What is the essential difference between right and left ?

[Rogo]

Most of those sound like things centrists would support—not leftists. Unless you consider liberals like those in the Democratic Party to be leftists.

Communists, anarchists, etc are typically seen to be left-wing throughout most of the world. But again, I'm not a huge fan of the left/right divide.

Obviously, you're a leftist.

Sure. I'm an anarchist and communist after all.

Your kind support everything in that list. Centrists don't.

Pretty sure anarchists don't support the existence of borders or corporations.

So you support everything else?

Here's some news for you kid: you aren't an anarchist. Being a leftist is 100% the opposite of being an anarchist.

I don't believe I said that, so no I don't support everything else. I didn't think it was necessary to go through the entire list.

Also, anarchism is a socialist political philosophy—going all the way back to figures like Godwin, Proudhon, and Bakunin. Unfortunately, you seem to be caught up in the liberal political paradigm of "authoritarianism = left, libertarianism = right" which is just false.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The left live in hope and the right live in fear.

I have always felt that things can always get better but my right wing friends think that things can only get worse.

Progressive is a positive. If it wasnt we would still be living in caves.

The right creates value, the left takes value by force and violence.

The right believes that all man are made equal, and it's up to them whether to succeed or fail.

The left believes that all man are not made equal, and it's up to the federal government to make them so.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

What is the essential difference between right and left ?

It is exactly the same difference as that between right and wrong.

 

[Nova78]

The right see"s the problem ,the left creates the problem , then blames the right .
The left is pond scum.

 

[Mac1958]

The Right thinks that they and their tribe have all the answers, and that the Left is Hitler.

The Left thinks that they and their tribe have all the answers, and that the Right is Hitler.

Did I win?
.

 

[francoHFW]

The left live in hope and the right live in fear.

I have always felt that things can always get better but my right wing friends think that things can only get worse.

Progressive is a positive. If it wasnt we would still be living in caves.

/——/ Who fears guns, low taxes, global warming, conservative judges and secure borders? Not the Right.

Low taxes on the rich and cuts in services for everyone else... Only lies make it possible super duper.

 

[dave p]

The left live in hope and the right live in fear.

I have always felt that things can always get better but my right wing friends think that things can only get worse.

Progressive is a positive. If it wasnt we would still be living in caves.

Plus the left has about 30 IQ points on the right on average.

Not if your posts are reflective of the intelligence level of the left.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

What is the essential difference between right and left ?
The left live in hope and the right live in fear.
Progressive is a positive. If it wasnt we would still be living in caves.

One of the biggest differences between Right and Left is the Right doesn't write and think stupid shit like: "The left live in hope and the right live in fear."

If you're going to shit on it, perhaps invalidate it with facts rather than acting like a partisan douche canoe, snowflake.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

The right see"s the problem ,the left creates the problem , then blames the right .
The left is pond scum.

I must take issue with your use of the term “pond sum”. As it happens, most pond scum is actually quite beautiful, if viewed the right way. Here are some pictures I've taken through my microscope, of pond scum.

 

[Wyatt earp]

The Left are busybodies who want to tell everyone else how to live.

The Right mostly just want to be left alone.

The right wants to tell me who I can fuck and who I can marry.

Because your to fucking stupid to figure out tab A goes into slot C and not the poop shoot to make a baby

 

[bripat9643]

Obviously, you're a leftist.

Sure. I'm an anarchist and communist after all.

Your kind support everything in that list. Centrists don't.

Pretty sure anarchists don't support the existence of borders or corporations.

So you support everything else?

Here's some news for you kid: you aren't an anarchist. Being a leftist is 100% the opposite of being an anarchist.

I don't believe I said that, so no I don't support everything else. I didn't think it was necessary to go through the entire list.

Also, anarchism is a socialist political philosophy—going all the way back to figures like Godwin, Proudhon, and Bakunin. Unfortunately, you seem to be caught up in the liberal political paradigm of "authoritarianism = left, libertarianism = right" which is just false.

Godwin, Proudhon, and Bakunin were idiots who believed you can have socialism with government imposing it on you. What you call a "paradigm" is simply a fact.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Therefore, the myth of ‘originalism’ is as ridiculous as it is wrong.

And this post is just as much bullshit as your first (and all in between).

 

[Rogo]

Sure. I'm an anarchist and communist after all.

Your kind support everything in that list. Centrists don't.

Pretty sure anarchists don't support the existence of borders or corporations.

So you support everything else?

Here's some news for you kid: you aren't an anarchist. Being a leftist is 100% the opposite of being an anarchist.

I don't believe I said that, so no I don't support everything else. I didn't think it was necessary to go through the entire list.

Also, anarchism is a socialist political philosophy—going all the way back to figures like Godwin, Proudhon, and Bakunin. Unfortunately, you seem to be caught up in the liberal political paradigm of "authoritarianism = left, libertarianism = right" which is just false.

Godwin, Proudhon, and Bakunin were idiots who believed you can have socialism with government imposing it on you. What you call a "paradigm" is simply a fact.

They believed in the abolition of government lol

 

[boedicca]

Your kind support everything in that list. Centrists don't.

