Trump Claims He Has Every Right To Prosecute His Enemies

If he would have done his job, Trump may have never become president. If he had done his job, he would have indicted Hillary and maybe the Democrats would have moved from her.
His job, in consultation with his team, was to make a judgement as to whether Hillary's actions constituted an intentional violation of law for which the DoJ could obtain a conviction. It was his judgement it couldn't.

Just as the grand jury's job in hearing evidence against Trump was to determine if it rose to the level of an indictable crime. It was their judgement it did. Four times.
 
‘I Would Have Every Right To Go After Them’

Surveying the news of the past 24 hours, we’re presented with a particularly sobering reflection of our current state of affairs. I will lay it out brick by brick in the items below, but first I want to circle back to Donald Trump’s appearance two nights ago on Sean Hannity’s Fox News program.

Hannity asked a leading question, clearly trying to throw Trump a softball that will let him deny his intention to use the office of the presidency to exact retribution against his political foes – even though Trump has spent many months now promising to do precisely that.

At first, Trump took the easy swing and suggested that he won’t perpetuate what he implies is a cycle of retribution he’s already been victimized by. But then he launched into an extended justification of doing exactly what he had just disclaimed and asserting that he has “every right to go after them”:

Trump Claims He Has Every Right To Prosecute His Enemies

This could be one of the better cons he's invented in a while. Setting up a win-win scenario by which should he be re-elected he can claim righteousness and excite the base for going after his proclaimed enemies, or get credit with the minions if he does not. Because if he goes after those who have held him accountable for his many crimes he'll say he's justified. If he doesn't he'll say he is showing great restraint. The Following will love him either way. This guy is a genius in a manipulative, malevolent kind of way.

Same thing with the hush money trial. Win or lose he set up a construct by which he was being unfairly treated by the system. Acquittal.......the charges were made up. Conviction.......the charges were made up. Amazingly, the rubes fell for it AGAIN.
This is what happens when you let bad Genies out of the bottle.
 
Unfortunately for your self soothing fantasy, the people who respect the law and count the most -- the courts, probation officers, etc. -- respect and acknowledge the simple fact of reality that is the verdict.

Would you like a pillow to shout into?
Only those who dislikes the rule of law likes banana republic convictions. Haters of the Constitution. People like you.
 
Only those who dislikes the rule of law likes banana republic convictions. Haters of the Constitution. People like you.
uh-huh and Hunter Biden's conviction is just a ploy. See, everything fits into Benedict Donald's Neo-GOP fevered scam on the base.
 

No mention of clearly marked documents.
Haha try reading the entire thing again. He clearly mentions that some were…and goes on to say that even the ones that weren’t were obviously classifed

So why do you lie?
 
uh-huh and Hunter Biden's conviction is just a ploy. See, everything fits into Benedict Donald's Neo-GOP fevered scam on the base.
Hunter braking a law and being convicted in no way evens the score you're due. Hell sentencing has yet to happen and wait and see if the big guy pardons his son.
 
Haha try reading the entire thing again. He clearly mentions that some were…and goes on to say that even the ones that weren’t were obviously classifed

So why do you lie?
Nowhere does he say they were “clearly marked”.

That’s a fact.
 

Forum List

Back
Top