🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

NY Times Editor Carlos Tejada, 49, Dies of Heart Attack a Day After Getting His Covid Booster Shot

Excellent....I'm actually giddy.
Myocarditis no doubt and a damn good target to take out too!
I'm reading the deaths on this other site......just to see the reports........Hour and half after shot .........dead in Nursing home........WTF. Even though most were on deaths door......dang.
 

Age:58.0
Sex:Female
Location:Washington
Vaccinated:2021-01-04Onset:2021-01-04 Days after vaccination:0Submitted:0000-00-00Entered:2021-01-05

Write-up: Vaccine received at about 0900 on 01/04/2021 at her place of work, Medical Center, where she was employed as a housekeeper. About one hour after receiving the vaccine she experienced a hot flash, nausea, and feeling like she was going to pass out after she had bent down. Later at about 1500 hours she appeared tired and lethargic, then a short time later, at about 1600 hours, upon arrival to a friends home she complained of feeling hot and having difficulty breathing. She then collapsed, then when medics arrived, she was still breathing slowly then went into cardiac arrest and was unable to be revived.




58 year old housekeeper.........Dead same day as shot. Happened at the Medical Center and they sent her home.....Then collapsed........Dropped and then the ambulance couldn't revive her........Medical Center where she worked.......let her go home.
 
I think your search engine needs a break dude. That paper was NOTHING TO DO with the vaccines. Only the rampaging damage that the VIRUS does to critical organs and other body parts when you get SERIOUSLY ill with the disease.

A GREAT REASON to GET immunity from Covid either thru nat. immunity or vaccination..

I'm sure you'll agree. :stir:

From your link --
You're not educated enough on the topic.
 
CIA-MI6 operative Neil Ferguson is mentioned here:

'At the outset of the pandemic, Dr. Fauci used wildly inaccurate modeling that overestimated US deaths by 525 percent. Scammer and pandemic fabricator, Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London was their author, with funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) of $148.8 million. Dr. Fauci used this model as justification for his lockdowns.

Dr. Fauci acquiesced to CDC's selective protocol changes for completing death certificates in a way that inflated the claimed deaths from COVID, and thus inflated its infection mortality rate. CDC later admitted that only 6 percent of COVID deaths occurred in entirely healthy individuals. The remaining 94 percent suffered from an average of 3.8 potentially fatal comorbidities.

Regulators misused PCR tests that CDC belatedly admitted in August 2021 were incapable of distinguishing COVID from other viral illnesses. Dr. Fauci tolerated their use at inappropriately high amplitudes of 37 and up to 45, even though Fauci had told Vince Racaniello that tests employing thresholds of 35 and above were very unlikely to indicate the presence of live virus that could replicate.

In July 2020, Fauci remarked that at these levels, a positive result is "just dead nucleotides, period," yet did nothing to modify testing so it might be more accurate.'
(Kennedy, The Real Anthony Fauci, pp.4-5)

We'll be excerpting from the NIH autopsy report mentioned in post #107, because of the Jingmen tick virus, a virus from a bloodsucker linked to the Chinese communist military's virus found on Zhoushan Island, to reinforce the notion that SARS-CoV-2 is a thrombotic disease.

32 COVID Autopsies
'....However, many patients (88%) also have widespread microscopic thromboses, as well as characteristic findings in the liver and lymph nodes.
'
 
Medalerts.org is run by antivaxxers, who post misinformation and fake news. I'm hardly shocked that you're all over that site.
 
yes


Table 1. Alleged COVID-19 Countermeasure Claims Filed as of November 1, 2021​

This table displays the alleged countermeasure and alleged injury/death for each COVID-19 countermeasure claim filed as of November 1, 2021. Of the 4,751 COVID-19 countermeasure claims, 2,297 allege injuries/deaths from COVID-19 vaccines and 2,454 allege injuries/deaths from other COVID-19 countermeasures.

The CICP does not maintain its aggregated data concerning alleged countermeasures, including vaccines, by specific manufacturer or trade name.


2297 injuries death claims. 2454 covid countermeasures claims. That is the official list.

That is historical data for EVERYTHING.


