Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nobody during Jesus' time or the time the disciples were walking the earth EVER contested the fact that he performed miracles.
Including Josephus, who was a historian and NOT a Christian, and who refers to the miracles of Christ in his records.
Lol o really? Any sources outside of your cool little book that prove this? You can claim that no one doubted, but thats just a claim. Josephus was born a year after Pontius Pilate ceased to be governor of rome. Meaning he could not have lived during the same time jesus did.
Lol and of course people doubted jesus fool. Isnt that why he was crucified in the first place? Someone must have doubted his divinity.
Lol you think i had to look those up....
Seriously you come across hell bent on proving your theory even to the point of posting stuff that has been refuted long ago. Examples , coelacanth fish, you didn't know of micro adaptations , you dint know the terms of macro evolution, you didn't under stand micro evolution. A true biologist would not use the fossil record for proof of macro evolution because it shows no change or a term you might be familiar with stasis. You didn't know gene pools get smaller. The neanderthals probably went extinct do to the gene pool being so small and all the inbreeding taking place. People that raise racing greyhounds in Europe and the united states inferred so much and the gene got so small that they had to cross breed European and united states greyhound to introduce new bloodlines so they didn't become diseased or deformed from breeding family members. Once again showing how new information is produced. This evidence can test studied and observed. That my son is real science. Real science is not making wild assumptions that can't be test studied and observed.
Wow. Your basing your entire theory that evolution cant lead to speciation by citing how people breed dog? Seriously? People purposely restrict the gene pool, thats how you breed pure breds. That doesnt happen in nature. A purebred dog just fucks the shit out of what ever dog it wants to. Your entire theory is based on the idea that homozygous organisms will only mate with homozygous organisms. Thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard.
Didnt you use a theory proposed an evolutionist to try to prove your theory. Gould theory?
Nobody during Jesus' time or the time the disciples were walking the earth EVER contested the fact that he performed miracles.
Including Josephus, who was a historian and NOT a Christian, and who refers to the miracles of Christ in his records.
Lol o really? Any sources outside of your cool little book that prove this? You can claim that no one doubted, but thats just a claim. Josephus was born a year after Pontius Pilate ceased to be governor of rome. Meaning he could not have lived during the same time jesus did.
Lol and of course people doubted jesus fool. Isnt that why he was crucified in the first place? Someone must have doubted his divinity.
You need to avoid those anti Jesus sites and start looking at the evidence of Jesus. josephus one historian that confirmed him. Some time put on the history channel they bring up a lot evidence supporting Jesus and the Christian movement.
Seriously you come across hell bent on proving your theory even to the point of posting stuff that has been refuted long ago. Examples , coelacanth fish, you didn't know of micro adaptations , you dint know the terms of macro evolution, you didn't under stand micro evolution. A true biologist would not use the fossil record for proof of macro evolution because it shows no change or a term you might be familiar with stasis. You didn't know gene pools get smaller. The neanderthals probably went extinct do to the gene pool being so small and all the inbreeding taking place. People that raise racing greyhounds in Europe and the united states inferred so much and the gene got so small that they had to cross breed European and united states greyhound to introduce new bloodlines so they didn't become diseased or deformed from breeding family members. Once again showing how new information is produced. This evidence can test studied and observed. That my son is real science. Real science is not making wild assumptions that can't be test studied and observed.
Wow. Your basing your entire theory that evolution cant lead to speciation by citing how people breed dog? Seriously? People purposely restrict the gene pool, thats how you breed pure breds. That doesnt happen in nature. A purebred dog just fucks the shit out of what ever dog it wants to. Your entire theory is based on the idea that homozygous organisms will only mate with homozygous organisms. Thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard.
Didnt you use a theory proposed an evolutionist to try to prove your theory. Gould theory?
I use dogs because it is simple to understand,the same can be said for kind ,family,and to make you happy,species.
Lol you think i had to look those up....
Seriously you come across hell bent on proving your theory even to the point of posting stuff that has been refuted long ago. Examples , coelacanth fish, you didn't know of micro adaptations , you dint know the terms of macro evolution, you didn't under stand micro evolution. A true biologist would not use the fossil record for proof of macro evolution because it shows no change or a term you might be familiar with stasis. You didn't know gene pools get smaller. The neanderthals probably went extinct do to the gene pool being so small and all the inbreeding taking place. People that raise racing greyhounds in Europe and the united states inferred so much and the gene got so small that they had to cross breed European and united states greyhound to introduce new bloodlines so they didn't become diseased or deformed from breeding family members. Once again showing how new information is produced. This evidence can test studied and observed. That my son is real science. Real science is not making wild assumptions that can't be test studied and observed.
