This is why we need to tax the wealthy

[Markle]

And then they do when they do better.

What is their motivation to do better? Why get married when they are rewarded for being single with children?

 

[pknopp]

What is their motivation to do better? Why get married when they are rewarded for being single with children?

I see no reason one must get the governments ok to be who you want to be with.

What a single mother gets is less than a drop in the bucket compared to what wall street has got.

 

[Arlette]

We need to tax the morbidly rich because we can't afford em

 

[Markle]

When did I ever suggest we adopt a non-profit marketless mode of production or communism at this time? I wasn't even referring to it, so you're just resorting to strawmen arguments. Nothing I mentioned is an "iron fist" or oppressive, it's simply a set of regulations that perhaps you don't like but that in and of itself doesn't make it communism or anything other than just a regulatory framework. Markets need to be properly regulated and society sets its rules through its government.

You're also clueless to the fact that communism is a stateless society, without socioeconomic classes or the need for money. That's not my definition of communism, that's the definition as set by Karl Marx himself along with his colleague and fellow scholar Fredrick Engels.

A communist society would entail the absence of private property and social classes,[1] and ultimately money[6][non-primary source needed] and the state (or nation state).[7][8][9]

Communism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

And see:

Withering away of the state - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The USSR wasn't really a communist state, it was a socialist one.

USSR = UNITED SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS.

It wasn't communist in a strict sense. Socialism is the process that leads to communism. It can take several forms, from market socialism to marketless socialism as the one in the USSR. It all depends.

 

[Nostra]

We need to tax the morbidly rich because we can't afford em

What are they costing you, Simp?

 

[Markle]

We need to tax the morbidly rich because we can't afford em

Please elaborate.

 

[BackAgain]

How am I wrong?

In almost every thing you think and say.

 

[Markle]

I see no reason one must get the governments ok to be who you want to be with.

What a single mother gets is less than a drop in the bucket compared to what wall street has got.

 

[pknopp]

Odd, we have done so for wall street over and over and now those who benefitted the most from that don't want to cover the costs.

 

[BluesLegend]

I and all members of society have a right to determine the rules of our country and community. If anyone is taking wealth away from others it's the big-money capitalists that you worship with their yearly subsidies:

Dem pathetic wealth envy is noted, get jobs, start a business, earn your own wealth, work for it losers.

 

[Markle]

Odd, we have done so for wall street over and over and now those who benefitted the most from that don't want to cover the costs.

Please be specific.

 

[pknopp]

Please be specific.

You understand.

 

[Markle]

You understand.

As I thought. It's just hollow rambling.

 

[pknopp]

As I thought. It's just hollow rambling.

It's only been discussed endlessly for over 15 years.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Dem pathetic wealth envy is noted, get jobs, start a business, earn your own wealth, work for it losers.

That's what you need to do and stop leeching off workers. Your employees are the real workers, not you the one living off of other people's toil like a little fief-lord. Punk.

 

[TruthNotBS]

In almost every thing you think and say.

You didn't answer my question. In what way was I wrong? Be specific.

 

[TruthNotBS]

You're the one calling the leg a tail, not me. Nice try, try again.

 

[beagle9]

They pay more money in taxes because they have more money. It's that simple. The more one benefits from the country's economy the more one contributes to its upkeep via taxes (local, state, and federal). Taxes are needed to keep the system running, without them local and state governments would be unable to fund anything without the federal government.

That's the problem, otherwise state and local Democrat governments funding or funneling money in give away programs in order to buy loyalty and votes with the money...

 

[BackAgain]

You didn't answer my question. In what way was I wrong? Be specific.

I did answer. You’re a clown.

 

[pknopp]

That's the problem, otherwise state and local Democrat governments funding or funneling money in give away programs in order to buy loyalty and votes with the money...

What do you think this was?

‘Here’s your check’: Trump’s massive payouts to farmers will be hard to pull back

The president was already spending double his predecessor to spare farmers the cost of his trade war. Now the price is reaching unsustainable levels.

www.politico.com