The Worst?? Move Over, Carter and Buchanan!!

With a few months left in Obamas presidency, looks like he will be a top ten president

Stopped a depression
Saved auto companies and banks
Got us out of two wars
Passed Obamacare
Killed bin laden
Gay rights
Recognition of Cuba
Iran nuclear disarmament

A president is evaluated by what he was given and what he left as well as lasting legacy....Obama is a top ten

Stopped a depression
More like created a massive economic downturn from a recession creating more debt than all the presidents before him.

Saved auto companies and banks
Not the governments business to bail out the 1 percent on our grandchildren's dime.

Got us out of two wars
I thought you folks were saying it was Bush's time table in Iraq? We are still fighting in Afghanistan apparently you forgot. Add to that Libya and Syria and we are back in Iraq. Sounds more like he got us caught up in more war.

Passed Obamacare
Are you seriously calling Obamacare a success? Really? Apparently you have employer based insurance.

Killed bin laden
I thought the SEALS are taking credit. Either way it wasn't OBL.

Gay rights
What rights?

Recognition of Cuba
Since Cuba changed their ways then this truly is a success. Oh wait, still the Castro brothers, still the oppression that JFK first recognized. Nothing has changed in Cuba, the US just gave up.

Iran nuclear disarmament
The story is far from over in Iran. Might be Mrs. Tuzla may have to make good on her promise to destroy all of Iran.

I blame public education.
 
Thanks for showing you are a delusional idiot. I'll bet you are just as conservative as those 20th century KKK democrats were. But wait… you are a Republican now… Oh OH!
Racist are liberals who hate white people, who hate black conservatives, and who hate immigrants who came here legally.
What study are you citing. I can't seem to find references to your assertions anywhere. Are you making this stuff up?
It's common accepted fact. What the fuck is BLM but a front to elect Hillary. 98% of blacks vote Democrat blindly. Nuff said.
It may be a common accepted fact by RW White males but the rest of us don't accept it. wtf does BLM or the Blacks voting for Hilary have to do wth your last outrageous claim? Here is what you said:

"Racist are liberals who hate white people, who hate black conservatives, and who hate immigrants who came here legally."

Now, it seems, you are positing that BLM is a front to elect Hillary ( she is White) and that Blacks vote 98% Democrat ( whether the candidate is Black or White.). How can Liberals hate White people when Hillary is White and they LOVE her? See how ridiculous you sound?
Tell the the "hands up donut shoot lie...pile the police bodies high and try to elect Hillary."



And from the Washington Compost....proof of the palpable fear the Democrats have that not enough blacks will come out and vote for 'em:

"Perhaps most significant are the promises on criminal justice reform that largely mirror the demand of the Black Lives Matter movement."
The most progressive Democratic platform ever


Any truth to the rumor that the Democrats are going to re-name their convention "The Criminal's Convention"???
 
With a few months left in Obamas presidency, looks like he will be a top ten president

Stopped a depression
Saved auto companies and banks
Got us out of two wars
Passed Obamacare
Killed bin laden
Gay rights
Recognition of Cuba
Iran nuclear disarmament

A president is evaluated by what he was given and what he left as well as lasting legacy....Obama is a top ten

Stopped a depression
More like created a massive economic downturn from a recession creating more debt than all the presidents before him.

Saved auto companies and banks
Not the governments business to bail out the 1 percent on our grandchildren's dime.

Got us out of two wars
I thought you folks were saying it was Bush's time table in Iraq? We are still fighting in Afghanistan apparently you forgot. Add to that Libya and Syria and we are back in Iraq. Sounds more like he got us caught up in more war.

Passed Obamacare
Are you seriously calling Obamacare a success? Really? Apparently you have employer based insurance.

Killed bin laden
I thought the SEALS are taking credit. Either way it wasn't OBL.

Gay rights
What rights?

Recognition of Cuba
Since Cuba changed their ways then this truly is a success. Oh wait, still the Castro brothers, still the oppression that JFK first recognized. Nothing has changed in Cuba, the US just gave up.

Iran nuclear disarmament
The story is far from over in Iran. Might be Mrs. Tuzla may have to make good on her promise to destroy all of Iran.