Wow. Your basing your entire theory that evolution cant lead to speciation by citing how people breed dog? Seriously? People purposely restrict the gene pool, thats how you breed pure breds. That doesnt happen in nature. A purebred dog just fucks the shit out of what ever dog it wants to. Your entire theory is based on the idea that homozygous organisms will only mate with homozygous organisms. Thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard.
Didnt you use a theory proposed an evolutionist to try to prove your theory. Gould theory?
And why dont you follow my advice and tether your phone to your laptop.
That way you dont have excuses to not post.
Seriously you come across hell bent on proving your theory even to the point of posting stuff that has been refuted long ago. Examples , coelacanth fish, you didn't know of micro adaptations , you dint know the terms of macro evolution, you didn't under stand micro evolution. A true biologist would not use the fossil record for proof of macro evolution because it shows no change or a term you might be familiar with stasis. You didn't know gene pools get smaller. The neanderthals probably went extinct do to the gene pool being so small and all the inbreeding taking place. People that raise racing greyhounds in Europe and the united states inferred so much and the gene got so small that they had to cross breed European and united states greyhound to introduce new bloodlines so they didn't become diseased or deformed from breeding family members. Once again showing how new information is produced. This evidence can test studied and observed. That my son is real science. Real science is not making wild assumptions that can't be test studied and observed.
Wow. Your basing your entire theory that evolution cant lead to speciation by citing how people breed dog? Seriously? People purposely restrict the gene pool, thats how you breed pure breds. That doesnt happen in nature. A purebred dog just fucks the shit out of what ever dog it wants to. Your entire theory is based on the idea that homozygous organisms will only mate with homozygous organisms. Thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard.
Didnt you use a theory proposed an evolutionist to try to prove your theory. Gould theory?
The only ones that should be referring to the fossil record are creationist,because it supports our theory better the macro evolution. You know no one was around a couple hundred millions years ago. Fact is modern man can only be traced back 6 to 12 thousand years ago depending on who you want to believe. I will trust in the bible considering the oldest known tree is only 4,600 years old right in line with the bible account of the flood.
Evidence in support?Wrong, book of acts was written 40 years after the death of Christ. That was around 30 years before prophecies of Jesus began being fulfilled.
other than the bible.
"Nobody challenged his miracles, though. Not once."
Again, your opinion is not fact. How do you plan on proving jesus's miracles? Please...im very interested. Prove to me that jesus walked on water.
I didn't say there was proof that he performed them.
I said nobody questioned them.
Difference. Again, your basic problem is with the language. You don't understand it, or you aren't able to separate what is actually said from the convo in your head.
Wow. My problem is with semantics then? I think the problem is with your inability to actually use the right terms. Kind of like the difference between a species and a genus.
Either way you have no proof jesus performed those miracles. If your going to start some theological bullshit about how the people in the bible were convinced of jesus's divinity once they saw his miracles, then i can assure you that I'm thoroughly uninterested in that debate.
Wow. Your basing your entire theory that evolution cant lead to speciation by citing how people breed dog? Seriously? People purposely restrict the gene pool, thats how you breed pure breds. That doesnt happen in nature. A purebred dog just fucks the shit out of what ever dog it wants to. Your entire theory is based on the idea that homozygous organisms will only mate with homozygous organisms. Thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard.
Didnt you use a theory proposed an evolutionist to try to prove your theory. Gould theory?
The only ones that should be referring to the fossil record are creationist,because it supports our theory better the macro evolution. You know no one was around a couple hundred millions years ago. Fact is modern man can only be traced back 6 to 12 thousand years ago depending on who you want to believe. I will trust in the bible considering the oldest known tree is only 4,600 years old right in line with the bible account of the flood.
Once again, your opinion is not fact. Even if the fossil record doesnt support evolution, which it does, it certainly doesnt support creationism. Where in the bible does it talk about how adam and eve walked with dinosaurs? O, mind telling me how fossils got under thousands of feet of rock if they arent millions of years old? The giant flood took sand from....somewhere(?)....and covered....everywhere(?).... and some how hardened to stone in the incredibly short timespan of 5000 years?
Where does oil come from friend? Goddidit?
