Pick a Con that can win in 2016

Pick a con that can win in 2016

  • Jeb

    Votes: 3 16.7%
  • Romney

    Votes: 3 16.7%
  • Huckabee

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lindsey Graham

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Rand Paul

    Votes: 3 16.7%
  • Paul Ryan

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 2 11.1%
  • No way no how

    Votes: 7 38.9%

  • Total voters
    18
In election polling, Rasmussen has a mathematically proven AVERAGE of +4 to the right.

So, an Obama 50 disapprove / 47 approve, with Rasmussen, could actually easily be Obama approve 49 / disapprove 48, from -3 to +1, a shift of, you guessed it: 4.

RAS' mathematical bias was +4 to the Right in 2008, 2010, 2012 and in some but not all polling from 2014.

Math trumps propaganda EVERY TIME.

:thup:
Except no other major polling outfit shows Obama doing even as well as Rasmussen shows, Herr Dipschit.
Do you realize that you just keep on writing long after you've been confronted with compelling arguments that contradict your positions?
No. Because there have been no compelling arguments that contradict my position. There have been flatulent emanations from some posters that dont understand what they are posting. Not the same.
 
In election polling, Rasmussen has a mathematically proven AVERAGE of +4 to the right.

So, an Obama 50 disapprove / 47 approve, with Rasmussen, could actually easily be Obama approve 49 / disapprove 48, from -3 to +1, a shift of, you guessed it: 4.

RAS' mathematical bias was +4 to the Right in 2008, 2010, 2012 and in some but not all polling from 2014.

Math trumps propaganda EVERY TIME.

:thup:
Except no other major polling outfit shows Obama doing even as well as Rasmussen shows, Herr Dipschit.
Do you realize that you just keep on writing long after you've been confronted with compelling arguments that contradict your positions?

Rabbid is punch drunk. Too addled to know when he is beaten because all he ever does is lose.
Ahhh....so he's having an intellectual disagreements with the oxygen that surrounds him huh?....like a drunk having a fist fight with the air?

:lol:

I suspect that there is no oxygen in the bubble that Rabbid inhabits.
 
In election polling, Rasmussen has a mathematically proven AVERAGE of +4 to the right.

So, an Obama 50 disapprove / 47 approve, with Rasmussen, could actually easily be Obama approve 49 / disapprove 48, from -3 to +1, a shift of, you guessed it: 4.

RAS' mathematical bias was +4 to the Right in 2008, 2010, 2012 and in some but not all polling from 2014.

Math trumps propaganda EVERY TIME.

:thup:
Except no other major polling outfit shows Obama doing even as well as Rasmussen shows, Herr Dipschit.


Watch, listen and learn:

both Rasmussen and Gallup do 3-day rolling polls vis-a-vis presidential approval/disapproval and take the average of three days and post it on the third day of said 3-day cycle. Only, their cycles are not synchronous with each other. But indeed, at the moment, Rasmussen's values and Gallup's values are close to each other.

Hope that helps, Herr Arschlecker.
 
The only Republican nominees that could win are Mark Rubio and Jeb Bush since they are the only candidates that can win Florida. The Democrats have their BLUE WALL of 18 states that have voted solid Democrat every election since 1992 which brings them to 242, only 28 electoral votes from victory. Winning Florida, a total of 19 states automatically gives them the White House. Given these facts, if the Republicans want to have a chance at winning, they have to pick someone that can at least win Florida and only Mark Rubio and Jeb Bush can do that.
 
The behavior of the Right in Congress has defeated them all. The Hog Castrator, who voted against everything Obama proposed, will put another nail in the coffin tonight.
 
In election polling, Rasmussen has a mathematically proven AVERAGE of +4 to the right.

So, an Obama 50 disapprove / 47 approve, with Rasmussen, could actually easily be Obama approve 49 / disapprove 48, from -3 to +1, a shift of, you guessed it: 4.

RAS' mathematical bias was +4 to the Right in 2008, 2010, 2012 and in some but not all polling from 2014.

Math trumps propaganda EVERY TIME.

:thup:
Except no other major polling outfit shows Obama doing even as well as Rasmussen shows, Herr Dipschit.


Watch, listen and learn:

both Rasmussen and Gallup do 3-day rolling polls vis-a-vis presidential approval/disapproval and take the average of three days and post it on the third day of said 3-day cycle. Only, their cycles are not synchronous with each other. But indeed, at the moment, Rasmussen's values and Gallup's values are close to each other.

Hope that helps, Herr Arschlecker.
Lemme check.
Yup, you're still wrong.
 
In election polling, Rasmussen has a mathematically proven AVERAGE of +4 to the right.

So, an Obama 50 disapprove / 47 approve, with Rasmussen, could actually easily be Obama approve 49 / disapprove 48, from -3 to +1, a shift of, you guessed it: 4.

RAS' mathematical bias was +4 to the Right in 2008, 2010, 2012 and in some but not all polling from 2014.

Math trumps propaganda EVERY TIME.

:thup:
Except no other major polling outfit shows Obama doing even as well as Rasmussen shows, Herr Dipschit.


Watch, listen and learn:

both Rasmussen and Gallup do 3-day rolling polls vis-a-vis presidential approval/disapproval and take the average of three days and post it on the third day of said 3-day cycle. Only, their cycles are not synchronous with each other. But indeed, at the moment, Rasmussen's values and Gallup's values are close to each other.

Hope that helps, Herr Arschlecker.
Lemme check.
Yup, you're still wrong.
Nope.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
 
The only Republican nominees that could win are Mark Rubio and Jeb Bush since they are the only candidates that can win Florida. The Democrats have their BLUE WALL of 18 states that have voted solid Democrat every election since 1992 which brings them to 242, only 28 electoral votes from victory. Winning Florida, a total of 19 states automatically gives them the White House. Given these facts, if the Republicans want to have a chance at winning, they have to pick someone that can at least win Florida and only Mark Rubio and Jeb Bush can do that.
So you're saying the 2016 election is all about Florida...again.
 
A winning conservative?

Now that's a relative thing.

Were Hillary to run as a Republican she'd be conservative when compared with Fauxahontas, Jammie-Jake, or Little Mitty.

That might be the key to her being president if she can remember to run.
 

Forum List

Back
Top