XponentialChaos
Platinum Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 28,692
- 10,520
Maybe. Just saying I haven't seen it in response to the last mass shootings.Huh ? It happens all the time in this country.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe. Just saying I haven't seen it in response to the last mass shootings.Huh ? It happens all the time in this country.
There's no data either way.His argument had no supportive data that I saw. He simply dismissed the bill "claiming without evidence the bill would bring 'more guns in schools'." when the bill doesn't even mention guns. It basically would ". . . require the Department of Homeland Security to form a subagency that cooperates with education and law enforcement . . . ." What would be the harm of DHS working with education and le?
So just except that American streets and schools are the most dangerous in the world. Gotcha.This isn't ever going to end, so the best thing we can do is stop panicking about it.
Only under certain conditions.As you know, it's not an assault rifle, it's an 'assault weapon'.
'Assault weapons' are banned in NY.
Thus, there -is- a law against it.
Unsupportable nonsense.So just except that American streets and schools are the most dangerous in the world. .
Seems to me the bill was meant to collect data that could aid local government towards preventing events like school shootings.There's no data either way.
But I agree with you, I wish he would have passed it.
Which is what these cons want.Only under certain conditions.
He bought one that supposedly could not accept magazines and drilled out the lock.
Stupid rule and easily gotten around
Correct. 'Assault weapons' possessed before the ban are still legal. That's irrelevant here.Only under certain conditions.
What's that? He -illegally- modified the weapon?He bought one that supposedly could not accept magazines and drilled out the lock.
And thus, demonstrating the unnecessary and ineffective nature of the ban.Stupid rule and easily gotten around
No just make it harder to modify. You can do it.Correct. 'Assault weapons' possessed before the ban are still legal. That's irrelevant here.
What's that? He -illegally- modified the weapon?
Well shit. We need a law to make it illegal to illegally modify a weapon.
Tell us:
How do you prevent someone from illegally modifying a legal firearm?
And thus, demonstrating the unnecessary and ineffective nature of the ban.
The NY 'assault weapon' ban was passed by a Dem-controlled legislature and signed into law by a Dem governor.Which is what these cons want.
Data like what?Seems to me the bill was meant to collect data that could aid local government towards preventing events like school shootings.
You have no idea whatsoever if this is true.No just make it harder to modify. You can do it.
This is what the bill targets. . .Data like what?
You have no idea whatsoever if this is true.
Meh. Seems like we have plenty of data. I don’t think it would be effective but I do agree that he should have passed it.This is what the bill targets. . .
". . . collect data on school safety and provide recommendations."
. . .we'll never know what data since Schumer isn't interested in finding out.
Thank you for proving my statement true.![]()
And you don't care to. That's the problem.
Thank you for not wanting to know about the engineering that can block the ability to modify these weapons.Thank you for proving my statement true.
-Snort-Thank you for not wanting to know about the engineering that can block the ability to modify these weapons.![]()
It's easy. You don't know gun expert?-Snort-
Please. Enlighten me. Demonstrate the technology you claim.
![]()
If you consider this just more bureaucratic waste then you should probably welcome Schumer blocking it. In the end, though, the charge that Republicans aren't interested in doing anything is a shallow argument that doesn't negate the actual evidence to the contrary.Meh. Seems like we have plenty of data. I don’t think it would be effective but I do agree that he should have passed it.