Trump backs down

[Eaglewings]

Awww, another douche liberal pretending.

Pretending what? lol...

Have you ever noticed when someone is in a losing argument the insults come out next... ? You do not have anything to add why Trump exaggerated and lied?

 

[miketx]

Awww, another douche liberal pretending.

Pretending what? lol...

Have you ever noticed when someone is in a losing argument the insults come out next... ? You do not have anything to add why Trump exaggerated and lied?

You have any proof that Trump exaggerated and lied?

 

[Eaglewings]

And back to the topic at hand. Considering that the NYT ran a story with wire tap in screaming headlines, considering everyone around him is being investigated to try to find even the smallest link to the Russians including Ivanka's mother in law, Trump and anyone else associated with him would be foolish to beleive that they were not under surveillance.

Trump is the one who tweeted at 5:30 in the morning 3 insulting and false claims accusing Obama of wiretapping..

The NYT and all other news outlets just reported it.

 

[brummelben]

Awww, another douche liberal pretending.

Pretending what? lol...

Have you ever noticed when someone is in a losing argument the insults come out next... ? You do not have anything to add why Trump exaggerated and lied?

You have any proof that Trump exaggerated and lied?

which time? There are so many

 

[miketx]

Awww, another douche liberal pretending.

Pretending what? lol...

Have you ever noticed when someone is in a losing argument the insults come out next... ? You do not have anything to add why Trump exaggerated and lied?

You have any proof that Trump exaggerated and lied?

which time? There are so many

Anytime. Show proof.

 

[miketx]

And back to the topic at hand. Considering that the NYT ran a story with wire tap in screaming headlines, considering everyone around him is being investigated to try to find even the smallest link to the Russians including Ivanka's mother in law, Trump and anyone else associated with him would be foolish to beleive that they were not under surveillance.

Trump is the one who tweeted at 5:30 in the morning 3 insulting and false claims accusing Obama of wiretapping..

The NYT and all other news outlets just reported it.

Prove they are false.

 

[brummelben]

Awww, another douche liberal pretending.

Pretending what? lol...

Have you ever noticed when someone is in a losing argument the insults come out next... ? You do not have anything to add why Trump exaggerated and lied?

You have any proof that Trump exaggerated and lied?

which time? There are so many

Anytime. Show proof.

If we work backwards we can begin with the Trump lie about wiretapping the white house

 

[Eaglewings]

Awww, another douche liberal pretending.

Pretending what? lol...

Have you ever noticed when someone is in a losing argument the insults come out next... ? You do not have anything to add why Trump exaggerated and lied?

You have any proof that Trump exaggerated and lied?

1. You pay attention to how someone acts after a lie ( make excuses, or change what they said)

2. Trump has come out with nothing and wants more time to try to make something up...if there was concrete evidence, it would be out right now..

3. We have seen Trumps past and how he loves to get a rise out of people by making shit up and twitter it..
He went too far this time and he knows it.

 

[brummelben]

And back to the topic at hand. Considering that the NYT ran a story with wire tap in screaming headlines, considering everyone around him is being investigated to try to find even the smallest link to the Russians including Ivanka's mother in law, Trump and anyone else associated with him would be foolish to beleive that they were not under surveillance.

Trump is the one who tweeted at 5:30 in the morning 3 insulting and false claims accusing Obama of wiretapping..

The NYT and all other news outlets just reported it.

Prove they are false.

How long has Trump had to provide proof of these wiretaps and he has nothing, Thats cause he is lying, sis

 

[rightwinger]

And back to the topic at hand. Considering that the NYT ran a story with wire tap in screaming headlines, considering everyone around him is being investigated to try to find even the smallest link to the Russians including Ivanka's mother in law, Trump and anyone else associated with him would be foolish to beleive that they were not under surveillance.

Times ran a story about wiretapping the Russians not Trump

 

[rightwinger]

And back to the topic at hand. Considering that the NYT ran a story with wire tap in screaming headlines, considering everyone around him is being investigated to try to find even the smallest link to the Russians including Ivanka's mother in law, Trump and anyone else associated with him would be foolish to beleive that they were not under surveillance.

Trump is the one who tweeted at 5:30 in the morning 3 insulting and false claims accusing Obama of wiretapping..

The NYT and all other news outlets just reported it.

Prove they are false.

How long has Trump had to provide proof of these wiretaps and he has nothing, Thats cause he is lying, sis

He made the wild accusation . He must have some proof

Nobody would make such wild claims without proof ....... Unless they are a moron

 

[brummelben]

And back to the topic at hand. Considering that the NYT ran a story with wire tap in screaming headlines, considering everyone around him is being investigated to try to find even the smallest link to the Russians including Ivanka's mother in law, Trump and anyone else associated with him would be foolish to beleive that they were not under surveillance.

Trump is the one who tweeted at 5:30 in the morning 3 insulting and false claims accusing Obama of wiretapping..

The NYT and all other news outlets just reported it.

Prove they are false.

How long has Trump had to provide proof of these wiretaps and he has nothing, Thats cause he is lying, sis

He made the wild accusation . He must have some proof

Nobody would make such wild claims without proof ....... Unless they are a moron

Rump will do anything to deflect from his failed presidency

 

[miketx]

And back to the topic at hand. Considering that the NYT ran a story with wire tap in screaming headlines, considering everyone around him is being investigated to try to find even the smallest link to the Russians including Ivanka's mother in law, Trump and anyone else associated with him would be foolish to beleive that they were not under surveillance.