I blame public education.


...that wholly owned subsidiary of Liberalism, Inc.

This is where their interests lie:

"The California Federation of Teachers (CFT) passed a resolution at its most recent convention claiming that “the continued unjust incarceration of Mumia Abu-Jamal represents a threat to the civil rights of all people.” Thirty years ago, Abu-Jamal took away Philadelphia policeman Daniel Faulkner’s foremost civil right: his life. How obtuse of the CFT to disregard “the threat to the civil rights of all people” represented by someone capable of gunning down a man tasked with protecting the public.

The pantheon of leftist saints includes the Haymarket Square bombers, responsible for the deaths of eight Chicago cops, Joe Hill, murderer of former police officer John Morrison in Salt Lake City, Huey Newton, murderer of Oakland policeman John Frey, and Leonard Peltier, murderer of FBI agents Jack Coler and Ronald Williams. Notice a pattern?"
Teachers' Mumia Abu-Jamal Resolution Out of Sync Morally and Historically | Human Events
 
We see, and will continue to see, more and more of essays such as the following.

First...the timeline.....then the indictment proving the title.... "America’s Worst President?"


1. "I nominate Barack Obama, the anti-Lincoln.
America’s Worst President?



After Thursday’s terrorist slaughter of policemen in Dallas, it’s fair to say that Barack Obama might well be the worst president in U.S. history. Here’s why.


2. ...America’s domestic politics for the last 60 or 70 years—from sometime between the Supreme Court’s 1954 Brown v Board of Education school desegregation decision and the 1964 Civil Rights Act—has been the nation’s effort to undo the heinous wrongs that slavery and Jim Crow perpetrated on black Americans...
[Both slavery and Jim Crow are the handiwork of the Democrat Party.]




3. .[but]..civil rights zeal turned into zealotry. We made the integration of our schools, and then the closing of the black-white achievement gap, our principal educational goal for half a century, with the unintended consequence that we neglected actual education and turned urban schools into machines for perpetuating black failure.


4. Judge-ordained busing in Boston, completely contrary to the terms of the Civil Rights Act, made the schools more segregated than ever. A judge-ordained Kansas City school-funding-equalization order, forcing local taxpayers to shell out $2 billion over a decade, including building a bizarrely unnecessary Olympic swimming pool, produced no educational gains whatsoever and proved to anyone with eyes to see that money was not the key to racial equality in education.

5. Then, the colleges turned to affirmative action in admissions, the ed schools taught their students not how to teach or what facts they needed to transmit but only “social-justice” ideology,.... They replaced Plato with Ta-Nehisi Coates.




6. Believing that welfare payments constituted well-deserved reparations for 300 years of slavery and oppression, we New Yorkers created a come-and-get-it dole that ended up with one in eight of our neighbors on the welfare rolls—paid for by the rest of us and resulting in a multi-generational underclass. ...

....the foolish [Liberal] notion that black crime was a manly revolt against oppression—that black criminals were only protesting against the closure of all avenues of honest advancement for their race, as well as against the daily humiliation heaped on African-Americans.


[Are you listening, Obama???]


7. The resulting depolicing of black neighborhoods and unwillingness of courts to punish black criminals drove crime to Hobbesian levels and turned minority neighborhoods into killing fields, where mothers put their kids to bed in the bathtub, trying to keep them safe from stray bullets."
America’s Worst President?




Every debilitating policy above is at the behest of Democrats/Liberals.

It is not credible to imagine that they did so out of the best of intentions.

The Dallas speech of the nation's worst President ever puts the problem in stark perspective.



Coming right up.....

Beyond doubt he's the worst. There isn't a single aspect of his administration that hasn't ruined something. His Justice Department is a racist joke, he has stymied the economy so much that it has taken 7 years to recover from the recession, he has set the Middle East on fire, he has alienated our only ally in the Middle East, he has driven a wedge between the races in this country, he supports BLM which is a domestic terrorist organization, he has demonized the police encouraging their murder, he lies continually about everything, and he hates this country and everything it stands for.

That said, I fear that Hillary will try to do worse.



