Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 69,990
- 34,915
So you’re full of shit as usualThe better question is...........which of your posts isn't a lie.
Fick off troll
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you’re full of shit as usualThe better question is...........which of your posts isn't a lie.
According to who?Biden's approval rating in creeping up. MAGA is becoming desperate.
You fucking broke it.
What about wanting to censor Lankford for being bipartisan? The GOP really sucks.
Sinema is on board with this billSinema? Manchin? Those names ring a bell?
Fuck off hypocrite.
The low IQ folks are the ones who believe that this border deal would fix anything. It would allow 5,000 per day or per week and then they would lock it down? It begs the question, why don't they just lock it down before 5,000 illegals come in?Trump has the right to advocate any position on the border he wishes. However, shame on Republican politicians for allying with such a low IQ bully like Trump
Again.The low IQ folks are the ones who believe that this border deal would fix anything. It would allow 5,000 per day or per week and then they would lock it down? It begs the question, why don't they just lock it down before 5,000 illegals come in?
Not my point Lesh.Sinema is on board with this bill
“The height of stupidity is having a strong opinion in something you know nothing about… I’m extremely disappointed in the strange maneuvering by many on the right to torpedo a potential border reform bill… If we have a bill, that on net significantly decreases illegal immigration, and we sabotage that. That is inconsistent with what we told our voters, we would do.” Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX)
No bill is needed, just the enforcement of existing laws and the reinstatement of some of Trumps border policies.Again.
It would NOT “allow 5,000 per day to enter”
As the law stands all asylum seekers have the right to a court hearing.No bill is needed, just the enforcement of existing laws and the reinstatement of some of Trumps border policies.
You still haven't figured out that the Democrats aren't interested in controlling the border?
Tell us exactly what is wrong with the bipartisan bill, parrot.If letting in 5,000 illegal aliens every day is a bipartisan deal, it deserves to die.
Read the post above yoursHow could a new law decrease illegal immigration?
Only enforcement of the border will decrease illegal immigration. If that’s the plan, we can do it under existing laws.
Yes. One is an Independent and the other says he may be. Fuck off.Sinema? Manchin? Those names ring a bell?
Fuck off hypocrite.
The MAGA herd continues to shrink. See the Charles MacKay quote in my signature.Republican Senator Stunningly Slams Trump for Killing Border Deal
Republican Senator Kevin Cramer is mad that Donald Trump is destroying what was supposed to be a bipartisan border deal.newrepublic.com
Finally! Here we have a repub Senator who puts country above the worship of trump. This is amazing!
After Democrats drove them out of the party. Sucks to be a hypocrite, doesn't it.Yes. One is an Independent and the other says he may be. Fuck off.
How will that be enforced, though? If the border is still wide open, what would be the difference?As the law stands all asylum seekers have the right to a court hearing.
This law would change that so that the criteria now would allow FAR fewer legitimate complaints to even reach the courts and it would set up far more courts in order to take that backlog of years to months or even weeks
Why aren't asylum seekers staying in Mexico?As the law stands all asylum seekers have the right to a court hearing.
This law would change that so that the criteria now would allow FAR fewer legitimate complaints to even reach the courts and it would set up far more courts in order to take that backlog of years to months or even weeks