Trump is the one who tweeted at 5:30 in the morning 3 insulting and false claims accusing Obama of wiretapping..

The NYT and all other news outlets just reported it.

Prove they are false.

How long has Trump had to provide proof of these wiretaps and he has nothing, Thats cause he is lying, sis

He made the wild accusation . He must have some proof

Nobody would make such wild claims without proof ....... Unless they are a moron

Rump will do anything to deflect from his failed presidency

Still waiting for any one of you to offer some real proof.

 

[brummelben]

Trump is the one who tweeted at 5:30 in the morning 3 insulting and false claims accusing Obama of wiretapping..

The NYT and all other news outlets just reported it.

Prove they are false.

How long has Trump had to provide proof of these wiretaps and he has nothing, Thats cause he is lying, sis

He made the wild accusation . He must have some proof

Nobody would make such wild claims without proof ....... Unless they are a moron

Rump will do anything to deflect from his failed presidency

Still waiting for any one of you to offer some real proof.

Where is Rumps proof?

 

[Czernobog]

And that's how you squash any impartial investigation. They arrive at findings you don't like? Just keep firing them, until you get someone who's says what you want them to say...

Power really does have its perks...
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

What were the 93 lawyers fired by Bill Clinton investigating?

The same thing the attempt to claim Trump is 'firing' lawyers to prevent/hinder an investigation.

But, you knew that, didn't you?

Uh, wrong! When you suggested that the connection between the Trump campaign/Administration and the Russians was unfounded, and needed to be apologized for, you were reminded that it has been linked by, and was being investigated by, and I quote, "17 national intelligence agencies.", to which you specifically responded, "You mean all those folks Trump is going to fire?", directly tying those firings to the investigations they are attempting to oversee.

My response was directly related to your post; your response, on the other hand, was the typical bait, and switch, red herring, whenever you guys get into trouble defending Trump: "Oh shit! They're onto us! Quick! Bring up Obama, Hillary, or Bill Clinton!!!"

the claims are that he fired the lawyers because of the investigation.

NO evidence as been provided that is the reason he fired them.

Just as there was no evidence Clinton fired twice as many because of an investigation.

No. The implication, by you, was that their findings were suspect, because they were fired. Clinton had nothing to do with it. Now, if you are walking back your "You mean the guys he fired" comment, then I will happily retract my response. Are you walking back your suggestion that their findings were suspect because Trump fired them?

Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

 

[RealDave]

Ok,

This is how it works.

He was asked a question........and gave an answer that was untrue.

It isnt a complicated proposition.

His answer was totally true and accurate. Spicer had no meetings with Russian officials in the capacity referred to in the question. This is yet more fake news by the fake news media.

Oh dear, is this another entry in the rwnj mythology ?
Yup he so didnt lie that he had to step back from the investigation because, um, HE HAS NO CREDIBILITY.

He was going to recuse himself anyhow. The question was whether he or anybody in the campaign communicated or collaborated with Russia, and his answer was limited to that scope, not his entire 30 year tenure in office. And Obama's and Hillary's lackey, CIA's Clapper even confirmed "no evidence of collaboration". This is yet another left wing nutjob concocted media driven controversy, which will fall flat on its face.

Then you will be all for an investigation by a special prosecutor since there is nothing to find.

Eh, did the thought ever occur to you that you don't get to tell the intelligence committee how to conduct an investigation?

Trump being caught colluding with the Russians after all the Republicans backed him in the all election would greatly damage the Republican Party. Republicans would rather bury the Russian investigation than destroy their own party.

Like you would not have been freaking the fuck out if a Democrat run committee investigated Hillary Clinton's e-mails.

You'd be whining, bitching, throwing as freaking tantrum. You know it.

Evidently you & your pathetic party does not care if Trump was in bed with the Russians. Like you don't care that he has lied to you. " Oh Oh Oh I won't take vacations & I won't golf blah blah blah" and yet you don't say a thing when Trump runs back & forth to Florida.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Watch the gullible RWNJs rubes line up to help the cheeto spread this version.

So, what's his next lie gonna be?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[RealDave]

Chickenshit Trump send out Spicer to back down from his wire tap claim. The spineless orange wonder did have the guts to do it himself.

Well RealDave
At least he had the guts to back down at all.
We couldn't get that out of Clinton, Obama, and anyone
else whose image relies solely on propaganda and not on truth.
Or their whole platform falls apart, they can't back down.

He is trying to weasel his way out. I want him to apologize to Obama & the American people. He won't. He is a chickenshit lying immature uninformed jackass.

 

[radical right]

Still waiting for any one of you to offer some real proof.

Where is Rumps proof?

Logic dictates the proof of existence, not proving non-existence. If a wiretap order existed, there would be a record of it. How odd for the head of the executive branch to ask the legislative branch to use their judicial powers to search the executive branch. And akin to Rudy Giuliani saying WMD's weren't found in Iraq because the soldiers didn't look hard enough, Trump would do the same if the congressional search fore wiretap evidence turned up empty.

 

[Iceweasel]

Logic dictates the proof of existence, not proving non-existence. If a wiretap order existed, there would be a record of it. How odd for the head of the executive branch to ask the legislative branch to use their judicial powers to search the executive branch. And akin to Rudy Giuliani saying WMD's weren't found in Iraq because the soldiers didn't look hard enough, Trump would do the same if the congressional search fore wiretap evidence turned up empty.

How odd that libs have no problem repeating the Russian conspiracy ad nauseum but suddenly need evidence.

Even more oddly, they think everyone is as stupid as they are and won't see through it.