Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Making a point to you that you can’t admit you’re wrong when you know you’re wrong.
You're a proven hypocrite. So?So why should I try to convince you you’re wrong? You’re a proven liar who would rather argue an incorrect point than admit you are wrong. QED.
Then what is your goal here in continuing this horseshit?You would never admit you’re wrong. You would rather defend a lie that you know is a lie than admit you’re wrong.
If you knew you were wrong, you wouldn’t admit you’re wrong. Stupid fuck.I don't know that I'm wrong because you haven't told me how I'm wrong you stupid fuck.
I’m just enjoying the show.Then what is your goal here in continuing this horseshit?
If you knew you were wrong, you wouldn’t admit you’re wrong. Stupid fuck.
I’m just enjoying the show.
If you knew you were wrong, you wouldn’t admit you’re wrong. Stupid fuck.
Oh I have shown proof of this. Allow me to demonstrate once again.Which you refuse to prove.
My point is, I didn’t assume anything before the trial. You did.
You didn’t have an opinion on whether Chauvin killed Floyd or not?
No, I didn’t. I usually reserve judgment until more info comes out. Especially in cases like this when woke imbeciles want to hang someone just to make a point, rather than waste any time on guilt or innocence.
“Yet to prove”.So the show is me theoretically not admitting the wrong you have yet to prove?
“Yet to prove”.
You said you were going to prove I was wrong about you not answering questions. You already posted this shit.Oh I have shown proof of this. Allow me to demonstrate once again.
You less than a month after Floyd was killed:
"I think a combination of drugs, his heart condition and the stress of the situation caused him to have a heart attack. He very clearly did not want to get in the cruiser and getting arrested got him torqued up. I don't know why but whatever his reason was, he was willing to try to bullshit his way out of it.
I've no doubt he had trouble breathing but it wasn't because of anything Chauvin was doing.“
Proof.
No. I proved that you’re not going to admit you’re wrong even if you know you’re wrong.You said you were going to prove I was wrong about you not answering questions. You already posted this shit.
Wrong about what?No. I proved that you’re not going to admit you’re wrong even if you know you’re wrong.
Anything. With your delicate ego, you’re always going to refuse to admit you’re wrong even when you know you’re wrong.Wrong about what?
My point is, I didn’t assume anything before the trial. You did.
You didn’t have an opinion on whether Chauvin killed Floyd or not?
No, I didn’t. I usually reserve judgment until more info comes out. Especially in cases like this when woke imbeciles want to hang someone just to make a point, rather than waste any time on guilt or innocence.
Anything. With your delicate ego, you’re always going to refuse to admit you’re wrong even when you know you’re wrong.
Anything. With your delicate ego, you’re always going to refuse to admit you’re wrong even when you know you’re wrong.
You less than a month after Floyd was killed:
"I think a combination of drugs, his heart condition and the stress of the situation caused him to have a heart attack. He very clearly did not want to get in the cruiser and getting arrested got him torqued up. I don't know why but whatever his reason was, he was willing to try to bullshit his way out of it.
I've no doubt he had trouble breathing but it wasn't because of anything Chauvin was doing.“
Proof.
It‘s not just something i think. It has been proven.I know what you think I lied about…
My point is, I didn’t assume anything before the trial. You did.
You didn’t have an opinion on whether Chauvin killed Floyd or not?
No, I didn’t. I usually reserve judgment until more info comes out. Especially in cases like this when woke imbeciles want to hang someone just to make a point, rather than waste any time on guilt or innocence.
Both. Those two are not mutually exclusive.Are we talking about lying or being wrong?
The show continues. All of this because you don’t want to admit you’re wrong when you know that you’re wrong.Bullshit. In Post #984, you said:
"And if I were to show you where you’re wrong, would you accept that?"
In Post #992 I asked:
"Wrong about what? You still haven't answered that"
In Post #993 you said:
"About whatever you’re accusing me of."
This whole business about admitting wrong started there. It had nothing to do with lying.
You're just trying to divert attention from your own hypocrisy.
You just said you were talking about both but earlier when I asked:The show continues. All of this because you don’t want to admit you’re wrong when you know that you’re wrong.
He should get a medal for killing drug headed asshole.
Supreme court rejects Chauvin’s appeal of George Floyd murder conviction
Decision affirms Minneapolis ex-police officer’s conviction for second-degree murder and sentence of over 20 years in prisonwww.theguardian.com
Its a joke that he was allowed to appeal his sentence for murdering Mr Floyd. It must have been awful for the Floyds to relive this.
We all saw what happened. They should incrase the sentence for wasting court time.
Again, the two are not mutually exclusive. You were wrong when you said “My point is, I didn’t assume anything before the trial.“ That’s also a lie.I didn't ask what I was lying about, I asked what I was wrong about.
Then that means that when you were wrong about me thinking Baker is incompetent, it was a lie, yes?Again, the two are not mutually exclusive. You were wrong when you said “My point is, I didn’t assume anything before the trial.“ That’s also a lie.
