hangover
Gold Member
- Oct 8, 2013
- 5,734
- 642
- 190
You still laughing from when Obama won both times?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You still laughing from when Obama won both times?
Here's a clue....It's not just YOUR country, and none of us have to live up to your fascist expectations. A true American stands for freedom, not fascism.Nope, not at all. The butt hurt is your generation's ilk who can't stand the world changes. Tough to be you, but you won't need to worry about it much longer, will you?Randall is the ilk of the loser class folks.
Read him to see what we don't want and won't accept.
Awww... more butthurt. The truth is a son-of-a-gun isn't it Starkey? The very LAST thing you, and those of YOUR ilk want, is people who remember when this country was the envy of the world - not the joke. Hey, don't fret loser! I - and those Americans who actually LOVED this country, will soon be gone. Then, we can watch from our graves as those like you finish the country off!
Sonny - I'm an American. A TRUE AMERICAN. I don't give a damn about the world changing. I give a damn about YOU and those like YOU destroying MY country. Get it through your thick head jerk off. People like YOU are destroying THIS country. Another 30 years and we will be Mexico you stupid little person.
Jesus - you and your ilk (again - word of the day) are sure dumb. You are destroying a country that has been the light of the world for the last 200+ years - and you are proud of it. Where I come from - that is the definition of "traitor".
You still laughing from when Obama won both times?
Here's a clue....It's not just YOUR country, and none of us have to live up to your fascist expectations. A true American stands for freedom, not fascism.Nope, not at all. The butt hurt is your generation's ilk who can't stand the world changes. Tough to be you, but you won't need to worry about it much longer, will you?Randall is the ilk of the loser class folks.
Read him to see what we don't want and won't accept.
Awww... more butthurt. The truth is a son-of-a-gun isn't it Starkey? The very LAST thing you, and those of YOUR ilk want, is people who remember when this country was the envy of the world - not the joke. Hey, don't fret loser! I - and those Americans who actually LOVED this country, will soon be gone. Then, we can watch from our graves as those like you finish the country off!
Sonny - I'm an American. A TRUE AMERICAN. I don't give a damn about the world changing. I give a damn about YOU and those like YOU destroying MY country. Get it through your thick head jerk off. People like YOU are destroying THIS country. Another 30 years and we will be Mexico you stupid little person.
Jesus - you and your ilk (again - word of the day) are sure dumb. You are destroying a country that has been the light of the world for the last 200+ years - and you are proud of it. Where I come from - that is the definition of "traitor".
I love pointing out your stupidity, of course you make it easy as can be:
E-mails
BenGhazi
Norman Yung Yuen Hsu, Ponzi Scheme
Jorge Cabrera Donations
"Lootergate" (The Clintons stole furniture from the White House)
Hillary's Cattle Futures Miracle
"Filegate Scandal"
Vince Foster
Whitewater Scandal
Travelgate Scandal
Chinagate
Bush lied to start a war that killed 6000 Americans
I win
Bush isn't running idiot.
Yes he is idiot
You're too stupid to be talking.
Bush is running idiot
Here's a clue....It's not just YOUR country, and none of us have to live up to your fascist expectations. A true American stands for freedom, not fascism.
Got it all figured out don't you?One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.
Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.
The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.
Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.
She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race
She is pot committed to the liberal elite.If she does not permanently distance herself from her Wall Street buddies she have to win without my vote.
You are fascist and as such don't like being called a fascist. We understand that, right. And don't think you will ever rise up, you or the socon far right or libertarians, because the American people will party on your head like it was 1776.Aww...isn't that cute. The "American" calls me a Facist. What's next? Racist? Blow it out your ass traitor.
You realize there's more candidates to come, right?One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.
Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.
The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.
Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.
She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race
Hillary will lose. She is a known quantity with far too much baggage that will weigh her down. After 8 years of Obama, America wants a change as evidenced in the 2014 election and she isn't it.
Very true
But who are the Republicans offering that will bring about change? All Republicans offer is a return to the Bush policy of 2001-2008.....we saw how that turned out
The clown car has plenty of room
Jeb is the only candidate who can compete with Hillary
You realize there's more candidates to come, right?One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.
Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.
The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.
Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.
She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race
Hillary will lose. She is a known quantity with far too much baggage that will weigh her down. After 8 years of Obama, America wants a change as evidenced in the 2014 election and she isn't it.
Very true
But who are the Republicans offering that will bring about change? All Republicans offer is a return to the Bush policy of 2001-2008.....we saw how that turned out
The clown car has plenty of room
Jeb is the only candidate who can compete with Hillary
Clown cars are not exclusive to a single party. Here is a reminder for those suffering short term memory loss..
2004 Democratic Candidates
You realize there's more candidates to come, right?One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.
Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.
The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.
Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.
She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race
Hillary will lose. She is a known quantity with far too much baggage that will weigh her down. After 8 years of Obama, America wants a change as evidenced in the 2014 election and she isn't it.
Very true
But who are the Republicans offering that will bring about change? All Republicans offer is a return to the Bush policy of 2001-2008.....we saw how that turned out
The clown car has plenty of room
Jeb is the only candidate who can compete with Hillary
Clown cars are not exclusive to a single party. Here is a reminder for those suffering short term memory loss..
2004 Democratic Candidates
I voted Green that year. Nothing against Kerry, but once he tossed the fake medals, imo he lost the right to claim to be the war president.You realize there's more candidates to come, right?Hillary will lose. She is a known quantity with far too much baggage that will weigh her down. After 8 years of Obama, America wants a change as evidenced in the 2014 election and she isn't it.
Very true
But who are the Republicans offering that will bring about change? All Republicans offer is a return to the Bush policy of 2001-2008.....we saw how that turned out
The clown car has plenty of room
Jeb is the only candidate who can compete with Hillary
Clown cars are not exclusive to a single party. Here is a reminder for those suffering short term memory loss..
2004 Democratic Candidates
The only one from that whole list that I would have possibly voted for is Lieberman.