Speaking of "closed hearings".....

Over a hundred closed door hearings were conducted by the House under the very same rules House Republicans are calling "Soviet Union" style hearings.


Indeed, I wonder if someone should not whisper in Rep Scalise's ear that bringing up the Soviet Union given Trump's love affair with Putin may NOT be the best kind of reminder to his fellow cult members?
 
Over a hundred closed door hearings were conducted by the House under the very same rules House Republicans are calling "Soviet Union" style hearings.


Indeed, I wonder if someone should not whisper in Rep Scalise's ear that bringing up the Soviet Union given Trump's love affair with Putin may NOT be the best kind of reminder to his fellow cult members?

Most of their cult has the memory of a Goldfish.
 
"Even if there was quid pro quo with Ukraine on behalf of President Donald Trump, it is neither a crime nor an impeachable offense – even if it is a "political sin"


Take it one step further and say, "what Trump is not a crime or impeachable offense since he is a fucking idiot and doesn't know that abuse of power is a bit against our current laws...."

Now THAT would be a "fantastic defense".........but I am glad that morons.....like you....are at least admitting that a quid pro quo DID happen.........LOL

"Abuse of power" is not a crime nor an impeachable offense, what part of "it is neither a crime nor an impeachable offense" don't you understand?
I'm glad that clowns like you can't count to 67 Senators voting to remove Trump, the impeachment shit show will just be a partisan pissing contest. Trump will be a shoo-in in the 2020 election thanks to the brainless democrats.

Only a true moron would argue that abuse of power is not impeachable.

A brainless post with no link proving your point. Maybe you belong in the "flame zone" where its just idiots in a food fight? I prefer a debate.
I provided a link to Alan Dershowitz Harvard law professor proving my point.

Alan Dershowitz to Newsmax TV: 'Political Sin' Not a Crime

Here is another link to GW law professor Jonathan Turley also saying the Ukraine call is not impeachable.
Trump's Ukraine transcript: Unwise words but no proof of a crime

So grow a brain and admit that the dems are plotting a coup against Trump, which will fail and he will be re-elected in 2020, so thanks for playing. Now give your mommy her computer back.
 
I'm glad that clowns like you can't count to 67 Senators voting to remove Trump, the impeachment shit show will just be a partisan pissing contest. Trump will be a shoo-in in the 2020 election thanks to the brainless democrats


.....then I guess you have NOTHING to worry about......Why are you here then???

I'm here to rub the liberal noses in their poopy brain farts. Just admit I'm right and start another troll thread about Trump.
I'm just amazed how unified the Republicans are now! Not one GOP vote to support the dem's coup attempt in the House.
That bodes well in the Senate where even Mitt, Sue Collins and Lisa Murkowski would probably say that the dems' coup attempt is a bridge too far. A real shit show that goes nowhere. Just in time for the 2020 election. I can see the commercials now...
 
Over a hundred closed door hearings were conducted by the House under the very same rules House Republicans are calling "Soviet Union" style hearings.


Indeed, I wonder if someone should not whisper in Rep Scalise's ear that bringing up the Soviet Union given Trump's love affair with Putin may NOT be the best kind of reminder to his fellow cult members?

Whose love affair with Putin? Think again. Its not Trump, he killed over 300 Russians in Syria, and still has sanctions on Russia....now its Tulsi, war veteran Tulsi.

HA. Its your 2016 hag's standard line to call someone she doesn't like a "Russian Asset". Pop quiz, who has more dealings with the Russians, Trump or the Clintons?
Hint: UraniumOne cash, paid for the Steele Dossier, gets $500,000 for speeches in Russia, etc.

Hillary Clinton suggests Russians are 'grooming' Tulsi Gabbard for third-party run - CNNPolitics

upload_2019-10-31_15-54-54.png
 
Gee, Trump's sycophants in Congress are a bit upset........not about the Trump extortion of the Ukrainian government........but about the fact that House Dems are holding closed hearings.

Never mind that House republicans in the appropriate committees are certainly allowed to attend these "open hearings".......but given the limited IQ of Trump's 35% base, the argument sounds "good."

These closed hearings held by the Dem majority have been a bout a dozen (yielding LOTS of damaging testimony on Trump's attempts to abuse power)....and will probably wind up being a bout 15 before PUBLIC hearings are held with TV coverage.....

But the interesting bit of hypocrisy by these elected republican dimwits who are bitching about closed hearings, is their loss of memory when the Benghazi CLOSED hearings were about ONE HUNDRED and TEN.

What that medicine advertised about combating the on-set of dementia???..................lol


Benghazi hearings wern't closed off to Democrat lawmakers and it wasn't a damn star chamber like what Schiff has created. The two cases arnt even comparable with the power play Schiff is trying to create by manipulating witnesses

These hearings aren't closed to Repub lawmakers either, dope. They're open to committee members of which there are equal numbers of Dems and Repubs.

You haven't heard anything from the Repubs because it's all been damning of the President.