Evidence in support?Wrong, book of acts was written 40 years after the death of Christ. That was around 30 years before prophecies of Jesus began being fulfilled.
…other than the bible.
when I'm back online ill respond. The book of acts was historical record of the Christian movement. And I will go further into it when they fix my internet.
how many opinions have you given are not fact ?Wow. Your basing your entire theory that evolution cant lead to speciation by citing how people breed dog? Seriously? People purposely restrict the gene pool, thats how you breed pure breds. That doesnt happen in nature. A purebred dog just fucks the shit out of what ever dog it wants to. Your entire theory is based on the idea that homozygous organisms will only mate with homozygous organisms. Thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard.
Didnt you use a theory proposed an evolutionist to try to prove your theory. Gould theory?
The only ones that should be referring to the fossil record are creationist,because it supports our theory better the macro evolution. You know no one was around a couple hundred millions years ago. Fact is modern man can only be traced back 6 to 12 thousand years ago depending on who you want to believe. I will trust in the bible considering the oldest known tree is only 4,600 years old right in line with the bible account of the flood.
Once again, your opinion is not fact. Even if the fossil record doesnt support evolution, which it does, it certainly doesnt support creationism. Where in the bible does it talk about how adam and eve walked with dinosaurs? O, mind telling me how fossils got under thousands of feet of rock if they arent millions of years old? The giant flood took sand from....somewhere(?)....and covered....everywhere(?).... and some how hardened to stone in the incredibly short timespan of 5000 years?
Where does oil come from friend? Goddidit?
The only ones that should be referring to the fossil record are creationist,because it supports our theory better the macro evolution. You know no one was around a couple hundred millions years ago. Fact is modern man can only be traced back 6 to 12 thousand years ago depending on who you want to believe. I will trust in the bible considering the oldest known tree is only 4,600 years old right in line with the bible account of the flood.
Once again, your opinion is not fact. Even if the fossil record doesnt support evolution, which it does, it certainly doesnt support creationism. Where in the bible does it talk about how adam and eve walked with dinosaurs? O, mind telling me how fossils got under thousands of feet of rock if they arent millions of years old? The giant flood took sand from....somewhere(?)....and covered....everywhere(?).... and some how hardened to stone in the incredibly short timespan of 5000 years?
Where does oil come from friend? Goddidit?
Ah oil,another thing coincidence that modern man needed to become modern. Nope .6,000 years. And 6,000 years may not seem like a long time because what you read in your text book. In 5,000 years the population of man went from 8 people to around 7 billion,that means a lot of people have been on this planet now consider how many more fossils we should be finding and we are not. If you did the math on every species for billions of years we could not dog without finding them
how many opinions have you given are not fact ?The only ones that should be referring to the fossil record are creationist,because it supports our theory better the macro evolution. You know no one was around a couple hundred millions years ago. Fact is modern man can only be traced back 6 to 12 thousand years ago depending on who you want to believe. I will trust in the bible considering the oldest known tree is only 4,600 years old right in line with the bible account of the flood.
Once again, your opinion is not fact. Even if the fossil record doesnt support evolution, which it does, it certainly doesnt support creationism. Where in the bible does it talk about how adam and eve walked with dinosaurs? O, mind telling me how fossils got under thousands of feet of rock if they arent millions of years old? The giant flood took sand from....somewhere(?)....and covered....everywhere(?).... and some how hardened to stone in the incredibly short timespan of 5000 years?
Where does oil come from friend? Goddidit?
How about diamonds? Where did those form? What about plate tectonics? Did god just try to trick us by shaping the continents in the right shape and put them into a line of motion that hints at a certain formation in the past?
Im sure.
How about diamonds? Where did those form? What about plate tectonics? Did god just try to trick us by shaping the continents in the right shape and put them into a line of motion that hints at a certain formation in the past?
Im sure.
In my view plate tectonics was the result of the global flood. That much water and movement probably broke it up and at one point there was one big piece of ground before that occurred. I also believe the ice age happened after the flood. It's pretty hard to explain Ll that ice no ?
How about diamonds? Where did those form? What about plate tectonics? Did god just try to trick us by shaping the continents in the right shape and put them into a line of motion that hints at a certain formation in the past?
Im sure.
In my view plate tectonics was the result of the global flood. That much water and movement probably broke it up and at one point there was one big piece of ground before that occurred. I also believe the ice age happened after the flood. It's pretty hard to explain Ll that ice no ?
