Translating the doublespeak from liberals

Clementine believes it. True Story. Ask him.

Better yet...read the first post of this thread. It's some real tin foil hat shit.

First of all, I am a 'she.' Second, that language is in the law and people are going to lose their homes when they are forced onto Medicaid. Without home health care, many will no longer be able to stay home and receive care. That means nursing home. That means states have the right to take houses. Obama pushed for Obamacare for months. It sounds like you are saying he had no clue as to what was in the law. It's his signature legislation. He knows who wrote it. Did they do so without any input from him? Are you saying that no one, at any time, discussed this with him? There wasn't a clear purpose for everything in the law? He is totally clueless????

Obama signed the bill into law and by doing so took complete responsibility for everything in it. If the law allows states to confiscate homes for patients on Medicaid who end up in nursing homes, is he or isn't he the man behind the confiscation when it happens? Or do you not hold him responsible for anything he does?

Then you'll have no problems linking to the section of the law that states what you claim.

This is where you go missing from the thread.

you dont have a problem proving you're an idiot
 
Bullshit argument. Not rooted in fact at all.
Your post is your perception. Your comfort zone.
BTW, WE ALL benefit from spending on the military.
The fact that we have a strong armed forces allows you the ability to have your opinions and perceptions heard.

LOL, "not rooted in fact at all" he says. So we don't have the largest military budget in the world by far? Conservatives are ok with reducing the size of that budget?

You inbreds make this too easy.

it's already been reduced leftard. the only one making things easy is you making a fool of yourself

and it's been pointed out to you that the military and defense spending is a better bargain than increasing the welfare state for votes

idiots and hypocrites

Ha! Like I said...Conservatives aren't for smaller government.
 
LOL, "not rooted in fact at all" he says. So we don't have the largest military budget in the world by far? Conservatives are ok with reducing the size of that budget?

You inbreds make this too easy.

it's already been reduced leftard. the only one making things easy is you making a fool of yourself

and it's been pointed out to you that the military and defense spending is a better bargain than increasing the welfare state for votes

idiots and hypocrites

Ha! Like I said...Conservatives aren't for smaller government.

they are for smaller government than you want

everything is relatie dimwit
 
Bullshit argument. Not rooted in fact at all.
Your post is your perception. Your comfort zone.
BTW, WE ALL benefit from spending on the military.
The fact that we have a strong armed forces allows you the ability to have your opinions and perceptions heard.

LOL, "not rooted in fact at all" he says. So we don't have the largest military budget in the world by far? Conservatives are ok with reducing the size of that budget?

You inbreds make this too easy.

The far left continues to show they have no clue about the constitution or the far left family tree (which grows straight up).

Good point. The Constitution does stipulate that we must spend more on our military than the next 10 countries combined.
 
LOL, "not rooted in fact at all" he says. So we don't have the largest military budget in the world by far? Conservatives are ok with reducing the size of that budget?

You inbreds make this too easy.

The far left continues to show they have no clue about the constitution or the far left family tree (which grows straight up).

Good point. The Constitution does stipulate that we must spend more on our military than the next 10 countries combined.


considering we are on treaties obligated to defend more than the next 10 countries
only an idiot is suprised
 
people on welfare are easier to pander to; now you know why the left prefers them over people in the Defense industry and our military
 
corporations hire your mommy and daddy leftard; and pay for dems to pander to and enslave minorities in welfare dependence

and they are making record profits under obama

so whose overlords are they left-wing nutjob?

Once again you prove trickle down doesn't work. You're not even a good conservative.

Maybe you need to reread your talking points. Perhaps you need them in the form of a scratch and sniff book so that you can understand them better.



how can we still have that mean ol system in the 8th straight year of progressive majority rule?

if i proved trickle down doesnt work; you REALLY proved left-wing nutjobs are abject failures and great excuse-makers

Because we don't have "Progressive Majority Rule". I didn't realize the Senate and House were Democrat controlled. Learned something else new! Thanks!
 
Let me check again....


....nope, definitely is nothing like that at all. But you wear a name tag to work, so your slowness is excused.

ur right dork; there is another explanation why he delayed his own law until right after the next elections

because it's failing?

The whole law is delayed? Wow, who knew.



good one stupid; but thanks for admitting just the parts that could affect the next election have been delayed

lol
 
Once again you prove trickle down doesn't work. You're not even a good conservative.

Maybe you need to reread your talking points. Perhaps you need them in the form of a scratch and sniff book so that you can understand them better.



how can we still have that mean ol system in the 8th straight year of progressive majority rule?

if i proved trickle down doesnt work; you REALLY proved left-wing nutjobs are abject failures and great excuse-makers

Because we don't have "Progressive Majority Rule". I didn't realize the Senate and House were Democrat controlled. Learned something else new! Thanks!
um; yes we do

go cry now
 
it's already been reduced leftard. the only one making things easy is you making a fool of yourself

and it's been pointed out to you that the military and defense spending is a better bargain than increasing the welfare state for votes

idiots and hypocrites

Ha! Like I said...Conservatives aren't for smaller government.

they are for smaller government than you want

everything is relatie dimwit

Bzzzzz, false.
 
"Liberals" want to take people's property?

But Harter, like thousands of other landowners, doesn’t have much choice. Two days earlier, Harter had been in court trying to stop TransCanada, which had asked a judge to let it exercise eminent domain and force Harter to give it access to his land.

Harter lost.


Keystone XL pipeline is issue of property rights for some ranchers - The Washington Post

How little you understand.
http://encyclo.findlaw.com/6200book.pdf

BTW, just because liberal oppose this project does not mean the decision to invoke eminent domain is one steeped in conservatism.
Conversely, eminent domain is the law. The court decision was a matter of law.
Under eminent domain, all landowners are offered compensation in fair market value in exchange for the taking.
 
big businesses are making record profits under Progressive rule; but arent hiring

true story

welfare and food stamps are at record levels under obama; is that libs fostering a sense of personal responsibility?

at least the militay protects us; what did we get for obama's expansion of the federal government? record welfare and food stamps?

if people arent gaming the system; how come welfare and food stamps need to be at record levels at a time when obama and the Left claim to much job growth? somebody is mooching


idiots and hypocrites

Thanks for proving that trickle down economics doesn't work.

Oh but it does. And will continue to do so.
Trickle down works for those who wish it to do so. By working and producing.
 
The far left continues to show they have no clue about the constitution or the far left family tree (which grows straight up).

Good point. The Constitution does stipulate that we must spend more on our military than the next 10 countries combined.


considering we are on treaties obligated to defend more than the next 10 countries
only an idiot is suprised

That in the Constitution too?
 

Forum List

Back
Top