"His Justice Department is a racist joke,..."

Spot on!

"For much of his life, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. carried around something peculiar…an old clipping of a quote from Harlem preacher Reverend Samuel D. Proctor. Holder put the clipping in his wallet in 1971, when he was studying history at Columbia University, and kept it in wallet after wallet over the ensuing decades.

What were Proctor’s words that Holder found so compelling?

“Blackness is another issue entirely apart from class in America. No matter how affluent, educated and mobile [a black person] becomes, his race defines him more particularly than anything else.”

When asked to explain the passage, Holder replied, “It really says that… I am not the tall U.S. attorney, I am not the thin United States Attorney. I am the black United States attorney. And he was saying that no matter how successful you are, there’s a common cause that bonds the black United States attorney with the black criminal or the black doctor with the black homeless person.”

…It may seem shocking to hear these racialist views ascribed to America’s top law enforcement officer. But to people who have worked inside the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice, these attitudes are perfectly familiar."
DOJ Whistleblower J. Christian Adams Releases New Book | Video | TheBlaze.com
DOJ‘s ’Whistleblower’ in New Black Panther Case Releases Book


Has anyone asked Holder what exactly is the “common cause” that binds the black attorney general and the black criminal?
 
Of course we now live in a pluralistic society, but even in such an environ, we still have our share of racists, bigots and all around evil assholes. Today they are not known as Democrats, and the Republican Party is no longer a progressive force in keeping to Jefferson's vision that "all men are created equal...."; it has become a small tent cabal looking to take America backwards to the late 19th Century, before women's suffrage, before the income tax, before the 17th Amendment, before the 24th Amendment and into the era before Affirmative Action which leveled the playing field and led to equal opportunities, as Jefferson and others who signed the Declaration of Independence fought for.

You are silly.


I believe 'slow-witted' is the more accurate term.

only to half-witled rightwingnuts.


What a terrible mistake you've just made in providing a post, rather than your usual inarticulate hit-and-run emoticon!


Now I get to expose you as the low-level moron that most recognize you as.

Here goes:

I double dog dare you to find any quote of mine....and there are myriad (better look that up).....and try to refute or deny same.



Shall I wait...or continue with a multifaceted and adventurous life?






Looks like I proved my point.

Never have you proved a point, you belabor issues with predilections and ignore objective knowledge whenever it conflicts with your oh so obvious biases. In fact your defense is callow, for no mature and honest (or sane) person declares victory in every case - your egotistical response to criticism is more telling than you might think, if you ever really looked in a mirror you would be blinded by the potemkin village defense.
 
Racist are liberals who hate white people, who hate black conservatives, and who hate immigrants who came here legally.
What study are you citing. I can't seem to find references to your assertions anywhere. Are you making this stuff up?
It's common accepted fact. What the fuck is BLM but a front to elect Hillary. 98% of blacks vote Democrat blindly. Nuff said.
It may be a common accepted fact by RW White males but the rest of us don't accept it. wtf does BLM or the Blacks voting for Hilary have to do wth your last outrageous claim? Here is what you said:

"Racist are liberals who hate white people, who hate black conservatives, and who hate immigrants who came here legally."

Now, it seems, you are positing that BLM is a front to elect Hillary ( she is White) and that Blacks vote 98% Democrat ( whether the candidate is Black or White.). How can Liberals hate White people when Hillary is White and they LOVE her? See how ridiculous you sound?
Tell the the "hands up donut shoot lie...pile the police bodies high and try to elect Hillary."
You are tired and confused…get some rest. You aren't making any sense now!

He never does.
 
It is not insensitive, it accurately reflects the American society. It was not too long ago that blacks were relegated to menial tasks. The fact that Obama could rise from a child of mixed race parents to President of the United States reflects on how our society has changed and just how amazing Obamas victory was

Of course we now live in a pluralistic society, but even in such an environ, we still have our share of racists, bigots and all around evil assholes. Today they are not known as Democrats, and the Republican Party is no longer a progressive force in keeping to Jefferson's vision that "all men are created equal...."; it has become a small tent cabal looking to take America backwards to the late 19th Century, before women's suffrage, before the income tax, before the 17th Amendment, before the 24th Amendment and into the era before Affirmative Action which leveled the playing field and led to equal opportunities, as Jefferson and others who signed the Declaration of Independence fought for.