That is how it works........full description from Congress.


Confirmation of the claim comes almost a year after distribution of the vaccines began and after 965,843 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines were submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (as of Dec. 10).

However, it is unclear whether the claim that will be compensated pertains to a reaction to a COVID vaccine, or to some other COVID-related treatment, The Epoch Times reported.

The CICP was established under the aegis of the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act of 2005. The PREP Act was developed to coordinate the response to a “public health emergency.”


official data base vaers.......You have to do the search yourself.....I cannot link my search directly

I agree. vaers search. section 3 covid 19 enter......

Message
VAERS data in CDC WONDER are updated every Friday. Hence, results for the same query can change from week to week.
Message
These results are for 701,127 total events.
Message
Rows with zero Events Reported are hidden. Use Quick Options above to show zero rows.

DEATH7,5771.08%

701 k doesn't match the article I posted.........I'd like to find that raw data site they keep using that never matches this site.

Here's the discrepancy you noted. From the StuartBramhall link.

According to the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) website, “[o]ne COVID-19 claim has been determined eligible for compensation and is pending a review of eligible expenses.”

Under CICP they are covering ALL the drugs with EUA and off label use. Not JUST the vaccine. So the ONE CLAIM that has been honored could have been a hospital mistake of administering any of the OTHER drugs that were used to treat. There's no specifics that one was CV vaccine.

And forget about the larger numbers since COvid. People were BEGGED to report to VAERS and file for compensation with the LINKS on the paperwork that they recieved at the shot clinic. It's virtually unprecedented to have SO MANY PEOPLE disclosed like that for a EUA drug. So the normal 3% or 4% vax settlement rate when each case is examined -- because of ABNORMAL REPORTING VOLUME -- will be 1% or LESS of the VAERS reports.
 
Here's the discrepancy you noted. From the StuartBramhall link.



Under CICP they are covering ALL the drugs with EUA and off label use. Not JUST the vaccine. So the ONE CLAIM that has been honored could have been a hospital mistake of administering any of the OTHER drugs that were used to treat. There's no specifics that one was CV vaccine.

And forget about the larger numbers since COvid. People were BEGGED to report to VAERS and file for compensation with the LINKS on the paperwork that they recieved at the shot clinic. It's virtually unprecedented to have SO MANY PEOPLE disclosed like that for a EUA drug. So the normal 3% or 4% vax settlement rate when each case is examined -- because of ABNORMAL REPORTING VOLUME -- will be 1% or LESS of the VAERS reports.
which is why the VAERs site filters the site........21000 deaths to 7000 deaths.......And if you look at it....it is explainable.......Most have massive issues and are on deaths doorstep.......That is why I stated they are filtered.

I've only used the one site I posted til now.
 
CIA-MI6 operative Neil Ferguson is mentioned here:

'At the outset of the pandemic, Dr. Fauci used wildly inaccurate modeling that overestimated US deaths by 525 percent. Scammer and pandemic fabricator, Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London was their author, with funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) of $148.8 million. Dr. Fauci used this model as justification for his lockdowns.

Dr. Fauci acquiesced to CDC's selective protocol changes for completing death certificates in a way that inflated the claimed deaths from COVID, and thus inflated its infection mortality rate. CDC later admitted that only 6 percent of COVID deaths occurred in entirely healthy individuals. The remaining 94 percent suffered from an average of 3.8 potentially fatal comorbidities.

Regulators misused PCR tests that CDC belatedly admitted in August 2021 were incapable of distinguishing COVID from other viral illnesses. Dr. Fauci tolerated their use at inappropriately high amplitudes of 37 and up to 45, even though Fauci had told Vince Racaniello that tests employing thresholds of 35 and above were very unlikely to indicate the presence of live virus that could replicate.

In July 2020, Fauci remarked that at these levels, a positive result is "just dead nucleotides, period," yet did nothing to modify testing so it might be more accurate.'
(Kennedy, The Real Anthony Fauci, pp.4-5)

We'll be excerpting from the NIH autopsy report mentioned in post #107, because of the Jingmen tick virus, a virus from a bloodsucker linked to the Chinese communist military's virus found on Zhoushan Island, to reinforce the notion that SARS-CoV-2 is a thrombotic disease.

