Trump Rape Trial: Begins 4/25/23

I told you when the date of the trial was, stupid. You think arguing about the date is going to make your lack of any sense of justice look better?

Who knew all I had to do to strip your gears was give you a math problem a child could solve?

"That the trial is scheduled start in 5 days, despite Trump's many attempts to delay?"

If you're overwhelmed by 20 + 5, then Jean Carroll's legal position in the civil trial is utterly beyond you.
 
FuFQLTlXwAIi_YC


Trump unable to delay E. Jean Carroll civil rape trial set for April, judge rules

Will he be convicted? What do you think?

Judge Dismissive of Trump's Reasons For Skipping New York Rape Trial.


NEW YORK (AP) — Former President Donald Trump’s lawyers won’t be allowed to tell jurors next week that he’d like to testify at a rape trial but might decide against it because he wants to spare New York City from logistical burdens posed by his presence, a federal judge said Thursday.

“Mr. Trump is free to attend, to testify, or both. He is free also to do none of those things,” Judge Lewis A. Kaplan wrote in an order five days before the start of a civil trial.

The trial stems from columnist E. Jean Carroll’s claims that the Republican raped her in late 1995 or early 1996 in the dressing room of a luxury Manhattan department store. She is seeking unspecified damages.
 
Judge Dismissive of Trump's Reasons For Skipping New York Rape Trial.


NEW YORK (AP) — Former President Donald Trump’s lawyers won’t be allowed to tell jurors next week that he’d like to testify at a rape trial but might decide against it because he wants to spare New York City from logistical burdens posed by his presence, a federal judge said Thursday.

“Mr. Trump is free to attend, to testify, or both. He is free also to do none of those things,” Judge Lewis A. Kaplan wrote in an order five days before the start of a civil trial.

The trial stems from columnist E. Jean Carroll’s claims that the Republican raped her in late 1995 or early 1996 in the dressing room of a luxury Manhattan department store. She is seeking unspecified damages.

Trump's reasoning is dogshit, akin to insulting the judge then insisting the judge can't be impartial because you've insulted them.

But dipshits are gonna dip
 
Any other bullshit we can tie Trump and the courts up with on the taxpayers' tab in order to steal another election?
 
Any other bullshit we can tie Trump and the courts up with on the taxpayers' tab in order to steal another election?

What stolen election?

And Trump's a private citizen. He's as subject to the laws as anyone else. Why should he be immune?
 
What stolen election?

And Trump's a private citizen. He's as subject to the laws as anyone else. Why should he be immune?
No need to be immune to bullshit.
Dems have mostly been shooting blanks at him since 2016.
 

Forum List

Back
Top