You are silly.

I am? You find factual truth to be "silly"?

The New Right (the Crazy Right Wing as I like to characterize them) is reactionary. They want a return to the Gilded Age, when all of the items noted in my "silly" post did not exist. Oh, and I forgot labor unions, and an electrified rural America and a strong and growing middle class. Yes, the good old days which weren't so good.

They're batshit insane. Deregulations caused the great depression(Harding, Hover) and Great recession, but they somehow think doing the same will have different results? Government regulations on air, water and food is why America has such high standards that these assholes can brag about the dirty water of mexico as they certainly do. Most of the world would kill for the clean air, water and food America enjoys because of government regs! Liberterians really are sick in the head.

I haven't heard anyone mention deregulating air, water and food. The regulations strangling startup businesses and industry are what hold down economic growth.

I supervised an employee who wanted to start his own restaurant. He had to jump through many hoops before he opened, permits and fees along with infrastructure that needed to be added to the rented space being used as a restaurant.

But your conclusion, "regulations strangling startup businesses and industry are what hold down economic growth" is bullshit. He cleared all the jumps and operated the restaurant managed by his wife for several years. Because he was so successful, the owner of the strip mall refused to renew his lease, and allowed a chain operation to open a restaurant selling the same cuisine of lesser quality and higher priced.

Your simple explanation sans any examples is an example of simple thinking.
 
Of course we now live in a pluralistic society, but even in such an environ, we still have our share of racists, bigots and all around evil assholes. Today they are not known as Democrats, and the Republican Party is no longer a progressive force in keeping to Jefferson's vision that "all men are created equal...."; it has become a small tent cabal looking to take America backwards to the late 19th Century, before women's suffrage, before the income tax, before the 17th Amendment, before the 24th Amendment and into the era before Affirmative Action which leveled the playing field and led to equal opportunities, as Jefferson and others who signed the Declaration of Independence fought for.

You are silly.

I am? You find factual truth to be "silly"?

The New Right (the Crazy Right Wing as I like to characterize them) is reactionary. They want a return to the Gilded Age, when all of the items noted in my "silly" post did not exist. Oh, and I forgot labor unions, and an electrified rural America and a strong and growing middle class. Yes, the good old days which weren't so good.

They're batshit insane. Deregulations caused the great depression(Harding, Hover) and Great recession, but they somehow think doing the same will have different results? Government regulations on air, water and food is why America has such high standards that these assholes can brag about the dirty water of mexico as they certainly do. Most of the world would kill for the clean air, water and food America enjoys because of government regs! Liberterians really are sick in the head.

I haven't heard anyone mention deregulating air, water and food. The regulations strangling startup businesses and industry are what hold down economic growth.

"Obama Imposed 75,000 Pages of New Regulations in 2014
Just in the last few weeks, the Obama administration has proposed or imposed over 1,200 new regulations on the American people that will add even more to the already crushing $2 trillion per year cost burden of the federal regulatory machine. According to data compiled from the federal government’s Regulations.gov website by the Daily Caller, most of the new regulatory schemes involve energy and the environment — 139 during a mere two-week period in December, to be precise. In all, the Obama administration foisted more than 75,000 pages of regulations on the United States in 2014, costing over $200 billion, on the low end, if new proposed rules are taken into account.."
Obama Imposed 75,000 Pages of New Regulations in 2014

Give an example of why a regulation, such as a zoning law, or one disallowing ABC Industries from discharging polluted water into a river is a bad practice. I'm sure there are some silly regulations, but rather than paint with broad brush as you always do, why not use one or two examples of regs which you find extremely toxic.
 
Racist are liberals who hate white people, who hate black conservatives, and who hate immigrants who came here legally.
What study are you citing. I can't seem to find references to your assertions anywhere. Are you making this stuff up?
It's common accepted fact. What the fuck is BLM but a front to elect Hillary. 98% of blacks vote Democrat blindly. Nuff said.
It may be a common accepted fact by RW White males but the rest of us don't accept it. wtf does BLM or the Blacks voting for Hilary have to do wth your last outrageous claim? Here is what you said:

"Racist are liberals who hate white people, who hate black conservatives, and who hate immigrants who came here legally."

Now, it seems, you are positing that BLM is a front to elect Hillary ( she is White) and that Blacks vote 98% Democrat ( whether the candidate is Black or White.). How can Liberals hate White people when Hillary is White and they LOVE her? See how ridiculous you sound?
Tell the the "hands up donut shoot lie...pile the police bodies high and try to elect Hillary."



And from the Washington Compost....proof of the palpable fear the Democrats have that not enough blacks will come out and vote for 'em:

"Perhaps most significant are the promises on criminal justice reform that largely mirror the demand of the Black Lives Matter movement."
The most progressive Democratic platform ever


Any truth to the rumor that the Democrats are going to re-name their convention "The Criminal's Convention"???

Are you now, or have you ever been a member of the KKK? By your silence, one must infer that you once had a membership in the John Birch Society, an organization even the most revered conservative William Frank Buckley Jr. tossed under the bus.

I wonder how he would respond to people like you? Not very well, methinks.
 
Racist are liberals who hate white people, who hate black conservatives, and who hate immigrants who came here legally.
What study are you citing. I can't seem to find references to your assertions anywhere. Are you making this stuff up?
It's common accepted fact. What the fuck is BLM but a front to elect Hillary. 98% of blacks vote Democrat blindly. Nuff said.
It may be a common accepted fact by RW White males but the rest of us don't accept it. wtf does BLM or the Blacks voting for Hilary have to do wth your last outrageous claim? Here is what you said:

"Racist are liberals who hate white people, who hate black conservatives, and who hate immigrants who came here legally."

Now, it seems, you are positing that BLM is a front to elect Hillary ( she is White) and that Blacks vote 98% Democrat ( whether the candidate is Black or White.). How can Liberals hate White people when Hillary is White and they LOVE her? See how ridiculous you sound?
Tell the the "hands up donut shoot lie...pile the police bodies high and try to elect Hillary."
You are tired and confused…get some rest. You aren't making any sense now!

you ask too much of the troll
 
You are silly.

I am? You find factual truth to be "silly"?

The New Right (the Crazy Right Wing as I like to characterize them) is reactionary. They want a return to the Gilded Age, when all of the items noted in my "silly" post did not exist. Oh, and I forgot labor unions, and an electrified rural America and a strong and growing middle class. Yes, the good old days which weren't so good.

They're batshit insane. Deregulations caused the great depression(Harding, Hover) and Great recession, but they somehow think doing the same will have different results? Government regulations on air, water and food is why America has such high standards that these assholes can brag about the dirty water of mexico as they certainly do. Most of the world would kill for the clean air, water and food America enjoys because of government regs! Liberterians really are sick in the head.

I haven't heard anyone mention deregulating air, water and food. The regulations strangling startup businesses and industry are what hold down economic growth.

"Obama Imposed 75,000 Pages of New Regulations in 2014
Just in the last few weeks, the Obama administration has proposed or imposed over 1,200 new regulations on the American people that will add even more to the already crushing $2 trillion per year cost burden of the federal regulatory machine. According to data compiled from the federal government’s Regulations.gov website by the Daily Caller, most of the new regulatory schemes involve energy and the environment — 139 during a mere two-week period in December, to be precise. In all, the Obama administration foisted more than 75,000 pages of regulations on the United States in 2014, costing over $200 billion, on the low end, if new proposed rules are taken into account.."
Obama Imposed 75,000 Pages of New Regulations in 2014

Give an example of why a regulation, such as a zoning law, or one disallowing ABC Industries from discharging polluted water into a river is a bad practice. I'm sure there are some silly regulations, but rather than paint with broad brush as you always do, why not use one or two examples of regs which you find extremely toxic.

it interferes with the abuse of the environment by the Koch brothers and their friends.
 
You are silly.

I am? You find factual truth to be "silly"?

The New Right (the Crazy Right Wing as I like to characterize them) is reactionary. They want a return to the Gilded Age, when all of the items noted in my "silly" post did not exist. Oh, and I forgot labor unions, and an electrified rural America and a strong and growing middle class. Yes, the good old days which weren't so good.

They're batshit insane. Deregulations caused the great depression(Harding, Hover) and Great recession, but they somehow think doing the same will have different results? Government regulations on air, water and food is why America has such high standards that these assholes can brag about the dirty water of mexico as they certainly do. Most of the world would kill for the clean air, water and food America enjoys because of government regs! Liberterians really are sick in the head.

I haven't heard anyone mention deregulating air, water and food. The regulations strangling startup businesses and industry are what hold down economic growth.

"Obama Imposed 75,000 Pages of New Regulations in 2014
Just in the last few weeks, the Obama administration has proposed or imposed over 1,200 new regulations on the American people that will add even more to the already crushing $2 trillion per year cost burden of the federal regulatory machine. According to data compiled from the federal government’s Regulations.gov website by the Daily Caller, most of the new regulatory schemes involve energy and the environment — 139 during a mere two-week period in December, to be precise. In all, the Obama administration foisted more than 75,000 pages of regulations on the United States in 2014, costing over $200 billion, on the low end, if new proposed rules are taken into account.."
Obama Imposed 75,000 Pages of New Regulations in 2014

Give an example of why a regulation, such as a zoning law, or one disallowing ABC Industries from discharging polluted water into a river is a bad practice. I'm sure there are some silly regulations, but rather than paint with broad brush as you always do, why not use one or two examples of regs which you find extremely toxic.




"....I'm sure there are some silly regulations,...."


Done.
 
What study are you citing. I can't seem to find references to your assertions anywhere. Are you making this stuff up?
It's common accepted fact. What the fuck is BLM but a front to elect Hillary. 98% of blacks vote Democrat blindly. Nuff said.
It may be a common accepted fact by RW White males but the rest of us don't accept it. wtf does BLM or the Blacks voting for Hilary have to do wth your last outrageous claim? Here is what you said:

"Racist are liberals who hate white people, who hate black conservatives, and who hate immigrants who came here legally."

Now, it seems, you are positing that BLM is a front to elect Hillary ( she is White) and that Blacks vote 98% Democrat ( whether the candidate is Black or White.). How can Liberals hate White people when Hillary is White and they LOVE her? See how ridiculous you sound?
Tell the the "hands up donut shoot lie...pile the police bodies high and try to elect Hillary."
You are tired and confused…get some rest. You aren't making any sense now!

you ask too much of the troll



Wasn't that fun yesterday when I whooped you speechless.

BTW....speechless is your very best debate strategy.

True story.
 
What study are you citing. I can't seem to find references to your assertions anywhere. Are you making this stuff up?
It's common accepted fact. What the fuck is BLM but a front to elect Hillary. 98% of blacks vote Democrat blindly. Nuff said.
It may be a common accepted fact by RW White males but the rest of us don't accept it. wtf does BLM or the Blacks voting for Hilary have to do wth your last outrageous claim? Here is what you said:

"Racist are liberals who hate white people, who hate black conservatives, and who hate immigrants who came here legally."

Now, it seems, you are positing that BLM is a front to elect Hillary ( she is White) and that Blacks vote 98% Democrat ( whether the candidate is Black or White.). How can Liberals hate White people when Hillary is White and they LOVE her? See how ridiculous you sound?
Tell the the "hands up donut shoot lie...pile the police bodies high and try to elect Hillary."



And from the Washington Compost....proof of the palpable fear the Democrats have that not enough blacks will come out and vote for 'em:

"Perhaps most significant are the promises on criminal justice reform that largely mirror the demand of the Black Lives Matter movement."
The most progressive Democratic platform ever


Any truth to the rumor that the Democrats are going to re-name their convention "The Criminal's Convention"???

Are you now, or have you ever been a member of the KKK? By your silence, one must infer that you once had a membership in the John Birch Society, an organization even the most revered conservative William Frank Buckley Jr. tossed under the bus.

I wonder how he would respond to people like you? Not very well, methinks.


"Are you now, or have you ever been a member of the KKK?"

Now...how could I have ever been a member of the KKK.....I've never been a Democrat.



Gads, you're dumb.....you walked right into that.
 
You are silly.


I believe 'slow-witted' is the more accurate term.

only to half-witled rightwingnuts.


What a terrible mistake you've just made in providing a post, rather than your usual inarticulate hit-and-run emoticon!


Now I get to expose you as the low-level moron that most recognize you as.

Here goes:

I double dog dare you to find any quote of mine....and there are myriad (better look that up).....and try to refute or deny same.



Shall I wait...or continue with a multifaceted and adventurous life?






Looks like I proved my point.

Never have you proved a point, you belabor issues with predilections and ignore objective knowledge whenever it conflicts with your oh so obvious biases. In fact your defense is callow, for no mature and honest (or sane) person declares victory in every case - your egotistical response to criticism is more telling than you might think, if you ever really looked in a mirror you would be blinded by the potemkin village defense.


Laminate this for your wallet....or, the fanny pack in your case....

...and never forget this about moi....

1. I know everything
2. I'm never wrong.


Recognizing same will save you a lot of time posting....you can spend more time coloring in your blanket fort.
 
You are silly.


I believe 'slow-witted' is the more accurate term.

only to half-witled rightwingnuts.


What a terrible mistake you've just made in providing a post, rather than your usual inarticulate hit-and-run emoticon!


Now I get to expose you as the low-level moron that most recognize you as.

Here goes:

I double dog dare you to find any quote of mine....and there are myriad (better look that up).....and try to refute or deny same.



Shall I wait...or continue with a multifaceted and adventurous life?






Looks like I proved my point.

Never have you proved a point, you belabor issues with predilections and ignore objective knowledge whenever it conflicts with your oh so obvious biases. In fact your defense is callow, for no mature and honest (or sane) person declares victory in every case - your egotistical response to criticism is more telling than you might think, if you ever really looked in a mirror you would be blinded by the potemkin village defense.



"....your egotistical response to criticism...."

I always take criticism well......as long as I don't hear it.
 
Last edited:
You are silly.


I believe 'slow-witted' is the more accurate term.

only to half-witled rightwingnuts.


What a terrible mistake you've just made in providing a post, rather than your usual inarticulate hit-and-run emoticon!


Now I get to expose you as the low-level moron that most recognize you as.

Here goes:

I double dog dare you to find any quote of mine....and there are myriad (better look that up).....and try to refute or deny same.



Shall I wait...or continue with a multifaceted and adventurous life?






Looks like I proved my point.

Never have you proved a point, you belabor issues with predilections and ignore objective knowledge whenever it conflicts with your oh so obvious biases. In fact your defense is callow, for no mature and honest (or sane) person declares victory in every case - your egotistical response to criticism is more telling than you might think, if you ever really looked in a mirror you would be blinded by the potemkin village defense.



"Never have you proved (sic) a point, ....
..... the potemkin (sic) village."

Never have you proven a point...
...the Potemkin village...."



Watta dunce.
Your poor usage of the English language makes me (sic).



One day, remind me to explain how utterly ironic it is for a socialist like you to refer to Potemkin villages.
Even you will laugh at yourself.

....
 
Here's a paradox...

1. Do you realize how easy it is to mock stupid people...y'know....like you.

2. Being stupid.....you don't.
 
Using the term "Democrat" to define the actions of a specific group of racist in a particular era is problematic because during the 1st half of the 20th Century most of the states were controlled by Democrats. Most of those Blue states were not slave states nor did they share the Southern conservative fervor in maintaining the peculiar institution of slavery. Those Democratic states sided with the Union during the Civil War against the Southern conservative confederacy. That is why I choose to make the crucial distinction between conservative Southern Democrats and liberal Northern Democrats. The Republicans would have been powerless without them.

You are being delusional. There was no "party of slavery." Slavery was original sanctioned by the founding fathers before the Democrats or Republicans were even formed. If any ownership for slavery is to be bestowed upon a group of Americans, place that mantle on the shoulders of southern conservatives. Slavery was the tradition to be conserved, by them.