32 COVID Autopsies
'....However, many patients (88%) also have widespread microscopic thromboses, as well as characteristic findings in the liver and lymph nodes.
'
'Once again -- all of the autopsy stuff youre posting is about damage FROM THE VIRUS.. All of these discussions youre trolling with your glib mentions of CIA/MI6 conspiracy shit ARE ABOUT THE VACCINE. If you cant' separate the 2 things -- dont be surprised if no one wants to respond to you..
 
which is why the VAERs site filters the site........21000 deaths to 7000 deaths.......And if you look at it....it is explainable.......Most have massive issues and are on deaths doorstep.......That is why I stated they are filtered.

I've only used the one site I posted til now.

The data is shit. And the media get it wrong 80% of the time, because they don't invest the learning time. EXPERTS can't make heads/tails out of US Govt official data. So maybe the media ought to be more SKEPTICAL about what each number means.
 
The data is shit. And the media get it wrong 80% of the time, because they don't invest the learning time. EXPERTS can't make heads/tails out of US Govt official data. So maybe the media ought to be more SKEPTICAL about what each number means.
It's not all shit........I scanned through some of it and there is no other explanation of it other than the vaccine killed them dead...........I posted some.

2/3rds that got deleted by OFFICIAL VAERs.........were pretty much bogus......as I saw many of them.......including some on Hospice with the death coctail.

But it is raw data and the actual reports there.
 
It's not all shit........I scanned through some of it and there is no other explanation of it other than the vaccine killed them dead...........I posted some.

Every 38 seconds. Given that most of them died less than a week after vax --

60/38sec X 60min/hr X 24hr/day X 7 days = How many people die in a week?

About 16,000

If ya keep that up for ONE YEAR since vaccinations STARTED =

about 828,000

Important -- 204 Million (minus the 828,000) people GOT the vax and DID NOT DIE !!! By WHAT chemical/physiological path did the VACCINE contribute to the miniscule number of death claims?????

Sure -- there are other explanations. That's why I'm telling ya that the number of claims HONORED will be less than 1% of the death cases filed for Covid.

You cannot blame death on an alcohol company just because someone drank your beer that night. That's why the entire medical history and WHY they were brought to the hospital is important.
 
It's not all shit........I scanned through some of it and there is no other explanation of it other than the vaccine killed them dead...........I posted some.

2/3rds that got deleted by OFFICIAL VAERs.........were pretty much bogus......as I saw many of them.......including some on Hospice with the death coctail.

But it is raw data and the actual reports there.
There's something very funky about the spike protein circulating in the vaccinated without the rest of the virus also being there.
 
Every 38 seconds. Given that most of them died less than a week after vax --

60/38sec X 60min/hr X 24hr/day X 7 days = How many people die in a week?

About 16,000

If ya keep that up for ONE YEAR since vaccinations STARTED =

about 828,000

Important -- 204 Million (minus the 828,000) people GOT the vax and DID NOT DIE !!! By WHAT chemical/physiological path did the VACCINE contribute to the miniscule number of death claims?????

Sure -- there are other explanations. That's why I'm telling ya that the number of claims HONORED will be less than 1% of the death cases filed for Covid.

You cannot blame death on an alcohol company just because someone drank your beer that night. That's why the entire medical history and WHY they were brought to the hospital is important.
So. If you are under 50 and in good health thebststs are even better. So why jab at all? Especially under 19. Thet are at virtuallt no risk.

Repeal the 1985 law and then the thousands of claims being sent to the compensation group can be decided in court then. Then they can discuss the facts of the case why they died or have permanenr damage from the jab.

Ive never been anti jab til now. Thought anthrax was bs but wasnt birching ahout it. But these are Experimental vaccines that they keep moving the goal posts on. They offer no long term immunity.....so they changed the definition to protection.

Sorry. When you have to change the definition of vaccine to sell you leaky ass product....ITS BS
 
Ive never been anti jab til now. Thought anthrax was bs but wasnt birching ahout it. But these are Experimental vaccines that they keep moving the goal posts on. They offer no long term immunity.....so they changed the definition to protection.

