibbi and @shellenbergermd have documented, pressure grew, both inside and outside of Twitter, to ban Trump."

Weiss cited "dissenters" within Twitter that did not want to ban Trump, including one who wrote, "Maybe because I am from China. I deeply understand how censorship can destroy the public conversation."

"But voices like that one appear to have been a distinct minority within the company. Across Slack channels, many Twitter employees were upset that Trump hadn’t been banned earlier," Weiss wrote. "After January 6, Twitter employees organized to demand their employer ban Trump. ‘There is a lot of employee advocacy happening,’ said one Twitter employee."

Okay.

The government’s role is conspicuously absent from this text.

 

[Rambunctious]

LOL

Haven't you embarrassed yourself enough making nonsensical predictions?

​

​

​

​

​

​

We must first rid the nation of election fraud... when that happens or enough people stand up and vote dems out so that cheating would not be enough to win... then my day will rise...

 

[Lesh]

The opinion of so-called "experts" is very relevant. It's relied on in court all the time.

Think of it this way; if your doctor, a "senior medical official", told you that you had stage 4 cancer and weeks to live, and you decided to kill yourself to avoid the suffering. Then, it turned out you actually had no cancer, it was just the doctor's opinion, do you see a problem with that?

Yea except that these folks offered nothing close to that concret

What they essentially said was that the symptoms were consistent with cancer and more tests were required

 

[Rambunctious]

Okay.

The government’s role is conspicuously absent from this text.

Previous releases of information from Musk says they where neck deep in this... an ex FBI lawyer one of the most corrupt men in DC Mr. Baker was working at Twitter... you are being shorted the full story by the media you watch....

 

[easyt65]

Previous releases of information from Musk says they where neck deep in this... an ex FBI lawyer one of the most corrupt men in DC Mr. Baker was working at Twitter... you are being shorted the full story by the media you watch....

Well yeah...which is why he only wants to focus on THIS part / release...

 

[Faun]

We must first rid the nation of election fraud... when that happens or enough people stand up and vote dems out so that cheating would not be enough to win... then my day will rise...

A pity you can't prove there was cheating. But at least you believe your hallucinations.

 

[Marener]

Previous releases of information from Musk says they where neck deep in this... an ex FBI lawyer one of the most corrupt men in DC Mr. Baker was working at Twitter... you are being shorted the full story by the media you watch....

Oh, Musk said.

Baker working at Twitter has nothing to do with the first amendment. It’s just weak innuendo.

Why don’t you have actual facts? Just casting aspersions.

 

[Marener]

Well yeah...which is why he only wants to focus on THIS part / release...

I’d settle for any part or release that actually says what you guys are claiming regarding government and the first amendment.

All we get is more smoke and mirrors.