And you again show yourself to be the true dope. It has been widely reported that Schitt for brains is not allowing Republicans to ask questions, and coaching and leading witnesses. Those are crimes by the way dope. You haven’t heard from republicans because they have been threatened with action if they do talk. So go educate yourself dope.
 
"Even if there was quid pro quo with Ukraine on behalf of President Donald Trump, it is neither a crime nor an impeachable offense – even if it is a "political sin"


Take it one step further and say, "what Trump is not a crime or impeachable offense since he is a fucking idiot and doesn't know that abuse of power is a bit against our current laws...."

Now THAT would be a "fantastic defense".........but I am glad that morons.....like you....are at least admitting that a quid pro quo DID happen.........LOL

"Abuse of power" is not a crime nor an impeachable offense, what part of "it is neither a crime nor an impeachable offense" don't you understand?
I'm glad that clowns like you can't count to 67 Senators voting to remove Trump, the impeachment shit show will just be a partisan pissing contest. Trump will be a shoo-in in the 2020 election thanks to the brainless democrats.

Only a true moron would argue that abuse of power is not impeachable.

A brainless post with no link proving your point. Maybe you belong in the "flame zone" where its just idiots in a food fight? I prefer a debate.
I provided a link to Alan Dershowitz Harvard law professor proving my point.

Alan Dershowitz to Newsmax TV: 'Political Sin' Not a Crime

Here is another link to GW law professor Jonathan Turley also saying the Ukraine call is not impeachable.
Trump's Ukraine transcript: Unwise words but no proof of a crime

So grow a brain and admit that the dems are plotting a coup against Trump, which will fail and he will be re-elected in 2020, so thanks for playing. Now give your mommy her computer back.

Like I said, only a moron would hold such an opinion. You posting two morons who hold that opinion doesn't change that.
 
Gee, Trump's sycophants in Congress are a bit upset........not about the Trump extortion of the Ukrainian government........but about the fact that House Dems are holding closed hearings.

Never mind that House republicans in the appropriate committees are certainly allowed to attend these "open hearings".......but given the limited IQ of Trump's 35% base, the argument sounds "good."

These closed hearings held by the Dem majority have been a bout a dozen (yielding LOTS of damaging testimony on Trump's attempts to abuse power)....and will probably wind up being a bout 15 before PUBLIC hearings are held with TV coverage.....

But the interesting bit of hypocrisy by these elected republican dimwits who are bitching about closed hearings, is their loss of memory when the Benghazi CLOSED hearings were about ONE HUNDRED and TEN.

What that medicine advertised about combating the on-set of dementia???..................lol


Benghazi hearings wern't closed off to Democrat lawmakers and it wasn't a damn star chamber like what Schiff has created. The two cases arnt even comparable with the power play Schiff is trying to create by manipulating witnesses

These hearings aren't closed to Repub lawmakers either, dope. They're open to committee members of which there are equal numbers of Dems and Repubs.

You haven't heard anything from the Repubs because it's all been damning of the President.

And you again show yourself to be the true dope. It has been widely reported that Schitt for brains is not allowing Republicans to ask questions, and coaching and leading witnesses. Those are crimes by the way dope. You haven’t heard from republicans because they have been threatened with action if they do talk. So go educate yourself dope.

That is simply not true.

You obviously "heard" that bullshit from Republicans, dope.
 
The Democrats are fond of closed door hearings, nothing new here.

Hahaha. Well not in 2015. Dems hated them then. It was the Republicans turn to love them. Just Ask Trey and Darrell. You can thank them too for giving that power to the Dems now.
 
"Even if there was quid pro quo with Ukraine on behalf of President Donald Trump, it is neither a crime nor an impeachable offense – even if it is a "political sin"


Take it one step further and say, "what Trump is not a crime or impeachable offense since he is a fucking idiot and doesn't know that abuse of power is a bit against our current laws...."

Now THAT would be a "fantastic defense".........but I am glad that morons.....like you....are at least admitting that a quid pro quo DID happen.........LOL

"Abuse of power" is not a crime nor an impeachable offense, what part of "it is neither a crime nor an impeachable offense" don't you understand?
I'm glad that clowns like you can't count to 67 Senators voting to remove Trump, the impeachment shit show will just be a partisan pissing contest. Trump will be a shoo-in in the 2020 election thanks to the brainless democrats.

Only a true moron would argue that abuse of power is not impeachable.

A brainless post with no link proving your point. Maybe you belong in the "flame zone" where its just idiots in a food fight? I prefer a debate.
I provided a link to Alan Dershowitz Harvard law professor proving my point.

Alan Dershowitz to Newsmax TV: 'Political Sin' Not a Crime

Here is another link to GW law professor Jonathan Turley also saying the Ukraine call is not impeachable.
Trump's Ukraine transcript: Unwise words but no proof of a crime

So grow a brain and admit that the dems are plotting a coup against Trump, which will fail and he will be re-elected in 2020, so thanks for playing. Now give your mommy her computer back.

