Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,864
- 2,040
Anthony Weiners weiner is in the news again?
they will elect him again, you watch..
something wrong with the people up there
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anthony Weiners weiner is in the news again?
Oh, I see.
Libtards math
They are equating five DECADES with two years
Nope. You are still completely missing the point.
All economies are local, but the general direction of the economy belongs to the President after 18 months. It takes that long for his policies to kick in.
His policies weren't adopted, they were filibustered.
FAIL.
Absolute rubbish... his programs, policies, etc were all there for him to do.. and as you can see by Obamalamacare, it got thru the DEM congress.. it has been his economy since he first started all this.. period.. the fucker has to reap what he has sown
It seems to me all the right wingers in this thread are missing the point. The original post suggests that it is hypocritical to blame Obama for the economy after he was in office only two years and inherited a seriously messed up economy from GW Bush's administration, while at the same time not blaming the current Republican administration in Detroit for an economy it has had for 2 years and inheritied from another administration. And, as well, blaming Obama for a poor economy when he not only inherited it from someone else, but has to struggle with an obstructionist Senate and Congress in order to get anything passed to help improve things, while at the same time, not blaming the Republican administration in Detroit for not fixing the problem even though they don't have to fight the current government there in order to get bills passed.
It seems again and again, the right wingers are unable to read or understand anything beyond the literal and that things have to be spelled out for your understanding like using alphabet blocks with pre-schoolers.
Detroit wasn't bankrupt until Republicans took over.Electing incompetent Democrats like these is what led to Detroit's bankruptcy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqOSNI7l0bQ
Electing incompetent Republicans like these is what led to the financial crash of 2008:
the economy was doing fine until the democrats took control of congress
It seems to me all the right wingers in this thread are missing the point. The original post suggests that it is hypocritical to blame Obama for the economy after he was in office only two years and inherited a seriously messed up economy from GW Bush's administration, while at the same time not blaming the current Republican administration in Detroit for an economy it has had for 2 years and inheritied from another administration. And, as well, blaming Obama for a poor economy when he not only inherited it from someone else, but has to struggle with an obstructionist Senate and Congress in order to get anything passed to help improve things, while at the same time, not blaming the Republican administration in Detroit for not fixing the problem even though they don't have to fight the current government there in order to get bills passed.
It seems again and again, the right wingers are unable to read or understand anything beyond the literal and that things have to be spelled out for your understanding like using alphabet blocks with pre-schoolers.
Except that Obama claimed to have saved Detroit. But of course he only said that so he could win an election?
Oh, and Obama sure did a lot that first two years did he not
Further, the boy king never learned how to play nice with the other children. No wonder they don't want to play his games now?
He did however take time to address the Zimmerman situation in between hundred million dollar vacations.
We should be glad for small favors I suppose
It seems to me all the right wingers in this thread are missing the point. The original post suggests that it is hypocritical to blame Obama for the economy after he was in office only two years and inherited a seriously messed up economy from GW Bush's administration, while at the same time not blaming the current Republican administration in Detroit for an economy it has had for 2 years and inheritied from another administration. And, as well, blaming Obama for a poor economy when he not only inherited it from someone else, but has to struggle with an obstructionist Senate and Congress in order to get anything passed to help improve things, while at the same time, not blaming the Republican administration in Detroit for not fixing the problem even though they don't have to fight the current government there in order to get bills passed.
It seems again and again, the right wingers are unable to read or understand anything beyond the literal and that things have to be spelled out for your understanding like using alphabet blocks with pre-schoolers.
It seems to me all the right wingers in this thread are missing the point. The original post suggests that it is hypocritical to blame Obama for the economy after he was in office only two years and inherited a seriously messed up economy from GW Bush's administration, while at the same time not blaming the current Republican administration in Detroit for an economy it has had for 2 years and inheritied from another administration. And, as well, blaming Obama for a poor economy when he not only inherited it from someone else, but has to struggle with an obstructionist Senate and Congress in order to get anything passed to help improve things, while at the same time, not blaming the Republican administration in Detroit for not fixing the problem even though they don't have to fight the current government there in order to get bills passed.
It seems again and again, the right wingers are unable to read or understand anything beyond the literal and that things have to be spelled out for your understanding like using alphabet blocks with pre-schoolers.
Except that Obama claimed to have saved Detroit. But of course he only said that so he could win an election?
Oh, and Obama sure did a lot that first two years did he not
Further, the boy king never learned how to play nice with the other children. No wonder they don't want to play his games now?
He did however take time to address the Zimmerman situation in between hundred million dollar vacations.
We should be glad for small favors I suppose
You're a fucking liar. He saved the auto industry.
His policies weren't adopted, they were filibustered.
FAIL.
Absolute rubbish... his programs, policies, etc were all there for him to do.. and as you can see by Obamalamacare, it got thru the DEM congress.. it has been his economy since he first started all this.. period.. the fucker has to reap what he has sown
The House won't even let Obama's Jobs bill come up for a vote.
Can you explain why?
His policies weren't adopted, they were filibustered.
FAIL.
Absolute rubbish... his programs, policies, etc were all there for him to do.. and as you can see by Obamalamacare, it got thru the DEM congress.. it has been his economy since he first started all this.. period.. the fucker has to reap what he has sown
The House won't even let Obama's Jobs bill come up for a vote.
Can you explain why?
The House won't even let Obama's Jobs bill come up for a vote.
Can you explain why?
Oh, I see.
Libtards math
They are equating five DECADES with two years
Nope. You are still completely missing the point.
But he was elected President, twice, in landslides.Absolute rubbish... his programs, policies, etc were all there for him to do.. and as you can see by Obamalamacare, it got thru the DEM congress.. it has been his economy since he first started all this.. period.. the fucker has to reap what he has sown
The House won't even let Obama's Jobs bill come up for a vote.
Can you explain why?
because they suck, won't create jobs, and will create more debt.
Absolute rubbish... his programs, policies, etc were all there for him to do.. and as you can see by Obamalamacare, it got thru the DEM congress.. it has been his economy since he first started all this.. period.. the fucker has to reap what he has sown
The House won't even let Obama's Jobs bill come up for a vote.
Can you explain why?
1) he had 2 years were everything went thru... enacting all he wanted... it is his economy
2) If there was a decent bill instead of a 'shove it down your throat my way' Obama bill, it may be considered...
3) Every jobs bill is filled with pork.. and is not about jobs
4) It is not the federal government's responsibility to create jobs by throwing money at things
That total jumps another trillion every day to you wingnuts!The House won't even let Obama's Jobs bill come up for a vote.
Can you explain why?
I think it has to do with a 17 trillion dollar debt.
You're a fucking liar. He saved the auto industry.
But he was elected President, twice, in landslides.The House won't even let Obama's Jobs bill come up for a vote.
Can you explain why?
because they suck, won't create jobs, and will create more debt.