Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,439
- 2,290
What the report said is that 44% consider themselves Republican while Democrat, Independents and Libertarians make up the majority at 54%, so Republican led businesses are not even in the majority.
Republicans are leading the charge to solving this immigration problem while Democrats are fighting us every step of the way from preserving their sanctuary cities to threatening the shutdown of government over the wall to stopping Kate's Law. Are there some Republicans that may hire illegals? Of course there are, but odd are the majority of them are not Republican.
Democrats have much more to gain from illegals than Republicans. And mind you, I have no problem with locking up or shutting down employers of companies that knowingly use them, and I don't care if it's a mom and pop lawn care company.
Well, Independents aren't Democrats, are they?
The elite have much more to gain from "Illegals" point blank.
While it's true that Democrats gain voters from importing immigrants, in general.
The fact of the matter is this whole ordeal was kind of started under Republican Reagan's Amnesty.
Can't say that it's only Democrats.
I personally don't vote anymore, because both parties are really, really becoming clown shows.
No, I never said it's mostly anybody, but face facts, conservatives are more likely to be law abiding citizens than liberals. We have instances of it nearly every day in this country.
Also the myth that Republicans own all the businesses in the country is something the Democrats came up with that for some reason seemed to stick with the public as truth. They use the lie to promote their utter hatred of the rich that draws support of other wealth envy people.
Yes, of course Democrats are more likely to be criminals, largely because the Blacks, Hispanics, and Muslims etc. are Democrats here.
But, what about White Democrats vs White Republicans?
Actually, presumably White Republicans are slightly more criminal than White Democrats.
States like Montana, West Virginia, and Wyoming have sort of high "White Murder rates" even if states like New York, Connecticut, or Massachusetts have pretty low "White Murder rates" in comparison.
Statistically you are eight times more likely to be murdered by a black than a white in the US. Also statistically whites overwhelmingly kill other whites and blacks overwhelmingly kill other blacks. So if whites have higher murder rates in some areas, it's because they live with other whites and the minority population pales in comparison.
My theory is that the "Frontiers people" or "Colonial Whites" are more aggressive than other "Whites" simply because they came fighting Bears, Native Americans, Wolves, cutting lumber, farming, owning slaves, etc.
It just happens to be such people are more Conservative because of gun rights to protect themselves, self sufficient taxation, and religious motives, and they just happen to live in places like Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, West Virginia, Alabama, etc.
As opposed to say New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, or Massachusetts where very few Whites are "Frontiers peoples" or "Colonial Whites"
I don't know about that. I would have to do some research. But for the entire country, whites are the least violent and criminal.