Like I said, only a moron would hold such an opinion. You posting two morons who hold that opinion doesn't change that.

Thank you for proving my point. Calling law professors Dershowitz and Turley "morons" just proves that you're stupid.
 
The Democrats are fond of closed door hearings, nothing new here.

Hahaha. Well not in 2015. Dems hated them then. It was the Republicans turn to love them. Just Ask Trey and Darrell. You can thank them too for giving that power to the Dems now.

Closed door hearings have been going on long before 2015, in fact 54 of them since 1929. Nothing new under the sun.

The people are the mushrooms of this country.
 
What is and should be very clear the House of Representatives is nothing more than a circus run by washed up attorney’s dressed up as clowns.
 
Gee, Trump's sycophants in Congress are a bit upset........not about the Trump extortion of the Ukrainian government........but about the fact that House Dems are holding closed hearings.

Never mind that House republicans in the appropriate committees are certainly allowed to attend these "open hearings".......but given the limited IQ of Trump's 35% base, the argument sounds "good."

These closed hearings held by the Dem majority have been a bout a dozen (yielding LOTS of damaging testimony on Trump's attempts to abuse power)....and will probably wind up being a bout 15 before PUBLIC hearings are held with TV coverage.....

But the interesting bit of hypocrisy by these elected republican dimwits who are bitching about closed hearings, is their loss of memory when the Benghazi CLOSED hearings were about ONE HUNDRED and TEN.

What that medicine advertised about combating the on-set of dementia???..................lol

If you want even the President of the USA subject to Stalinist show trial, elect more democrats

You realize these are the last days of the democrat Party, right?
 
What the Rats are doing is a total disgrace!


Shame on the PeLousy....shame on the pencil neck ... shame on all the Rats


H2utDMK.png
 
Gee, Trump's sycophants in Congress are a bit upset........not about the Trump extortion of the Ukrainian government........but about the fact that House Dems are holding closed hearings.

Never mind that House republicans in the appropriate committees are certainly allowed to attend these "open hearings".......but given the limited IQ of Trump's 35% base, the argument sounds "good."

These closed hearings held by the Dem majority have been a bout a dozen (yielding LOTS of damaging testimony on Trump's attempts to abuse power)....and will probably wind up being a bout 15 before PUBLIC hearings are held with TV coverage.....

But the interesting bit of hypocrisy by these elected republican dimwits who are bitching about closed hearings, is their loss of memory when the Benghazi CLOSED hearings were about ONE HUNDRED and TEN.

What that medicine advertised about combating the on-set of dementia???..................lol
Closed hearings in which Dems were also allowed and allowed to question and call witnesses. And Benghazi was not an attempt at impeaching the President, yet Dems had many more rights than Reps or the President has. They were invited to participate from the beginning, on the select investigation. Schumer almost had Dems not participate.
 
Fascism on full display. Then again isn’t this what teachers have indoctrinated their students to subscribe to....National Socialism, mob rule?
 
Benghazi was nothing more then a cover up perpetrated for political reasons, regretfully an Ambassador and brave Americans paid with their lives so someone could be re-elected, like get over it, move on, isn’t that what in essence the bitch said.
 
Take it one step further and say, "what Trump is not a crime or impeachable offense since he is a fucking idiot and doesn't know that abuse of power is a bit against our current laws...."

Now THAT would be a "fantastic defense".........but I am glad that morons.....like you....are at least admitting that a quid pro quo DID happen.........LOL

"Abuse of power" is not a crime nor an impeachable offense, what part of "it is neither a crime nor an impeachable offense" don't you understand?
I'm glad that clowns like you can't count to 67 Senators voting to remove Trump, the impeachment shit show will just be a partisan pissing contest. Trump will be a shoo-in in the 2020 election thanks to the brainless democrats.

Only a true moron would argue that abuse of power is not impeachable.

A brainless post with no link proving your point. Maybe you belong in the "flame zone" where its just idiots in a food fight? I prefer a debate.
I provided a link to Alan Dershowitz Harvard law professor proving my point.

Alan Dershowitz to Newsmax TV: 'Political Sin' Not a Crime

Here is another link to GW law professor Jonathan Turley also saying the Ukraine call is not impeachable.
Trump's Ukraine transcript: Unwise words but no proof of a crime

So grow a brain and admit that the dems are plotting a coup against Trump, which will fail and he will be re-elected in 2020, so thanks for playing. Now give your mommy her computer back.

Like I said, only a moron would hold such an opinion. You posting two morons who hold that opinion doesn't change that.

Thank you for proving my point. Calling law professors Dershowitz and Turley "morons" just proves that you're stupid.

More like....it proves that you're stupid.

The funniest part of that dynamic is that you have no idea yet. Even at this late date.
 
What is and should be very clear the House of Representatives is nothing more than a circus run by washed up attorney’s dressed up as clowns.

Which attorneys gather your attention?

The conspiracy crowd or the ones working the case?

Which do history favor?
 

Forum List

Back
Top