Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ultimately, its not the role of the state safeguard citizens from their own stupidity. Nor does the Constitution authorize the state to do so.
Ultimately, its not the role of the state safeguard citizens from their own stupidity. Nor does the Constitution authorize the state to do so.
Ultimately they do just that.
Think Helmet Laws.
I was then commuting between Nevada and California. I needed someone to feed my cat in the week I was in California. He had a dying wife and was home all the time as her caregiver so he said he would come and feed the cat. We exchanged phone numbers. By the time I got back to my apartment, he had sent me a photo of his shriveled up 70 year old dick and sagging balls.
I had to find someone else to feed the cat.
Were you afraid the sagging balls would upset the cat?
He had some pretty sharp claws and loved to bat hanging balls around. It made him a big hit at the Christmas Tree every year.
Were you afraid the sagging balls would upset the cat?
He had some pretty sharp claws and loved to bat hanging balls around. It made him a big hit at the Christmas Tree every year.
Perhaps the man was just trying to demonstrate how qualified he was to feed, and entertain your cat.
You should give him Another Chance.
Ultimately, its not the role of the state safeguard citizens from their own stupidity. Nor does the Constitution authorize the state to do so.
Ultimately they do just that.
Think Helmet Laws.
You need a law to keep you from posting on message boards.
He had some pretty sharp claws and loved to bat hanging balls around. It made him a big hit at the Christmas Tree every year.
Perhaps the man was just trying to demonstrate how qualified he was to feed, and entertain your cat.
You should give him Another Chance.
The Powers that Be, moved me so I don't commute any more.
And, the cat died.
Perhaps the man was just trying to demonstrate how qualified he was to feed, and entertain your cat.
You should give him Another Chance.
The Powers that Be, moved me so I don't commute any more.
And, the cat died.
Now we'll never know if the old-man's testicles would have been as entertaining as Christmas Tree Ornaments.
The Powers that Be, moved me so I don't commute any more.
And, the cat died.
Now we'll never know if the old-man's testicles would have been as entertaining as Christmas Tree Ornaments.
We will never know. But, if I had a facebook page, I would certainly have posted those pictures with the man's name and address.
If you think about it, and compare helmet laws to nude pictures. It would be illegal to take nude pictures and give them to any person other than the subject of the photos. The women who imagine they are proving their love by distributing nude shots would be the ones prosecuted NOT the men who use them.
Women gave them away to men under the misunderstanding that these men were trustworthy. Which makes as much sense as leaving your car at 3rd and Alvarado with the motor running and the keys in the ignition trusting that no one is going to drive off.
Women should not be rewarded for being stupid. They should ALWAYS have guarded themselves to prevent strangers from finding them on line!
The way to stop the posting of nude pictures is to stop taking nude pictures. Are people seriously this idiotic? Are women? "Stop me before I make a fool of myself".
The very second someone says I want to take naked pictures of you, or send me a nudie selfie, the bell should ring loud. Expect that that photo is going to be used against you and you will be defriended on facebook.
If women started acting like adults, maybe they would be able to pass some adult wisdom on to young girls and the whole practice of public nude pictures will go away.
I'd have to see the porn.
is it a sex act? then yea
is it her acting naughty? suck it up and grow up.
aside from that, its his word against hers.
I need to take back my post. In my defense I was tired.
-----------------------------------------
She did not enter into a legal contract, therefore she has no say over his right of free speech.
so let this be a lesson, don't do a gad damn thing with anyone that you wouldn't want your mom and dad to know about.
A person does not have unfettered rights to free speech. Speech that creates a dangerous situation is not protected. You are also not protected from committing Libel and Slander.
Was the statement false, or put in a context that makes true statements misleading? You do not have a constitutional right to tell lies that damage or defame the reputation of a person or organization.
Education for Freedom Lesson 4
Ultimately, its not the role of the state safeguard citizens from their own stupidity. Nor does the Constitution authorize the state to do so.
Ultimately they do just that.
Think Helmet Laws.
Ultimately they do just that.
Think Helmet Laws.
You need a law to keep you from posting on message boards.
How fascist of you.
The Powers that Be, moved me so I don't commute any more.
And, the cat died.
Now we'll never know if the old-man's testicles would have been as entertaining as Christmas Tree Ornaments.
We will never know. But, if I had a facebook page, I would certainly have posted those pictures with the man's name and address.
If you think about it, and compare helmet laws to nude pictures. It would be illegal to take nude pictures and give them to any person other than the subject of the photos. The women who imagine they are proving their love by distributing nude shots would be the ones prosecuted NOT the men who use them.
Ultimately, its not the role of the state safeguard citizens from their own stupidity. Nor does the Constitution authorize the state to do so.
Ultimately they do just that.
Think Helmet Laws.
And seat belts,and mandatory car insurance.... and any number of other items.
Freedom of speech for me...but not for thee.
Now we'll never know if the old-man's testicles would have been as entertaining as Christmas Tree Ornaments.
We will never know. But, if I had a facebook page, I would certainly have posted those pictures with the man's name and address.
If you think about it, and compare helmet laws to nude pictures. It would be illegal to take nude pictures and give them to any person other than the subject of the photos. The women who imagine they are proving their love by distributing nude shots would be the ones prosecuted NOT the men who use them.
^^Ah...the truth comes out. Someone wants to be able to take the law into their own hands and exact revenge. But doesn't want women seeking justice of their own to do it within the boundaries of the law. lol
I need to take back my post. In my defense I was tired.
-----------------------------------------
She did not enter into a legal contract, therefore she has no say over his right of free speech.
so let this be a lesson, don't do a gad damn thing with anyone that you wouldn't want your mom and dad to know about.
A person does not have unfettered rights to free speech. Speech that creates a dangerous situation is not protected. You are also not protected from committing Libel and Slander.
Was the statement false, or put in a context that makes true statements misleading? You do not have a constitutional right to tell lies that damage or defame the reputation of a person or organization.
Education for Freedom Lesson 4
his promise still passes muster
unless he posted the pics with words like; check out this whore/slut/etc
shes' not defamed and is not in danger
Both men and women do stupid crap in the name of love. It is not an affliction of one sex over the other. You don't think men send women nekkid photos of themselves?
Yes, but most men dont care in fact many fancy the idea, as correctly noted in post #18.
You don't think a man would care if their nekkid images and contact information was posted on a revenge site?
Ultimately they do just that.
Think Helmet Laws.
And seat belts,and mandatory car insurance.... and any number of other items.
Freedom of speech for me...but not for thee.
We will never know. But, if I had a facebook page, I would certainly have posted those pictures with the man's name and address.
If you think about it, and compare helmet laws to nude pictures. It would be illegal to take nude pictures and give them to any person other than the subject of the photos. The women who imagine they are proving their love by distributing nude shots would be the ones prosecuted NOT the men who use them.
^^Ah...the truth comes out. Someone wants to be able to take the law into their own hands and exact revenge. But doesn't want women seeking justice of their own to do it within the boundaries of the law. lol
So you want women to be able to pass out nude pics with a guarantee that whoever gets them will never show it to anyone else ?
Yes, but most men dont care in fact many fancy the idea, as correctly noted in post #18.
You don't think a man would care if their nekkid images and contact information was posted on a revenge site?
He might if it was one soliciting same sex liaisons!
A person does not have unfettered rights to free speech. Speech that creates a dangerous situation is not protected. You are also not protected from committing Libel and Slander.
Education for Freedom Lesson 4
his promise still passes muster
unless he posted the pics with words like; check out this whore/slut/etc
shes' not defamed and is not in danger
He encouraged others to stalk her and gave out her personal information (same thing).