You've committed a inordinate amount of time addressing my "stupidity." That, in and of itself, is quite telling. But nothing is as telling as your need to have your pseudo-facts addressed despite my introduction of graphics to make my points clear.

Ignoring the two political maps I took the time to post, you posted this:

"Democrats are and have always been the party of slavery, segregation, and second class citizenship.
FDR disparaged minorities....blacks, Jews and Asians."

Look, I don't give a f—k about what FDR did. I wasn't even alive back then..perhaps YOU were. Today's political parties and who is in them now is the real issue. Blacks Asians , Jews and Hispanics plus liberal Whites of both sexes have come together to make America great for EVERYBODY under the auspices of the Democratic Party. BTW America was a bastion of slavery, does that mean blacks should abandon these shores because of that? And don't forget, Republicans AND democrats tolerated slavery in the South for several hundred years. Now go to bed and dream up more nonsense you silly curmudgeon!


"Using the term "Democrat" to define the actions of a specific group of racist blah blah blah...."


Who used the term 'Democrat'????


George Wallace, Al Gore, Sr., Lyndon Baines Johnson, Franklin Roosevelt, Oval Faubus, Lester Maddox, Hugo Black, Sam Ervin, William Fulbright, ..Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.


Every KKK member, too.

Every JIm Crow law.....Democrat provenance.


That's the policy basis for the group that you are tied to.
Change is a byatch, isn't it? Just like you!


Destroying your posts was a pleasure.

Proving you a liar....a bonus.
HAHAHAHA. You probably believe in the tooth fairy too. Just because you are such an obstinate c**t who refuses to acknowledge the conservative connection to the most blatant racism in this country doesn't make you a winner. It just shows you are a light weight with no formal education. No matter where conservatism raises it's ugly head, whether it be under the auspices of 20th century Democrats or 21str century Republicans, racism, sexism and general intolerance follows.


Time and again, when folks realize they have been skewered, that they have no adequate response to truth that destroys their worldview, their most closely held beliefs, their language falls to the vulgar.

It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at being bested leaks out as vulgarity.

This explains your post.

This also explains why I have never had to resort to that sort of language.

Since when did the word "coot" become vulgar? See how dumb you are? I am always one step ahead of you, dummy! Does this revelation explain your failure to come to grips with the conservatism of the racist Southern Democrats of the 19th and 20th Centuries?
Stop whining and wash the bitter dregs of defeat from your mouth with some dark beer…heh heh heh!
 
"Using the term "Democrat" to define the actions of a specific group of racist blah blah blah...."


Who used the term 'Democrat'????


George Wallace, Al Gore, Sr., Lyndon Baines Johnson, Franklin Roosevelt, Oval Faubus, Lester Maddox, Hugo Black, Sam Ervin, William Fulbright, ..Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.


Every KKK member, too.

Every JIm Crow law.....Democrat provenance.


That's the policy basis for the group that you are tied to.
Change is a byatch, isn't it? Just like you!


Destroying your posts was a pleasure.

Proving you a liar....a bonus.
HAHAHAHA. You probably believe in the tooth fairy too. Just because you are such an obstinate c**t who refuses to acknowledge the conservative connection to the most blatant racism in this country doesn't make you a winner. It just shows you are a light weight with no formal education. No matter where conservatism raises it's ugly head, whether it be under the auspices of 20th century Democrats or 21str century Republicans, racism, sexism and general intolerance follows.


Time and again, when folks realize they have been skewered, that they have no adequate response to truth that destroys their worldview, their most closely held beliefs, their language falls to the vulgar.

It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at being bested leaks out as vulgarity.

This explains your post.

This also explains why I have never had to resort to that sort of language.

Since when did the word "coot" become vulgar? See how dumb you are? I am always one step ahead of you, dummy! Does this revelation explain your failure to come to grips with the conservatism of the racist Southern Democrats of the 19th and 20th Centuries?
Stop whining and wash the bitter dregs of defeat from your mouth with some dark beer…heh heh heh!



How easily you slip into lying.


Years of practice, eh?
 

Forum List

Back
Top