skookerasbil
Platinum Member
Yeah, you Nazi Meatheads are pretty warped. You're obsessed with defending your beloved Big Brother. It is pretty funny though. I mean seriously, how long have you and dawgshit stalked this thread of mine? If you look it up, you'll see that it's a crazy long time. You're the ones bringing attention to the thread.
And you've spewed your 'Final Veridict' on the Theories like 25 different times. I think we all get it by now, you're a silly loyal Nazi Meathead, So it's no longer necessary for you to give us your 'Final Verdict' rant again. We got ya. You're done. Let it go dude... Or stalk some more, whatever makes ya happy.![]()
Pauli......just focus on getting stuff out there that the typical standard msm dweller might find compelling because some dots are not connecting. On this forum, you are either dealing with a paid disinformation hack or people who will go to their box clinging desperately to the established matrix. Just have to keep at it and presenting stuff they might not have been exposed to and perhaps lead them to look more deeply........one by one. And you know where it goes from there.....but meanwhile, a huge plurality of the population are quite content being enrolled in the University of iPhone.
My brother sent this to me this week........he's been all over Newtown since day 1. Very concise and clear, plus a couple of new things to consider >>>
Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax | Veterans Today
Your source is not just suspect, it's senior editor admits it is bogus:
veterans today debunked - Google Search
"... about 30% of what's on Veterans Today is patently false." - Gordon Duff
"...about 40% of what I write is at least purposely partially false..." - Gordon Duff
Kudos to Veterans Today senior editor Gordon Duff for stepping out of the closet and admitting that 30% of what VT publishes (and 40% of what he himself writes) is "at least partially" and even "patently false!" Given it is in his best interest to understate the % it may well be that 50% (and 80%) are closer to the truth. It seems that the years of authoring and publishing LIES have caught up to him and he can no longer look at his own face. The real question is; can those who have built their conclusions on the LIES of VT and their interconnected web of international web sites face themselves and each other? Can the CT Movement face the fact that their CT World has been built on these LIES?
My guess? Not likely.
LOL.....last time I checked, that leaves 70%.
![up :up: :up:](/styles/smilies/up.gif)
And who wouldn't want to hook the senior editor of the New York Times up to a lie detector test??!!!!!!
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi1133.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fm593%2Ftuitu2u%2FSmileys%2520and%2520gifs%2Flaugh3.gif&hash=5f2864a22803c025c33c37de068f81b4)
Hey but I get it......most folks are very content with accepting the official msm narrative. Decades of this stuff and people are in deep.
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi42.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fe305%2Fbaldaltima%2Ffootussa.gif&hash=cee5c146ffe55c94786b4467c299cab6)
Last edited: