Trump Claims He Has Every Right To Prosecute His Enemies

And the special prosecutor investigating xiden, well, works for xiden’s DOJ
Who are we talking about now? Hur? Garland could have appointed a Dem who likely would have come to the same conclusion Hur did about no charges being recommended, without inappropriate editorializing about Biden's state of mind.
 
No one that respects the rule of law recognizes that banana republic conviction
Unfortunately for your self soothing fantasy, the people who respect the law and count the most -- the courts, probation officers, etc. -- respect and acknowledge the simple fact of reality that is the verdict.

Would you like a pillow to shout into?
 
Comey most definitely was a registered Repub for most of his adult life.

He sabotaged Hillary's candidacy.

If he would have done his job, Trump may have never become president. If he had done his job, he would have indicted Hillary and maybe the Democrats would have moved from her.
 
Who are we talking about now? Hur? Garland could have appointed a Dem who likely would have come to the same conclusion Hur did about no charges being recommended, without inappropriate editorializing about Biden's state of mind.
We are talking about xiden, and how the DOJ said he violated the law
 
Comey most definitely was a registered Repub for most of his adult life.

He sabotaged Hillary's candidacy.
Who cares what he was registered. He was working for Obama, and made clear he was protecting Clinton
 
what was "flimsy" about it? She was literally caught red handed with classified documents on an illegal server system.
They weren’t documents, just emails that were only classified after the government reviewed them years after she left office.
 
They weren’t documents, just emails that were only classified after the government reviewed them years after she left office.
That’s just a lie. One, emails are documents, two she had clearly marked classified documents, as well as documents that were classifed at the time.

Why do you all lie?

She then tried to destroy evidence by having people use hammers to destroy devices
 
‘I Would Have Every Right To Go After Them’

Surveying the news of the past 24 hours, we’re presented with a particularly sobering reflection of our current state of affairs. I will lay it out brick by brick in the items below, but first I want to circle back to Donald Trump’s appearance two nights ago on Sean Hannity’s Fox News program.

Hannity asked a leading question, clearly trying to throw Trump a softball that will let him deny his intention to use the office of the presidency to exact retribution against his political foes – even though Trump has spent many months now promising to do precisely that.

At first, Trump took the easy swing and suggested that he won’t perpetuate what he implies is a cycle of retribution he’s already been victimized by. But then he launched into an extended justification of doing exactly what he had just disclaimed and asserting that he has “every right to go after them”:

Trump Claims He Has Every Right To Prosecute His Enemies

This could be one of the better cons he's invented in a while. Setting up a win-win scenario by which should he be re-elected he can claim righteousness and excite the base for going after his proclaimed enemies, or get credit with the minions if he does not. Because if he goes after those who have held him accountable for his many crimes he'll say he's justified. If he doesn't he'll say he is showing great restraint. The Following will love him either way. This guy is a genius in a manipulative, malevolent kind of way.

Same thing with the hush money trial. Win or lose he set up a construct by which he was being unfairly treated by the system. Acquittal.......the charges were made up. Conviction.......the charges were made up. Amazingly, the rubes fell for it AGAIN.
Democrats turned America into a Banana Republic.
 
Powell didn’t use a private server.

The US Govt has people on their payroll that aren’t computer illiterate. Clinton knows that. But she used an illegal private server anyway to hide her communications from oversight and to steal classifed material for her personal use.

It seemed to all be done to cover her guns running operation.
At least mainly.
 
That’s just a lie. One, emails are documents, two she had clearly marked classified documents, as well as documents that were classifed at the time.

Why do you all lie?

She then tried to destroy evidence by having people use hammers to destroy devices
None of the emails had anything that was “clearly marked”.

The problem you have is you don’t know what you’re talking about.
 
None of the emails had anything that was “clearly marked”.

The problem you have is you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Haha. Yes she had clearly marked classifed documents

The problem with you is you lie
 

Forum List

Back
Top