Pretty sure anarchists don't support the existence of borders or corporations.

So you support everything else?

Here's some news for you kid: you aren't an anarchist. Being a leftist is 100% the opposite of being an anarchist.

I don't believe I said that, so no I don't support everything else. I didn't think it was necessary to go through the entire list.

Also, anarchism is a socialist political philosophy—going all the way back to figures like Godwin, Proudhon, and Bakunin. Unfortunately, you seem to be caught up in the liberal political paradigm of "authoritarianism = left, libertarianism = right" which is just false.

Godwin, Proudhon, and Bakunin were idiots who believed you can have socialism with government imposing it on you. What you call a "paradigm" is simply a fact.

They believed in the abolition of government lol

Only because they wanted to assume power and put their own systems of control in place.

 

[Rogo]

Pretty sure anarchists don't support the existence of borders or corporations.

So you support everything else?

Here's some news for you kid: you aren't an anarchist. Being a leftist is 100% the opposite of being an anarchist.

I don't believe I said that, so no I don't support everything else. I didn't think it was necessary to go through the entire list.

Also, anarchism is a socialist political philosophy—going all the way back to figures like Godwin, Proudhon, and Bakunin. Unfortunately, you seem to be caught up in the liberal political paradigm of "authoritarianism = left, libertarianism = right" which is just false.

Godwin, Proudhon, and Bakunin were idiots who believed you can have socialism with government imposing it on you. What you call a "paradigm" is simply a fact.

They believed in the abolition of government lol

Only because they wanted to assume power and put their own systems of control in place.

They wanted to establish a system of control that abolishes systems of control?

 

[boedicca]

So you support everything else?

Here's some news for you kid: you aren't an anarchist. Being a leftist is 100% the opposite of being an anarchist.

I don't believe I said that, so no I don't support everything else. I didn't think it was necessary to go through the entire list.

Also, anarchism is a socialist political philosophy—going all the way back to figures like Godwin, Proudhon, and Bakunin. Unfortunately, you seem to be caught up in the liberal political paradigm of "authoritarianism = left, libertarianism = right" which is just false.

Godwin, Proudhon, and Bakunin were idiots who believed you can have socialism with government imposing it on you. What you call a "paradigm" is simply a fact.

They believed in the abolition of government lol

Only because they wanted to assume power and put their own systems of control in place.

They wanted to establish a system of control that abolishes systems of control? Lol

Indeed. If you read through the intellectual incoherence of their "philosophy", one form of tyranny just replaces another. Their form is The Mob.

 

[Rogo]

I don't believe I said that, so no I don't support everything else. I didn't think it was necessary to go through the entire list.

Also, anarchism is a socialist political philosophy—going all the way back to figures like Godwin, Proudhon, and Bakunin. Unfortunately, you seem to be caught up in the liberal political paradigm of "authoritarianism = left, libertarianism = right" which is just false.

Godwin, Proudhon, and Bakunin were idiots who believed you can have socialism with government imposing it on you. What you call a "paradigm" is simply a fact.

They believed in the abolition of government lol

Only because they wanted to assume power and put their own systems of control in place.

They wanted to establish a system of control that abolishes systems of control? Lol

Indeed. If you read through the intellectual incoherence of their "philosophy", one form of tyranny just replaces another. Their form is The Mob.

That's quite a claim. Got any citations?

 

[boedicca]

Godwin, Proudhon, and Bakunin were idiots who believed you can have socialism with government imposing it on you. What you call a "paradigm" is simply a fact.

They believed in the abolition of government lol

Only because they wanted to assume power and put their own systems of control in place.

They wanted to establish a system of control that abolishes systems of control? Lol

Indeed. If you read through the intellectual incoherence of their "philosophy", one form of tyranny just replaces another. Their form is The Mob.

That's quite a claim. Got any citations?

Read up on Bakunin's Invisible Dictatorship and get back to us.

And here's a wee clue: It takes more than an image on a t-shirt to understand ideology, bub.

 

[Rogo]

They believed in the abolition of government lol

Only because they wanted to assume power and put their own systems of control in place.

They wanted to establish a system of control that abolishes systems of control? Lol

Indeed. If you read through the intellectual incoherence of their "philosophy", one form of tyranny just replaces another. Their form is The Mob.

That's quite a claim. Got any citations?

Read up on Bakunin's Invisible Dictatorship and get back to us.

And here's a wee clue: It takes more than an image on a t-shirt to understand ideology, bub.

Yeah, I didn't think you had any

 

[boedicca]

Only because they wanted to assume power and put their own systems of control in place.

They wanted to establish a system of control that abolishes systems of control? Lol

Indeed. If you read through the intellectual incoherence of their "philosophy", one form of tyranny just replaces another. Their form is The Mob.

That's quite a claim. Got any citations?

Read up on Bakunin's Invisible Dictatorship and get back to us.

And here's a wee clue: It takes more than an image on a t-shirt to understand ideology, bub.

Yeah, I didn't think you had any

You don't understand this thing you proclaim to support. It's glaringly obvious to any student of actual history.