Kevin McCarthy Vows To Subpoena 51 Deep State Intelligence Agents Who Stated Hunter Biden Laptop Was Likely Russian Election Interference

And who were these Ukrainian Officials? Yea...Russian sympathizers

As far as Shokin

In 2012, the Ukrainian prosecutor general Viktor Pshonka began investigating Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky, owner of the natural gas company Burisma Holdings, over allegations of money laundering, tax evasion, and corruption during 2010–2012.[40][41]

In 2015, Shokin became the prosecutor general, inheriting the investigation. The Obama administration and other governments and non-governmental organizations soon became concerned that Shokin was not adequately pursuing corruption in Ukraine, was protecting the political elite, and was regarded as "an obstacle to anti-corruption efforts".[25][42] Among other issues, he was slow-walking the investigation into Zlochevsky and Burisma and, according to Zlochevsky's allies, using the threat of prosecution to try to solicit bribes from Mr. Zlochevsky and his team – to the extent that Obama officials were considering launching their own criminal investigation into the company for possible money laundering.[40]

You skipped over an entire year of obfuscation. In 2014, Shokin as Deputy Prosecutor General, he was assigned to cooperate with the U.K. who opened up an investigation into Zlochevsky and had frozen $23 million of his assets. Almost a year transpired when a British court ordered the investigation be halted and the $23 million released due to lack of evidence. The reason they lacked evidence...? Instead of cooperating with the U.K., Shokin stonewalled them until the case was dropped.
 
what was stolen? who stole it?
They were Hunter's personal emails, did the laptop owner get permission to distribute them to the public?

He may have now owned Hunter's physical laptop as he claims, because it was never picked up, but to claim that made it ok for the computer repair man to then give this personal and financial content of the original owner to the public is beyond unethical imo.

I would hate all of my personal and financial documents and emails put on to the open market....for goodness sake, wouldn't you think we were protected from that?
 
The "whole piece" is incredibly condemning.
It shows that clearly Joe Biden was getting kickbacks from US foreign aid to the Ukraine, and that Zelensky was illegally protecting Burisma Holdings from investigation, by firing Shokin.
Which is substantiated not only by the fact Burisma Holding was paid to do nothing, but it was illegal to fire Shokin without a trial proving guilt of a crime.

Oh look, the Russian bot is here to spread disinformation.
 
That it was Russian disinformation.

They're going to be subpoenaed to explain how they came to that conclusion, and why they were willing to go public with it. It should be a very interesting conversation, don't you think?
What they said was that it bore all the hallmarks of Russian disinfo.

There has been nothing that proves that assessment incorrect
 
They were Hunter's personal emails, did the laptop owner get permission to distribute them to the public?

He may have now owned Hunter's physical laptop as he claims, because it was never picked up, but to claim that made it ok for the computer repair man to then give this personal and financial content of the original owner to the public is beyond unethical imo.

I would hate all of my personal and financial documents and emails put on to the open market....for goodness sake, wouldn't you think we were protected from that?

Hunter lost his right to the information when, in a crack-induced haze, he abandoned the laptop.

If you don't want that to happen to you, stay away from hard drugs.
 
They were Hunter's personal emails, did the laptop owner get permission to distribute them to the public?

He may have now owned Hunter's physical laptop as he claims, because it was never picked up, but to claim that made it ok for the computer repair man to then give this personal and financial content of the original owner to the public is beyond unethical imo.

I would hate all of my personal and financial documents and emails put on to the open market....for goodness sake, wouldn't you think we were protected from that?
when you abandon property, it’s no longer yours. He was so high on crack he forgot it and never came back.
 
A federal badge does not give you the right to subvert the electoral process in favor of your chosen candidate... if you do that or even come close to it you need to serve time in a federal prison... these disgusting clowns all need to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law as an example of what will happen if you do what these 51 agents did...
 
So you want testimony about an OPINION?

That should be...underwhelming

The opinion of so-called "experts" is very relevant. It's relied on in court all the time.

Think of it this way; if your doctor, a "senior medical official", told you that you had stage 4 cancer and weeks to live, and you decided to kill yourself to avoid the suffering. Then, it turned out you actually had no cancer, it was just the doctor's opinion, do you see a problem with that?
 
A federal badge does not give you the right to subvert the electoral process in favor of your chosen candidate... if you do that or even come close to it you need to serve time in a federal prison... these disgusting clowns all need to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law as an example of what will happen if you do what these 51 agents did...
What embarrassing horseshit.
 
No MFER what's embarrassing is suck asses like you that are wallowing in your nations decline because you hated the last president...
Stop your stupid crybabying. Anyone and everyone is allowed to give their opinion. Your fascism fetish is going nowhere.
 

Forum List

Back
Top