Actually, the goal post has BEEN "protection from serious infection (and hospitalization and death) all along. This vaccine is more a therapeutic that keeps antibodies in the serum than any kind of "cure". Again, there are 4 goal lines.

Exposure, asymptomatic infection, symptomatic/clinicalcase infection and SERIOUS infection causing 2ndary pulmonary infections.

Most people EXPOSED or asymptomatic never know or never even SEEK medical attention if they are not periodically tested. So the whole CONCEPT of "preventing CV infections in THEM -- is ridiculous. Can't even study that because of the high number of UNREPORTED asymptomatic infections even with the EARLIER strains of Cvid.

I can give you MANY QUOTES from health officials and the manufacturers at the times these vaxxes were released promising ONLY to prevent symptomatic and serious cases.
 
Actually, the goal post has BEEN "protection from serious infection (and hospitalization and death) all along. This vaccine is more a therapeutic that keeps antibodies in the serum than any kind of "cure". Again, there are 4 goal lines.
That was not the definition of vaccine before this plannedemic.......HCL offers protection from getting covid........by many studies.......Ivermectin also does and it stops replication of the spike protein........It is PROTECTION.........NTZ is used for cytokine storms.........IT STOPS THEM.........It is also protection.....

Are these drugs VACCINES? The mRNA are Therapuetics...........not traditional vaccines.......they allow you to get and transmit the virus............that is why they changed the definition.

Covaxin from India is a traditional whole antigen of Covid 19 and TEACHES IMMUNITY..........mRNA not so much.........
Exposure, asymptomatic infection, symptomatic/clinicalcase infection and SERIOUS infection causing 2ndary pulmonary infections.
Are they asymptomatic? Given the fallacies of PCR tests and using too many cycles for well over a year..........Why should I listen to those who allowed 40 cycle PCR tests when they knew it would lead to massive false positives?

I can give you MANY QUOTES from health officials and the manufacturers at the times these vaxxes were released promising ONLY to prevent symptomatic and serious cases.
So. I can show you the 2015 study of leaky vaccines.......It almost is word for word on what has been going on.
 
So. If you are under 50 and in good health thebststs are even better. So why jab at all? Especially under 19. Thet are at virtuallt no risk.

We already agree on kids under 18. That was an effort to make CVid ZERO RISK to society as a whole and NOT required to save lives or hospital beds. Because leftists ABHOR ANY RISK and seek to eradicate it everywhere it exists.

I'd agree about maybe under SIXTY FIVE and good health -- it's a personal judgement. Once you're 65 and on Medicare is even better because the simple stuff costs nothing.

You gotta remember there's tons of people over 50 who havent started to have regular checkups and screenings. They still THINK they're too young to worry about mammograms, colonoscopies, lung screening or EVEN regular blood work for hypertension, cholesterol, diabetes.

And if you're worried about a few thousand people YOU BELIEVE dropped dead from the injections, --- the number of folks from 50 to 65 WHO DIED FROM THE VIRUS without the injections is easily 10 times larger.
 
And if you're worried about a few thousand people YOU BELIEVE dropped dead from the injections, --- the number of folks from 50 to 65 WHO DIED FROM THE VIRUS without the injections is easily 10 times larger.
So..........I'm not worried about it. I returned fire from saying that the VAERs site FILTERS the data.

I've proved it.........It DOES.........

I now question your quote above. DID THEY DIE FROM THE VIRUS or WITH THE VIRUS.........I know of 3 personally from people at work who died from their other issues but were PRESUMED died from Covid on their death Certificate. THAT IS FROM THEIR FAMILIES.

We give the vaccine the pass that those who died after the injection had ISSUES......and they did so THEY AREN'T COUNTED.

But not the same for the FEAR PORN in this country of Covid deaths.........who most are in the same boat that died in the Adverse effects reports but discounted.

This is COOKING the books depending on the narrative being played.
 

18 studies and is being used against the WHO by India...........who accuse the WHO of spreading false information against Ivermectin.........Saying because of the WHO some States didn't allow the treatment and the deaths WERE 10 FOLD as a result.

