Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As I said. What you meant is clear.
You can spin it now all you want.
No sale.
I heard it with my own ears and noticed the News narrative changed wording, twisted it, and did not put it in proper context and I am an expert and this stuff, my track record proves it, your does not. Tomorrow you will see your media source will talk avout Trump to avoid the real news that the media put a China compromised pressident in the WH and protected and coddled the influence peddler. This is a smokescreen and intimidation attempt that won' t work.It's not a narrative. I have ears that can discern what is being said without the need for any commentary, be it MSM or anyone else. The access Hollywood tape and the deposition are both in the public realm. So is the witness list. The only thing I got second hand is what was said by those witnesses, since no cameras where allowed in court. I have no reason to doubt the reporting on it. Since NOONE on the right is disputing what was said.
Civil trial....they found for the plaintiff. Right?
They found that Trump committed sexual assault and defamation.
Right?
So squawking about not guilty is an absurd deflection...right?
Yes, everyone is against the magaturds.In other news TDS is spreading like the plague across the nation.
A videotape is physical evidence. You really should know what words mean before you use them.You presented no physical evidence and then fine I think that it's all a bunch of lies.
She has been suing him for years. Grow a Brain.
No money has changed hands skank.
Not exactly, jimmieboi.It was proven that he sexually assaulted her.
No. Not proved. Just “found.” Denying a rape that never happened can’t logically be called “defamation,” you imbecile.He lied and slandered her.
He pays.
Zzz. Thanks for your guesswork, Nostradumbass.Many other women are lining up.
Sure. As I said, the Id was already noted. I just don’t believe you.Laughing....what I mean is exactly what I said.
If Trump's DNA is on the dress, then criminal charges of rape could probably be proven. But its moot because of the statute of limitations.
Did you see the 'if' this time? I bolded it for you....because you apparently need it.
I knew you would be a fan of Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein.Repeating your lie doesn’t convert it into anything more than a lie, Dainty.
Yes, yes, of course it was a $5 million Dollar peck on the cheek. Whatever you say.I didn’t say he stuck it in her nor did I say he didn’t. I wasn’t there. I’m not sure that Trump was either on whatever fanciful date it may have been. So I’m kind of confused about your opening sentence.
In this case, we don’t know if the jury itself determined that he did so either. He was sued for “battery” and she alleged rape. Rape would qualify. But according to the judge’s instructions, it is an undetermined thing. It is conceivable that the jury determined that Trump gave E. Jean an unwanted peck on the cheek.
That aside, I believe it is the height of lethal absurdity to contend that denying a rape is actionable as a defamation.
I don’t have a crystal ball. But it seems pretty clear that this case might very well get reversed on an appeal.
This thread exposes that the Trump minions have no clue about how our judicial system works. They don't like it but they have no idea how it works. Stupid is as stupid does.you have no clue what hearsay is. From the victim's mouth to a witness is not hearsay. Expert witnesses opinions are not hearsay. A person saying what happened to them is not hearsay. Looking at a tape and listening to what's being said is not hearsay. This is all direct evidence.
Can he just say, go get it from the MoneyChump change for Trump. He is going to appeal it into fucking oblivion anyway. It means nothing,
This thread exposes that the Trump minions have no clue about how our judicial system works. They don't like it but they have no idea how it works. Stupid is as stupid does.
Not a valid argument, you are admitting defeat.get a new psychiatrist
Remember her testimony that all the leftists believed?
View attachment 783911
She testified (under oath) that kavanaugh took her into the bedroom...was trying to rape her...and then his best friend came into the room and started jumping up and down on the bed.
I don't know about you...but if I were a graduate student and I walked in on my friend trying to rape a girl...the FIRST thing I would do is start jumping up and down on the bed
And the leftists scream "I BELIEVE"
If Trump is re-elected will you kill yourself?I know. From Jack to Georgia, Trump's troubles are far from over.
