Sure. What territory that was under Palestinian sovereignty did you say the Israelis occupied ?There were several issues in this thread. Could you post your specific question?You’re right Tinmore, I must have missed the last time you posted it. So, care to post the link again or are you still going to duck duck duck ?You need to keep up.Just because you claim you posted it, doesn’t make it so Tinmore . Let’s try again... where’s the link ?All of it.He asked a simple question and once again you ducked . Let’s try again Tinmore: what territory was under Palestinian sovereignty that Israel occupied? Link??All of it and you have been dancing around that question for years.Just how successful have the Hostile Arab Palestinians been holding that position. Remember, that when the Israelis chased the Jordanians out of the West Bank and then chased the Egyptians from the Gaza Strip, I don't recall the Palestinians having lost any territory.The is no implied "euphemism." I tried to explain that you have no idea what talks may or may not be undertaken in the dark. In fact, you do not even understand the "Israeli policy on negotiation efforts." I don't think the Israelis would be taking you into their confidence.Is all this a euphemism for candy ass?RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Surreptitious and Politically Concealed Communications and Meetings 'vs' Policy
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
BLUF: Dark Political Communications may be happening at any time without your knowledge.
(COMMENT)P F Tinmore said:Israel is too candy ass to talk to Hamas.
Well, there is a mistake on the part of the general public on the policy (most) nations have concerning negotiating with terrorists.
In the US, there is a thing called an "Executive (or Presidential) Finding" (50 U.S. Code § 3093 - Presidential approval and reporting of covert actions) which grants the action necessary to support identifiable foreign policy objectives - and is important to the national security. I know of no nation in the civilized world that does not have this extraordinary option. And every now and then you will hear about it after the fact. These cover all matters of concern to the Executive. And these are often given to Ambassadors without portfolios when setting up these very private meetings, or other Dark Political Communications.
For all you know, these meetings (between Israel and HAMAS) may be orchestrated by a third party (maybe Egypt). And such meetings have occurred in the past.
EXAMPLE:
Whether or not the true purpose of the meeting was possible "Kidnapping" or the faint to draw away scrutiny from some other event or activity.Palestinian Sources • Newspaper Al-Sharak Al-Awsat said:A secret meeting took place between Israeli and Hamas officials this past week, the London based newspaper Al-Sharak Al-Awsat reported on Saturday.
According to Palestinian sources quoted in the report, the former Treasury Minister in the Hamas government of Ismail Haniyeh, Omar Abed al-Razak was taken from Nablus, in the West Bank, to the Israeli city of Netanya on Tuesday.
SOURCE: Report: Secret Meeting Held Between Israeli, Hamas Officials
![]()
Most Respectfully,
R
What are you trying to say? English please.
View attachment 493664
This describes the Arab Palestinians - NOT - the Israelis. The Israelis have been addressing the Question of Palestine head-on since 1948. Today's splinter groups and facets of the Hostile Arab Palestinians are (generally) talking about the Question of Palestine since 1967. (Although you can make the argument that there is no one voice among the splinter groups that express the "Palestinian Political Position."
You should speak to the reality and ground truth; especially when you include the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS).
![]()
Most Respectfully,
RAnd still clueless.The Israelis have been addressing the Question of Palestine head-on since 1948.![]()
What territory did you say was of Palestinian Sovereignty that the Israelis occupied?
![]()
Most Respectfully,
R
![]()
Try not to dance again , Tinmore. As hard as that is for you ...
I posted links many times and you keep asking the same stupid questions.