India, Africa, Japan, and Bangladesh to name a few...........all used this treatment plan and faired NIGHT AND DAY BETTER THAN US.

You know why........It's about money.........they are cheap.
 
That was not the definition of vaccine before this plannedemic.......HCL offers protection from getting covid........by many studies.......Ivermectin also does and it stops replication of the spike protein........It is PROTECTION.........

If you talking about PROTECTION -- you must TAKE THESE BEFORE you CONTRACT a covid infections -- or VERY SOON thereafter. Then they would be called Prophylactics (same protection as the Trojan brand or "morning after" lol)

If you DONT take prophylactically, then there's NO GUARANTEE that you will NEVER be symptomatically infected for some period of time either during the doses or as you recover -- so that's semantics.

The powers of Fauci -- were probably scared to put 300Mill people on "prophylactic anything" and it could have created panic and severe hoarding/shortages worldwide.

And I agree we could have saved at least 10s of thousands of lives with protocols to add the other drugs that go along with HCQ and IVMectin. But the deal was, the FDA rules only allow EUA vaccines if there are no EXISTING drugs available for USEFUL treatment protocols, So -- HCQ was authorized BEFORE the vaccines were available for a SHORT period of time and as soon as the clinical trials ended and the vaccines were submitted for EUA -- that authorization was withdrawn and scientists/doctors wanting the VACCINE over therapeutics trashed the hell of existing protocols with 1000s of favorable front line studies existing.

You remember the tactics they USED TO TRASH THEM? Isolated (and later WITHDRAWN) studies from Brazil and couple 1/2 dozen others claiming DEATHS because they doubled or tripled the HCT dose.

Should be a lesson for you that using dubious reports of death isn't really fair if you're TRYING to do the right thing. :biggrin:
 
If you talking about PROTECTION -- you must TAKE THESE BEFORE you CONTRACT a covid infections -- or VERY SOON thereafter. Then they would be called Prophylactics (same protection as the Trojan brand or "morning after" lol)

If you DONT take prophylactically, then there's NO GUARANTEE that you will NEVER be symptomatically infected for some period of time either during the doses or as you recover -- so that's semantics.
Baloney...........They used them in medical kits and were told to use them at the first sign of symptoms ..........And all of them have better stats than us.

Ntz is designed to STOP THE CYTOKINE STORM......look it up........that is what kills you. So only before hand is NOT THE TRUTH.......And it has also been shown to lower hospital times as well...Ivermectin.....

It's not SEMANTICS..............What are you gonna say next.........it's Horse Dewormer...lmao

And I agree we could have saved at least 10s of thousands of lives with protocols to add the other drugs that go along with HCQ and IVMectin. But the deal was, the FDA rules only allow EUA vaccines if there are no EXISTING drugs available for USEFUL treatment protocols, So -- HCQ was authorized BEFORE the vaccines were available for a SHORT period of time and as soon as the clinical trials ended and the vaccines were submitted for EUA -- that authorization was withdrawn and scientists/doctors wanting the VACCINE over therapeutics trashed the hell of existing protocols with 1000s of favorable front line studies existing.
We agree there..........and I believe not allowing EUA was a complete joke and killed a lot of people. These drugs have been used a long time.........and have proven safety records. Do you at least agree that this is OVER MONEY and NOT SCIENCE?
You remember the tactics they USED TO TRASH THEM? Isolated (and later WITHDRAWN) studies from Brazil and couple 1/2 dozen others claiming DEATHS because they doubled or tripled the HCT dose.

Should be a lesson for you that using dubious reports of death isn't really fair if you're TRYING to do the right thing. :biggrin:
YAWN........We agree they used the studies that were guaranteed to fail.

Your do the right thing............This only started between me and you after you trashed my claim that the VAERs site FILTERS the raw data.

I've proven that PERIOD. In regards to some of the individual case reports from the Raw site.......I'll use them when I want to............That is just how it is.

Had I not gotten ticked off I'd have never even found that site.. lmao
 

Forum List

Back
Top