Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2017
- 46,062
- 29,788
If your argument is that free speech is not bound by time/place/manner restraints then I expect that you will FULLY support a repeal of ALL FUCKING GUN LAWS!!!Nope. Your president attacking peaceful protesters just so he could walk across the park makes you a liar.But, we are not trying to infringe on free speech. See the difference?Who said I'm defending violence and rioting? I was not. I was making the point that you people accept wayyy more violence for the sake of gun ownership than is going on with the protests.You do the first amendment a great disservice by calling violence and rioting "free speech" and acting like we have no right to defend ourselves against it.You do the second amendment a great disservice by acting the part of a potentially violent terrorist.Arming up for a battle against politically motivated people who have already armed up and proceeded to throw bricks and explosives at police in an attempt to achieve their political goals through the threat of force, on the other hand, is precisely what responsible gun ownership means in an American context.Violence is not free speech.Apply your feelings about the second amendment to the first amendment and you will have your explanation.
Now, apply your feelings about the first to the second.
LOL Arming up for some glorious politically motivated battle against other Americans is not responsible gun ownership.